跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.123) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/23 05:23
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:Puspa Endah Widowaty
研究生(外文):Puspa Endah Widowaty
論文名稱:Optimal Integrated Locations of Wind Power Generations by Considering Ancillary Market
論文名稱(外文):Optimal Integrated Locations of Wind Power Generations by Considering Ancillary Market
指導教授:郭明哲郭明哲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ming-Tse Kuo
口試委員:郭明哲
口試委員(外文):Ming-Tse Kuo
口試日期:2016-01-08
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣科技大學
系所名稱:電機工程系
學門:工程學門
學類:電資工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2016
畢業學年度:104
語文別:英文
論文頁數:86
中文關鍵詞:reactivepowerprocurementlocationalmarginalpricing(LMP)totalpaymentfunction(TPF)societaladvantagefunction(SAF)costofopportunitylost(LOC)
外文關鍵詞:reactive power procurementlocational marginal pricing (LMP)total payment function (TPF)societal advantage function (SAF)cost of opportunity lost (LOC)
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:129
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
Wind power is the one of most promising renewable energy sources today, but the rapid development of wind power installations should be balanced with the capability of the power system. In a deregulated power system, the basic responsibility of the Independent System Operator (ISO) is to maintain system reliability and security by providing for ancillary service such as reactive power support. Reactive power management is required to support the real power shipment and supply reactive loads reliably and securely. In this thesis, DFIG turbine is integrated to the IEEE 14-bus test system to analyze the best integrated location to reach optimum ancillary service. There are three methods of reactive power procurements are applied in integrated system to illustrate the best procurement model; expected formula cost (EFC) with locational marginal pricing (LMP) based, modified total payment function (TPF) and marginal benefits cost. The results show that wind integration on bus number 3 has less cost generation and high profit system. Cost generation of wind integration on bus 3 can be reduced up to 21.8%. Profit system on similar location can be increased up to 130%. The minimum ISO support is achieved by marginal benefits cost method. The closure of this thesis is societal advantage function (SAF) optimization of final generator reactive power cost payment after considering bids from each service provider. Maximum payment of reactive power is achieved by wind integration on bus number 3. Generator receive reactive power payment per hour of 4,992.2 $ for 110% load factor and 5,908.9 $ for 120% load factor. The SAF optimization gives the results that would form a basis of contractual agreement for provisional calculation of reactive power procurement.
Wind power is the one of most promising renewable energy sources today, but the rapid development of wind power installations should be balanced with the capability of the power system. In a deregulated power system, the basic responsibility of the Independent System Operator (ISO) is to maintain system reliability and security by providing for ancillary service such as reactive power support. Reactive power management is required to support the real power shipment and supply reactive loads reliably and securely. In this thesis, DFIG turbine is integrated to the IEEE 14-bus test system to analyze the best integrated location to reach optimum ancillary service. There are three methods of reactive power procurements are applied in integrated system to illustrate the best procurement model; expected formula cost (EFC) with locational marginal pricing (LMP) based, modified total payment function (TPF) and marginal benefits cost. The results show that wind integration on bus number 3 has less cost generation and high profit system. Cost generation of wind integration on bus 3 can be reduced up to 21.8%. Profit system on similar location can be increased up to 130%. The minimum ISO support is achieved by marginal benefits cost method. The closure of this thesis is societal advantage function (SAF) optimization of final generator reactive power cost payment after considering bids from each service provider. Maximum payment of reactive power is achieved by wind integration on bus number 3. Generator receive reactive power payment per hour of 4,992.2 $ for 110% load factor and 5,908.9 $ for 120% load factor. The SAF optimization gives the results that would form a basis of contractual agreement for provisional calculation of reactive power procurement.
LIST OF FIGURES VIII
LIST OF TABLES IX
CHAPTER ONE 1
INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objective 2
1.3 Thesis structure 2
CHAPTER TWO 4
LITERATURE REVIEW 4
2.1 Power market and Ancillary Service 4
2.2 Location Marginal Price Definition and Calculation 8
2.2.1 Definition 8
2.2.2 Characteristic 9
2.2.3 Calculation 11
2.3 Wind Power Generation and Integration 13
2.3.1 Wind Turbines 13
2.3.2 Wind Turbine Integration 16
2.4 Reactive Power Market 17
2.4.1 Reactive Power Market Policies in International Experiences 17
2.4.2 Reactive Power Payment Mechanism in Power Market 23
2.4.3 Pricing Methods for Reactive Power 24
CHAPTER THREE 26
METHODS, SIMULATION & OPTIMIZATION 26
3.1 Optimal Power Flow in PowerWorld 26
3.2 Locational Marginal Pricing 29
3.2.1 Location Marginal Pricing Formula 29
3.2.2 Application in Power Market 29
3.3 Modeling Method 32
3.3.1 Test Model 32
3.3.2 Research Process Flow Diagram 33
3.4 The Pricing Structure of Reactive Power Support by ISO 38
3.4.1 Expected Formula Cost (EFC) based on LMP 38
3.4.2 Total Payment Function (TPF) based on modified Reactive Power Market Framework 40
3.4.3 Marginal Benefits Function by Considering Constraints 42
3.4.4 Societal Advantage Function (SAF) 46
CHAPTER FOUR 50
RESULT & DISCUSSION 50
4.1 Power Flow Analysis for Integrating Wind Turbine 50
4.1.1 LMP Analysis 50
4.1.2 Hourly Cost Analysis 51
4.1.3 Profit Analysis All Generators 51
4.1.4 Profit Analysis of Wind Turbine 52
4.2 Calculation Total Reactive Payment by ISO of Wind Turbine 53
4.2.1 Expected Formula Cost (EFC) Based on LMP 53
4.2.2 Total Payment Function (TPF) Based on Modified Reactive Market Framework 55
4.2.3 Marginal Benefits Function by Considering Constraints 58
4.3 Comparison of Three Calculation Methods for Minimum Reactive Payment of Wind Generation 64
4.4 Reactive Power Optimization by Societal Advantage Function (SAF) 67
4.5 Result 68
CHAPTER FIVE 71
CONCLUSION & FUTURE WORKS 71
5.1 Conclusion 71
5.2 Future Works 72
REFERENCES 73
APPENDIX A: PARAMETERS TEST SYSTEM 75
APPENDIX B: PARAMETERS OF PROPOSED METHODS 85
[1]T. R. Ayodele, A. Jimoh, J. L. Munda, and A. J. Tehile, "Challenges of grid integration of wind power on power system grid integrity: a review," International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), vol. 2, pp. 618-626, 2012.
[2]H. S. Saini, H. S. Sandhu, and F. AIET, "IMPACT OF WIND POWER ON POWER SYSTEM STABILITY."
[3]J. Zhong, On some aspects of design of electric power ancillary service markets: Chalmers University of Technology, 2003.
[4]J. Kueck, B. Kirby, T. Rizy, F. Li, and N. Fall, "Reactive power from distributed energy," The Electricity Journal, vol. 19, pp. 27-38, 2006.
[5]T. P. Nam, L. H. Lam, D. T. Viet, and M.-T. Kuo, "Analysis profit of generation company in power market by bidding strategy," in Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG), 2014 International Conference on, 2014, pp. 1-4.
[6]C. Richter and G. B. Sheblé, "Genetic algorithm evolution of utility bidding strategies for the competitive marketplace," IEEE Power Engineering Review, vol. 17, pp. 39-39, 1997.
[7]C.-A. Li, A. J. Svoboda, X. Guan, and H. Singh, "Revenue adequate bidding strategies in competitive electricity markets," Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 14, pp. 492-497, 1999.
[8]H. Song, C.-C. Liu, J. Lawarrée, and R. W. Dahlgren, "Optimal electricity supply bidding by Markov decision process," Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 15, pp. 618-624, 2000.
[9]V. P. Gountis and A. G. Bakirtzis, "Bidding strategies for electricity producers in a competitive electricity marketplace," Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 19, pp. 356-365, 2004.
[10]L. H. Lam, T. P. Nam, and M.-T. Kuo, "Optimal location of power plant in power market," in Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG), 2014 International Conference on, 2014, pp. 1-4.
[11]W. W. Hogan, "Competitive electricity market design: A wholesale primer," December, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 1998.
[12]S. Stoft, "Power System Economics, New York: IEEE," ed: Wiley-Interscience, 2002.
[13]H. Singh and A. Papalexopoulos, "Competitive procurement of ancillary services by an independent system operator," Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 14, pp. 498-504, 1999.
[14]N. Navid and G. Rosenwald, "Market solutions for managing ramp flexibility with high penetration of renewable resource," Sustainable Energy, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 3, pp. 784-790, 2012.
[15]P. K. K.Kamal dass, M.Prabavathi, "Locational Marginal Pricing In Restructured Power Market," International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, p. 6, 2014.
[16]T. Wu, Z. Alaywan, and A. D. Papalexopoulos, "Locational marginal price calculations using the distributed-slack power-flow formulation," Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 20, pp. 1188-1190, 2005.
[17]N. Amutha and B. K. Kumar, "Initialization of DFIG based wind generating system," in Power Systems Conference (NPSC), 2014 Eighteenth National, 2014, pp. 1-5.
[18]M. R. B. Contributing Members: E.H. Camm, O. Bolado, M. Bollen, M. Bradt, C. Brooks, W. Dilling, M. Edds, W. J. Hejdak, D. Houseman, S. Klein, F. Li, J. Li, P. Maibach, T. Nicolai, J. Patiño, S. V. Pasupulati, N. Samaan, S. Saylors, T. Siebert, T. Smith, M. Starke, R. Walling, "Characteristics of Wind Turbine Generators for Wind Power Plants " IEEE Xplore, vol. IEEE PES Wind Plant Collector System Design Working Group, 2009.
[19]"Competitive Electricity Markets and Reactive Power Management*," F. o. E. Dept. of Electrical Engg., Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra-282110., Ed., ed.
[20]J. Zhong and K. Bhattacharya, "Reactive power management in deregulated electricity markets-A review," in Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, 2002. IEEE, 2002, pp. 1287-1292.
[21]P. Bajpai and S. Singh, "Electricity trading in competitive power market: an overview and key issues," in International Conference On Power Systems, ICPS2004, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2004.
[22]G. S. Daniel Kirschen, in Fundamentals of Power System Economics. vol. England, ed: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
[23]C. I. S. O. Corporation, "Ancillary services requirement protocol," in FERC Electricity Tariff. vol. First Replacement Volume No.II, ed, October 2000.
[24]H. Saadat, Power system analysis: WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1999.
[25]"Power System Economics and Market Modeling," in Optimal Power Flow, p. W. Corporation, Ed., ed: http://www.powerworld.com/files/M02Optimal-Power-Flow.pdf.
[26]A. Rabiee, H. Shayanfar, and N. Amjady, "A new framework for reactive power market considering power system security," Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 196-204, 2009.
[27]A. Singh, D. Chauhan, and K. Upadhyay, "Design of reactive power procurement in deregulated electricity market," International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 3, 2011.
[28]Y. Dai, Y. Ni, F. Wen, and Z. Han, "Analysis of reactive power pricing under deregulation," in Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000. IEEE, 2000, pp. 2162-2167.
[29]I. El-Samahy and C. Canizares, "A unified framework for reactive power management in deregulated electricity markets," in Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2006. PSCE'06. 2006 IEEE PES, 2006, pp. 901-907.
[30]J. Wang, R. Yang, and F. Wen, "On the procurement and pricing of reactive power service in the electricity market environment," in Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004. IEEE, 2004, pp. 1120-1124.
[31]I. El-Samahy, K. Bhattacharya, and C. Cañizares, "A heuristic method to reactive power service procurement," in Electrotechnical Conference, 2006. MELECON 2006. IEEE Mediterranean, 2006, pp. 920-923.
[32]J. Zhong, K. Bhattacharya, and J. Daalder, "Reactive power as an ancillary service: Issues in optimal procurement," in Power System Technology, 2000. Proceedings. PowerCon 2000. International Conference on, 2000, pp. 885-890.
[33]J. Zhong and K. Bhattacharya, "Toward a competitive market for reactive power," Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 17, pp. 1206-1215, 2002.
[34]I. El-Samahy, K. Bhattacharya, C. Cañizares, M. F. Anjos, and J. Pan, "A procurement market model for reactive power services considering system security," Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 23, pp. 137-149, 2008.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top