跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/09/17 23:16
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳靖玟
研究生(外文):Ching-Wen Chen
論文名稱:決策任務及目標導向對多樣化蒐尋行為的影響
論文名稱(外文):The impacts of decision task and goal orientation on variety seeking behavior
指導教授:吳佩勳
指導教授(外文):Pei-Hsun Wu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:臺中技術學院
系所名稱:事業經營研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:127
中文關鍵詞:多樣化蒐尋行為決策任務目標導向風險傾向提昇導向防護導向
外文關鍵詞:Variety-seekingDecision TaskGoal OrientationRisk PropensityPromotion FocusPrevention Focus
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:266
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
  多樣化蒐尋行為是消費心理研究領域中一個主要的研究議題,過去已有許多研究探討多樣化蒐尋行為發生的原因及干擾多樣化蒐尋行為的因素,而目標導向(提昇導向vs. 防護導向)在心理學領域亦是近年來一個重要的研究議題,並且已經延伸到消費心理領域,然而在多樣化蒐尋行為的相關研究中並未考慮目標導向的影響,因此,本研究設計實驗一與實驗二,分別以模擬人物情境(A、B)及透過調節焦點量表來衡量受測者目標導向之類型,論證決策任務及目標導向將交互影響多樣化蒐尋行為,在循序選擇、循序使用的任務下(每天僅購買每天所需之商品),提昇導向消費者的多樣化蒐尋程度將大於防護導向的消費者,而在同時選擇、循序使用的任務下(未來多天的消費一起購買),防護導向消費者的多樣化蒐尋程度將大於提昇導向的消費者;而在實驗三為推論受測者對於不同風險傾向(風險愛好者 vs. 風險規避者)的消費心理特性與不同目標導向(提昇導向vs. 防護導向)特性相同,皆是對損失與獲取之敏感度,故以風險傾向量表方式來衡量受測者,論證決策任務及風險傾向也將交互影響多樣化蒐尋行為。本研究根據研究結果討論相關意涵,並提供後續研究建議。
  The Variety-seeking behavior is one of the key issues in the domain of consumer psychology. Many studies have explored the causes of the variety-seeking behavior and its moderating factors. The topic of goal-orientation(promotion-focused vs. prevention-focused)has become an important issue in psychology and extended to the domain of consumer psychology. However, most studies regarding variety-seeking behaviors failed to address the influences of goal-orientation. Therefore, the present research used two experiments to explore the influences of decision task and goal orientation on variety-seeking behavior. The difference between experiment 1 and 2 was manipulation or measurement in goal orientation. Given the task of sequential choices/sequential consumption(the consumer buys one item at a time, just before each consumption occasion), the extent of variety-seeking for a promotion-focused consumer is greater than that for a prevention-focused consumer. Given a decision-task of simultaneous choices/sequential consumption(the consumer buys several items on one shopping trip and consumes the items over several consumption occasions), the extent of variety-seeking for a prevention-focused consumer is greater than that for a promotion-focused consumer. In addition, experiment 3 also demonstrated the interaction effect of decision task and risk propensity(risk taking behavior vs. risk aversive behavior) on variety seeking behavior. The present research also discussed the theoretical and practical implications derived from the research results.
目 錄
誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
目 錄 iv
表目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 4
1.3 研究流程 5
第二章 文獻探討與研究假設 8
2.1 決策任務與多樣化蒐尋行為 8
2.2 目標導向理論(Goal Orientation Theory) 11
2.2.1 目標導向之起源 11
2.2.2 目標導向之分類 11
2.2.3 自我調節概念(self-regulation) 13
2.2.4 目標導向之相關理論連結 14
2.2.5 不同目標導向之差異 18
2.2.6 目標導向理論之相關研究 21
2.3 決策任務及目標導向對於多樣化蒐尋行為的交互影響 23
2.4 風險傾向(Risk Propensity) 28
2.4.1 風險定義 28
2.4.2 風險傾向定義與分類 28
2.4.3 風險傾向與目標導向相關連結 30
2.4.4 影響風險態度因素 31
2.4.5 風險傾向衡量 32
2.4.6 風險決策行為模型 34
2.4.7 風險傾向對消費者購買行為之影響 35
2.5 決策任務及風險傾向對於多樣化蒐尋行為的交互影響 37
第三章 研究方法 42
3.1 研究架構 42
3.2 實驗設計 44
3.2.1 實驗一 44
3.2.2 實驗二 50
3.2.3 實驗三 55
3.3 資料分析方法 60
第四章 資料統計分析 62
4.1 決策任務及目標導向將交互影響消費者多樣化蒐尋的程度 62
4.1.1 實驗一:樣本回收狀況 62
4.1.2 實驗一:目標導向之情境操弄檢定 64
4.1.3 實驗一:變異數同質性檢定 65
4.1.4 實驗一:單變量變異數分析 66
4.1.5 實驗一:單變量分析之敘述統計結果 66
4.1.6 實驗一:剖面圖分析 68
4.1.7 實驗一:獨立樣本T檢定分析 68
4.1.8 實驗一:小結 69
4.1.9 實驗二:樣本回收狀況 70
4.1.10 實驗二:目標導向之量表 73
4.1.11 實驗二:變異數同質性檢定 74
4.1.12 實驗二:單變量變異數分析 74
4.1.13 實驗二:單變量分析之敘述統計結果 75
4.1.14 實驗二:剖面圖分析 77
4.1.15 實驗二:獨立樣本T檢定分析 78
4.1.16 實驗二:小結 79
4.2 不同決策任務及風險傾向下的多樣化蒐尋程度 81
4.2.1 實驗三:樣本回收狀況 81
4.2.2 實驗三:風險傾向量表 83
4.2.3 實驗三:變異數同質性檢定 84
4.2.4 實驗三:單變量變異數分析 84
4.2.5 實驗三:單變量分析之敘述統計結果 85
4.2.6 實驗三:剖面圖分析 87
4.2.7 驗三:獨立樣本T檢定分析 88
4.2.8 驗三:小結 88
4.3 本研究假設之驗證結果 90
第伍章 結論與建議 91
5.1 研究結論 91
5.2 研究貢獻 94
5.2.1 理論意涵 94
5.2.2 實務意涵 95
5.3 研究建議 97
5.4 研究限制 98
參考文獻 99
附錄一 實驗一餅乾口味圖卡 111
附錄二 實驗一問卷:(A1) 112
附錄三 實驗一問卷:(B1) 114
附錄四 實驗一問卷:(A2) 116
附錄五 實驗一問卷:(B2) 117
附錄六 實驗二與實驗三果汁口味圖卡 119
附錄七 實驗二問卷:(A) 120
附錄八 實驗二問卷:(B) 122
附錄九 實驗三問卷:(A) 124
附錄十 實驗三問卷:(B) 126


表目錄
表 2.1 國內外學者對不同目標導向類型之分類 12
表 2.2 自我調節之概念 14
表 2.3 自我差距理論之原則 15
表 2.4 不同目標導向之特性比較 20
表 2.5 國內外學者相關目標導向之研究 21
表 2.6 影響風險態度因素 31
表 2.7 風險傾向之衡量類型 32
表 2.8 風險傾向之衡量方法 33
表 4.1 實驗組別*性別之交叉表(實驗一) 63
表 4.2 實驗組別*年齡之交叉表(實驗一) 64
表 4.3 不同目標導向操弄之獨立樣本T檢定(實驗一) 65
表 4.4 誤差變異量的 Levene 檢定等式(a)(實驗一) 65
表 4.5 單變量變異數分析之檢定(實驗一) 66
表 4.6 不同決策任務及目標導向下的多樣化蒐尋程度(N=200)(實驗一) 67
表 4.7 獨立樣本T檢定(實驗一) 69
表 4.8 評估目標導向後所刪除的中立者(實驗二) 71
表 4.9 實驗組別*性別之交叉表(實驗二) 72
表 4.10 實驗組別*年齡交叉表(實驗二) 73
表 4.11 目標導向問卷之信度統計量(N=224)(實驗二) 73
表 4.12 誤差變異量的 Levene 檢定等式(a)(實驗二) 74
表 4.13 單變量變異數分析之檢定(實驗二) 75
表 4.14 不同決策任務及目標導向下的多樣化蒐尋程度(N=224)(實驗二) 77
表 4.15 不同目標導向操弄之獨立樣本T檢定(實驗二) 79
表 4.16 實驗組別*性別之交叉表(實驗三) 82
表 4.17 實驗組別*年齡交叉表(實驗三) 83
表 4.18 風險傾向問卷之信度統計量(N=146)(實驗三) 83
表 4.19 誤差變異量的 Levene 檢定等式(a)(實驗三) 84
表 4.20 單變量變異數分析之檢定(實驗三) 85
表 4.21 不同決策任務及目標導向下的多樣化蒐尋程度(N=146)(實驗三) 87
表 4.22 不同目標導向操弄之獨立樣本T檢定(實驗三) 88
表 4.23 本研究假設之驗證結果 90


圖目錄
圖 1.1 研究流程 7
圖 2.1 四種自我差距引發之情緒反應 16
圖 2.2 本研究假設H1a之推論 25
圖 2.3 本研究假設H1b之推論 26
圖 2.4 風險愛好者與提昇導向之相同處 30
圖 2.5 風險規避者與防護導向之相同處 31
圖 2.6 風險決策行為模型 34
圖 2.8 本研究假設H2a之推論 39
圖 2.9 本研究假設H2b之推論 40
圖 3.1 研究架構(實驗一與實驗二) 43
圖 3.2 研究架構(實驗三) 43
圖 4.1 估計邊緣平均數之剖面圖(實驗一) 68
圖 4.2 估計邊緣平均數之剖面圖(實驗二) 78
圖 4.3 估計邊緣平均數之剖面圖(實驗三) 87
參考文獻
1.Aaker, Jennifer L. & Angela Y. Lee(2001). I Seek Pleasures and We Avoid Pains:The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.28, No.1, June, 33-49.
2.Ames, C.(1992). Classroom:Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
3.Ariely, D., & Levav, J.(2000). Sequential choice in group settings:Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279-290.
4.Athearn J. L.(1978). The Risk Less society, The Journal of Risk and insurance, 565-573.
5.Avent, Tamar & E. Tory Higgins(2006). How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1-10.
6.Barrett, P.T., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, S.B. G., & Eysenck, H. J.(1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(5), 805-819
7.Bauer. R.A.(1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In: Cox. Donald F. (Ed.). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Boston:Harvard Business Press. 23-30
8.Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, W. J.(2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 497-505.
9.Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187-217.
10.Brendl, C. Miguel, E. Tory Higgins, & Kristi M. Lemm(1995). Sensitivity to Varying Cains and Losses: The Role of Self-Discrepancies and Event Framing. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(June), 1028-1051.
11.Brockhaus, R. H.(1980). Risk-taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 509-520.
12.Bromiley, P., Curley S.,(1992). Individual differences in risk taking, IN Risk-taking Behavior, Yates JF(ed.), John Wiley:New York
13.Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E. & Zajac, D, M,(1996). Goal Orientation in Organizational Research:A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decistion Processes, Vol. 67(1), 26-48.
14.Chernev, A.(2004). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 557-565.
15.Chernev(2004). Goal–Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice. Journal Of Consumer Psychology, 14, 141–150.
16.Cunningham, William A., Carol L. Raye & Marcia K. Johnson(2005). Neural Correlates of Evaluation Associated with Promotion and Prevention Regulatory Focus Cognitive. Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(2), 202-211.
17.David V. D. & Stanley B. S.(1989). Personality and Job Performance:Evidence of Incremental Validity. Personal Psychology, 42, 25-36.
18.Donkers, B., Bertrand M., & Arthur van S.,(1997). Estimating risk attitudes usinglotteries: A large sample approach. Discussion Paper, 12, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
19.Driver, Michael J. & Siegfried Streufert(1964). The ''General Incongruity Adaptation Level (GIAL) Hypothesis: An Analysis and Integration of Cognitive Approaches to Motivation. Paper No.114, Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Management, Purdue University.
20.Dweck, C. S.(1986). Motivation processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
21.Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L.(1988). A Social-cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychological Review, Vol. 95(2), 256-273
22.Elliot, A. J.(1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
23.Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A.(1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232..
24.Elliot, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: an approach to motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
25.Faison, E. W. J. (1977). The neglected variety drive: A useful concept for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 172–175.
26.Farley(2000). Corporate Culture,Customer Orientation,and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms:A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, pp.23-37..
27.Fiske, D. W. & Salvatore R. Maddi (1961). Functions of Varied Experience. Homewood, IL:Dorsey Press.
28.Fisher, S. L., & Ford, J. K.(1998). Different effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51(2), 397-420.
29.Friedman, Ronald S. & Jens Forster(2001). The Effects of Promotion and Prevention Cues on Creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.81, December, 1001-1013.
30.Givon, M. (1984). Variety seeking through brand switching. Marketing Science, 3(1), 1-22.
31.Greene, M.R. (1973). A Note on Loading Charges for Variable Annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 40, 473-478.
32.Grol, R., Whitfield, M., Maeseneer, J. De. and Mokkink, H.(1990). Attitudes to Risk Taking in Medical Decision Making among British, Dutch and Belgian General Practitioners, Gen Pract, Br. J., 40(333), 134–136.
33.Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
34.Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 79-109.
35.Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self —discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.
36.Higgins, E. Tory(1997), Beyond Pleasure and Pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
37.Higgins, E. T.(1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In: P. Z.Mark, ed. Advances in Experimental Psychology, vol. 30, pp.1-46. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.Higgins, E. T.(2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 177–191.
39.Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
40.Hoyer, Wayne D. & Nancy M. Ridgway(1984). Variety Seeking as an Explanation for Exploratory Purchase Behavior:A Throretical Model. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.11, 114-119.
41.Idson, Lorraine Chen, Nira Liberman, & E. Tory Higgins(2000). Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains:A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity. Joumal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (May), 252-274.
42.Jackson, D. (1976), Jackson Personality Inventory Manual, Research Psychologists Press, Goshen, NY.
43.Jackson, D. N., Hourany, L., & Vidmar, N. J.(1972). A four dimensional interpretation of risk-taking. Journal of Personality, 40, 483-501.
44.Jain, S. P., Lindsey, C., Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2007). For better or for worse? Valenced comparative frames and regulatory focus. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 57-65.
45.Kahn, B. E.(1995). Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2, 139-148.
46.Kahn, B. E.(1998). Variety:From the consumer perspective. In:Christopher S. Tang and Tech H. Ho, eds. Research Advances in Variety Management, pp. 19-37. Boston: Kluwer.
47.Kahn, B. E., Kalwani, M. U., & Morrison, D. G. (1986). Measuring variety-seeking and reinforcement behaviors using panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(May), 89-100.
48.Kahn, B. E., & Lemann, D. R. (1991). Modeling choice among assortments. Journal of Retailing, 67, 274-299.
49.Kahn, B. E., & Isen, A. M. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety-seeking among safe, enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 257-270.
50.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
51.Kahneman, D., & Snell, J.(1992). Predicting a changing taste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5,187-200.
52.Keller, Punam, Angela Y. Lee, & Brian Sternthal(2004). Construing Fit to Judgment:The Effects of Regulatory Focus and Level of Construal. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.
53.Kogan, N. & Wallach, M., (1967). Group Risk Taking as a Function of Members Anxiety and Def ensiveness. Journal of Personality, March, 50-63.
54.Kotler(1911). Marketing management:Analysis, planning, implementation and control . (7th). New York :Prentice-Hall.Inc.
55.Kotler, P.(1994). Marketing Management Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. 8th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
56.Kim, D.J., Cho, B., & Rao, H.R.(2002). Effects of Consumer Lifestyles on Purchasing Behavior on the Internet: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation. Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on information systems, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2000, 688-695.
57.Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.77, December , 1135–1145.
58.Lin, Wu, Chuang, & Kao,(2007). Price as a quality or sacrifice cue: Role of goal orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 179–187.
59.Lockwood, Jordan, C.h., & Kunda, Z.(2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best in spireus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
60.MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D.A(1990). Characteristic of risk taking executives. Management Science,(36),422-435.
61.Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A schoolwide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399-427.
62.McAlister, L.(1982). A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 141-150.
63.McAlister, L., & Pessemier, E. (1982). Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 311-322.
64.Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (1995). The impact of context on variety seeking in product choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 275-295.
65.Mourali, M., Bockenholt, U., & Laroche, M. (2007). Compromise and attraction effects under prevention and promotion motivations. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 234-247.
66.Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjectiveexperience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
67.Nicholson, Soane, Fenton-O'Creevy, & William(2004). Traders, Managers and Loss Aversion in Investment Banking:a field study, 85-98.
68.Pennington, Ginger L. & Neal J. Roese(2003). Regulatory Focus and Temporal Distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.39, November,563-576.
69.Pervin, L.A.(1993). Personality:Theory and Reasearch, 6th Ed., New York John Wily & Sons.
70.Pessemier, E.(1978). Stochastic properties of changing preferences. American Economic Review, 68, 380-385.
71.Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H.(1996). Motivation in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
72.Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B. E., & Kahneman, D.(1999). Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1-15.
73.Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E.(2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 246-257.
74.Read, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking combined and separated choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 1, 34-49.
75.Robbins, S. P.(1991). Essential of organizational behavior, Upper Saddle, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall International.
76.Roehm, Jr. H. A., & Roehm, M. L.(2005). Revisting the effect of positive mood on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 330-336.
77.Rohrmann, B.,(2002). Risk Attitude Scales:Concepts and Questionnaires, Melbourne:University of Melbourne.
78.Rozin, P., L. Ebert, & D. Schiller(1980). The Nature and Acquisition of a Preference for Chili Pepper by Humans. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 77-101.
79.Rozin, P., L. Ebert, & J. Schull (1982). Some Like It Hot:A Temporal Analysis of Hedonic Responses to Chili Pepper. Appetite, 3, 13-22.
80.Schoemaker, P.(1990). Are risk attitudes related across domains and response modes?. Management Science,(36),1451-1461.
81.Scott, Robert C. & Mitchell(1972). Productivity Improvement through better Management of Human Resources. Cost and Management, NO.49(1), 14-24.
82.Simonson, I.(1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 150-162.
83.Sicard, B., Jouve, E., Blin, O., Mathieu, C. (1999). Construction et validation d’une échelle analogique visuellede risque (EVAR). L’Encephale, XXV, 622-629
84.Simonson, I., & Winer, R. S.(1992). The influence of purchase quantity and display format on consumer preference for variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 133-138.
85.Shih, S. S., & Alexander, J. M.(2000). Interacting effects of goal setting and self- or other-referenced feedback on children''s development of self-efficacy and cognitive skill within the Taiwanese classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 536-543.
86.Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P. B., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 724-738.
87.Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H.(1992). The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 434-448.
88.Steve Lance, Jeff Woll(2007). The little blue book of advertising:52 small ideas that can make a big difference, 33-41.
89.Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R.(1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573-1592.
90.Suarez Riveiro, J. M., Cabanach, R. G., & Arias, A. V.(2001). Multiple goals pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self-regulatory, motivational strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 561-572.
91.Swan, J. E., & Nolan, J. J.(1985). Gaining Customer Trust: A Conceptual Guide for the Salesperson. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management,5(11), 39-48.
92.Taylor, J. W.(1974). The Role of Risk in consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing. Vol.38, 54-60.
93.Vandewalle, D.(1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015.
94.VandeWalle, D., Brown, S. P., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W.(1999). The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinalfield test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 249-259.
95.Van Trijp, H. C. M. (1995). Variety-seeking in product choice behavior:Theory with applications in the food domain. Mansholt Series, 1, Wageningen, The Netherlands:Wageningen University.
96.Van Trijp, H. C. B., Hoyer, W. D., & Inman, J. J.(1996). Why switch? Product category-level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 281-292.
97.Venkatesan, M.(1973). Cognitive Consistency and Novelty Seeking. in Consumer Behavior: Theoretical Sources, Scott Ward and Thomas S. Robertson, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc., 355-384.
98.Warneryd, K. E.(1996). Risk attitudes and risky behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(6), 749-770.
99.Weber, E.U., Ann-Renee, Blais & Nancy E.Betz,(2002). A Domain-Specific    
Risk-Attitude Scale:Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behavior. Journal of Behavior Decision Making, Vol.15, Iss.4, 263-290.
100.Weiner, B.(1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research.
Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
101.Wright, Peter L. & Mary Ann Kriewall(1980). State-of-Mind Effects on the
Accuracy With Which Utility FunctionsPredict Marketplace Choice. Journal of
Marketing Research, 17(August), 277-93.
102.Zuckerman, M.(1979). Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level arousal.
Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrenece Erlbaum Associates.
103.Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, DM., Joireman, J. & Teta, P. (1993). A Comparison
of Three Structural Models for Personality; the Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.
104.毛仁傑(1989),個人生活型態理財觀念與理財行為--台北市國小學生家長個案研究,台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
105.余伯泉、李茂興譯(2003),Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert合著,社會心理學,台北:弘智。
106.宋明哲(2001),現代風險管理,五版,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
107.吳秉恩(1986),組織行為學,台北:華泰書局。
108.吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。台北:知城。
109.杜梅明(2005),風險偏好、組織氣候、激勵因素與組織承諾之相關性研究,
國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
110.邱皓政(2008),量化研究與統計分析,11-17, 15-9~15-11。
111.陳忠慶 (1990)。個人理財手冊。台北市:遠流出版社。
112.陳滄河(1985),「我國執業會計師風險態度及相關因素之研究」,政治大學會
計研究所碩士論文。
113.楊鎮華(2004),消費者抵制意圖與態度之研究--社會兩難觀點,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,25-42。
114.鄭玉英(1994)。自我差距理論與其在諮商上的啟示。諮商與輔導,100,9-12。
115.劉泰明(2008),品牌知名度與調節焦點對於創新性產品的廣告態度影響,實踐大學企業創新發展研究所碩士論文。
116.劉照庭(2002),目標導向對電腦技能學習的影響,國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,52-64。
117.劉詩琪(2007),調節配適對消費者購買意圖影響之研究-以消費者動機為干擾變數,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文,66-70。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top