跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.223) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/08 22:50
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳芷瑩
研究生(外文):Chen, Chih-Ying
論文名稱:集中控股、控股結構與分析師追蹤意願
論文名稱(外文):Concentrated Control、Ownership Structure and Analyst Following
指導教授:謝文良謝文良引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsieh, Wen-Liang
口試委員:鍾惠民李進生邱忠榮
口試委員(外文):Chung, HuiminLee, Chin-SimChiou, Jong-Rong
口試日期:2015-06-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:財務金融研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:33
中文關鍵詞:分析師追蹤意願控股集中度控制型態資訊透明度
外文關鍵詞:Analysts Willingness of FollowingConcentrated ControlOwnership StructureInformation Transparency
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:344
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:25
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文探討台灣上市櫃公司的控股集中度與單一家族主導、共治型態、專業經理人治理、公股主導這四種不同的控制型態對分析師追蹤意願的影響。在討論控股集中度與控制型態對分析師追蹤意願的影響上,本文從兩個角度切入問題:第一,控股集中度與控制型態是否會影響公司受追蹤的可能性?第二,控股集中度與控制型態是否會影響公司的受追蹤程度(分析師人數)?實證結果顯示公司無論在何種控制形態下,只要控股集中度過大,就會使公司受追蹤的可能性降低,然而控制持股對於公司受追蹤程度的影響卻因控制型態而異,當公司為共治型態時,控制持股與公司受追蹤程度正向顯著。此外,單一家族主導的公司會降低公司受追蹤之可能性,共治型態的公司會降低公司的受追蹤程度,而專業經理人治理的公司則是同時增加公司受追蹤之可能性與受追蹤程度。綜合上述結果,分析師對資訊透明度低的單一家族主導公司與共治型態公司的追蹤意願較低,而對資訊透明度較高之專業經理人治理公司的追蹤意願較高。
This paper investigates how analysts’ willingness of following a firm is affected by the concentrated shareholding and ownership structures. The study analyzes whether concentrated shareholding and ownership structures affect the possibility of the company being followed by analysts and the number of analysts who follow the firm. Empirical results show that the possibility of being followed reduces as the controlling ownership is too high. This is true no matter under what form of ownership structures. The number of analysts following, however, depends on the structure of controlling ownership. When structure of controlling ownership is widely held, higher controlling ownership have more analysts following. Besides, the possibility of being followed reduces as the firm’s ownership structures is family control;the number of analysts following increases as the firm’s ownership structures is widely held;the possibility of the firm being followed and the number of analysts following both increase as the firm’s ownership structures is professional managers control. Based on the results, the firm with low information transparency, like family control、widely held will reduce analysts willingness of following. However, the firm with high information transparency, like professional managers control firms will increase analysts willingness of following.
一、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 2
1.3 研究流程與架構 3
二、研究假說 4
2.1 名詞與變數解釋 4
2.2 最終控制者之控股集中度與分析師人數假說 5
2.3 控制型態以及各控制形態下控股集中度與分析師人數之假說 6
三、樣本說明 8
3.1 樣本資料來源 8
3.2 樣本篩選方法 9
3.3 樣本敘述統計 9
四、單變數檢定 11
4.1 影響公司受分析師追蹤與否之因素的單變數檢定 11
4.2 影響公司受追蹤程度之因素的單變數檢定 12
五、多變數檢定 15
5.1 迴歸模型介紹 15
5.1.1 股集中度、控制型態與公司受追蹤之可能性的模型介紹 15
5.1.2 控股集中度、控制型態與公司之受追蹤程度的模型介紹 16
5.1.3 控制變數說明 17
5.2 變數敘述統計與相關係數 20
5.3 控股集中度、控制型態與分析師人數之迴歸結果 25
5.3.1 控股集中度、控制型態與公司受追蹤之可能性的分析 25
5.3.2 控股集中度、控制型態與分析師追蹤度之分析 28
六、結論 31

Ali, A., Chen, T. Y., &; Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1), 238-286.
Barth, M.E., Kasznik, R., &; McNichols, M.F. (2001). Analyst coverage and intangible assets. Journal of Accounting Research, 39, 1–34.
Baik, B., Kang, J.-K., &; Morton, R. (2010). Why are analysts less likely to follow firms with high managerial ownership?. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 25(2), 171-200.
Bebchuk, L. A., Kraakman, R., &; Triantis, G. (2000). Stock pyramids, Cross-Ownership, Dual Class Equity: The Creation of Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash-Flow Rights. In: Morck, R.K. (Ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 295–318.
Bhushan, R. (1989). Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2), 255–74.
Boubaker, S., &; Labégorre F. (2008). Ownership structure, corporate governance and analyst following: A study of French listed firms. Journal of banking &; finance, 32(6), 961-976.
Bradley, D., Chan, K., Kim, J., &; Singh, A. (2008). Are there long-run implications of analyst coverage for IPOs?. Journal of Banking &; Finance, 32(6), 1120-1132.
Bradley, D.J., Jordan, B.D., &; Ritter, J.R. (2008). Analyst behavior following IPOs: the “bubble period” evidence. Review of financial studies, 21(1), 101-133.
Chang, X., Dasgupta, S., &; Hilary, G. (2006). Analyst coverage and financing decisions. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 3009-3048.
Cheng, M., &; Subramanyam, K.R. (2008). Analyst following and credit ratings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1007–43.
Das, S., Guo, R.-J., &; Zhang, H. (2006). Analysts' selective coverage and subsequent performance of newly public firms. The Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1159-1185.
Gilson, R. J., &; Gordon, J. N. (2003). Controlling controlling shareholders. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 152, 785-843.
Hope, O.-K. (2003). Analyst following and the influence of disclosure components, IPOs and ownership concentration. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting &; Economics, 10(2), 117-141.
Jiraporn, P., Chintrakarn, P., &; Kim, Y.S. (2012). Analyst following, staggered boards, and firm value. Working Paper (Pennsylvania State University- School of Graduate Professional Studies).
Jiraporn, P., Liu, Y., &; Kim, Y. S. (2014). How do powerful CEOs affect analyst coverage?. European Financial Management, 20(3), 652-676.
Jo, H., &; Harjoto, M. (2014). Analyst coverage, corporate social responsibility, and firm risk. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 272-292.
Kim, J.¬-B., &; Shi, H. (2012). Voluntary IFRS adoption, analyst coverage, and information quality: International evidence. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1) 45-76.
King, R., Pownall, G., &; Waymire, G. (1990). Expectations adjustment via timely management forecasts: Review, synthesis, and suggestions for future research. Journal of accounting Literature, 9(1), 113-144.
Lang, M., Lins, K., &; Miller, D. (2004). Concentrated control, analyst following and valuation: do analysts matter most when investors are protected least?. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 589–623.
Lang, M., &; Lundholm, R. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review, 71, 467–92.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., &; Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–517.
Lobo, G.J., Song, M., &; Stanford, M. (2012). Accruals quality and analyst coverage. Journal of Banking &; Finance, 36(2), 497-508.
Marhfor, A., Cosset, J.-C., M’Zali, B., &; Charest, G. (2013). Stock price informativeness and analyst coverage. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 30(3), 173-188.
McConnell, J. J., &; Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial economics, 27(2), 595-612.
Mola, S., Rau, P.R., &; Khorana, A. (2012). Is There Life after the Complete Loss of Analyst Coverage?. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 667-705.
Moyer, R. C., Chatfield, R. E., &; Sisneros, P. M. (1989). Security analyst monitoring activity: Agency costs and information demands. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24(04), 503-512.
O’Brien, P.C., &; Bhushan, R. (1990). Analyst following and institutional holding. Journal of Accounting Research, 55–76.
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of financial studies, 22(1), 435-480.
Roulstone, D.T. (2003). Analyst following and market liquidity”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(3), 552-578.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊