跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/03 18:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:徐慧如
研究生(外文):Hui-Ju Hsu
論文名稱:以Kano與QFD探討電子郵件系統之服務品質
論文名稱(外文):Using Kano’s Model and QFD Method to Explore Service Quality of E-Mail System
指導教授:吳建文吳建文引用關係
口試委員:陳凱瀛杜壯
口試日期:2008-05-21
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:工業工程與管理研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:工業工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:82
中文關鍵詞:電子郵件系統Kano二維模式QFD品質機能展開服務品質
外文關鍵詞:E-Mail SystemKano Two-Dimensional ModelQFDService Quality
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:526
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
隨著科技的日益的進步,上網收發e-mail對於網路使用者來說已是一個必要的動作,在電子郵件系統競爭激烈的市場中,每個信箱都一昧的擴大信箱的容量,來滿足顧客對信箱太小的抱怨,對於垃圾信件或是病毒之預防卻不見有顯著的改善,電子郵件系統功能不斷的增加,然而,這些附加功能對顧客來說不完全都是重要且必須的。本研究希望了解一般消費者對於電子郵件系統,所需要以及所重視的構面,再運用品質機能展開技術,將顧客需求融入電子郵件系統設計。研究結果如下:
1.使用Kano分類電子郵件系統之服務品質,可發現電子郵件系統之服務大多係為當然品質和一元品質,而「網頁設計美觀且具有創意」和「版面安排簡潔明瞭」則是被視為魅力品質。
2.對於電子郵件系統之期望重要度,顧客最重視的是「個人資料將不會被惡意外洩或竊取」、「郵件的傳送過程是安全可靠的」與「不會對個人電腦造成危害」,顯示顧客較重視隱私與安全性。
3.在HotMail、Yahoo Mail與Gmail之競爭分析中,顧客對Yahoo Mail之滿意度明顯比其他兩家業者要來的低,而顧客對HotMail與Gmail兩者滿意度則是不相上下。
4.由品質機能展開可得知電子郵件系統前五項重要品質技術改善項目,分別為「阻隔垃圾與廣告信件」、「資料庫管理系統」、「員工道德教育訓練」、「用戶意見回覆時效」、「客服人員表達與態度」。
Along with the progress in technology day by day, it is necessary to receive and send email for internet users, but e-mail system market competition is very vigorous. Email-box managers only pay attention to expand their email space to satisfy their customers, and neglect the importance of the prevention in spam mails and virus. The function of email system is continuous increment; however those additional functions aren’t important and necessary for most customers. This research would like to know what services or functions of E-Mail System are necessary to consumers. So, we have applied Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to find out consumers’ needs into the product design of E-Mail System. There are several issues have been discussed as follow in this research:
1.Most of service quality of E-Mail Systems are one-Dimensional quality element and must-be quality of Kano model. And, “The web designing is beautiful and has a creativity” and “The web designing is simple and clear” are attractive quality element of Kano model.
2.The 3 most important quality dimensions of E-Mail System for consumers are “Personal privacy will not be leaked or stolen”, “The transmission of mails is safe and dependant” and “It will not harm the computer”. So consumers attach great importance to privacy and safety.
3.A competition analysis among HotMail, Yahoo Mail and Gmail of E-Mail System
has also been finished. The satisfied degree of Yahoo Mail is lower than HotMail’s and Gmail’s. The satisfied degrees of HotMail and Gmail are almost equal.
4.The result shows that the most important service qualities are “Separate Spam and Advertisement Letter”, “Data Base Management System ; DBMS”, “Respond Customer’s Opinions Immediately” and “Customer Service’s Expression and Attitude”.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT iii
誌 謝 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
圖目錄 ix
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 4
1.3 研究流程 4
1.4 研究範圍 5
1.5 研究限制 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
2.1 電子郵件系統 6
2.1.1 電子郵件系統功能 6
2.2 服務品質 10
2.2.1 服務品質定義 10
2.2.2 服務品質構面 12
2.3 網路服務品質 15
2.3.1 網路服務品質模式 15
2.3.2 網路服務品質構面 17
2.4 二維品質模式(Kano) 23
2.4.1 二維品質模式之演進 23
2.4.2 二維品質模式(Kano’s Model)之定義 24
2.4.3 二維品質模式之歸類 27
2.5 品質機能展開(QFD) 30
2.5.1 品質機能展開之定義 30
2.5.2 品質屋 30
2.5.3 整合Kano 模式與品質機能展開 33

第三章 研究方法 36
3.1 研究架構 36
3.2 問卷設計 38
3.3 研究設計 41
3.3.1 抽樣設計與資料收集 41
3.3.2 統計資料分析 41
3.3.3 Kano二維品質分類 42
3.3.4 品質屋之建構 42
第四章 資料分析 45
4.1 電子郵件系統前置問卷結果 45
4.2 正式問卷分析 47
4.2.1 基本人口統計變數分析 47
4.2.2 信度分析 50
4.3 Kano 二維品質分類 53
4.3.1 重要度與滿意度分析 55
4.3.2 服務品質技術 59
4.3.3 品質機能展開 60
第五章 結論與建議 62
5.1 結論 62
5.2 後續研究建議 68
參考文獻 69
附錄A (前置問卷) 76
附錄B (正式問卷) 79
書籍
[1] 楊錦洲,服務業品質管理,台北,品質協會,2002
[2] 李南賢,企業管理(管理學),台北,滄海書局,2000
[3] 孫鴻業,2006年我國家庭寬頻、行動與無線應用現況與需求調查分析報告,資策會創新應用服務研究所FIND,台北,經濟部工業局,2007
[4] 孫鴻業,2005年我國家庭寬頻、行動與無線應用現況與需求調查,資策會創新應用服務研究所FIND,台北,經濟部工業局,2005
[5] 麥素蓮譯,行銷學,台北,麥格羅希爾,2001
[6] Bossert, J. L., “Quality Function Deployment-A Practitioner’s Approach”, ASQC Quality Press Inc., New York, 1991.
[7] Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric Theory, New York, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978.
[8] Sasser, W. E., R. P. Olsen, & D. D. Wyckoff (1978), Management of Service Operations: Text, Cases and Readings, Boston: Alley & Bacon, Inc
[9] Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization, The MIT Press. ,1991
[10] Wolfindarger, M. F., and Gilly, M. C., .comQ:Dimensionalizing, Measuring and Predicting Quality of the E-tail Experience Working Paper, No. 02-100, Marketing Science Institue, Cambridge, MA,2002

期刊論文
[11] 狩野紀昭、瀨樂信彥、高橋文夫、新一 ,「有魅力的品質與應該有的品質」,品質管制月刊,第二十一卷,第五期,1984,第33~41頁
[12] 黃淑如、莊玲玉,「電子郵件系統探討」,商業職業教育季刊,1997,第7-22頁。
[13] Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Mary Stanfield Tetreault, “TheService Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, January 1990, pp. 71-84.
[14] Bitner, Mary Jo, “Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.56, April 1992,pp.57-71
[15] Brady,M K., J. J.Cronin & R. R. Brand.,“Performance-only measurement of service quality:A replication and extension,” Journal of Business Research, Vol.55, No.1, 2002, pp.17-31
[16] Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S.A.. Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension, Journal of Marketing, Vol.56, July, 1992, pp.55-68.
[17] Detmar W. Straub and James C. Wetherbe,“Information Technologies for the 1990s: An Organizational Impacct Perspective,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.32,No.11, Novermber, 1989 , pp. 1382-1339.
[18] Garvin, D.A.. What does Product Quality Really Mean?, Sloan Management Review, Vol.26, 1984,pp.25-43.
[19] Garvin, D. A., ”What Does Product Quality Really Mean,” Sloan Management Review ,Vol. 26,1988,pp.25-43.
[20] Govers,C.M.P., “What and how of quality function deployment (QFD)”, Proceedings of the eighth International Working Seminar on Production Economics, December, vol. 46, no. 7, 1996, pp. 275-285.

[21] Gronroos, C.,”A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.18,no.4,1984,pp.36-44.
[22] Hauser, J.R. & D. Clausing, “The house of quality,”Harvard Business Review, May-June, 1998, pp.63-73
[23] Herzberg, F. “One More Time: How do you Motivate Employees ?” HBR, 1987, pp.109-120.
[24] Juran, J. M., Juran on Planning for quality, Free press, 1988
[25] Kay C.Tan & Theresia A. Pawitra,” Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’smodel into QFD for service excellence develope” ,Managing Service Quality, 2001, pp.418-430.
[26] Keeler Len L, “How to Extend Your E-Mail Reach,” Supervisory Management, Aug,1995, pp.7-8.
[27] Kolesar, Mark B&R Wayne Galbraith, “A Service-Marketing Perspective onE-Retailing: Implications for E-Retailers and Directions for Future Research,” Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy,, 2000,pp.424-438.
[28] Kurt, Matzler and Hans H. Hinterhuber, “How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment”, Technovation, Vol.18, No.1, 1998, pp.25-38.
[29] Lehtinen, Uolevi; Lehtinen, Jarmo R, “Two Approaches to Service Quality Dimensions,” The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 11, Iss. 3 ,1991, pp. 287-304.
[30] Lewis, Barbara R ; Mitchell, Vincent W., “Defining & Measuring the Quality of Customer Service,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 8, Iss. 6, 1990,pp. 11-17.


[31] Liu, c., and Arnett, K. P.. “Exploring the Facctors Associated with Web Site Suuccess in the Context of Electronic Commerce”. Information and Management. Vol.38, No.1, 2000,pp 23-34
[32] Lociacono, E., Watson, R. T.,and Goodhue, D. L., 2000. “WebQual: A Web Site Quality Instrument”. Workin Paper. Worcester Polytechnic Insitute.
[33] Lockamy, A. et al.,"Quality function Deployment:A case study", Production and Inventory Management Quarterly Journa l, 1995, pp56~60
[34] Matzlar,K. and H. H. Hinterhuber, "How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano''s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment", Technovation , Vol.18(1) , 1998, p.25-38
[35] Oliver, R. L..Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Process in Retail Settings, Journal of Retailing, Vol.57 ,1981, pp.25-48.
[36] Parasurman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A. and Berry, L. L.,”A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, Fall 1985,pp.41-50,.
[37] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml Valarie A., and Leonard L. Berry , “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64(1) , Spring 1988, pp. 12-40.
[38] Rice, R. E. & Bair, J. H.,“New organizational media and productivity,” The new media: Communication, research, and technology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984, pp.185
[39] Rogers, E. M. & Rafaeli, S..”Computer and communication”, Information and Behavior, Vol. 1, 1985,pp95-112.
[40] Rudy I A., “A critical review of research on electronic mail,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol 4, 1996, pp.198-213.
[41] Santos J., “E-Service Quality: A Model of Virtual Service Quality Dimensions,” Managing Service Quality Vol. 13, No. 3, 2003, pp. 233-246.
[42] Schvaneveldt, Shane J. Takao Enkawa and Masami Miyakawa, “Consumer Evaluation Perspectives of Service Quality:Evaluation Factors and Two-Way Model of Quality”, Total Quality Management, Vol.12, 1991, pp.149-161.
[43] Shohreh, A. Kaynama & I. Black Christine, “A Proposal to Assess the Service Quality of Online Travel Agencies: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 21(1), 2000, pp.63-88.
[44] Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S.. “ Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organization communication”, Management Science,Vol.32,1986, pp1492-1513.
[45] Sullivan, L. P., “Quality Function Deployment”, Quality Progress, 1986, pp.39-50.
[46] Tan, K. C. and X. X. Shen, “Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment”, Total Quality Management, Vol.11, No.8, 2000, pp.1141-1151.
[47] Rice, R. E. & Bair, J. H.. “New organizational media and productivity”, The new media: Communication, research, and technology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984,pp85-215.
[48] Wortzel, R., (1979), “New Life Style Determinants of Women’s Food Shopping Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43, pp. 28-29.
[49] Yang, Z., and Jun, M.. “Consumer Perception of E-Service Quality:From Internet Purchaser and Non-Purchaser Perspectives”. Journal of Business Strategies, Vol.19, No. 1, 2002 ,pp19-41
[50] Zeithaml, Valarie A., Parasuraman, A., and Malhotra, A., “Service Quality Delivery Through Web Sites:A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2002, pp. 362-375.
學位論文
[51] 吳有典,整合Kano模式與品質機能展開法運用於數位相機產品設計之研究,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學工業管理系,台北,2004。
[52] 吳基輔,以Kano 的二維品質模式探討數位相機使用者滿意度之研究,碩士論文,國立東華大學企業管理研究所,花蓮,2004
[53] 魏上欽,以Kano模式建構顧客導向之品質屋─以中華職棒大聯盟兄弟象為例,碩士論文,國立台北科技大學工業工程與管理研究所,台北,2003
[54] 蔡珮娟,以品質機能展開法探討台北捷運系統之服務品質,碩士論文,國立台北科技大學工業工程與管理研究所,台北,1999
[55] 郭峻廷,以品質機能展開法探討-電信產業之服務品質,碩士論文,國立台灣科技大學工業管理系,台北,2002
[56] 楊菀菁,由服務品質缺口模式探討高雄市市長電子信箱服務品質與民眾滿意度,碩士論文,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所,高雄,2003
[57] 郭俊麟,整合Kano、FAHP與QFD於提昇診所之醫療服務品質,碩士論文,中華大學資訊管理學系,新竹,2005
[58] 呂東壕,應用Kano,模糊層級分析法與品質機能展開法於線上服務品質之研究,碩士論文,中華大學資訊管理學系,新竹,2005
[59] 邱璟明,網際網路線上服務服務品質衡量模式之建立,碩士論文,國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所,台北,1999
[60] 邱以倫,顧客對於線上服務品質衡量之研究-以網路銀行為例,碩士論文,國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所,台北,2004
[61] 王俊凱,消費者科技準備度對線上服務品質評量之影響研究,碩士論文,國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所,台北,2005
[62] 杜書楊,線上資訊系統品質衡量模式之建立-以網路書店為例,碩士論文,國立台灣大學資訊管理研究所,台北,2004

[63] 黃雯汝,組織內使用電子郵件實之滿意度探討,碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學資訊管理研究所,屏東,1999
[64] 齊立平,電子郵件的使用對組織傳播民主化的影響,碩士論文,國立交通大學傳播科技研究所,新竹,1996
[65] 許元和,二維品質模式於非營利機構服務品質之探討-以台北縣立鶯歌陶瓷博物館為例,碩士論文,國立台北科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所,台北,2002
[66] 高宜慶,以綠色品質機能展開建立旅遊產品設計概念模式,碩士論文,國立台北科技大學工業工程與管理研究所,台北,2004
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top