跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.110) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/05/05 08:19
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:吳佩錚
研究生(外文):Wu, Pei-Jheng
論文名稱:資料結構的模擬式學習系統之發展-以樹狀結構為例
論文名稱(外文):The Development of Simulation-Based Learning System for Tree Structures of Data Structures
指導教授:賴阿福賴阿福引用關係
口試日期:2016-01-21
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:臺北市立大學
系所名稱:資訊科學系
學門:工程學門
學類:電資工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:中文
論文頁數:82
中文關鍵詞:模擬式學習資料結構樹狀結構自我導向學習理論學習成就系統評估
外文關鍵詞:Simulation-based learningData structureTree structuresSelf-regulated learningLearning effectSystem evaluation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:1354
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:105
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
樹狀結構是一種很重要的資料結構,但是因為概念抽象、種類繁多與特性複雜等學習問題,導致學習者不易習得正確知識,而模擬式學習的多項優點正適合用在解決樹狀結構的教學問題上,例如模擬式學習可以具體呈現樹狀結構的抽象觀念,且能提供高度互動。
因此本研究的主要目的在於開發樹狀結構之模擬式學習系統(Simulation-Based Learning System for Tree Structures,簡稱SBLST)以幫助大學生學習資料結構。SBLST包含動畫教學和測驗兩大核心,其中,動畫教學又分為特性說明及步驟教學兩種模式,且SBLST結合ICDE學習環,讓學習者更能了解樹狀結構的知識。本研究在SBLST開發完後,邀請40位具有資訊相關背景的專家進行評估,使系統功能更精進。
本研究亦進行教學實驗,以99位大學生為實驗對象,採用準實驗設計,以探討SBLST的學習成效,其中除了課堂之正常教學以外,實驗組利用SBLST自主複習樹狀結構的知識,而對照組利用課本進行課後複習。此教學實驗為期六星期,在實驗最後,兩組學生接受樹狀結構的紙筆測驗,並透過獨立樣本t檢定來評估兩組之學習成效;另外,請實驗組的學習者填寫學習覺知問卷。最後列出主要研究結論:
1. 實驗組之學習成就顯著地優於對照組。
2. 系統評估結果顯示,學習者對於本系統在有用性、易用性、趣味性和使用意願皆達到滿意的接受度。

Tree structures are very important concepts in data structure, but their abstract concepts with multiple categories and complex properties are difficult for the learners. The simulation-based learning providing concrete and interactive environment have the potential for reducing the learning problems in tree structures.
As a result, the main purpose of this study is to develop a Simulation-Based Learning System (SBLST) for supporting the undergraduate students to learn tree structures of data structure. SBLST offers animation learning and test environment, and the animation environment consists of property illustration mode and step learning mode. In addition, SBLST adopts ICDE learning cycle for helping learners to learn tree structures systematically. After finished the development of SBLST, the study invite 40 ICT experts to evaluate system functions for improving the SBLST.
Eventually, this study conducted a self-regulated learning experiment, the samples were 99 undergraduate students, quasi-experimental design method was employed for exploring the learning effectiveness of the SBLST. After class, the experimental group accept self-regulated learning with SBLST, while the control group accept traditional self-regulated learning with textbook. The research period lasted for six weeks. At the end of the experiment, these two groups took the paper-based test of tree structures, and independent sample t-test is used for assessing the learning effect. In addition, the experimental group was asked to fill out the questionnaire for evaluating the system. The research results are shown as follows:
1. The learning achievement in the experiment group was significantly better than that in the control group.
2. The evaluation results show that the learners gave high appraisal toward the system functions including easy to use, useful to use, fun to use and willing to use.

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目次 iii
表次 v
圖次 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 名詞釋義 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 自我導向學習理論 5
第二節 模擬式學習 6
第三節 模擬式學習的相關研究 9
第四節 電腦化測驗 10
第五節 學習回饋機制的重要性 12
第六節 相關系統的比較 15
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究流程 21
第二節 專案與管理流程 24
第三節 系統架構 25
第四節 系統使用流程 29
第五節 研究工具 31
第六節 系統成果 33
第四章 實驗結果與評估結果分析 47
第一節 專家評估結果分析 47
第二節 學習者學習覺知分析 53
第三節 學習者成就結果 62
第五章 結論與建議 65
第一節 結論 65
第二節 建議 66
參考文獻 68
附錄 74
附錄一 樹狀結構之模擬式學習系統專家評估問卷 74
附錄二 樹狀結構之模擬式學習系統學習覺知問卷 78

Aldrich, C. (2009). Learning online with games, simulations, and virtual worlds: Strategies for online instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
Arachchi, S. M., Dias, K., Madanayake, R. S., Chong, E. S. C., & Gunawardana, K. D. (2014). A comparison between evaluation of computer based testting and paper based testing for subjects in computer programming. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 5(1), 57-71.
Baek, Y. (2009). Digital simulation in teaching and learning. In Digital simulations for improving education: Learning through artificial teaching environments. Information Science Reference.
Bakaç, M., Taşoğlu, A. K., & Akbay, T. (2010). The effect of computer assisted instruction with simulation in science and physics activities on the success of student: Electric current. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 1(1), 34-42.
Bosman, K. (2002). Simulation-Based e-learning. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse university, New York, US.
Botean, R. & Meinco, J. (2000). Providing Feedback in Computer-based Instruction: What the Research Tells Us. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska.
Bryant, K., Campbell, J., & Kerr, D. (2003). Impact of web based flexible learning on academic performance in information systems. Journal of Information systems education, 14(1), 41-50.
Chen, L. J., Ho, R. G., & Yen, Y. C. (2010). Marking strategies in metacognition-evaluated computer-based testing. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 246-259.
Chen, Y. L., Hong, Y. R., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2011). Efficacy of simulation-based learning of electronics using visualization and manipulation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 269-277.
Chou W. C. , & Lin T. H. (2010). The Reflection of the Physical and Virtual Manipulative on the Teaching Application. Journal of Computer Science and Application, 6 (2), 33-46.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R . (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of educational research, 68(2), 179-201.
Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The concept of self-directed learning and its implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 158-177.
Eskrootchi, R., & Oskrochi, G. R. (2010). A study of the efficacy of project-based learning integrated with computer-based simulation-STELLA. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 236-245.
Evans L.V., Dodge K. L., Shah T. D., Kaplan L. J., Siegel M. D., Moore C. L., Hamann C. J., Lin Z., & D'Onofrio G. (2010). Simulation training in central venous catheter insertion: improved performance in clinical practice. Academic Medicine, 85(9), 1462-1469.
Fagbola Temitayo, M., Adigun Adebisi, A., & Oke Alice, O. (2013). Computer-Based Test (Cbt) System For University Academic Enterprise Examination. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2(8), 336-342.
Fang, L., Tan, H. S., Thwin, M. M., Tan, K. C., & Koh, C. (2011). The value simulation‐based learning added to machining technology in Singapore.Educational Media International, 48(2), 127-137.
Findley, B. W. (2009). The relationship of self-directed learning readiness to knowledge-based and performance-based measures of success in third-year medical students (Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL).
Fischer, G., & Sugimoto, M. (2006). Supporting self-directed learners and learning communities with sociotechnical environments. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(01), 31-64.
Guglielmino L. M. & Long H. B. (2011). The International Society for Self-Directed Learning and The International Self-Directed Learning Symposium. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 8(1), 1-6.
Guglielmino, L. M. (2013). The case for promoting self-directed learning in formal educational institutions. SA-eDUC JOURNAL, 10(2), 1-18.
Gürbüz, R., & Birgin, O. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted teaching on remedying misconceptions: The case of the subject “probability”. Computers & Education, 58(3), 931-941.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hatziapostolou, T., & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the Impact of Formative Feedback on Student Learning through an Online Feedback System. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 111-122.
Hiemstra. R. (2011). Self-Directed Learning:Individualizing Instruction–Most Still Do It Wrong. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 8(1), 46-59.
Lai, A. F., & Wu, P. J. (2015, July). The Development of Simulation-Based Learning System for Binary Tree of Data Structures. Proceedings of IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 296-298.
Lateef, F. (2010). Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock, 3(4), 348-352.
Liu, T. C. (2010). Developing simulation-based computer assisted learning to correct students' statistical misconceptions based on cognitive conflict theory, using “correlation” as an example. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 180-192.
Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., & Wang, S. C. (2012). Can verbalisers learn as well as visualisers in simulation‐based CAL with predominantly visual representations? Preliminary evidence from a pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 965-980.
Luo, G. H., Liu, E. Z. F., Kuo, H. W., & Yuan, S. M. (2014). Design and implementation of a simulation-based learning system for international trade. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 204-226.
Madden, C., & Sgarioto, D. (2013). Computer-based Simulation of the Wayamba Unmanned Underwater Vehicle. In Proceedings of the 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Adelaide, Australia, 1033-1039.
McKimm, J., & Swanwick, T. (2010). Web‐based faculty development: e‐learning for clinical teachers in the London Deanery. The clinical teacher, 7(1), 58-62.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Ulmer, L. A., & Anderson, K. L. (2012). Examining pictorial models and virtual manipulatives for third-grade fraction instruction. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(3), 103-120.
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice.Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199-218.
Race, P. (2006). The Lecturer’s Toolkit – A Practical Guide to Assessment, Learning and Teaching, 3rd Edition, Routledge, London.
Royce, W. W. (1970, August). Managing the development of large software systems. proceedings of IEEE WESCON (Vol. 26, No. 8), 328-388.
Shute, V. J. (2007). Focus on Formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1),181-189.
Schroedl, C. J., Corbridge, T. C., Cohen, E. R., Fakhran, S. S., Schimmel, D., McGaghie, W. C., & Wayne, D. B. (2012). Use of simulation-based education to improve resident learning and patient care in the medical intensive care unit: a randomized trial. Journal of critical care, 27(2), 219 7-13.
Summers, J. E. (2012). Simulation-based military training: An engineering approach to better addressing competing environmental, fiscal, and security concerns. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 9-12.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370.
Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S. S., Albus, D., & Hodgson, J. (2010). Computer-Based Testing: Practices and Considerations. Synthesis Report 78. National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
Tough, A. M.(1966). The assistance obtained by adult self-teacher. Adult Education U. S., 17(1), 31-37.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top