臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以車內提示音為例，針對方向燈、車門未關警示、喇叭、倒車雷達、R檔音總共5種功能35個聲音樣本進行實驗，探討使用者對聲音信號的主觀評價，並透過訪談，提供在設計聲音信號時，那些特性會影響使用者評估聲音的喜好度與適合度，以期望能夠提供滿足大眾所偏好的聲音。
聲音收集以實地錄音的方式進行錄製，並在聲音的後製處理上，篩選掉同質性高的聲音，一方面將聲音樣本的差異性增加，另一方面也減少實驗的長度避免受測者產生不耐。在形容詞篩選的部分，以聲音的五個不同的特性：音調、音量、質感、音色、節奏，經由相關文獻的收集與整理，發展出符合這五個特性的總共九組的形容詞進行語意差異法的評價，在問卷的設計上，除了九組形容詞的評估，同時也會詢問受測者對聲音與功能搭配的適合度以及喜好程度。
實驗包含兩個部分，成對比較法(paired comparison method)以及語意差異法(semantic differential method)，探討聲音在各項功能主觀評價，包含受測者對聲音的偏好程度以及在各組語意形容詞中對聲音感受程度的評估。
此研究成果提供了一個聲音主觀評量的方法，提供設計者在設計聲音時，要如何評估並增進聲音信號對於使用者好感度的參考依據。

The research conducted subjective evaluation toward sound signals by taking interior car sounds including 5 functions and total 35 sound samples (indicator, door warning, horn, parking sensor, and automatic shift car gear). And through interview, researchers can infer the characteristics that affect the user preference and suitability.
When collecting the sound samples, research recorded those in reality and filtered sounds with high consistency. It can enhance the discrepancies of the sample, and decrease the required length of the whole experiment process. On the adjective phase, by literature review and the five features of the sounds including tone, loudness, quality, timbre, and tempo, research collect and integrate 9 pair of adjectives to conduct semantic differential method and construct the questionnaire. Besides the adjectives questionnaire, it also incorporates questions concerning the user preference and suitability between sounds and functions.
In the research, it has two experiments: (1) paired comparison method and (2) semantic differential method. It intends to find out the subjective evaluation, which includes the participants preference and the perception of the sounds based on the selected adjectives.
The result contributes a method of subjective evaluations toward sounds, enable sound signals designers to take accordance of user preference, evaluate and enhance the signals.

圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究內容與流程 2
第二章 文獻探討 3
第一節 聲音 3
第二節 聽覺與聲音信號 7
第三節 汽車產業 9
第四節 感性工學 10
第三章 研究方法 13
第一節 實驗規劃 13
第二節 實驗環境 14
第三節 聲音收集與處理 15
第四節 受測者篩選 22
第五節 實驗ㄧ：成對比較法 23
第六節 實驗二：語意差異法 24
第四章 研究結果與分析 26
第一節 成對比較測試 26
第二節 語意差異法測試 31
第五章 結論與建議 45
第一節 結果整理 45
第二節 後續研究建議 46
參考文獻 47
附錄 49

Genuit, K. (1996) Objective Evaluation of Acoustic-Quality Based on a Relative Approach, lnter-Noise’96, 30.07-02.08, Liverpool, England.
Genuit, K. (2004). The sound quality of vehicle interior noise: a challengefor the NVH-engineers. International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration ,1(1/2), 158–168
G. Cerrato, Automotive sound quality — Accessories, BSR and brakes, Sound Vib. 43 (2009) 10–15.
細谷多聞（1995）.Auditory Sounds and Product User Interface,日本デザイソ學会誌,Vol.3,No.2,pp.53-58.
Sanders, M. S., &; McCormick, E. J. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design . McGRAW-HILL book company, 190-195
Campbell, J. L., Richman, J. B., Carney, C., &; Lee, J. D. (2004). In-Vehicle Display Icons And Other Information Elements. Volume I: Guidelines (No. FHWA-RD-03-065,).
Patterson, R. D. (1989). Guidelines for the design of auditory warning sounds. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 11, 17–24.
Bliss, J. P., &; Acton, S. A. (2003). Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. Applied ergonomics, 34(6), 499-509.
Roeber, U., Widmann, A., &; Schroger, E. (2003). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(2), 347-357.
SeungHee, Harada A. and Pieter J. S. (2002), Pleasure with products : Design based on Kansei.
Nagamachi, M. (1995). Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of industrial ergonomics, 15(1), 3-11.
Tzeng, Oliver, Dan Landis, and Diana Y. Tzeng. "Charles E. Osgood's continuing contributions to intercultural communication and far beyond!." International Journal of Intercultural Relations 36.6 (2012): 832-842.
Otto, N., Amman, S., Eaton, C., &; Lake, S. (2000). Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds. SAE transactions, 108(6; PART 2), 3015-3034.
Kuwano, S., Fastl, H., Namba, S., Nakamura, S., &; Uchida, H. (2002). Subjective evaluation of car door sound. Proc. Sound-Quality Sym., Dearborn MI.
Yost, W. A., Popper, A. N., &; Fay, R. R. (2008). Auditory perception of sound sources (Vol. 29). New York:: Springer.
Jindo, T., &; Hirasago, K. (1997). Application studies to car interior of Kansei engineering. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 19(2), 105-114.
Parizet, E., Guyader, E., &; Nosulenko, V. (2008). Analysis of car door closing sound quality. Applied Acoustics, 69(1), 12-22.
Pratt, R. L., &; Doak, P. E. (1976). A subjective rating scale for timbre. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 45(3), 317-328.
Parizet, E. (2002). Paired comparison listening tests and circular error rates. acta acustica united with acustica, 88(4), 594-598.
Yamauchi, K., Choi, J. D., Maiguma, R., Takada, M., &; Iwamiya, S. I. (2004). A basic study on universal design of auditory signals in automobiles. Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science, 23(6), 295-298.
Mao, D., Yu, W., Gao, Y., &; Wang, Z. (2004). Error rating of paired comparison listening test for sound quality assessment. In Proceeding of ICA 2004.
Martellotta, F. (2008). Subjective study of preferred listening conditions in Italian Catholic churches. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 317(1), 378-399.
李月恩，王震亞，徐楠(2009) 感性工程學Kansei Engineering，海洋出版社，北京
周君瑞, &; 陳國祥. (2009). 感性化產品造形之塑造-以造形特徵為基礎. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 8(2).
李文宏 (2003)，世代別汽車購買行為，碩士論文，管理科學所，國立交通大學。
林俊男 (2000)，人工聲音信號意象感知評價之研究，國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文
廖宜賢 (2008)，手機提示音之功能適合度及感性知覺之研究，國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文
莊雅量. (2001). 應用音樂性聲音訊號傳達訊息屬性的可能性研究-以行動電話之 “聽聲辨人” 為例
洪偲芸. (2010). 汽車車門關閉音之感性意象研究. 成功大學工業設計學系學位論文