跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.44) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/01/03 10:08
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:謝佳靜
研究生(外文):Hsieh,Chia-Ching
論文名稱:金融發展、金融自由化和經濟全球化對所得不均的影響
論文名稱(外文):The impacts of financial development, financial freedom, and economic globalization on income inequality
指導教授:簡美瑟簡美瑟引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chien,Mei-Se
口試委員:張李淑容張嘉倩
口試委員(外文):Chang Lee,Shu-JungChang, Chia-Chien
口試日期:2018-05-31
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:金融系金融資訊碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:63
中文關鍵詞:所得不均金融發展金融自由化經濟全球化
外文關鍵詞:Income inequalityFinancial developmentFinancial freedomEconomic globalization
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:346
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:16
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本文主要以金融自由化、金融發展且加入經濟全球化探討對各國所得不均的影響。研究數據選取1996年至2012年,共46個國家年資料進行實證,並使用一般動差法(Generalized method of moments)進行估計。同時,將國家分類為開發中和已開發國家相互比較,比較其因素在不同國家狀況下的影響。本文得到下列實證結果:第一、在全樣本中,金融發展、金融自由化和經濟全球化皆會正向影響所得不均,也就是更高的金融發展、金融自由化和經濟全球化會導致所得更加不均。第二、經濟全球化對所得不均的影響,不論是在開發中還是已開發國家皆為正向影響。第三、開發中和已開發國家相互比較,發現金融發展、金融自由化對所得不均的影響方向是不同的。兩個變數在開發中國家影響是反向的,在已開發國家則為正向。
This paper studies how income inequality is affected by financial development, financial freedom, and economic globalization. Following the line of the relative literature to investigate the relationship between financial development and income inequality, we build an empirical model covering the indices of economic globalization and financial freedom, and the generalized method of moments is applied to examine a panel data including 46 countries. The sample data is also classified into two groups, the developing and developed countries, to compare differences of these impacts for the two groups. The empirical results, applying annual panel data over the sample period from 1996 to 2012, are shown as the followings. First, the empirical results from the full sample group, higher degree of financial development will increase income inequality. Higher degrees of financial freedom and economic globalization also raise income inequality. Second, the impacts of economic globalization on income equality are positive for all countries, no matter for the developing or developed countries. Third, higher degree of financial development and financial freedom will increase income inequality for the developed countries, but there are converse effects for the developing countries.
目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖表目錄 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究架構與流程 2
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 金融發展與所得不均 4
第二節 金融自由化與所得不均 6
第三節 全球化與所得不均 7
第三章 理論模型與研究方法 11
第一節 理論模型 11
第二節 一般動差估計法 (Generalized Method of Moments) 12
第四章 實證結果 14
第一節 實證資料和敘述統計量 14
4.1.1實證資料 14
4.1.2敘述統計量分析 16
第二節 實證結果 24
4.2.1.估計模型設計 24
4.2.2基本模型估計結果 26
4.2.3考量交乘效果之估計結果 28
4.2.4加入控制變數之影響 32
第四節 開發中國家與已開發國家的比較 36
4.3.1基本模型估計結果 36
4.3.2考量交乘效果之估計結果 40
第五節 小結 44
第五章 結論與建議 46
參考文獻 49
附錄 考量單一金融發展變數與控制變數模型之實證結果 53


圖表目錄
圖1.1 研究流程 3
表4.1 不同所得群組之國家組成 14
表4.2 變數定義與資料來源一覽表 15
表4.3 吉尼係數 (GI)的敘述統計量 17
表4.4. 私人信貸/GDP(CRED)的敘述統計量 18
表4.5 股市市值/GDP比 (ST)的敘述統計量 19
表4.6 經濟自由化指數(OF)的敘述統計量 21
表4.7. 經濟全球化(KOF)的敘述統計量 23
表4.8 各估計模型設計 25
表4.9. 基本模型估計結果 27
表4.10考量兩金融發展變數與交乘效果的模型估計結果 31
表4.11 加入控制變數之模型估計結果 35
表4.12兩個不同群組之基本模型結果 39
表4.13開發中國家之考量兩金融發展變數與交乘效果的模型估計結果 42
表4.14已開發國家之考量兩金融發展變數與交乘效果的模型估計結果 43
表4.15不同群組間之主要變數之符號比較 45


1.Abiad, A., Detragiache, E., & Tressel, T. (2010). A new database of financial reforms. IMF Staff Papers, 57(2), 281-302.
2.Abiad, A., Oomes, N., & Ueda, K. (2008). The quality effect: does financial liberalization improve the allocation of capital? Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 270-282.
3.Agnello, L., Mallick, S. K., & Sousa, R. M. (2012). Financial reforms and income inequality. Economics Letters, 116(3), 583-587.
4.Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
5.Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
6.Banerjee, A. V., & Newman, A. F. (1993). Occupational choice and the process of development. Journal of Political Economy, 101(2), 274-298.
7.Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27-49.
8.Beck, T., Levine, R., & Levkov, A. (2010). Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1637-1667.
9.Ben Naceur, S., & Zhang, R. (2016). Financial development, inequality and poverty: some international evidence. (IMF Working Paper 16/32)
10.Bergh, A., Mirkina, I., & Nilsson, T. (2014). Globalization and institutional quality—a panel data analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 42(3), 365-394.
11.Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 488-505.
12.Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
13.Bumann, S., & Lensink, R. (2016). Capital account liberalization and income inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 61, 143-162.
14.Das, M., & Mohapatra, S. (2003). Income inequality: the aftermath of stock market liberalization in emerging markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(1-2), 217-248.
15.De Haan, J., & Sturm, J. E. (2017). Finance and income inequality: a review and new evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 50, 171-195.
16.Delis, M. D., Hasan, I., & Kazakis, P. (2014). Bank regulations and income inequality: empirical evidence. Review of Finance, 18(5), 1811-1846.
17.Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2009). Finance and inequality: theory and evidence. Annual Revision of Finance. Economics, 1(1), 287-318.
18.Denk, O., & Cournède, B. (2015). Finance and income inequality in OECD countries. (OECD Economics Department Working Paper 1224)
19.Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091-1110.
20.Dreher, A., & Gaston, N. (2008). Has globalization increased inequality? Review of International Economics, 16(3), 516-536.
21.Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalization: gauging its consequences. Springer Science and Business Media.
22.Doerrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2014). The impact of redistributive policies on inequality in OECD countries. Applied Economics, 46(17), 2066-2086.
23.Ezcurra, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Does economic globalization affect regional inequality? A cross-country analysis. World Development, 52, 92-103.
24.Furceri, D., & Loungani , P. (2015). Capital account liberalization and inequality. (IMF Working Paper 15/243)
25.Greenwood, J., & Jovanovic, B. (1990). Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 1), 1076-1107.
26.Hamori, S., & Hashiguchi, Y. (2012). The effect of financial deepening on inequality: some international evidence. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(4), 353-359.
27.Jauch, S., & Watzka, S. (2016). Financial development and income Inequality: a panel data approach. Empirical Economics, 51(1), 291-314.
28.Jaumotte, M. F., & Osorio, M. C. (2015). Inequality and labor market institutions. International Monetary Fund.
29.Kanbur, R., & Zhang, X. (2005). Fifty years of regional inequality in China: a journey through central planning, reform, and openness. Review of Development Economics, 9(1), 87-106.
30.Kim, D. H., & Lin, S. C. (2011). Nonlinearity in the financial development–income inequality nexus. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(3), 310-325.
31.Law, S. H., Tan, H. B., & Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2014). Financial development and income inequality at different levels of institutional quality. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(sup1), 21-33.
32.Levine, R. (2005). Finance and growth: theory and evidence. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 865-934.
33.Li, J., & Yu, H. (2014). Income inequality and financial reform in Asia: the role of human capital. Applied Economics, 46(24), 2920-2935.
34.Martinez-Vazquez, J., Moreno-Dodson, B., & Vulovic, V. (2012). The impact of tax and expenditure policies on income distribution: evidence from a large panel of countries.
35.Michael, O., Hannah, S.,(2016). Taking stock: income inequality and the stock market. Economic Synopses, 7,1-2
36.Milanovic, B. (2005). Can we discern the effect of globalization on income distribution? Evidence from household surveys. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(1), 21-44.
37.Sánchez‐Reaza, J., & Rodríguez‐Pose, A. (2002). The impact of trade liberalization on regional disparities in Mexico. Growth and Change, 33(1), 72-90.
38.Solt, F. (2009). Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 231-242.
39.Solt, F. (2015). On the assessment and use of cross-national income inequality datasets. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 13(4), 683-691.
40.Wade, R. H. (2004). Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality? World Development, 32(4), 567-589.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊