臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

永續環境的觀念逐漸受到重視，如何延長住宅生命週期並提升其使用價值成為未來永續發展的重要議題。目前台灣住宅市場趨近於飽和，對於住宅新建量需求逐漸降低，加上消費者對於住宅要求和以往有所不同，造成目前住宅整建需求的增加。然而整建知識涉及專業判斷，常導致消費者與廠商因資訊不對稱而產生許多問題。本研究藉由提出永續住宅整建遊戲，模擬廠商間之競爭，協助住戶在有限預算下判斷或評選出對自身最有利的整建方案。研究結果顯示，透過遊戲的進行有助於改善目前資訊不對稱的現象；消費者也能獲得最大的住宅品質改善；同時採用永續整建之效益也會在遊戲中討論與驗證。

The concept of sustainable environment becomes more and more valued in the world. How to extend the life cycle of the dwelling and promote its value becomes the important issue of the future development of sustainable environment. The dwelling market is close to be carrying capacity, the needs of new dwelling becomes lower and lower gradually. The demands of customers are different from before. It causes the increase of the demands of refurbishment. However the knowledge about refurbishment involves the professional estimation, it often causes the problems between customers and manufacturers because of the “information asymmetry”. This research simulates the competition between manufacturers by address the sustainable housing refurbishment game to assist residents choose the best scheme in a budget with limit. The result of this research shows that through the process of this game, it is helpful to improve the phenomenon of information asymmetry; the customers also can gain the most improvement of living quality; the benefit of sustainable refurbishment will be discussed and tested through the game.

中文摘要 Ⅰ
英文摘要 Ⅱ
謝誌 Ⅲ
目錄 Ⅳ
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章　序論 1
第二章　相關文獻回顧與探討 3
2-1　策略遊戲 3
2-1-1　策略遊戲歷史發展 3
2-1-2　策略遊戲的定義 3
2-1-3　策略遊戲的內容 3
2-1-4　策略遊戲的應用 4
2-2　診斷工具回顧 7
2-2-1　EPIQR　室內環境品質更新能源績效 7
2-2-2　TOBUS　辦公建築更新診斷工具 10
2-3　住宅評估指標回顧 12
第三章　住宅整建遊戲 17
3-1　遊戲概述 17
3-1-1　遊戲目標 17
3-1-2　遊戲背景與介紹 17
3-1-3　遊戲流程 19
3-2　遊戲規則與限制 21
3-2-1　遊戲條件與規則 21
3-2-2　得分計算方法與規則 22
第四章　遊戲實驗 25
4-1　遊戲假說 25
4-2　實驗設計 25
4-3　遊戲結果分析 26
第五章　遊戲結果探討 28
5-1　遊戲結果探討 28
5-2　遊戲教育成果 29
第六章　結論與建議 30
參考文獻 31
附錄一　遊戲進行照片 34
附錄二　廠商評選得分表 35
附錄三　遊戲廠商策略庫 41

1.Aikivuori,A.(1996).“Periods and demand for private sector housing refurbishment”, Construction Management and Economics, 14, pp.3-12.
2.Alsugair, A. M. (1999). “Framework for evaluating bids of construction contractors”. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(2), pp.72-78.
3.Balaras, C.A., Droutsa, K., Argiriou, A.A., & Asimakopoulos, D.N.(2000).“EPIQR surveys of apartment buildings in Europe”. Energy and Buildings,31, pp.111-128.
4.Bluyssen, P. M.(2000).“EPIQR and IEQ: indoor environment quality in European apartment buildings”. Energy and Buildings, 31, pp.103-110.
5.Caccavelli, D. Genre, J-L.“Diagnosis of the degradation state of building and cost evaluation of induced refurbishment works”. Energy and Buildings, 31, pp.159-165.
6.Carson, J.R.(1969).“Business games: A technique for teaching decision making”. In : R.G. Graham & C.F. Gray (Eds.), Business games handbook. American Management Association Inc.
7.Chua, D. K. H., and Li, D. (2000). “Key factors in bid reasoning model”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(5), pp.349-357.
8.Daoud, O.E.K. (1997). “The architect/engineer’s role in rehabilitation work”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(1), pp.1-5.
9.Egbu, C.O. (1997). “Refurbishment management: challenges and opportunities”. Building Research and Information, 25, pp.338-347.
10.European Commission (EC) (2000). “Final report of the EMAT Task Group: A proposed methodology that permits award to the economically most advantageous tender.” <http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/construction/alo/emat/ematfin.htm>
11.Flourentzou, F., Genre, J.L.& Roulet, C.-A.(2002).“TOBUS software — an interactive decision aid tool for building retrofit studies”, Energy and Buildings,34, pp.193-202.
12.Hays, R.T. & Singer, M.J.(1989).“Simulation fidelity in training system design: bridging the gap between reality and training”. New York: Springer Verlag.
13.Holm, M.G. (2000).” Service management in housing refurbishment: a theoretical approach”. Construction Management and Economics, 18, pp.525-533.
14.Koehn, E. and Tower, S.E. (1982). “Current aspects of construction rehabilitation”. Journal of the Construction Division ASME, 108(CO2), pp.330-340.
15.Leemkuil, H., Jong, T.D., Ootoes, S.(2000).“Review of educational use of games and simulations”,Knowledge management, Interactive Training System.
16.Jaggs, M. & Palmer, J.(2000).“Energy performance indoor environmental quality retrofit－a European diagnosis and decision making method for building refurbishment”. Energy and Buildings, 31, pp.97-101.
17.Okoroh, M.I. and Torrance V.B. (1999).” A model for subcontractor selection in refurbishment projects”.Construction Management and Economics, 17, pp.315-327.
18.Perng, Y.H., Juan, Y.K.,& Chien, S.F.(2006).“Exploring the Bidding Situation for Economically Most Advantageous Tender Projects Using a Bidding Game”.Construction Engineering and Management,132, pp.1037-1042.
19.Quah, L.K. (1992). “Comparative variability in tender bids for refurbishment and new build work”. Construction Management and Economics, 10(3), pp.263-269.
20.張柏超（2003）。集合住宅生命週期前期之修繕模式－以建設公司之售後修繕服務為例。國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文。
21.江哲銘（2004）。永續住宅導論。台北市：建築情報。
22.劉承霖（2004）。整建產業經濟及廠商經營管理之研究。國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文。
23.李正儀（2004）。綠建築教學遊戲。國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文。
24.吳穹霑（2005）。住宅永續整建之發展概況與建議。國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文。