臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

全球化的發展加速了產業環境的變化與激烈競爭，企業在面對日漸增加的競爭壓力下，必須發展出一個資源共用、協同合作的商業生態，以快速反應顧客的需求。
商業生態系統具備對複雜環境的動態適應性，靈活的與環境保持和諧互動將有助於企業發展敏捷性。敏捷是組織能夠明智地掌握先機、和對威脅快速地做出反應，並且可以獲取競爭優勢的一種動態能力。
在模組化管理的策略下，企業邊界將變得更具彈性化，能夠容納更多不同的外部資源，使其融合在模組架構中。企業組織也將具有更大的彈性，像吸鐵般持續吸引更多優秀資源投入生態系統中，並經過協同演化，持續強化商業生態系統的競爭力。
本研究以模組化理論發展出一套生態資源整合架構，提供企業面對資源整合時，能藉由模組化做法來增加組織彈性，同時融合生態系統的技術資源。持續而動態地塑造企業策略的靈活度，以最佳的敏捷性對環境的變化做出快速反應，來強化其競爭優勢。並希望透過分析此個案，提供企業做為未來資源整合時的參考依據。

With the rapid development of the Globalization has accelerated the change and competition of the industrial environment. Companies must to develop a business eco-system with resource sharing and collaborative to response the customer’s needs.
The business eco-system with dynamic adaptability to fit the complex environment, flexible interaction with the environment have contributed to the development of agility. Agility is a dynamic ability that is able to obtain the opportunity , quickly respond to threats, and can gain a competitive advantage.
The boundary of enterprise will become more flexible with modularity, have a capacity of external resources that can integration to the module architecture. Companies will attract more excellent resources to put in the eco-systems and enhanced the competitiveness.
This thesis is based on theory of the modularity to development a resources integration architecture, provides companies can through practice of modularity to increased elastic of organization. Sustainable and dynamic to construction the strategy flexible of enterprise, make it quickly respond the changes of environment and enhanced its competitive advantage. Expect this case study can provides a reference of resource integration for the enterprise.

摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 8
1.1 研究背景與動機 8
1.2 研究問題與目的 9
1.3 研究範疇與流程 10
1.4 研究架構 12
第二章 文獻探討 14
2.1 資源基礎 14
2.1.1 資源基礎理論之定義與內涵 14
2.1.2 資源基礎理論與競爭優勢 16
2.1.3 資源基礎理論之策略思考 19
2.2 協同合作 23
2.2.1 協同合作之定義 23
2.2.2 協同合作的分類 25
2.2.3 協同以強化競爭優勢 26
2.3 商業生態系統 31
2.3.1 商業生態系定義與發展階段 31
2.3.2 商業生態系統的角色 36
2.3.3 商業生態系統的整體價值 38
2.4 模組化 41
2.4.1 模組化概念與定義 41
2.4.2 模組化的優點 44
2.4.3 模組化的設計規則 46
第三章 研究設計 51
3.1 研究方法 51
3.2 資料蒐集與分析方法 52
3.3 研究架構 54
3.4 研究對象 56
3.5 產業概況 57
3.5.1 資訊服務業 57
3.5.2 系統整合服務業 60
第四章 個案研究與分析 62
4.1 個案公司概況 62
4.1.1 公司沿革 64
4.1.2 公司組織 65
4.2 個案簡介 65
4.3 個案分析 68
4.3.1 模組化生態資源管理 71
4.3.2 研究結果 82
第五章 結論 86
5.1 結論與研究貢獻 86
5.2 研究限制與未來研究方向 89
中文參考文獻 91
英文參考文獻 93

中文參考文獻
1.王中強(2004)，「延伸企業協同規劃與訂單管理之模擬分析」，義守大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文。
2.方世傑(1999)，「台灣中小企業之產業網路構形與企業國際化關係研究」，企業管理學報，第45期，9月份，pp.99~126
3.江如玉(2001)，「資訊系統整合業廠商合作關係之探討」，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
4.江明洲(2003)，「模組化理論與實務之研究－以資訊電子業 B 公司為例」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士學位論文。
5.朱海燕(2002)，「行動數據服務業創新協同合作模式之研究」，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程EMBA學位論文。
6.余建翰(2011)，「模組化資源整合流程之研究-以臺北國際花卉博覽會未來館為例」，國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士學位論文。
7.呂廣英(1985)，「簡介模組化設計與應用」，機械月刊，頁121-125。
8.李忠諭(2009)，「台灣線上音樂服務提供者之優勢資源與策略聯盟分析」， 國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
9.林晉寬(1995)，「從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
10.林瑋珍(2007)，「連鎖便利商店競爭優勢的維繫-以某便利商店為例」，國立中央大學資訊管理系研究所碩士論文。
11.吳思華(1994)，「策略九說-資源說」，世界經理文摘89期：74-87頁。
12.高樹榮(2002)，「模組化營運與競爭優勢-機電空調工程管理業之應用」，國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
13.邱瑞淙(2006)，「供應鏈協同之策略性夥伴關係研究－以國內汽車製造業為研究對象」，靜宜大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
14.周春芳(2003)，「流通業現代化與電子商務第三版」，五南圖書出版。
15.徐仁雄(2006)，「模組化設計之組裝介面幾何研究」，東海大學工業設計學系碩士學位論文。
16.郭國泰(2008)，「軟體商業生態系統中利基者經營模式之變遷：以資訊安全軟體公司為例」，國立政治大學博士論文。
17.陳俊良(2002)，「企業價值評估與創造策略之研究－以統一超商為例」，國立政治大學經營管理學程碩士論文。
18.陳曉屏(2002)，「企業電子化下協同作業發展之研究」，國立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程論文。
19.陳向明(2002)，「社會科學質的研究」，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
20.陳朝福(2002)，「組織轉型研究－新科學典範的創造性演化觀點」，國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
21.陳初真(2004)，「零售商自有品牌市場佔有率影響因素之研究 —三大便利商店POS 資料實證分析」，國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所碩士論文。
22.黃貝玲(2001)，「協同商務價值鏈管理，電子化企業經理人報告」，no. 20，4月，12~23頁。
23.張戌誼、張殿文、盧智芳(2002)，「三千億傳奇-郭台銘的鴻海帝國」，天下雜誌。
24.楊嘉麗(1998)，「我國資訊服務業市場現況及發展趨勢分析」，財團法人資訊工業策進會資訊市場情報中心。
25.詹文男、林素儀(2003)，「資訊服務業重要性分析、產業透析」，9207彙編本，23-34 頁。
26.蔡雄田(2011)，「A公司在螺絲產業的競爭優勢分析－資源基礎理論觀點」，國立高雄大學國際高階經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
27.歐芝岑(2001)，「模組產品創新策略類型之研究─台灣機械業的實證研究」，東海大學碩士論文。
28.賴志松(2010)，「以資源基礎理論探討臺灣補教事業資源與能力」，國立臺中教育大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
英文參考文獻
1.A. G. Tansley. (1935), “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms, Ecology”, Vol. 16, No. 3.,pp. 284-307.
2.Baldwin & Clark. (1997), “Managing in an age of modularity.” Harvard Business Review, 75(5): 84-93.
3.Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Managem ent, Vol. 17, No.1, pp. 99-120.
4.Barratt M.A., and Green, M. (2002), “ The cultural shift: the need for a collaborative culture , Conference Proceedings of Supply Chain Knowledge”, Granfield School of Management.
5.Bi, Z. M., & Zhang, W. J. (2001), “Modularity Technology in Manufacturing: Taxonomy and Issues, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology”, pp18, pp.381-390.
6.Browning, T. R. (2001), “Applying the De sign Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problem: A Review and New Directions”. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 292-306.
7.Burdick, D., Bond, B., Miklovic, D., Pond, K. and Eschinger, C. (1999), “C-Commerce：The New Arena for Business Applications, Research Note”, Gartner Group.
8.C.J. Anumba, O.O. Ugwu, L. Newnham, A. Thorpe. (2001), “A multi-agent system for distributed collaborative design", Logistics Information Management”, Vol. 14 Iss: 5/6, pp.355 – 367.
9.Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991), “Product Development Performance”. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10.Collis, D. J., & Rukstad, M. G. (1995), “Can you say what your strategy is? ” Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 82-90.
11.Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D., Lombard, F., Brennan, L., McNichols, T. and Nolan, R. (2003), “Managing Collaborative Relationships in a Period of Discontinuity, International Journal of Operations and Production Management”,pp23, pp10, pp1246-1259.
12.Coyle, Bardi and Langley. (2003), “The Management of Business Logistics”,7th edition,pp85-86,pp.452-454,pp.588-590.
13.Cusumano, Michael A. & Annabelle Gawer. (2002), “The Elements of Platform Leadership”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol.43, No.3, pp.51-58.
14.Dahmus, J. B. Gonzales, Z. Javier, P., & Otto, K. N. (2001), “Modular Product Architecture. Center for Innovation in Product Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology”, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
15.Duncan, R. B. (1972), “Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313-327.
16.Dyer, J. (1997), “Managing the Global Supply Chain, Journal of Economic Literature”, Nashville, Vol. 35, pp.1387-1390.
17.Eggen, O. (2003), “Modular product deve lopment: A Review of Modularization Objectives as well as Techniques for Identifying Modular Product Architectures, Presented in a Unified Model. Department of Product Design”. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
18.Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000), “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 1105-1121.
19.Eliashberg, J.,Michie, D. A. (1984), “Multiple Business Goal Sets as Determinants of Marketing Channel Conflict: An Empirical Study”.Journal of Marketing Research,21(1),75-88.
20.Erixon, G. (1996), “Modular Function Deployment (MFD), Support for Good Product Structure Creation. Presented at 2nd WDK Workshop on Product Structuring”, June 3-4-96 in Delft, Holland.
21.Evans, David S. (2003), “The Antitrust Economics of Multi–Sided Platform Markets”, Yale Journal on Regulation, vol. 20, pp. 325–381.
22.Frazier, G. L. (1983), “Interorganizational Exchange Behavior in Marketing Channels: A Broadened Perspective”.Journal of Marketing,47(4),68-78.
23.Gossain, S. and Kandiah, G. (1998), “Reinventing value: The new business ecosystem”, Strategy & Leadership, 26, 5, pp.28-33.
24.Grant, R. M. (1991), “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation”. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
25.Gulati, R. (1995), “Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: a Longitudinal analysis”.Administrative Science Quarterly,40,619-652.
26.Heide, J.B., and John, G. (1990), “Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants ofjoint action in buyer-supplier relationship.”, Journal of Marketing Research, 27,pp24–36.
27.Hennart, J. F. (1988), “A Transaction Cost Theory of Equity Joint Ventures”. Strategic Management Journal,9(4),361-374.
28.Iansiti, M. and R. Levien. (2004), “Strategy as ecology”, Harvard Business Review (March),pp.68-78.
29.James F. Moore. (1993), “Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition”, Harvard Business Review.
30.Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988), “A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance”.
31.Kough, B.,Singh, H. (1988), “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode”.Journal of International Business Studies,19(3),411-432.
32.Lambert, D.M., Emmelhainz, M.A. and Gardner, J.T. (1996), “Developing and implementing supply chain partnerships”. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 7(2), 1-19.
33.Lockett, A., & Thompson, S. (2004), “Edith penrose's contributions to the resource-based view: an alternative perspective”. Journal of Management Studies, 193-203.
34.Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995), “Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis”. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 421-505.
35.Mentzer, J. T., S. Min and Z. G. Zacharia. (2000), “Nature of Interim Partnering in Supply Chain Managemen”, Journal of Retailing 76, pp.549-568.
36.Mills, L. S., M. E. Soulé, & D. F. Doak. (1993), “The keystone species concept in ecology and conservation”. BioScience 43: 219-224.
37.Moonen, H. M., van Hillegersberg, J., & Zwegers. (2003), “A Framework for Collaborative Applications”,Proceedings of the 10th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications Madeira Portugal, 481-488, July ,26-30.
38.Moore, J.F. (1996), “The Death of Competition: Leadership & Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems”, New York: Harper Business.
39.O' Grady, P. (1999), “The Age of Modularity: Using the New World of Modular Products to Revolutionize Your Corporation”, Adams and Steele Publishers, Iowa City.
40.Penrose, E. T. (1995), “The Theory of the Growth of the Firm”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.Perrow, C. (1967), “A Framework for Comparative Organizational Analysis”, American Sociological Review, 16, 444-459.
42.Porter, M. E. (1990), “The Competitive Advantages of Nations”, The Free Press.
43.Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
44.Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990), “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage”. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88-102.
45.Sanchez, R. (1996), “Strategic Product Creation: Managing New Interactions of technology, Markets, and Organizations”, European Management Journal, April, p.121~139.
46.Sanchez, R. (1999), “Modularity Architecture in the Marketing Process”, Journal of Marketing, special issue, p.92~111.
47.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18:7, pp. 509-533.
48.Thompson, J. D. (1967), “Organizations in Action”. McGraw-Hill, New York.
49.Ulrich, K., & Tung. K. (1991), “Fundamentals of Product Modularity. Proceedings of the 1991 ASME Design Technical Conference – Conference on Design/Manufacture Integration”, September, Miami, Florida, 73-79.
50.Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource-based view of the firm”. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
51.Williamson, Oliver E. (1975), “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization”. New York: Free Press.
52.Zaheer, A., and Venkatraman, N. (1995), “Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: an empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange”. Strategic Management Journal, 16,373-392.
53.Zollo, M. and Winter, S. (2002), “Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, pp. 339-351.
54.Zott, C. (2003), “Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Industry Differential Firm Performance: Insights from a Simulation Study”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 97-125.