臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究主要探討在中國一帶一路倡議下，台灣相關上市公司營運績效之評估，本研究共計10產業38家廠商，利用杜邦分析法結合資料包絡分析法，並以2013年至2017年間的公開資料，投入變數(營業成本、營業費用、營業外支出和淨固定資產)及產出變項(營業收入淨額、營業外收入、期末市值及期末發行張數)。希望可以瞭解受到中國「一帶一路」政策影響之台灣廠商目前發展現況，藉由分析結果讓決策單位業者可以了解如何調整產業資產的分配，並進一步跨年度比較各產業的經營績效，希望讓決策單位更有效率，做為後續發展之參考方向。

This study focuses on the evaluation of the operational performance of relevant listed companies in Taiwan under the China Belt and Road Initiative. This study has a total of 38 companies in 10 industries, using DuPont analysis combined with data envelopment analysis, and using public information between 2013 and 2017. Input variables (operating costs, operating expenses, non-operating expenses and net fixed assets) and output variables (net operating income, non-operating income, ending market capitalization and number of final issues). I hope that we can understand the current development status of Taiwanese manufacturers affected by China's “One Belt, One Road” policy. By analyzing the results, decision-making unit operators can understand how to adjust the distribution of industrial assets, and further compare the operating performance of various industries across the year, hoping to make decision-making units more Effective, as a reference for subsequent development.

目錄
目　錄 I
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 V

第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究動機與背景 1
1.2研究流程 4
1.3章節架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1「一帶一路」政策背景介紹 7
2.1.1 「一帶一路」政策緣起 7
2.1.2 「一帶一路」之推行基礎及範圍界定 8
2.1.3 台灣與中國於「一帶一路」下之合作契機 11
2.2資料包絡分析法 12
2.2.1 DEA之理論發展 12
2.2.2 DEA之特性及限制 15
2.2.3 應用DEA於經營績效評估 16
第三章 研究方法 18
3.1 樣本與資料來源 18
3.1.1 樣本選取 18
3.2 一帶一路相關概念股網絡績效評估架構 20
3.3 方法論 22
3.3.1 動態網絡資料包絡分析法（Dynamic Network DEA） 25
第四章 實證結果分析 30
4.1杜邦分析法 30
4.2績效評估結果與分析 36
4.2.1一帶一路台灣概念股績效分析 36
4.2.2一帶一路相關產業績效分析 40
4.3結合杜邦分析法及DEA效率值分析 44
第五章 結論與建議 46
5.1 研究結論 46
5.1.1杜邦分析法 46
5.1.2 資料包絡分析法 47
5.2 研究建議 47
參考文獻 49
中文部份 49
英文部份 51

參考文獻
中文部份
1.黃亮雄（2016）。21世紀海上絲綢之路（廣東）國際智庫論壇會議綜述。戰略決策研究，廣東外語外貿大學，4，96-104。
2.張天桂（2016）。中國―東盟FTA升級和次區域經濟合作―共建21世紀海上絲綢之路的視角。中國商論。中國商業聯合會，14，97-101。
3.王敏（2015）。台灣參與「21世紀海上絲綢之路」的戰略構想與可行路徑。亞太經濟，福建社會科學院，1，140-144。
4.滕人傑（2017）。21世紀海上絲綢之路之侷限，以及新南向政策的突圍之道。臺灣經濟研究月刊，40，100-105。
5.蘇美惠、左峻德（2015）。「一帶一路」戰略下閩台產業合作之新商機。臺灣經濟研究月刊，38，115-121。
6.丁一顧、林瑜一、張德銳（1997）。國民小學教學有困難教師教學輔導策略之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，3，19-44。
7.王力行（2005）。落在世界隊伍的後面？遠見雜誌，6，14-16。
8.林天祐、陳麗華、蔡昆瀛、歐玲如、宋佩芬、黃於庭（2003）。臺北市全球教育白皮書。教育行政與評鑑學刊，6，1-40。
9.孫遜 (2004)。資料包絡分析法─理論與應用。揚智：台北。
10.蔡素琴 (2001)。台灣金融機構經營績效分析─以上市上櫃銀行為例，義守大學碩士論文。
11.黃盈凱 (2004)。台灣紡織業標竿之評估，逢甲大學碩士論文。
12.黃琴慧 (2016)。應用資料包絡法評估紡織業經營績效作業之研究，南榮科技大學碩士論文。
13.原文網址：https://read01.com/N2y5zP.html
14.https://info.taiwantrade.com/biznews/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E5%A4%A7%E9%99%B8%E8%9E%8D%E8%B3%87%E7%A7%9F%E8%B3%83%E6%A5%AD%E8%A6%8F%E6%A8%A1%E5%B1%85%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E4%BD%8D-1123233.html
15.許成偉. (2018). 蔡英文主政時期兩岸政策之持續與變遷. 淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-122.

英文部份
1.Athanassopoulos, Antreas D. (1997). Service Quality and Operating Efficiency Synergies for Management Control in the Provision of Financial Services: Evidence from Greek Bank Branches. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 300-313.
2.Arafah, M. (2015). Selecting the Six Sigma Project: A Multi Data Envelopment Analysis Unified Scoring Framework. American Journal of Operations Research, 5, 129-150.
3.Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
4.Byrnes, P., Fare, R. and Grosskopf, S. (1984). Measring Productive Efficiency: An Application to Illinois Strip Mines. Management Science, 30, 671-681.
5.Banker, R. D., and Morey, R. C. (1986). The Use of Categorical Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 12, 1613-1627.
6.Boussofiane, R. G., and Thanassoulis, D. E. (1991). Applied Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 52, 185-202.
7.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
8.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1979). Short Communication: Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European journal of operational research, 3, EJOR: 339.
9.Charnes, A., Clark, T., Cooper, W. W. and Golany, B. (1985). A Development Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units in the U. S. Air Forces. Annals of Operational Research, 2, 59-94.
10.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., Morey, R. C., and Rousseau, J. (1985). Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA. Annals of Operational Research, 2, 139-156.
11.Cooper, W. W., Ruiz, J. L., Sirvent, I. (2009). Selecting Non-zero Weights to Evaluate Effectiveness of Basketball Players with DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 195, 563–574.
12.Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
13.Farrell, M. J. and Fieldhouse, M. (1962). Estimating efficient production functions under increasing returns to scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 125, 252-267.
14.Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Roos, P. (1992). Productivity Change in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-parametric Malmquist Approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 85-102.
15.Hua, G. (2014). Research on Dynamic Change of China’s Reginal Innovation Efficiency-based on Malmquist Index. International Journal of Advances in Management Science, 3, 128-133.
16.Keh, H. T., and Chu, S. (2003). Retail Productivity and Scale Economics at the Firm Level: A DEA Approach. Omega, 31, 75-82.
17.Lewin, A. Y. and Minton, J. W. (1986). Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research. Management Science, 32(5), 514-538.
18.Land, K. C., Lovell, C. A. K., and Thore, S. (1993). Chance-constrained Data Envelopment Analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 541-554.
19.Olesen, O. B. and Petersen, N. C. (2003). Identification and Use of Efficient Faces and Facets in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20, 323-360.
20.Seiford, L. M. (1996). Data Envelopment Analysis: The Evolution of the State of the Art (1978-1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 99-138.
21.Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., and Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data Development Analysis: Critique and Extension. In: Silkman R. H. (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, 73-105. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.Shanling Li, G. R., Jahanshahloo, M., and Khodabakhshi. (2007). A Super-efficiency Model for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 184, 638-648.
23.Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, E. and Thrall, R. M. (1990). The Role of Multiplier Bounds in Effieiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93-108.
24.Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor Performance Measure Model with an Application to Fortune 500 Companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 105-124.
25.Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European journal of operational research, 197(1), 243-252.
26.Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3-4), 145-156.
27.Weygandt, J. J., Kieso, D. E., Kimmel, P. D., & DeFranco, A. L. (2008). Hospitality financial accounting. John Wiley and Sons.