臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究目的為透過在罰球線開眼、闔眼投籃探討投籃的準確率與命中率。研究對象以花蓮縣東華大學參加99學年度大專聯賽甲一選手10名、99學年度大專聯賽甲三選手10名，及花蓮高中、花蓮高工99學年度高中聯賽選手10名為施測對象。實驗分為兩階段，受試者在罰球線進行投籃，第一階段為開眼投籃10球，再闔眼投籃10球；第二階段為開眼投籃15球，再闔眼投籃15球，總計50球。每一次投籃後，研究者立刻以紙筆紀錄其分數及命中率，最後以獨立二因子設計來分析檢驗投籃準確率；利用單因子變異數分析檢驗罰球命中率，統計顯著水準訂為α=0.05。研究結果發現三組受試者在開眼投籃時皆有較好的準確率與命中率表現，且甲一組在開眼投籃和闔眼投籃的準確率與命中率皆優於甲三組和高中組；將三組的第一次闔眼投籃和第二次闔眼投籃做比較，甲一組的第二次表現優於第一次，而甲三組和高中組在兩次的闔眼投籃間無顯著的差異，依此發現甲一級選手在闔眼的投籃上有佳的適應能力。

The purpose of this study was to discuss the accuracy and shooting average of a basketball shot; through shooting with open and closed-eyes from the free-throw-line. Subjects of the study include 10 players from each the level 1 and level 3 of Dong-Hua University who participated in the “Academic Year 99’s College League Games”. In addition, 10 players from Hualien High School who participated in the “Academic Year 99’s High-school League Games” were also measured objects. The experiment came in two stages: The subjects began shooting from the free-throw-line. Stage one starts off with 10 open-eye shots; followed by another 10 of closed-eye shots. Stage two starts off with 15 open-eye shots; followed by another 15 of closed-eye shots. There were 50 shots in total. After each shot, the researchers immediately recorded the scores and shooting average. Finally, an independent two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the accuracy of the shooting tests; while a one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was carried out to investigate the shooting average of free-throw shots. The study results showed that all three groups of subjects performed better in both accuracy and shooting average; and that the level 1 group were better than those of level 3 group and High-school group. A comparison of all three groups on their first and second closed-eye shots, we saw that the level 1 group performed better on their second try; while there were no significant distinctions between the two trials for the level 3 group and the High-school teams. On this basis, we can thus inferred that the level 1 group possesses better adaptability in the closed-eye shots test.

目次
中文摘要 Ⅰ
英文摘要 Ⅲ
目次 Ⅴ
圖次 Ⅶ
表次 Ⅸ

第壹章 緒論
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究問題 3
第四節 研究假設 3
第五節 研究範圍與限制 4
第六節 名詞操作性定義 5

第貳章 文獻探討
第一節 運動學習技能的基礎理論 7
第二節 訊息處理的基本模式 12
第三節 籃球罰球相關研究 14

第參章 研究方法
第一節 預備實驗 19
第二節 研究架構 20
第三節 研究流程 21
第四節 研究對象 23
第五節 實驗日期與場地佈置 24
第六節 研究設計 26
第七節 資料處理與統計分析 27

第肆章 結果與討論
第一節 不同層級組別在開眼、闔眼情境中於罰球線投籃準確率之差異 29
第二節 不同層級組別在開眼、闔眼情境中於罰球命中率之關係 33
第三節 討論 37

第伍章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 39
第二節 建議 39

參考文獻
中文部份 41
英文部分 41

參考文獻
【中文部份】
田麥久（1998）。項群訓練理論。北京：人民體育出版社，19。
田孝倫（2003）。籃球單手投籃動作教材教法研究。師大體育，47，91-95。
李雲光（2007）。不同投籃姿勢各關節運動學分析。大專體育學刊，9（4），113-123。
林如瀚（2010）。人類視覺控制與運動知覺關係探討。中華體育，24 (2)，65-73。
胥樹玲（2006）。籃球投籃技術。國立體育學院教練所碩士技術報告書，未出版，桃園縣。
姚漢濤（1992）。運動技術測驗中設定試做的適宜次數。體育學報，14，339-350。
孫民治（2008）。籃球運動教程＋ＶＣＤ。大展出版社有限公司，台北市。
陳俊汕（2005）。運動視覺與選擇凝意的轉機及其在運動上的應用。大專體育，78，200-209。
梁嘉音、卓俊伶（2009）。情境壓力對籃球罰球投籃例行動作行為一致性與準確性的影響。台灣運動心理學報，1(14)，1-17。
梁嘉音、卓俊伶（2012）。籃球罰球投籃準確性的前況效應。大專體育學刊，14(1)，24-31。
許樹淵（2004）。運動生物力學。合計圖書出版社，台北市。
郭鼎文（2005）。籃球實站技術圖解-投籃高手。諾亞文化出版社，台北市。
劉俊業（2004）。籃球中距離跳投動作時間分析。國立體育學院教練研究所，桃園縣。

【外文部分】
Abermethy, B., & Russell, D. G. (1987). The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport. Human Movement Science, 6, 283-319.

Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior,3,111-150.

Anderson, D. I., Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., & Ryan, G (2005). Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 231-238.

Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. Oxford, England:Pergamon press.

Brisson, T. A., & Alain, C. (1996). Should common optimal movement patterns be identified as the criterion to be achieved? Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 211-223.

Fujishiro, H., Mashimo, I., Ishigaki, H., Edeagawa, H., Endoh, F., Nakazato , K., & Nakajima, H. (1998). Visual function of collegiate american football players in japan.13th Asian Games Scientific Congress.

Gatz, D. J. (1978). Vision and sports. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 49, 385-388.

Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3-23.

Gibson, J .J . (1979). The Ecological Approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, New York.

Goulet, C., Bard, D., & Fleury, M. (1989). Expertise differences in preparing to return a tennis serve: A visual information processing approach. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11 , 382-398.

Harbin, G., Durst, L., & Harbin, D. (1989). Evaluation of oculomotor response in relationship to sports performance. Medicine Science sports Exercise, 21 (3), 258-262.

Jenkins, R. (1977). Win The Big Ones From The Foul Line. Scholastic Coach, 47(5), 88-89.

Kirscher, D. W., Berk, M., & Warsh, D. (1988). A comparison of rection time in athletes and nonathletes. Highlights, 4(2), 8-14.

Kozar, B., Vaughn, R. E., Whitfield, K. E., Lord, R. H., & Dye, B. (1994). Importance of free-throws at various stages of basketball games. Perceptual and motor skills, 78(1), 243-248.

Lee, D. N. (1978). The functions of vision. Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information, . 159-170.

Magill, R. A. (2004). Motor learning and control: Concepts and application (7th ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Newell, K. M. (1981). Skill learning. In D. Holding (Ed.), Human Skill (pp. 203-226). New York: Wiley.

O’Connor, D., & Crowe, M. (1999). Visual reaction time and peripheral vision in professional rugby league players. Jouanal of Sports Sciences, 17, 830.

Pim, R. (1986). The effect of personal fouls on winning and losing basketball games. The Coaching Clinic, 24(4), 14-16.

Salom, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of result and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.

Schuetzle, R. K. (1988). The Relationship of Free Throw Shooting to Game Outcome. Eastern Washington University.

Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed. ). Champaon, IL: Human Kinetics.

Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed. ), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.

Vicker, J. N. (2007). Perception, cognition, and decision training: The quiet eye in action. New York: Human Kinetics.

Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. London: E & FN Spon.