臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資訊科技進步引領數位學習發展。因應國人提升國際競爭力的需求，英語學習網站如雨後春筍般出現。使用者選擇英語學習網站的首要條件除了客觀的實用性外，近來發現主觀感受－唯樂性及網站吸引力亦是重要因素。目前國內並沒有一套線上學習網站的評估標準，本研究從英語學習網站功能介面設計的主觀感受切入，旨在建構一份適用於國內的線上學習網站使用者經驗形容詞語意量表並加以驗證。
經由使用者經驗顧問、網站設計師、英語教師、語言專家共同討論及編修，以60名21至26歲的大學生為實驗對象，資料數據利用統計軟體進行分析，研究結果得一份三向度（實用性、唯樂性、網站吸引力）的31題七階形容詞語意量表。量表除了評估網站服務的實用性，更能量測出使用者的主觀感受，以有效評估國內線上學習網站的使用者經驗，同時做為線上學習網站服務規劃與設計的參考。

Advances in information technology continue to lead the development of digital learning. Many English learning websites were established for satisfying individuals’ needs of improving international competitiveness. Generally, users choose English websites based on the objective feelings - ergonomic quality. However, recent research found the subjective feelings - hedonic quality and website appeal might be also an important factor. Currently, we don't have standard for evaluate domestic learning website, the subjective feelings of English learning website interface design is an incision point, this study concentrate on construct and evaluate a user experience scale for domestic learning website.
By discussion and compilation with user experience consultant, website designer, English teacher and linguist, experiment on 60 university students (from 21 to 26 years old) and analyze data through SPSS and AMOS. This study findings is a 7 point semantic differential scale have three factors (ergonomic quality, hedonic quality and website appeal) include 31 questions. This scale not only evaluated ergonomic quality of learning website service but also subjective feelings of user, which can assess domestic learning website user experience effectively and be consultation for learning website construction in the future.

中文摘要.........................................................................................................i
英文摘要........................................................................................................ ii
目　　錄.......................................................................................................iii
表　　次........................................................................................................v
圖　　次.......................................................................................................vi
第一章　緒論...............................................................................................01
第一節　研究背景與動機...................................................01
第二節　研究目的......................................................................04
第三節　研究問題......................................................................04
第四節　研究範圍與限制...........................................................04
第二章　文獻探討.......................................................................................06
第一節　國內英語數位學習現況.........................................................06
第二節　使用者經驗.............................................................................08
第三節　使用者經驗評估量表...........................................................15
第四節　本章小節...............................................................................18
第三章　實驗研究流程...............................................................................19
第四章　線上學習網站使用者經驗形容詞語意量表建構………….…..20
第一節　量表題項蒐集............................................ ..... ......................20
第二節　量表題項篩檢....................................... ..... ..... .....................25
第五章　線上學習網站使用者經驗形容詞語意量表驗證………..32
第一節　線上學習網站使用者經驗形容詞語意量表驗證實驗........32
第二節　資料分析............................................................................... 34
第六章　討論與結論…............................................ .................................44
第一節　實驗結果分析與討論......................................................44
第二節　結論與建議…............................................ ... …...................49
參考文獻.......................................................................................................52
一、中文部分...........................................................................................52
二、外文部分...........................................................................................53
附錄...............................................................................................................57
附錄一　文獻蒐集形容詞對表............................................................58
附錄二　語言專家編修形容詞對表....................................................68
附錄三　各領域專家勾選刪除形容詞對表........................................70
附錄四　受測者基本資料表............ ........ ........ ......... ........................76
附錄五　翻譯AttrakDiff語意量表............ ........ .......... ......................77
附錄六　實驗測驗問卷............ ......................... .......... .......................78
附錄七　受測者任務表........... ......................... ... ............. .................79

一、中文部分
宋立群、陳憶如（2011）。大學生英語閱讀能力高及低者英語學習策略之研究。嶺東通識教育研究學刊，4(4)，1-25。
余伯泉、陳舜文、危芷芬、李茂興（譯）（2011）。社會心理學（原作者：Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., Akert, R.M.）。新北市：揚智。
周啟葶、黃玟君、黃平宇（2011）。英語自我效能、英語學習策略與英語學習成就之相關研究。高雄師大學報，31，33-58。
翁筱婷、張景媛、王鴻哲（2010）。樂「活」英語，創意「動」起來～創意教學對偏遠地區原住民學生英語學習成效之研究。創造學刊，1(1)，93-122。
教育測驗服務社（2012）。台灣1000大企業員工英語能力需求標準調查報告。台北市：教育測驗服務社。
陳建雄（譯）（2009）。Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H.著。互動設計（Interaction Design）。新北市：全華圖書。
張簡怡如、尚惠芳（2008）。運用自我發問策略於英語閱讀成效之文獻探討。英語教學與文化，4，75-84。
黃國禎（2006）。數位時代的學習契機與要素。理論與實務，71，241-252。
詹壬菡、方彩欣（2012）。論網路虛擬社群中的從眾行為現象。設計研究學報，5，153-167。
管秋雄、陳秀紋（2007）。英語學習策略之覺察訓練對高中學生英語學習成效影響。中華輔導學報，21，135-166。
劉書青、劉冠民、鄭先雋、彭凱平（2013）。從交互產品審美問卷分析中國用戶的審美體驗。裝飾，238，78-79。
劉繼仁（2007）。數位語言學習之現況與類型。教育研究月刊，163，61-76。
蔡昀澤、簡佑宏（2013，11月）。英語學習網站的實用性與唯樂性評估。2013明志科技大學技術與教學研討會，新北市。

二、外文部分
All About UX. (2010). Retrieved September 01, 2013, from http://www.allaboutux.org/
Beck, A.T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R.A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893-897.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R.. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(14), 1111-1132.
Ducoffe, R.H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 21-35.
Garrett, J.J. (2002). The elements of user experience. Macmillan Computer.
Gopal, A., Bostrom, R.P., & Chin, W.W. (1993). Applying adaptive structuration theory to investigate the process of group support systems use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(3), 45-69.
Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., & Lehner, K. (2000, April). Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. Paper presented at CHI2000, Hague, NL.
Heijden, H.V.D. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541-549.
Helander, M. G., & Zhang, L. (1997). Subjective Evaluations of Seat Comfort, identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in truck seats. Ergonomics, 40(9), 895-915.
Huizingh, E.K.R.E. (2000). The content and design of Web sites: an empirical study. Information & Management, 37(3), 123-134.
Igbaria, M., Schifflnan, S.J., & Wieckowski, T.J. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(6), 349-361.
IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., & Poels. (2008). Retrieved September 01, 2013, from http://www.citeulike.org/user/mjparnell/article/4934050
Karlsson, M.A. & Wikström, L. (1999). Beyond Aesthetics! Competitor Advantage by an Holistic Approach to Product Design. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1), 53-67.
Kirakowski, J. & Corbett, M. (1993). SUMI - The Software Usability Measurement Inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (3), 210-212.
Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.) , Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119-l37). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008) Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. HCI and Usability for Education and Work Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5298, 63-76.
Laviea, T. & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269-298.
Liu, C. & Arnett, K.P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23-34.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
Mattila, K.V.V., & Segerståhl, K. (2009, September) A Tool for Evaluating Service User eXperience (ServUX):Development of a Modular Questionnaire. Paper presented at MobileHCI'10, New York, NY.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Definition of usability. In Usability engineering (pp. 26-37). San Francisco, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Norman, D. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.
Norman, D. (2009, March). 3 Ways that good design makes you happy. TED.
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493–502.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
Scherer K.R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured?. Social Science Information, 44(4), 695-729.
Shuqing, L., Xianjun, S.Z., Guanmin, L., Jiang, J., & Kaiping, P. (2013) Beautiful, usable, and popular: good experience of interactive products for Chinese users. Science China Information Sciences, 56(5), 1-14.
Shuqing, L., Xianjun, S.Z., Guanmin, L., Jiang, J., Zaijia, L., & Kaiping, P. (2012) Assessing User Experience of Interactive Products: A Chinese Questionnaire. International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction, 104-109.
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E.R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.
Watson, D. & Clark, L.A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Witmer & Singer. (1998). Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence,7(3), 225–240.