跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.134) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/14 23:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:馮怡婷
研究生(外文):FENG,YI-TING
論文名稱:網路外部性對全球福利水準的影響- 單一關稅與差別關稅的比較
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of Network Externalities on Global Welfare Levels – Comparison of Uniform Tariff and Differential Tariff
指導教授:吳朝欽吳朝欽引用關係梁景洋梁景洋引用關係
指導教授(外文):WU, CHAO-CHINLIANG, CHING-YANG
口試委員:顏志達
口試委員(外文):YEN, CHIH-TA
口試日期:2019-05-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:逢甲大學
系所名稱:財稅學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財政學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:31
中文關鍵詞:產品相容性數量競爭價格競爭全球福利
外文關鍵詞:Product CompatibilityCournot CompetitionPrice CompetitionGlobal Welfare
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:257
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文採用三國兩廠商模型來探討存在網路外部性與產品相容性的情況下,比較單一關稅制度與差別關稅制度之間全球福利水準的大小。結果發現,(a) 在沒有網路外部性與產品為同質性的情況下,單一關稅的全球福利大於差別關稅的全球福利。(b) 在沒有網路外部性時,當產品相容愈小時,則單一關稅的全球福利小於差別關稅,當產品相容愈大時,則結果會相反。(c)當產品相容愈小且網路外部性愈小時,則單一關稅的全球福利小於差別關稅的全球福利,當產品相容愈大且網路外部性愈小時,或者當網路外部性大且產品為不完全相容性時,則結果會相反。

This paper uses the three-country two-firm model to explore the global welfare level between the unified tariff system and the differential tariff system in the case of network externalities and product heterogeneity. It is found that (a) without network externalities and homogeneity of products, the global welfare of uniform tariffs is greater than that of differential tariffs. (b) In the absence of network externalities, when the product is different from the product, the greater the product difference, the global welfare of the unified tariff is smaller than the differential tariff, and the smaller the product difference, the opposite result will be obtained. (c) In the case of network externalities and product heterogeneity, the greater the product differences and the smaller the network externalities, the smaller the global welfare of uniform tariffs than that of differential tariffs. The smaller the product differences and the smaller the network externalities, or the greater the network externalities and the heterogeneity of products, the opposite result will be obtained.
摘要 i
Abstract iii
1. 前言 1
2. 單一關稅 4
2.1廠商的決策問題 5
2.2政府的決策問題 6
3.差別關稅 8
3.1廠商的決策問題 8
3.2政府的決策問題 9
4. 關稅制度的比較 12
5. 擴充模型 19
6. 結論 22
參考文獻 23


陳宏易、林虹妤、邱俊榮 (2006), 「網路外部性與進口貿易政策的效果」,經濟論文,34 卷,2 期,161-190。
Bhattacharjee, T. and Pal, R. (2014), “Network externalities and strategic managerial delegation in cournot duopoly: Is there a prisoners dilemma?,” Review of Network Economics, 12, 343-353.
Cabral, L. (2011), “ Dynamic Price Competition with Network Effect,” Review of Economics Studies , 78, 83-111.
Choi, J. P. (1995), “Optimal Tariffs and the Choice of Technology: Discriminatory Tariffs vs. the Most Favored Nation Clause,” Journal of International Economics, 38, 143–160.
Din, H. R., K. C. A. Wang and W. J. Liang (2016), “MFN vs Tariff Discrimination in the Presence of Cross Ownership,” Review of International Economics, 24, 1149–1166.
Economides, N. (1996), “The Economics of Network,” International Journal of Industrial Organization , 14, 673-699.
Fujiwara, K. (2011a), “Tariffs and Trade Liberalization with Network Externalities,” Australian Economic Papers, 50, 51–61.
Fujiwara, K. (2011b), “Network Externalities, Transport Costs, and Tariffs,” Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 20, 729–739.
Fujiwara, K. (2016), “Tax principles and tariff-tax reforms under international oligopoly,” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 18, 84–98.
Gatsios, K. (1990), “Preferential Tariffs and the ‘Most Favoured Nation’ Principle: A Note,” Journal of International Economics, 28, 365–373.
Ghosh, A. and R. Pal (2014), “Strategic Trade Policy for Network Goods Oligopolies,” Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, 2014–2039.
Hashimzade, N., H. Khodavaisi and G. D. Myles (2011a), “MFN Status and the Choice of Tariff Regime,” Open Economies Review, 22, 847–874.
Hashimzade, N., H. Khodavaisi and G. D. Myles (2011b), “Uniform versus Discriminatory Tariffs,” Review of Development Economics, 15, 403–416.
Horiba, Y. and S. Tsutsui (2000), “International Duopoly, Tariff Policy and the Superiority of Free Trade,” Japanese Economic Review, 51, 207–220.
Katz, M. and C. Shapiro (1985), “Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.
Kikuchi, T. and C. Kobayashi (2007), “Network Effects and the Impact of Trade Liberalization,” Economic Bulletin, 6, 1-7.
Klimenko, M. M. and K. Saggi (2007), “Technical Compatibility and the Mode of Foreign Entry with Network Externalities,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 40, 176–206.
Larue, B. and J. P. Gervais (2002), “Welfare–Maximizing and Revenue–Maximizing Tariffs with a Few Domestic Firms,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 35, 786–804.
Liao, P. C. and K. Y. Wong (2006), “Uniform Versus Discriminatory Tariffs: When Will Export Taxes Be Used?” Southern Economic Journal, 72, 915–925.
Saggi, K. (2004), “Tariffs and the Most Favored Nation Clause,” Journal of International Economics, 63, 341–368.
Saggi, K. and H. M. Yildiz (2005), “An Analysis of the MFN Clause under Asymmetries of Cost and Market Structure,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 38, 242–254.
Saggi, K. (2009), “The MFN Clause, Welfare, and Multilateral Cooperation between Countries of Unequal Size,” Journal of Development Economics, 88, 132–143.
Wang, L. F. S., Y. C. Wang. and L. Zhao (2012), “Tariff Policy and Welfare in an International Duopoly with Consumerfriendly Initiative,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 64, 56–64.
Wei, Y. and F. S. Wang (2017), “Network externalities and tariff structure,” Journal of International Economics, 24, 485–496.
Yano, M. and F. Dei (2006), “Network Externalities, Discrete Demand Shits, and Submarginal-Cost Pricing,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 39, 455-476.


電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊