臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

我國剖腹產率近年來平均高達33%，相較於世界衛生組織建議之理想剖腹產率15%以下，還有很大的努力空間。過高的剖腹產率不只增加母親的死亡率與併發症的機率，也會增加住院天數且花費更多醫材與人力照顧而增醫療保險預算的負擔。
台灣雖然有探討剖腹生產的文獻，不過較少篇幅針對產婦對生產議題之態度與認知方面的探討。本研究目的，在於探討產婦對於其生產方式的選擇之相關影響因素。
本研究採橫斷性研究，以台北市某區域醫院教學醫院生產過的婦女為對象，以結構式問卷進行自填調查，研究樣本數為119人，分剖腹生產者33位，自然生產者86位。
本研究之主要結果如下：
1) 相對於沒有商業保險的產婦，有商業保險的產婦比較傾向於剖腹生產。
2) 年齡也是產婦選擇生產方式的重要原因之一。
3) 家庭收入的差異會影響婦女選擇剖腹生產或自然生產。
4) 對於自然生產議題的認知較高者，採用自然生產的機率也比較高。
5) 有工作的產婦比無工作或家管者更傾向於剖腹生產。
6) 有東方宗教信仰者比無宗教信仰或西方宗教信仰者更傾向於剖腹生產。
儘管衛生行政單位非常努力的降低剖腹產率，不過離理想的剖腹產率還是有偏高的現象。從研究結果可以發現，產婦生產知識的高低會影響其生產方式，若衛生主管及其他相關團體能積極推動衛生教育，建立醫療網路教育專欄、提供相關的生產知識及推廣生產之相關議題的宣傳廣告，使產婦對生產的知識充分了解，相信對剖腹產率能有相當的影響。

Abstract
The cesarean section rate in Taiwan was maintained above 33% for the past five years, which is significantly higher than the 15% maximum recommended by the World Health Organization. High cesarean section deliveries are associated with higher maternal mortality and mobility, in addition it also requires longer hospital stays, more surgical materials, personnel and place, overloading the already strained health care budget.
Although several studies have appeared in literature regarding the mode of delivery, very little research is available pertaining to measure women’s knowledge and opinion in the decision making of delivery by caesarean section.
The purpose of this study was to measure the influence of maternal factors toward the mode of delivery.
This study used a cross-sectional survey, focusing on delivered woman, which were asked to fill out a self-administered questionnaire. A sum of 119 cases wes enrolled.
The following are the major findings of the research:
1) Woman with private insurance had cesarean sections more often than the others.
2) Age is one of the factors associated with the mode of delivery.
3) Income differences are likely to affect maternal preference for cesarean delivery.
4) Delivered woman with highest scores of knowledge assessment about complications of labor and vaginal delivery were largely preferred a vaginal delivery.
5) Cesarean sections were more common among women who had work.
6) Woman with oriental religions had cesarean sections more often than the others.
Despite the effort from government health institute, cesarean rate remained far from ideal in Taiwan. From the result of this study, we can see the importance of knowledge assessment concerning complications of labor and vaginal delivery. The education and the resource information should be provided via multiple pathways.

第一章 緒論................. .........1
第一節 研究動機及重要性.............. 1
第二節 研究目的..................... 4
第二章 文獻探討..................... 5
第一節 剖腹生產的定義與型式 .........5
第二節 剖腹產率的非臨床因子 .........6
第三節 健康信念模式................13
第三章 研究設計與方法................21
第一節 研究架構...................21
第二節 研究假設...................22
第三節 研究變項與操作型定義 ........23
第四節 研究資料...................26
第五節 統計方法...................27
第四章 研究結果.....................28
第一節 單變項分析 .................28
第二節 雙變項分析 .................45
第三節 邏吉斯迴歸分析結果..........60
第五章 討論.........................62
第一節 研究結果討論...............62
第二節 研究限制...................66
第六章 結論與建議....................67
第一節 結論.........................67
第二節 建議........................69
參考文獻............................70
中文部份............................70
英文部份............................72
附錄一、研究調查問卷.................75

中文部份
王彩婺 (2003)。男嬰偏好對台灣地區已婚有偶婦女生育動機與生育行為的影響。臺北醫學大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
台北市衛生局2003/11/17新聞稿。www.health.gov.tw
馬芝琳 (2003)。剖腹產決策過程中女性身體自主權初探。臺北醫學大學醫學研究所碩士論文。
鐘麗娟 (2003)。應用健康信念糢式探討影響前列線癌高危險群男性執行前列線癌篩檢行為之因素。慈濟護理雜誌，2 (3)，38-48。
行政院衛生署(2001)，表62臺灣地區醫院平均每日醫療服務量及剖腹產率。www.doh.gov.tw。
徐佩華 (2001)。婦女預防保健之評估-─以子宮頸癌病患抹片檢查利用率為例─。中山大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
陳皙堯、謝豐舟等 (1993)。當代周產期醫學。台北：合記圖書出版社。
黃俊元、楊銘欽、陳維昭﹝1997﹞。產婦特性與採用剖腹產：以台大醫院為例。中華衛誌，16﹝4﹞，309-318。
劉瓊宇、李從業等(1987)。產科護理學（下冊）。台北：華杏出版股份有限公司。
英文部份
Behague, D. P., Victora, C. G., & Barros, F. C. (2002). Consumer
demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: population based birth
cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. British Midical Journal, 324, 942-945.
Bailit, J. L., Dooley, S. L. & Peaceman, A. N. (1999). Risk Adjustment for Interhospital Comparison of Primary Cesarean Rates. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 93(6), 1025-1030.
Brown III, H. S., (1996). Physician demand for leisure: Implications for cesarean section rates. Journal of Health Economics, 15, 233-242.
Chong, E. S. Y., Mongelli, M. (2003). Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 80, 189-194.
Dubay, L. Kaestner, R., & Waidmann, T. (1999). The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates. Journal of Health Economics, 18, 491-522.
Editorial (1997). What is the right number of cesarean section. Lancet, 349, 815.
Gareen, I. F., Morgenstern, H., Greenland, S., Gifford, D. S., et. al. (2003). Explaining the association of maternal age with Cesarean delivery for nulliparous and parous woman. Journal of Clinical epidemiology, 56, 1100-1110.
Gomes, U. A., Silva, A. A. M., Bettiol, H., et. al. (1999). Risk factors for the increasing caesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978-1979 and 1994. International Journal of Epidemiology, 28(4), 687-694.
Lialios, G., Kaponis, A. & Adonakis, G. (1999). Maternal age as an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery. International Journal of Gynecology & obstetrics, 67, 187-188.
Lo, J. C. (2003). Patient’s attitudes vs. physicians’ determination: implications for cesarean sections. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 91-96.
Hall, M.H., Bewley, S. (1999). Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet, 354, 776.
Hopkins, K. (2000). Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean? Social Science & Medicine, 51, 725-740.
Gruber, J., Kim, J., Mayzlin, D. (1999). Physician fees and procedure intensity: the case of cesarean delivery. Journal of Health Economics,18, 473-490.
Hall, H., Bewley, S. (1999). Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet, 354, 776.
Marsden W. (2000). Choosing caesarean section. Lancet, 356,
1677-1680.
Mitler, L. K., Rizzo, J. A. , & Horwitz S. M. (2000). Physician gender and cesarean sections. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 1030-1035.
Murray, S. F. (2000). Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. British medical Journal, 321, 1501-1505.
Penna, L., Arulkumaran, S. (2003). Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 82, 399-409.
Potter, J. E., Berquo, E., Perpetuo, I. H. O., et. al. (2001). Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. British Medical Journal, 323, 1155-1158.
Onah, H. E. (2002). Formal education does not improve the acceptance of cesarean section among pregnant Nigerian women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 76, 321-323.
Salihu, H. M., Shumpert, M. N., Slay, M. et. al. (2003). Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102(5), 1006-1014.
Shearer, E. L.(1993). Cesarean section: Medical benefits and costs. Social Science & Medicine, 37,1223-1232.
Stotland, N. E., Stotland, N. L. (1996). When your patient demands a cesarean delivery. Primary Care Update Ob/Gyns, 3(2), 65-68.
Witter, F. R., Caulifield, L. E. & Stoltzfus, R. J. (1995). Influence of Maternal Anthropometric Status and Birth Weigh on the Risk of Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 85(6), 947-951.
World Health Organization (1985). Appropiate technology for birth. Lancet, (2), 436-437.