跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.41) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/13 21:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:馮文濱
研究生(外文):Wen-Bin Feng
論文名稱:產業發展各階段之競爭優勢來源-以台灣電子產業為例
論文名稱(外文):The Sources of Competitive Advantage over Industrial Development Stages - The Case of Taiwan Electronic Industry
指導教授:劉芬美劉芬美引用關係
指導教授(外文):Fen-May Liou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元培科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:43
中文關鍵詞:可持續的競爭優勢資源基礎觀點杜邦方程式多元尺度分析因素分析
外文關鍵詞:sustainable competitive advantageresource-based viewdu Pont identitymulti-dimensional scaling analysisfactor analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:298
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:8
策略管理的主流學派主張產業內的績效差異來自企業的競爭優勢,但是競爭優勢的定義及來源則尚無定論。Tang and Liou(2010)運用貝氏認識論主張,組織之資源構型是競爭優勢與財務績效間之中介因素。資源構型是由杜邦等式分解式中所得出之10個財務比率所構成,為競爭優勢理論提供一個明確的衡量方法。本研究將運用資源構型模型檢測競爭優勢的二項特性:(1)造成產業內競爭異質性之來源;(2) 在不同產業發展階段之競爭優勢來源是否不同。本研究將以台灣電子業為例進行實證研究,首先運用因素分析法找出企業共同之資源與管理能力,其次將因素得點作為投入進行多元尺度分析,觀察1986-1995年及1996-2006年兩個期間裡,優勢及劣勢企業的分佈狀況。研究結果顯示,電子產業的資產管理能力對於獲利能力有相當大的影響,在1986-1995年成長階段中,客戶關係是影響獲利的重要因素;精實生產與稅盾則是1996-2006年經營多元化時代,影響獲利的重要因素。
The mainstreams of strategic management propose that intra-industry performance differences can attribute to the competitive advantage of the firms. By applying Bayesian epistemology, Tang and Liou (2010) proposed that particular resource configurations (RC), which is structured based on 10 financial ratios derived from the du Pont equation mediate between the competitive advantage and the financial performance. The RC model provides a practical measurement for competitive advantage. This research aims to apply the RC model to examine: (1) the competitive heterogeneity within industry; (2) if the sources of competitive advantage change in different stages of industrial development. The electronic industry in Taiwan will be used as an example. Factor analysis will be used to generate the dimensions of the resource and capability bundles of the firms. The factor scores derived from the factor analysis will then be used as data input for the subsequent Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis. The positioning of the firms in two time spans of 1986-1995 and 1996-2006 will be used to examine the differences between the advantage and the disadvantage firms. Calibration of the industry shows that assets management capabilities are crucial in embryo stage while configuration on customer relationship, lean production and tax beneficiary are vital in diversification stage.
目 錄
頁次
誌  謝 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
目  錄 IV
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒 論 - 1 -
1.1 研究背景 - 1 -
1.2 研究動機 - 2 -
1.3 研究目的 - 3 -
1.4 研究流程 - 4 -
第二章 文獻回顧 - 5 -
2.1 競爭優勢的定義與內涵 - 5 -
2.1.1 競爭優勢的各種定義 - 5 -
2.1.2 競爭優勢的來源 - 7 -
2.1.3 競爭優勢是自變數還是依變數? - 7 -
2.2 資源基礎觀點 - 8 -
2.3 殊途同歸(equifinality) - 9 -
2.4 資源構型模型之推導 - 10 -
2.4.1. 杜邦模式和競爭優勢相關財務指標 - 10 -
2.4.2. 資源構型模型的各種集體資源與連結 - 12 -
第三章 研究方法 - 15 -
3.1 因素分析 - 15 -
3.2 時間序列橫斷面分析方法 - 15 -
3.3 多元尺度分析 - 18 -
第四章 實證研究 - 20 -
4.1 台灣電子業之發展概況 - 20 -
4.2 Wintel之興起與台灣電子產業之發展 - 21 -
4.3 操作性定義 - 23 -
4.4 資料來源 - 24 -
4.5 因素分析 - 25 -
4.5.1 因素分析-成長時期(1986〜1995) - 25 -
4.5.2 因素分析-經營多元化時期(1996 〜 2006) - 26 -
4.6 Panel data分析結果 - 28 -
4.7 多元尺度分析(MDS) - 31 -
4.7.1 成長階段之多元尺度分析結果 - 32 -
4.7.2 經營多元化階段之多元尺度分析 - 33 -
第五章 結論與建議 - 35 -
5.1 結論 - 35 -
5.2 建議 - 35 -
參考文獻 - 36 -
一、英文部分 - 36 -
二、中文部分 - 43 -


圖目錄
圖1-1研究流程圖 - 4 -
圖2-1企業之資源構型圖 - 14 -
圖4-1 N個構面的資源構型圖 - 22 -
圖4-2 檢定架構圖 - 29 -
圖4-3 成長階段知覺圖 - 32 -
圖4-4 經營多元化階段知覺圖 - 33 -


表目錄
表2.1 競爭優勢的定義及其來源 - 6 -
表4.1成長階段(1986-1995年)之財務比率 - 24 -
表4.2 經營多元化階段(1996-2006年)之財務比率 - 25 -
表4.3 因素分析-成長時期( 1986 〜 1995 ) - 27 -
表4.4 因素分析-經營多元化時期(1996 〜 2006) - 28 -
表4.5 Panel data分析 - 30 -
表4.6 壓力係數解釋表 - 31 -
表4.7 成長階段獲利表現較佳以及較差之各企業代碼 - 32 -
表4.8 經營多元化階段獲利表現較佳以及較差之各企業代碼 - 34 -
參考文獻
一、英文部分
1.Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J., “Strategic assets and organizational rent,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1993, pp. 33-46.
2.Anthony, R. N. and Govindarajan, V., “Management Control Systems. (9ed),” Irwin McGraw-Hill: Burr Ridge, Ill, 1998.
3.Arthur, W. B., “Positive Feedbacks in the Economy,” The McKinsey Quarterly, No. 1, 1994, pp. 81-95.
4.Balestra, P. and Nerlove, M., “Pooling Cross-section and Time-series Data in the Estimation of a Dynamic Economic Model: The Demand for Natural Gas,” Econometrica, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1966, pp. 585-612.
5.Barney, J. B., “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1991, pp. 99-120.
6.Barney, J. B., “Organization economics: Understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis”, In Clegg S, Hardy C, Nord W (eds). Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage Publishers: London, 1997, pp. 115-147.
7.Barney, J. B., “Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 1986, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 656-665.
8.Barney, J. B., ”Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, 2nd ed”. Reading, Mass Addison-Wesley, 2002.
9.Besanko, David, David Dranove, and Mark Shanley . Economics of Strategy. 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2000.
10.Bharadwaj, A. S., “A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2000, pp. 169-196.
11.Bharadwaj, S., Varadarakam, P.R., and Fahy, J. “Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 10, 1993, pp.1347-1359.
12.Black, J. A. and Boal, K. B., “Strategic resources: traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal 15(Summer special issue), 1994, pp. 131-148.
13.Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V., “Capital Structure in Developing Countries,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2001, pp. 87-130.
14.Brandenburger, A. M. and Stuart, H. W., “Value-based business strategy”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1996, pp. 5-24.
15.Brown, P. R. Soybel, V. E. and Stickney, C. P., “Comparing U.S. and Japanese corporate-level Operating Performance Using Financial Statement Data,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1994, pp. 75-83.
16.Chakravarthy, B. S., “Measuring Strategic Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 5, 1986, pp. 437-458.
17.Christensen, C. M. and Raynor, M. E., “The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth”. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA. 2003.
18.Coff, R. W., “When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power”, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1999, pp. 119-133.
19.Cool, K. and Schendel, D., “Strategic Group Formation and Performance: the Case of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982,” Management Science, Vol. 33, No. 9, 1987, pp. 1102-1124.
20.Coyne, K.P., “Sustainable Competitive Advantage:What it is and What it isn’t”, Business Horizons, 1986, pp. 54-61.
21.Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K. L. and Linden, G., “Organizing global knowledge networks in the electronics industry”, Personal Computing Industry, University of California, Irvine 2007;Assessed on March 20, at http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=pcic; 2009.
22.Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage”, Management Science, Vol. 35, 1989, pp. 1504-1511.
23.Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J.A., “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10/11, 2000, pp. 1105 – 1121.
24.Ferri, M. G. and Jones, W. H., “Determinants of Financial Structure:A New Methodological Approach,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1979, pp. 631-644.
25.Firer, C., “Driving financial performance through the du Pont identity: A strategic use of financial analysis and planning”, Financial Practice & Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1999, pp. 34-45.
26.Furrer, O., Sudharshan, D., Thomas, H. and Alexandre, M. T., “Resource Configurations, Generic Strategies, and Performance,” Working Paper, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2004.
27.Ghemawat, P. and Nueno, J. L., Zara: “Fast fashion”, Harvard Business School Case 9-703-479, Harvard University: Boston, MA. 2006.
28.Ghemawat, P., Zara: “Fast fashion”. Harvard Business School Teaching Note 5-703-496, Harvard University: Boston, MA. 2004.
29.Ghemawat, P and Rivkin, J., “Strategy and the Business Landscape”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA. 1999.
30.Gilbert, X.and Paul S., “Taking Advantage of Industry Shifts”, European Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1989, pp. 398- 402.
31.Grant, R. M., “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation”, California Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1991, pp. 119-135.
32.Gresov, C. and Drazin, R., “Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organisation Design”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, 1997, pp. 403-428.
33.Hamel, G. and Prahalad C. K., “Competing for the Future,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, No. 4, 1994, pp. 122-128.
34.Harrigan, K., “An Application of Clustering for Strategic Group Analysis,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1985, pp. 55-73.
35.Hausman, J. A., “Specification Tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica, Vol. 46, No. 6, 1978, pp. 1251-1271.
36.Helfat, C.E. and Peteraf, M. A., “The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, 2003, pp. 997-1010.
37.Hergert, M. L., “The Incidence and Implications of Strategic Groupings in U.S. Manufacturing Industries,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University: Boston, MA, 1983.
38.Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T.L., and Walker, G., “Guest editors' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, 2003, pp.889-902.
39.Hunt, S., “Foundations of Marketing Theory: Toward a General Theory of Marketing”, M. E. Sharp: New York, NY, 2002.
40.Hunt, S. D. and Morgan, R. M., “The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, No. 4, 1996, pp. 107-114.
41.Hunt, S. D., “A General Theory of Competition”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pulications, 2000.
42.Ichniowski, C, Shaw, K., and Prennushi, G., “The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing line”, American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 3, 1997, pp.291-313.
43.Kaiser, H. F., “A Second Generation Little Jiffy”, Psychomettrika, Vol. 35, No, 4, 1970, pp.401-405.
44.Kay, J., “Foundations of Corporate Success”, Oxford University Press, 1993.
45.Kim, W. S. and Sorensen, E. H., “Evidence on the Impact of the Agency Cost of Debt on Corporate Debt Policy,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1986, pp. 131-144.
46.King, J. L. and Kraemer, K. L., “Evolution and Organizational Information System: An Assessment of Nolan’s Stage Model”, CACM, May ,1984.
47.Kirby, W. C., Chen, M., Chen, S. T. and Wong, K. “Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited: A Global Company's China Strategy”, Harvard Business School Case, 2008, 9-308-057.
48.Kogut, B. and Zander, U., “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of knowledge”, Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1992, pp.383-397.
49.Lawless, M. W. and Finch, L. K., “Choice and Determinism: A Test of Hrebiniak and Joyce's Framework on Strategy-environment Fit,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1989, pp.351-365.
50.Lee, H., Whang, S., and Shneorson, S., “Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co: The Semiconductor Services Company”, Stanford Graduate School of business case CG-40, 2006.
51.Levinthal, D., “Adaptation on landscapes”, Management Science, Vol. 43, 1997, pp. 934-950.
52.Lippman, S. A., Rumelt, R. P., “A bargaining perspective on resource advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1069 – 1086.
53.Lippman, S. A., Rumelt, R. P., “Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition”, The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1982, pp. 418-438.
54.Liu, P. L. and Tsai, T. H., “The Study of R&D Management on New Product Development Performance in Taiwan’s Hi-Tech Industries”, Journal of Business and Public Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 1, on-line edition ,at http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1053.htm), 2007.
55.Mahoney, J. T. and Pandian, J. R., “The Resource-Based View Within the Conversation of Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, No. 5, 1992, pp. 363-380.
56.Marsh, P., “The Choice between Equity and Debt: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1982, pp. 121-144.
57.Miles, R. E., Snow CC. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. McGraw Hill: New York. 1978.
58.Miles, R. E., “Snow CC. Fit, failure and the hall of fame”, California Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1984, pp. 10-28.
59.Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. “Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2/3, 1995, pp. 179-208.
60.Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J., “The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and Organization”, American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 3, 1990, pp. 511-528.
61.Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H., “Archetypes of strategy formulation”, Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 9, 1978, pp. 921-933.
62.Miller, D. and Mintzberg, H., “The case for configuration”, In Morgan G. (ed). Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, 1983, pp. 57-73.
63.Miller, D., “Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a Synthesis”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1986, pp. 233­249.
64.Miller, D., “Configurations revisited”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1996, pp. 505­512.
65.Moh’d, M. A., Perry, L. G. and Rimbey, J. N., “The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Debt Policy: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis”, Financial Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1998, pp. 85-98.
66.Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
67.Penrose, E., “Theory of the Growth of the Firm”, John Wiley: New York, 1959.
68.Peteraf, M. A. and Reed, R, “Managerial discretion and internal alignment under regulatory constraints and change”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 11, 2007, pp. 1089-1112.
69.Peteraf, M. A., “The cornerstones of competitive advantages: a resource-based view”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1993, pp. 179-191.
70.Porter, M. E., “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, Free Press: NY, 1985
71.Porter, M. E., “Competitive Strategy Techniques for Analyzing Industries”, 1980.
72.Porter, M. E., “Towards a dynamic theory of strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 8, 1991, pp. 95-117.
73.Porter, M. E., “What is strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.74, No.6, 1996, pp. 61-78.
74.Powell, T. C., “Complete advantage: Logical and philosophical considerations”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No.9, 2001, pp. 875-888.
75.Powell, T. C., “Strategy without ontology”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2003, pp. 285-291.
76.Powell, T. C., “The philosophy of strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2002, pp. 873-880.
77.Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G., “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, 1990, pp. 79-91.
78.Priem, R. and Butler, J., “Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No.1, 2001a, pp. 22-40.
79.Priem, R. and Butler, J., “Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2001b, pp. 57-66.
80.Rajan, and Zingales, “What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, 1995, pp.1421-1460.
81.Rayport, J. F. and Sviokla, J. J., “Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain,” McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 20-36.
82.Reed, R. and DeFillippi, R. J., “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1990, pp. 88-102.
83.Rivkin, J. W., “Reproducing knowledge: Replication Without Imitation at Moderate Complexity”, Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2001, pp. 274-293.
84.Rumelt, R. P., “What in the World is Competitive Advantage?” , Harry & Elsa Kunin Professor of Business & Society, The Anderson School at UCLA, Policy Working Paper 2003, 105.
85.Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V. and Srivastava, R. K., “Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, No. 4, 2004, pp. 76-89.
86.Saloner, Garth, Andrea Shepard, and Joel P., “Strategic Management”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
87.Selznick, P., “Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation”, New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1957.
88.Siggelkow, N., “Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claibome”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, 2001, pp. 838-857.
89.Siggelkow, N., “Evolution toward fit”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2002, pp. 125-159.
90.Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A. and Fahey, L., “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, No. 1, 1998, pp. 2-18.
91.Stalk, G., Evans, P. and Shulman, L. E., “Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, No, 2, 1992, pp. 57-69.
92.Tang, Y, C. and Liou, F. M., “Does Firm Performance Reveal its own Causes ?: the Role of Bayesian Inference,” Strategic Management Journal, March 2010.
93.Tapscott, D., “Strategy in the New Economy,” Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1997, pp. 8-14.
94.Teece, D. J. , Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1997, pp. 509-533.
95.Wernerfelt, B., “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1984, pp. 171-180.
96.Yoffie, D. B., Casadesus, M. R. and Mattu, S., “Wintel (A): cooperation or conflict: Boston”, MA: Harvard Business School Case, 2003, 9-704-419.
97.Yoffie, D. B., “Teaching Note: Wintel (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F)”, Harvard Business School Case, 2006, 9-706-495.
98.Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G., “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2002, pp. 339-351.
二、中文部分
1.周文賢,多變量統計分析SAS/SPSS使用方法,台北:智勝出版社,2002年
2.侯俊耀,網際網路大時代:網際網路的商業應用及未來大趨勢:The Internet Times,臺北市:第三波,1996年
3.徐進鈺,台灣半導體產業技術發展歷程-國家干預、跨國社會網絡與高科技發展:,1999年
4.黃俊英,多變量分析,台北:中國經濟研究院,2000年
5.黃俊英,多變量分析,台北:華泰出版社,1991年
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊