跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(3.233.242.204) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/09/26 22:25
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林少軍
研究生(外文):Shau-jiun Lin
論文名稱:以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型—一個資源與概念合作聯結工具
論文名稱(外文):A social creativity model based on contributing and linking - a collaborative resource and concept linking tool
指導教授:劉晨鐘劉晨鐘引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen-Chung Liu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:網路學習科技研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:教育科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:64
中文關鍵詞:概念分析知識建構合作學習
外文關鍵詞:collaborative learningconcept analysisknowledge construction
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:162
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:36
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究旨在針對:要如何在合作式網路探索的活動之中,幫助學習者發展出釐清開放式問題的架構。由於合作學習是一種需要人與人之間互動的活動,如何透過電腦的輔助,讓學習者在沒有辦法面對面討論的情況之下,也能持續的學習,持續的貢獻,將是本研究的重點。
本研究將開發一套合作式網路探索系統,希望能夠藉由網際網路的幫助,提供學習者一個不受時間限制與使用限制的開放空間,並且提供了貢獻資源、交換資源以及鏈結資源的功能。同時,將會記錄學習者解決問題,擴展概念的歷程。藉由分析這些歷程來瞭解,在學習者探索的過程當中,什麼對概念發展的影響最大。
本研究發現透過網際網路搜索得來的外部資源,對於討論開放式議題有很大的影響性。學習者對於外部資源的運用,隨著討論的進行,在扮演的角色上也會有所不同,通常可以分為廣度搜尋以及深度搜尋。此外,在電腦輔助之下,能夠成功的延長學習者學習的時間並且吸引學習者貢獻資源與意見。最後,學生在課中與課外的學習模式也不相同,課中的學習通常是為了討論出概念架構而著重在小組成員間的討論;課後的學習通常是發表個人的意見或是貢獻說明的文獻。
This research is focus on how to support learner solving open-ended problem in a cooperative network exploration activities. Collaborative learning is an human interactive activities, so we will focus on how to help people keep learning without giving an environment supported by a face to face but through computer.
We will develop a system for cooperative network exploration activities and make sure that learners can contributing, exchanging and linking their resources and concepts without any limit in this system. At the same time, system will record how learners solving their problem and expanding their concepts. By analysising this log data to understand what is the most influence in a learning process.
We find out that the external resources finding in Internet will have many influence on the discussion of open-ended problem. Learner will using external resource to help discussion in two ways : understanding the problem or supporting the position of the problem. Besides, computer supported collaborative learning environment can extend the participation time of learning and attract the contribution of resources and concepts. Finally, the learning model is different at in course and out course. Learner usually expend time on discussing the main structure of solution in the class and expend time on posting personal comment or contributing external resources to support position.
中文摘要 .................................................................................................................................... i
Abstract .................................................................................................................................... ii
誌 謝 ........................................................................................................................................ iii
目 錄 .................................................................................................................................. iv
表 目 錄 .................................................................................................................................. vi
圖 目 錄 ................................................................................................................................. vii
第1章 緒論 .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 研究背景 .................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究動機 .................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 研究目標 .................................................................................................................... 3
1.4 問題與對策 ................................................................................................................ 4
1.5 研究限制 .................................................................................................................... 5
1.6 論文架構 .................................................................................................................... 5
第2章 文獻探討 ...................................................................................................................... 6
2.1 合作學習理論 ............................................................................................................ 6
2.2 概念圖 ........................................................................................................................ 7
2.3 知識管理系統 ............................................................................................................ 8
第3章 系統設計 .................................................................................................................... 10
3.1 實驗教室環境 .......................................................................................................... 10
3.2 軟體功能與系統畫面 .............................................................................................. 12
系統畫面 ........................................................................................................................... 12
軟體基本功能使用 ........................................................................................................... 14
軟體功能對應 ................................................................................................................... 19
3.3 系統資源 .................................................................................................................. 20
第4章 研究方法 .................................................................................................................... 21
4.1 研究對象 .................................................................................................................. 21
4.2 研究設計 .................................................................................................................. 21
4.3 研究時程 .................................................................................................................. 22
4.4 研究工具 .................................................................................................................. 23
資料分析 ........................................................................................................................... 23
小組訪談 ........................................................................................................................... 31
第5章 實驗結果與討論 ........................................................................................................ 32
5.1 實驗目的 .................................................................................................................. 32
5.2 問題解決策略的討論 .............................................................................................. 32
5.3 節點分類的討論 ...................................................................................................... 34
5.4 點擊次數的討論 ...................................................................................................... 37
5.5 節點產生時間的討論 .............................................................................................. 38
5.6 特徵出現時間的討論 .............................................................................................. 40
5.7 狀態圖分析的討論 .................................................................................................. 43
第6章 結論與未來工作 ........................................................................................................ 51
6.1 結論 .......................................................................................................................... 51
6.2 未來工作 .................................................................................................................. 52
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................................. 53
附錄 實驗最後結果圖 ............................................................................................................ 56
Blaye, A. Confrontation socio-cognitive et résolution de problèmes. Doctorat En Psychologie.Centre De Recherche En Psychologie Cognitive, Université De Provence, 13261 Aix-en-Provence, France
Boy, G. (1996). Learning evolution and software agents emergence. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg,10-25.
Canas, A. J., Ford, K. M., Novak, J. D., Hayes, P., Reichherzer, T. R., & Suri, N. (2001). Online concept maps: Enhancing collaborative learning by using technology with concept maps. Science Teacher, 68(4), 49-51.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches Amsterdam; New York: Pergamon.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning. Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1-16.
Fischer, G. (2004). Social creativity: Bringing different points of view together. KBS Special Issues" C&C''99,
Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2002). Transcending the information given: Designing learning environments for informed participation. Computers in Education, 2002.Proceedings.International Conference on, Auckland, New Zealand, 378-381.
Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (1995). Collaboration through concept maps. Proceedings of CSCL95: Computer Supported Cooperative Learning, 53
Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (1995). Collaboration through concept maps. Proceedings of CSCL95: Computer Supported Cooperative Learning,
Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60, 627-623 1992..
Holley, C. D., & Dansereau, D. F. (1984). Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues Orlando, New York, Academic Press.
Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111.
Hsu, L., & Hsieh, S. I. (2005). Concept maps as an assessment tool in a nursing course. Journal of Professional Nursing : Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 21(3), 141-149.
Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002). Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 25-29.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1985). Cooperative learning Burgess Publishing Company.
Karacapilidis, N., & Papadias, D. (2001). Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Information Systems, 26(4), 259-277.
Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems. Center for Planning and Development Research, University of California at Berkeley,
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool star. Information Visualization, 5, 175-184.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn Cambridge University Press.
Okebukola, P. A., & Jegede, O. J. (1988). Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 72(4), 489-500.
Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: New perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 437-455.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569-600.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: Foundations. MIT Press.
Sizmur, S., & Osborne, J. (1997). Learning processes and collaborative concept mapping. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1117-1135.
Stahl, G. (2002). Introduction: Foundations for a CSCL community. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, , 1-2.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, UK, 409-426.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language MIT Press Cambridge, Mass.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊