跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.110) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/05/04 17:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:戴詩芹
研究生(外文):Shih-Chin Tai
論文名稱:餐廳消費者社經背景與產品涉入、知覺風險及購買意願之相關性
論文名稱(外文):The Relationship between the Social – Economic Background of Restaurant Customers and Product Involvement, Perceived Risk and Purchase Intention
指導教授:李正文李正文引用關係
指導教授(外文):Cheng-Wen Li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:國際經營與貿易研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:貿易學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:61
中文關鍵詞:產品涉入知覺風險購買意願
外文關鍵詞:Purchase IntentionPerceived RiskProduct Involvement
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:291
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
中文摘要
  根據全國營養師公會的統計顯示,2013年台灣每日外食人口已高達2千萬人次,餐飲市場規模蓬勃,餐廳的消費情況亦相當重要。
  本研究主要探討不同餐廳消費者之社經背景與產品涉入、知覺風險的關係,以及產品涉入、知覺風險對購買意願的影響。本研究以性別、年齡、職業、教育程度、婚姻狀況以及平均收入,作為衡量社經背景的構面。 透過問卷調查法,以餐廳消費者為對象,共回收有效問卷124份。所得資料以統計軟體SPSS進行分析,分析問卷之信度與因素分析測驗,類別變相對於變數之檢定結果,並進行迴歸分析,研究結果發現:
1. 餐廳消費者的性別,教育程度以及婚姻狀況對於產品涉入並無顯著差異;而不同年齡,職業與平均收入的餐廳消費者對於產品涉入有顯著差異。
2. 餐廳消費者的社經背景與其知覺風險無顯著相關性。
3. 餐廳消費者的產品涉入會正向顯著影響購買意願。
4. 餐廳消費者的知覺風險會負向顯著影響購買意願。
Abstract
According to the survey of Taiwan Dietitian Association, the number of out-dining population in Taiwan has been reached to 20 million per day. Since the size of catering market is huge and growing, the consumer behavior on restaurant choosing is very important.
This study intends to explain the relationship between the background of restaurant customers, product involvement and perceived risk, also examine the effect of consumer product involvement and perceived risk on purchase intention through restaurant customers’ perceptions.
This study use gender, age, occupation, education, marriage and average income as the facets of restaurant customers’ background.
Through questionnaire survey, we got 124 results from restaurant customers. This study use SPSS program to analyze the data, to examine reliable analysis, factor analysis and regression analysis.
The result of this study are as follow:
1. There was no significant difference between Gender, education, marriage of restaurant customers and product involvement of restaurant customers. There was significant differences between age, occupation, average income of restaurant customers and product involvement of restaurant customers.
2. There was no significant difference between restaurant customers’ background and their perceived risk
3. The product involvement of restaurant customers has a significant positive effect on purchase intention.
4. The perceived risk of restaurant customers has a significant negative effect on purchase intention.
中文摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝辭 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討與研究假設 3
2.1 產品涉入 (product involvement) 3
2.1.1 涉入的定義 3
2.1.2涉入的型態 5
2.2 知覺風險 (perceived risk) 9
2.3 購買意願 (Purchase Intension) 13
第三章 研究方法 14
3.2 研究變數之操作性定義與衡量構面 16
3.2.1 產品涉入(product involvement) 16
3.2.2 知覺風險 (perceived risk) 20
3.2.3購買意願 (Purchase Intension) 23
第四章 資料分析 25
4.1 問卷回收及樣本資料分析 25
4.1.1 問卷回收 25
4.1.2 基本資料部分 25
4.1.3 餐廳消費者之決策與購買選擇分析 30
4.1.4 餐廳消費者的購買選擇分析 31
4.2 實證研究信度與因素分析 32
4.2.1 信度檢定 32
4.2.2 驗證式因素分析 33
4.3 類別變數假說檢定 35
4.3.1 產品涉入 35
4.3.2 知覺風險 36
4.4 迴歸分析 37
第五章 研究結果與建議 38
5.1 研究結果 38
5.1.1 餐廳消費者的社經背景與決策過程和購買選擇分析 38
5.1.2 餐廳消費者的社經背景與其產品涉入有顯著相關性 39
5.1.4 餐廳消費者的社經背景與其知覺風險無顯著相關性 40
5.1.5 產品涉入會正向顯著影響購買意願 40
5.1.6 知覺風險會負向顯著影響購買意願 40
5.2 研究限制 41
5.3 研究實務建議 41
5.3.1 定價與餐廳定位策略 41
5.3.2 建構豐富的資訊平台 42
5.3.3 建立口碑,增進服務品質 42
5.3.4 多元的行銷策略 43
參考文獻 44
英文部分 44
中文部分 48
附錄 實測問卷 49


表 2-1 涉入定義彙整表 4
表3-2-1 產品涉入衡量構面與問項 18
表3-2-2 知覺風險衡量構面與問項 21
表3-2-3 購買意願衡量構面與問項 24
表4-1 問卷基本資料 26
表4-2 問卷基本分析 28
表4-5 信度分析 32
表4-6 因素分析之因素負荷量評選標準 33
表4-7 因素負荷量 33
表4-8 產品涉入假設分析 35
表4-9 知覺風險假設分析 36
表4-10 迴歸分析 37


圖1-1 台灣餐飲業歷年產值 1
圖2-1-1 涉入關係圖 6
圖 3-1 研究架構圖 14
參考文獻
英文部分
  Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archivesof             Psychology, 140, 1–55.
  Sherif, M. &; Cantril, H. (1947). The Psychology of Ego-Involvement. New York:John Wiley and Sons.
  Bauer, R. A.( 1960), Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking, in R. S . Hancock( Ed.),  Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World , Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  Freedman, Jonathan L. (1964). ”Involvement, Discrepancy and Chang,” Journal of   Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 290-295.
  Krugman, Herbert E. (1965 Fall).“The Impact of Television Advertising:Learning   Without Involvement”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 349-356.
  Cox, D. F. and U. S. Rich(1965): Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision Making: The Case of Telephone Shopping, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.1, Iss. 4, pp.32-39.
  Cox, D.F. (1967). Risk taking and information handling in cnsumer behavior. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  Cunningham, Scott M.(1967), “The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk”,In: Cox,  Donald F. (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA, pp.82-264.
  Nancy T. Hupfer and David M. Gardner (1971) ,"Differential Involvement With  Products and Issues: an Exploratory Study", in SV - Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, eds. David M. Gardner, College Park, MD : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 262-270.
  Roselius, E. (1971): Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of
    Marketing, 35(January), 56-61.
  Jacoby, J . a n d Kaplan, L . B .(1972): The Components of Perceived Risk , Advances  
    in Consumer Research. in M. Venkatesan, e d . ,Chicago.
  Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An
    Introduction to Theory and Research,”Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  Reynolds, F.D. &;Wells, W.D. (1977): Consumer Behavior. New York: Mc Graw-Hill
    Book Co..
  Houston, M. J. and Rothschild ,M. L. (1978). “Conceptual and Method of Logical
    Perceives in Involvement,,” Research Frontiers in Marketing:Dialogues and
    Directions, ed. S. Jain, Chicago: American Marketing Association, p.184.
  Lastovicka ,J. L. &;.Gardner, D. M (1978).Low Involvement Versus High Involvement
    Cognitive Structures . Advancesin Consumer Research, 5,87-92.
  Clarke, K. &; R. Belk (1978). “The effects of product involvement and task definition
    on anticipated consumer effort”, in H. Keith Hunt(ed.),Advances in Consumer
    Research, Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, Vol.5, pp.313-325.
  Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo (1981). “Attitude and Persuasion:Classic and
    Contemporary Approaches”, Dubuque, Iowa:Wm. C. Brown Co.
  Kassarjian, H. H., &; Sheffet (1981). Kent B. Monroe ed., Ann Arborm MI:Association
    for consumer research. low involvement: A second look. Advances in Consumer
    Research, 8, 31-34.
  Peter H Bloch (1982) ,"Involvement Beyond the Purchase Process: Conceptual Issues
    and Empirical Investigation", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume
    09, eds. Andrew Mitchell, Ann Abor, MI : Association for Consumer Research,
    Pages: 413-417.
  Engel, J. F., Kollat, D., &; Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer behavior, 4th ed. Taipei,
    Hwa-Tai Co.
  Schiffman,L.G.&; Kanuk,L.L (1983). Consumer Behavior, 2nd ed. New Jersey
    Prentice-Hall, p.4.
  Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L. L.(2000): Consumer Behavior 7th ed.,Prentice Hall,
    Inc..
  Mittal, Banwwari (1983). Understanding the Bases and Effects of Involvement in the
    Consumer Choice Process, Pittsburgh, Mass.: Ph. D. Dissertation, University of
    Pittsburgh.
  Cohen, J., &; Cohen, P. (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the
    behavioral science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Bloch, P. H., &; Richins, M. L.(1983),A Theoretical Model for the Study of
    ProductImportance Perceptons, Journal of Marketing, Vol.47, pp.69-81.
  Zaichkowsky, J. L (1985). “Measuring the involvement construct”, Journal of
    Consumer Research, Vol.12, PP.341-352.
  Laurent, Gilles &; Jean-Noel Kapferer (1985), “Measuring Consumer
    InvolvementProfiles”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.22, P.41, February.
  Baird, I. S. and Howard, T. (1985), “Toward A Contingency Model of Strategic Risk
    Taking,” The Academy of Management Review,Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 230-243.
  Celsi, RL, &; Olson, JC (1988). “The role of involvement in attention and
    comprehension processes” ,Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, pp 210–224
  Murray,Keith B and Schlacter ,John L.(1990): the Impact of Services versus Goods on
    Consumers: Assessment of Perceived risk and Variability, Journal of the Academy
    of Marketing Science, Vol. 1, pp.51-65.
  Dodds, W.B., K. B. Monroe, &; D. Grewal (1991). The Effects of Price, Brand, and
    Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research,    28 (August), 307-319.
  Biswas, Abhijit (1992), “The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity in Reference Price
    Perception,” Journal of Business Research, 25, Nov., pp.251-262.
  McIntyre, N. &; Pigram, J.(1992).Recreational specialization reexamined:The case of
    vehicle-based campers. Leisure Science,14,3-15.
  Stone, Robert N. and Gronhaug ,Kjell (1993) “Perceived Risk: Further Considerations
    for the Marketing Discipline”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27, No.3,
    pp.39-50.
  Dowling, G. R. &; Staelin, R.(1994): A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended
    Risk-handling Activity. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.21, 119-134.
  Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., &; Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer behavior.
    Orlando: The Dryden Press.
  Grewal,D., Krishnan,R., Baker,J.&Borin,N. (1998). The Effect of Store Name and
    Price Discount on Consumers,Evaluations and Purchase Intentions.Journal of
    Retailing,74(3), 331-352.
  Garretson, Judith A. and Clow, Kenneth E. (1999): The Influence of Coupon Fair Value
    on Service Quality Wxpe ctation, Risk Perception and Purchase Intention in the
    Dental Indsutry.Journal of Service Marketing, Vol. 13, No. 1, 59-72.
  Peter , J. Paul ., and Jerry C. Olson , (1999) . “ Consumer Behavior : Marketing
    Strategy Perspectives , ” Homewood , Illinois : Richard D. Irwin , 1999 , 222-223.
  Warrington, P. and Shim,S.(2000) “An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship   
    Between Product Involvement and Brand Commitment”, Psychology and
    Marketing, Vol.17, pp.761-782.
  Chaudhuri, A.Macro(2000): Analysis ofthe Relationship of Product Involvement and
    Information Search: The Role of Risk. Journal of Marketing, 64(Winter), 1-12.
  Lim ,N.(2003)” Consumers’ Perceived Risk: Sources versus Consequences.Electronic
    Commerce and Applications”pp.216-228.


中文部分
  許士軍(1987),管理學,東華書局出版。
  黃俊英、賴文彬 (1990),涉入的理論發展與實務應用。管理科學學報,7(1),  
    15-29。
  王志剛及謝文雀 (1995),消費者行為,台北:華泰書局。
  楊文壽(2002),行動電話手機消費者之涉入程度及購買決策相關因素之關聯性
    研究。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
  林靈宏(2003),消費者行為學,五南圖書公司出版,台北。
  吳淑鶯、黃淑鈴(2003),影響消費者對咖啡連鎖店涉入程度之前因及結果實證研
    究。中華. 管理評論國際學報,6(4),137-139。
  郭美瑜 (2004)。服務接觸的印象與購買意願之探討。國立中央大學企業管理研究
    所碩士論文,未出版,中壢。
  陳盈秀(2006),網路書店瀏覽者之產品涉入、知覺風險影響其購買意願之研究,
    碩士論文,南華大學,嘉義縣
  黃馨慧(2013),民眾對民宿知覺風險與購買意願關係之研究-以台中市為例,碩士
    論文,朝陽科技大學,台中
  陳冠憲 (2013),以女性遊客探討品牌權益、知覺風險、涉入與品牌績效之相關研
    究- 以高雄市為例,碩士論文,國立高雄應用科技大學,高雄
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top