跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.110) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/05/06 08:25
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:王偉文
研究生(外文):Benedictus Rahardjo
論文名稱:運用FMECA方法提升印尼油品公司安全性
論文名稱(外文):FMECA Approach to Improve Safety in an Indonesian Cooking Oil Company
指導教授:江行全江行全引用關係
指導教授(外文):Bernard C. Jiang
口試委員:江行全
口試委員(外文):Bernard C. Jiang
口試日期:2015-07-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:工業管理系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:英文
論文頁數:57
中文關鍵詞:FailureModeEffectsandCriticalityAnalysis(FMECA)CriticalityPriorityNumber(CPN)severityandoccurrenceclassificationcoconutoilandpalmoil
外文關鍵詞:Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FCriticality Priority Number (CPN)severity and occurrence classificationcoconut oil and palm oil
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:224
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:31
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
This study attempts to apply Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) to improve the safety of production system, especially on the production process of an oil company in Indonesia. Since food processing is a worldwide issue and the self management of a food company is more important than relying on government regulations, so the purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the criticality of potential failure mode on the production process, then take corrective actions to minimize the probability of making the same failure mode and re-analyze its criticality. This corrective actions are compared with the before improvement condition by testing the significance of the difference between before and after improvement using two sample t-test. Final result that had been measured is Criticality Priority Number (CPN), which refers to severity category and probability of making the same failure mode. Recommended actions that proposed on the part of FMECA give less CPN significantly compare with before improvement, with increment by 48.33% and 38.46%, respectively on coconut oil and palm oil case studies.
This study attempts to apply Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) to improve the safety of production system, especially on the production process of an oil company in Indonesia. Since food processing is a worldwide issue and the self management of a food company is more important than relying on government regulations, so the purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the criticality of potential failure mode on the production process, then take corrective actions to minimize the probability of making the same failure mode and re-analyze its criticality. This corrective actions are compared with the before improvement condition by testing the significance of the difference between before and after improvement using two sample t-test. Final result that had been measured is Criticality Priority Number (CPN), which refers to severity category and probability of making the same failure mode. Recommended actions that proposed on the part of FMECA give less CPN significantly compare with before improvement, with increment by 48.33% and 38.46%, respectively on coconut oil and palm oil case studies.
Abstract I
Acknowledgment II
Table of Contents III
List of Figures V
List of Tables VI
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research background 1
1.2 Research objectives 2
1.3 Research scopes and constraints 3
1.4 Thesis organization 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1 Traceability 7
2.2 Failure mode and effects analysis 8
2.3 Failure mode effects and criticality analysis 10
Chapter 3 Research Methodology 17
Chapter 4 Case Study 23
4.1 Production process of coconut and palm oil 23
4.2 Critical process 27
4.2.1 Coconut oil 27
4.2.2 Palm oil 29
4.3 Criticality analysis 30
4.4 Recommended actions and criticality analysis 38
4.5 Comparison between before and after improvement 41
4.5.1 Coconut oil 41
4.5.2 Palm oil 44
4.6 Failure mode effects and criticality analysis 46
4.7 Criticality matrix 51
Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Research 53
5.1 Conclusions 53
5.2 Future research 54
References 55
Alion System Reliability Center. (1983). US Military Standard, MIL-STD-1629A: Procedures for performing a failure mode, effect and criticality analysis. USA: Department of Defense.
Anon. (1996). Qualitatssicherung durch herkunftsnachweis. International Z. Lebensm, 47, 55-58.
Bertolini, M., Bevilacqua, M., & Massini, R. (2006). FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control, 17(2), 137-145.
Bowles, J. B. (2004). An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis. Journal of Institute of Environmental Sciences & Technology, 47(1), 51-56.
Bowles, J. B. & Pelaez, C. E. (1995a). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50(2), 203-213.
Braglia, M. (2000). MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(9), 1017-1033.
Chandler, G., Denson, W., Rossi M., & Wanner, R. (1991). Failure mode/mechanism distributions. Rome, NY: Reliability Analysis Center.
Chung, L. (2013, November 05). Concerns Over Food Safety Build In Taiwan After Scandals. Retrieved from South China Morning Post website: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1348274/
Clay, J. W. (2004). World agriculture and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
European Standard. (1995). [EN ISO 8402:1995, Point 3.16], European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
Ford. (1988). Potential failure mode and effects analysis in design (Design FMECA) and for manufacturing and assembly process (Process FMECA) instruction manual. Detroit, MI: Internal Report.
Lim, T. K. (2010). “Palm+stearin” Medicinal and non-medicinal edible plants. Dordrecht: Springer.
Malik, A., Masood, F., & Ahmad, S. (2014). Food processing: Strategies for quality assessment, a broad perspective. New York: Springer.
Manandhar, N. P. (2002). Plants and people of Nepal. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
Moe, T. (1998). Perspectives on traceability in food manufacture. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 9(5), 211-214.
Muralidharan, K. (2015). Six sigma for organizational excellence: A statistical approach. New Delhi, India: Springer (pp. 241).
Pirelli. (1988). FMEA-FMECA: Analisi delle modalita degli effetti e delle criticita dei guasti. Milan: Internal Report.
Ramesh, B., Dwiggins, D., De Vries, G., & Edwards, M. (1995). Towards requirements traceability models. Proceedings of International Symposium and Workshop on Systems Engineering of Computer Based Systems, IEEE, 229-232.
The China Post News Staff. (2013, October 25). Food Scares Jeopardize Health and Taiwan’s Image. Retrieved from The China Post website: http://www.chinapost.com.tw/editorial/taiwan-issues/2013/10/25/391961/
Yage, X. (2013, October 26). New Food Scandals Lead Consumers To Wonder About “What They Can Eat”. Retrieved from Asia News website: http://www.asianews.it/news-en/
Zanussi. (1989). FMEA: Guida all’analisi del guasto. Italy: Internal Report.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top