臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究蒐集臺南市有關開挖地下室的建築工程，就各工地的土壤產生量、流向、交易情形及價格等進行實地調查。利用所調查的資料可瞭解土壤地租的歸屬情形，而此種情形可利用賽局理論來加以解釋。研究發現土壤交易為一特別的市場，在此市場中每筆交易經由議價的程序來決定價格，且可能得到不同的價格。本研究的結果顯示：1. 土壤地租的歸屬並無特定對象，且地租大小亦不固定，變動幅度大。雙方策略的選擇、土壤權屬、土壤發生量、因具專業性所擁有的議價能力，都會影響土壤地租的產生、大小或分配。2. 在實際交易上，供需雙方的行為、策略及市場價格均符合Nash非合作解。3. 在實際交易時，土壤地租雖由土壤的供需雙方共同獲得，但明顯有一方有較高之利得。4.在實際交易上，並未發現 Nash合作議價之案例。因此，市場上雙方策略選擇傾向於非合作型態，但報酬並非公平分派；而若要進行合作議價，則先要對雙方資訊有所確認。

This study is focusing on the quantities，flow，trade and reice of soil at building sites with basement . Then we can realize the division of soil rent among the agents by data collected，and interpret it with game theory.We find that the trade of soil is a special market. The price in the market is decided by each individual bargaining procedure,which produces its own price. The conclusions of the study are as follows： 1.The soil rent does not belong to a unique one，and it is also changeable.and suppliers'strategies，soil ownership，the quantities of soil and the ability of bargaining will affect the soil rent. 2.The actions and strategies of buyers and suppliers and market prices in the real transactions match with the Nash non-cooperative solutions. 3.The soil rent in the real transactions is gained by both buyer and supplier，but one of them gains higher. 4.there is no Nash bargaining solution in the real transactions. Therefore， the stratergies of the buyers and suppliers trend toward model. But the poyoff distribution isn't fair，and they must certify each other before bargaining.