跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.103) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/22 06:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊昭儀
研究生(外文):Chao-Yi Yang
論文名稱:影響陸軍工兵訓練中心志願役官、士、兵留營意願關鍵因素之探討
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Key Factors Affecting the Willingness of Volunteers, Officials and Soldiers in the Army Engineering Training Center
指導教授:郭輝明郭輝明引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hui-Ming Kuo
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:樹德科技大學
系所名稱:經營管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:49
中文關鍵詞:留營意願KJ分類法層級分析法陸軍工兵訓練中心
外文關鍵詞:Willingness to stayKJ classificationAnalytic Hierarchy ProcessArmy Engineering Corps Training Center
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:153
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:1
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著經濟型態與社會價值改變等因素,影響志願役官、士、兵願意留營的因素也隨之改變,再者,國人對軍隊仍充斥著許多疑問與刻板印象,以及少子化的衝擊,致使志願役人力招募不易。以目前陸軍的現況來說明,人員短缺實屬常態,所產生的結果是武器裝備無法正常操行,內部業務乏人執行,或者是一人要分飾多角的情形,況且人才的流失,更造成專業技術的銜接出現斷層,相對訓練成本的提高,更讓國防預算每每是雪上加霜;因此,與其著重於提升招募成效,倒不如找出提升留營率的方法,是為本研究所探討的重點。本研究以陸軍工兵訓練中心從事後勤業務之志願役官、士、兵為對象,透過文獻探討及專家訪談得知影響官兵留營意願的因素有人力精簡政策、體能訓練標準政策等25項,並將各因素之關係,以KJ分類法歸納出政策制度、工作心態、實務工作、個人因素及家庭因素等五大構面項目;透過層級分析問卷,並完成權重分析後得知,在第一層構面的項目中,影響志願役官、士、兵留營意願的前三大項目分別是:政策制度、個人因素及家庭因素;在不同階級下,影響軍官留營意願的前三大項目為:政策制度、工作心態及家庭因素,對士官而言,前三大項目分別為:家庭因素、個人因素及政策制度,對士兵而言,前三大項目分別為:個人因素、政策制度及家庭因素;在不同性別下,影響男性志願役官兵留營意願的前三大項目分別是:政策制度、家庭因素及個人因素,對女性志願役官兵而言,前三大項目為:政策制度、個人因素及家庭因素。進入第二層影響因素的分析後發現,影響志願役官、士、兵留營意願的前三大影響因素分別是:資訊設備管制、內部管理及家屬的看法;對軍官而言,前三大影響因素為:人力精簡、內部管理及資訊設備管制;對士官而言,前三大影響因素為:婚姻情況、服務地點的取捨及家屬的看法;對士兵而言,前三大影響因素為:資訊設備管制、個人志向規劃及裝備使用情況;在不同性別下,影響男性志願役官兵留營意願的前三大影響因素分別是:資訊設備管制、內部管理及裝備使用情況;對女性志願役官兵而言,前三大影響因素為:婚姻情況、軍人的社會地位及個人志向規劃。整體來說,在資訊設備發達的現代社會,人們對於資訊設備過度的使用已造成物質與心理上過份的依賴,間接影響招募成效不佳、內部人員留營率偏低,導致部隊人力及訓練成本提升。
As the economic pattern and social value changes, factors which affect the retaining intention of volunteers have also been changed. Moreover, there are still some doubts and stereotypes about military in people’s minds, and the birth rate decreasing is another factor affecting retaining intention. These reasons cause difficulties about recruitment. According to the current situation about the Army, the lack of personnel is normal condition. The result is that the weapons and equipment cannot be operated normally. No one would be responsible for internal work, or a person has to do multiple jobs. The loss of talented people makes some professional skills disappeared because the job is not been taking over, and relative training cost is increased as well. Defense Budget keeps in worse situation, therefore, instead of focusing on improving the effectiveness of recruitment, it is better to find ways to increase the retention rate, which is the this study focus on. This study is based on the volunteers, officers, and soldiers of the Army Engineering Training Center who are engaged in logistics operations. With literature review and expert interviews, There are 25 items in factors affecting retaining intention such as human resource reduction policy and physical fitness training standard policy, In the KJ classification can be summarized into five major aspects: policy, work mentality, practical work, personal factors and family factors. Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process of the questionnaire and the completion of the weight analysis, it is known that among the factors of the first level of structure, the top three factors affecting the retaining intention of volunteers, officers and soldiers are: policy, personal factors and family factors. In the different classes, the top three factors affecting the intention of officers are: policy, work mentality and family factors. For the non-commissioned officers, the top three factors are: family factors, personal factors and policy. For the soldier, the first three factors are: personal factors, policy, and family factors. Under the different genders, the top three projects affecting the willingness of male volunteers to stay in the camp are: policy system, family factors and personal factors. For female volunteers, the top three projects are: policy system, personal factors and family factors. After analyzing the influencing factors of the second layer, it is found that the top three influencing factors affecting the willingness of volunteers, officers and soldiers to stay in the camp are the information equipment control, internal management and family members'' ideas. For officers, the top three influencing factors are: manpower streamlining, internal management and information equipment control; for the non-commissioned officers, the top three influencing factors are: marital status, choice of service location and family views; for soldiers The top three influencing factors are: information equipment control, personal ambition planning and equipment use. Under the different genders, the top three influencing factors affecting the willingness of male volunteers to stay in the camp are: information equipment control, internal management and equipment use; for female volunteers, the top three influencing factors are: marital status Military social status and personal ambition planning. Overall, in the modern society with high-developed information, the habits and dependence on using information equipment are other physical and psychological effects. Physical and psychological addiction in information devices indirectly results in the difficulty of personnel recruiting, the increase in turn over rate, shortage of troops and training cost increasing.
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 iii
誌謝 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 ix
圖目錄 xi
一、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 1
1.3 研究目的 2
1.4 研究流程 3
二、文獻探討 4
2.1留營意願 4
2.1.1 留任(留營)的定義 4
2.1.2 留營意願之相關理論 5
2.1.3 離職傾向 5
2.1.4 影響留營意願因素 7
2.2 KJ分類法 8
2.3層級分析法 11
三、研究設計 13
3.1 專家訪談問卷製作 13
3.2 KJ分類法建立層級架構 14
3.3 AHP問卷設計與權重分析 18
四、結果分析 19
4.1 所有受訪者於第一層構面項目之分析 19
4.2 所有受訪者於第二層影響因素之分析 19
4.2.1政策制度之影響構面 19
4.2.2工作心態之影響構面 20
4.2.3實務工作之影響構面 20
4.2.4個人因素之影響構面 21
4.2.5家庭因素之影響構面 21
4.2.6所有受訪者所有影響因素中之綜合權重 22
4.3 各階級於第一層構面項目之分析 22
4.4 各階級於第二層影響因素之分析 23
4.4.1政策制度之影響構面 23
4.4.2工作心態之影響構面 23
4.4.3實務工作之影響構面 24
4.4.4個人因素之影響構面 24
4.4.5家庭因素之影響構面 25
4.4.6各階層影響因素之綜合權重 25
4.5 不同性別官兵於第一層構面項目之分析 26
4.6 不同性別官兵於第二層影響之分析 27
4.6.1政策制度之影響構面 27
4.6.2工作心態之影響構面 28
4.6.3實務工作之影響構面 28
4.6.4個人因素之影響構面 28
4.6.5家庭因素之影響構面 29
4.6.6不同性別影響因素之綜合權重 29
五、結論與建議 31
5.1 結論 31
5.2 建議 32
參考文獻 34
附錄一 38
附錄二 39
中文部分:
丁一倫 (2002)。影響員工離職傾向因素之探討-以台中地區國際觀光旅館為例。私立朝陽科技大學,台中市。
丁華、程禹欽,2013,國軍志願役官兵工作認知、部隊適應、工作承諾與留營意願相關聯性研究,國防大學政治作戰學院心理及社會工作學系碩士論文,台北市。
王瑤芬、洪久賢(2004)。我國觀光餐旅業員工離職傾向研究之內容分析。觀光研究學報,10(4),125-143。
王中天 (2011)。從需求溝通滿意度探討募兵制官兵轉服或續服意願之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
皮連生、 邵瑞珍. (1989). 教育心理學. 臺北: 五南圖書出版公司.
呂家美、林佩芬、曹瓊文(2008)。高續效人力資源管理措施對工作續效、離職傾向之影響~以美髮服務業為例。美和技術學院學報,27(2),95-112。
沈士涼譯,日本能率協會編著(1993)。KJ法應用實務。台北:清華管理科學圖書中心。
李永光. (2008). 海巡機關基層志願役軍官工作壓力與離職傾向之研究-以海巡署南部地區巡防局為例. 臺東大學進修部公共事務碩 (假日) 學位論文, 1-115.
林慧芝(2005) 激勵制度對留任意願影響之探討-以內部稽核人員為例,碩士論文,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所,桃園。
周中理、傅綉晶、邱鈺鈞、張卉伶(2008)。以消費者觀點探討台灣動畫電影行銷策略關鍵成功因素:KJ法應用。朝陽科技大學,台中。
許順旺、林瑋婷、蘇紅文 (2010)。際觀光旅館內部行銷與留任意願之相關研究-以工作滿意度為中介效果,運 動休閒餐旅研究,第八卷,第三期,58-84 頁。
陳盈彰,2003,以AHP 輔助平衡計分卡建立指標及策略分工之研究,國立交通大學工業工程與管理學程碩士論文-新竹縣。
陳淑玲,2005,運用層級分析法於平衡計分卡指標權重之設定─以某醫院之護理部門為例,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
張春興. (1991). 現代心理學, 台北: 東華書局. Zhang, C. X.(1991). Modern psychology. Taipei: Tunghua Book.
張舒涵 (2004)。大學院校約聘人員人格特質、工作滿意度及離職傾向之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
張譽霖,2010,志願役士兵離營意願因素分析-以陸軍通信兵為例,國防大學政治作戰學院社會工作研究所碩士論文,台北市。
郭添漢(2013),我國募兵制招募政策與作為檢視,國防雜誌,28(1),118。
黃惇勝,1993,KJ 法的基本理念及應用,創造思考教育,5,28-34。
黃英忠(1993)。現代人力資源管理。台北:華泰。
黃惇勝(1995)。臺灣式 KJ 法原理與技術。臺北:中國生產力中心。
黃忠發、許文瓊、張力云(2005)。營建工程人員離職行為之調查與分析。工程科技與教育學刊,2(4),427-439。
楊志清、郭國成,2009,因應募兵時期士兵工作滿意度研究-以陸軍志願士兵為例,陸軍學術雙月刊,45(507),P159。
蔡坤宏(2000)。組織承諾、工作滿足與離職意圖的關係-Meta 分析。中華管理評論,3(4),33-49。
蔡明原,2009,國軍志願役士兵留營意願之探究-工作價值觀、工作滿意度與組職承諾因素,樹德科技大學經營管理所碩士論文,高雄市。
歐陽玲(1994),工作生活品質與臨床護理人員離職意願之研討-以台南地區綜合醫院為例,東海大學企業管理研究所,碩士論文。
鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。分析層級法的內涵特性與應用(上)。中國統計學報,27(6),台北,13707-13724。
劉俊昌,“企業文化契合度與留職傾向之研究-以中國石油公司為例",碩士論文,國立中山大學,2000。
劉建良,2004,以商業智慧觀點探討電腦週邊產品ODM代工供應商關鍵評選因素,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
賴墩謙(2007)。組織文化對工作滿足及募兵制度推行成效之相關性探討-以空軍航機保修部隊為例。未出版碩士論文,靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班,台中。
盧富娘(2010)。巧克力包裝視覺設計與味覺共感覺研究(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
蕭美玲(2010)。「工作找尋自我效能」及「負面情緒」干擾工作角色認知及留任意願關係之研究-以台北市里幹事為例。碩士論文,銘傳大學公共事務學系,台北市。

英文部分:
Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1982). A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 67(3), 350.
Abelson, M. A. (1987). Examination of avoidable and unavoidable turnover. Journal of Applied psychology, 72(3), 382.
Albayrak, E., & Erensal, Y. C. (2004). Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15(4), 491-503.
Bluedorn, A. C. (1982). The theories of turnover: Causes, effects, and meaning. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1(1), 75-128.
Butler, S., & Skipper Jr, J. K. (1983). Working the circuit: An explanation of employee turnover in the restaurant industry. Sociological Spectrum, 3(1), 19-33.
Blankertz, L. E., & Robinson, S. E. (1997). Turnover intentions of community mental health workers in psychosocial rehabilitation services. Community Mental Health Journal, 33(6), 517-529.
Banuelas, R., Antony, J., & Brace, M. (2005). An application of Six Sigma to reduce waste. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21(6), 553-570.
Caplan, R. D., & Jones, K. W. (1975). Effects of work load, role ambiguity, and type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart rate. Journal of applied psychology, 60(6), 713.
Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., & Krackhardt, D. M. (1982). Turnover overstated: The functional taxonomy. Academy of management Review, 7(1), 117-123.
Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human relations, 18(1), 21-32.
Fletcher, H. D., & Smith, D. B. (2004). MANAGING FOR VALUE: DEVELOPING A PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM INTEGRATING ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED AND THE BALANCED SCORECARD IN STRATEGIC PLANNING. Journal of Business Strategies, 21(1).
Chandler, G. E. (1990). Retention: Has it obstructed nursing''s view?. Nursing administration quarterly, 14(4), 70-75.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Holy Wiley & Sons.
Hayes, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.
Hafeez, K., Zhang, Y., & Malak, N. (2002). Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. International journal of production economics, 76(1), 39-51.
Huang, S. M., Chang, I. C., Li, S. H., & Lin, M. T. (2004). Assessing risk in ERP projects: identify and prioritize the factors. Industrial management & data systems, 104(8), 681-688.
Jackofsky, E. F. (1984). Turnover and job performance: An integrated process model. Academy of Management review, 9(1), 74-83.
Kraut, A. I. (1975). Predicting turnover of employees from measured job attitudes. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(2), 233-243.
Kahney, H. (1986). Problem solving: A cognitive approach. Open University Press.
Khasnabis, S., Alsaidi, E., Liu, L., & Ellis, R. D. (2002). Comparative study of two techniques of transit performance assessment: AHP and GAT. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(6), 499-508.
Liedtka, S. L. (2005). Analytic hierarchy process and multi-criteria performance management systems. Journal of cost management, 19(6), 30-38.
March, J. G. (81). Simon. HA (1958). Organizations. New York.
Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 62(2), 237.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. (1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover.
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. Wiley.
Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), 603.
Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Iowa State Press.
Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. JAI press.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (1992). Essentials of organizational behavior (Vol. 200, No. 1). Prentice Hall.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative science quarterly, 46-56.
Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of management journal, 21(3), 380-396.
Saaty, T. L. (1999). Basic theory of the analytic hierarchy process: How to make a decision. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas Fisicas y Naturales, 93(4), 395-423.
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process (Vol. 175). Springer Science & Business Media.
Searcy, D. L. (2004). Aligning the balanced scorecard and a firm''s strategy using the analytic hierarchy process. Management Accounting Quarterly, 5(4), 1.
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
Van Scotter, J. R. (2000). Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. Human resource management review, 10(1), 79-95.
Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of applied psychology, 71(2), 219.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊