臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Van Maanen雖然早在1976年即提出社會化策略的概念，但以往的研究僅限於探討社會化策略和個人與組織契合的關連性，而忽略了與其他契合概念的關係。因此在本研究中除了個人與組織在價值觀上的契合以外，同時亦探討社會化策略和需求與供給以及個人與團體兩種不同契合概念的關係，並檢視積極性格在各個關連性中是否皆同樣扮演著調節的角色。
本研究採用自陳式問卷收集資料，以公民營企業在職者為研究對象，其有效樣本共190份。研究結果顯示，不同的契合類型確實可以不同的社會化策略加以區分，且在部分社會化策略與契合的關連性中，積極性格確實具有調節的角色。釋意可顯著調節內容社會化策略與個人與組織契合的關係，當個體的釋意越強，內容社會化策略與個人與組織契合的關連性則越強；而關係建立可顯著調節社會面向的社會化策略與個人與組織契合的關係，當個體的關係建立越強，社會面向的社會化策略與個人與組織契合的關連性則越強。

The concept of socialization tactics was first proposed by Van Maanen in 1976, but most of past researches only focused on the relationship between socialization tactics and person-organization fit, however, ignored the relationship between socialization tactics and other types of fit. Therefore, the current study intended to examine different types of fit, included need-supplies fit and person-group fit, and then further examined the moderating effects of proactivity on the relationships between socialization tactics and fits.
Self-reported survey technique is used in the study and 190 valid samples are collected from current employees in public service and private business. Results indicated that different fits could discriminate different socialization tactics. Proactivity has the moderating effects on part of the relationship between socialization tactics and fits. Sense making could moderate the relationship between content socialization tactics and person-organization fit. When individual has more sense making, the relationship between content socialization tactics and person-organization fit is stronger. In addition, relationship building could moderate the relationship between social aspects socialization tactics and person-organization fit. When individuals have more relationship building, the relationship between social aspects socialization tactics and person-organization fit is stronger.

摘要.....................................................I
Abstract ...............................................II
目錄.....................................................i
表目錄..................................................ii
圖目錄.................................................iii
第一章 緒論..............................................1
第一節 研究動機與目的....................................1
第二節 個人與組織契合的基本概念..........................4
第三節 社會化策略與個人組織契合之關係....................8
第四節 積極性格的調節效果...............................14
第二章 研究方法.........................................19
第一節 研究樣本與程序...................................19
第二節 研究工具.........................................22
第三節 資料分析.........................................29
第三章 研究結果.........................................30
第一節 相關分析.........................................30
第二節 假設驗證.........................................32
第四章 討論與建議.......................................41
第一節 研究結果討論.....................................41
第二節 研究限制及未來研究方向...........................46
第三節 實務上的意涵.....................................48
第四節 結論.............................................50
參考文獻................................................51
附錄－研究問卷..........................................55

中文部分
林惠彥(2004)。個人與環境適配對工作態度及行為之影響。國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳智遠(2005)。人與組織契合類型的區分：組織社會化之應用。中原大學心理學系碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23，77-98。

英文部分
Adkins, C. L., Ravlin, E. C., & Meglino, B. M. (1996). Value congruence between co-workers and its relationship to work outcomes. Group and Organization Management, 21(4), 439-460.
Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organization entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 199-214.
Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1994). Effect of newcomer involvement in work-related activities: A longitudinal study of socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 211-223.
Bauer, T. N., Morrison, E. W., & Callister, R. R. (1998). Organizational socialization: A review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 149-214.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Brehm, S.S., Kassin, S., & Fein, S. (2002). Social Psychology. NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Bretz, R. D., Jr., & Judge, T. A. (1994).Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546-561.
Cable, D. M., & Parsons, C. K. (2001). Socialization tactics and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 54, 1-23.
Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 730-743.
Chatman, J. A. (1989).Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333-349.
Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organization: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6, 309-319.
Fisher, C. D. (1986). Organizational socialization: An integrative review. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 4, pp.101-145). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Gruman, J. A., Saks, A.M. & Zweig, D. I. (2006). Organizational socialization tactics and newcomer proactive behaviors: An integrative study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 90-104.
Hobman, E.V., Bordia, P., & Gallois, C. (2003). Consequences of feeling dissimilar from others in a work team. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 301-325.
Hofstede, C. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Holland, J. L. (1973). Applying an occupational classification to a representative sample of work histories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(1), 34-41.
Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa V. I., Cooper, D.M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 262-279.
Kim, T. Y., Cable, D. M., & Kim, S. P. (2005). Socialization tactics, employee proactivity, and person-organization fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 232-241.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
Kristof-Brown, A. L. (2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643-671.
Lewin, K. (1951). Problems of research in social psychology. In D. Cartwright(Ed.), Field theory in social science (pp. 155-169). New York: Harper & Row.
Lock, A. (1976). What is job satisfaction? Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309-336.
Lofquist, L. H., & Dawis, R. V.(1969). Adjustments to work. NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
Morrison, E. W. (1993).Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557-589.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Ostroff, C., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1992). Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psychology, 45, 849-874.
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational Behavior (8th ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall, (1993).
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Socialization tactics and newcomer information acquisition. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 48-61.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
Taormina, R. J. (1997). Organizational socialization: A multidomain, continuous process model. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(1), 29-47.
Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209-264.
Westerman, J. W., & Cyr, L. A. (2004). An integrative analysis of person-organization fit theories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(3), 252-261.
Wanous, J. P. (1992). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomer (2rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.