臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究旨在ＰＰＣＦ體育課目的、過程的觀念架構，來分析比較現階段高
中學生與體育教師對體育課程認知差異，以做為課程設計和未來擬定體育
課程之參考。研究工具乃依據Jewett & Mullan（1977）以及Jewett &　
Bain（1985）所揭櫫的「目的過程課程架構」（Purpose Process
Curriculum Framework，簡稱PPCF）中二十二個基本活動目的與七項活動
過程之內涵，修改編製為「高中學生與體育教師體育課認知量表」，以高
級中學體育教師 79位(男性59位、女性20位）與二、三年級學生809位（
男性412位、女性397位）為研究對象，實施調查，並以獨立樣本t-test來
比較分析所得之調查資料。結果發現：一．從信度、效度考驗及認知情形
的分析，PPCF的體育課程架構可以用來驗證國內的體育課程。二．全部高
中體育教師與學生對體育課程之目的、過程認　　知達顯著的差異。三．
高中男體育教師與學生對體育課程之目的認知達顯著　　的差異，但過程
部份未達顯著差異。。四．高中女體育教師與女學生對體育課程之目的、
過程認　　知未達顯著的差異。五．高中男體育教師與女學生對體育課程
之目的、過程認　　知達顯著的差異。六．高中女體育教師與男學生對體
育課程之目的、過程認　　知未達顯著的差異。七．高中男體育教師與女
體育老師對體育課程之目的、過程認知未達顯著的差異。八．高中男學生
與女學生對體育課程之目的、過程認知達　　顯著的差異。

The purpose of the study was to compare the perception of
physical educationcurriculum between sensior high school and PE
teachers through analysizing the Purpose Process Framework
(PPCF) to design physical education curriculum in the The
subjects of the research were sensior high school PE teachers
(59 male ,20 female ) and sensior high school students of the
andthird grade (412 male, 397 female). The tool of the research
the self-made questionnaire, according to the PPCF purpose of
basic activitiespurposes and the PPCF process of seven the t-
test of completely randomizeddesign to analysize data, the are
as follows: 1.From examining the reliability, validity, and
perception, the of PPCF is suitable for domestic PE curriculum.
2.There is significant difference between PE teachers and
perception of physical education curriculum. 3.There is a
significant difference between the male teachers and the
perception of PE curriculum purpose but no difference in
process. 4.There is no significant difference between the
female teachers 5.There is significant difference between the
male PE teachers students in PE curriculum''s purpose and
process. 6.There is no significant difference between the
female PEle students in PE curriculum''s purpose and process.
7.There is no significant difference between the male PE
teachers PE teachers in PE curriculum''s purpose and process.
8.There is a significant difference between the male and female
the perception of physical education curriculum''s purpose and