臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究是根據中華徵信所出版的「台灣地區大型企業排名」，選擇1986年到1995年共十年的資料進行分析，整理每年在資訊產品製造業中排名前四名的廠商，進行廠商的分類並進行個人電腦產業資料及樣本廠商資料的收集及整理。
根據前述資料整理出個人電腦產業的分期，及其不同時期的產業典範，並探討典範移轉的過程及方式;輔以廠商在各分期中的發展歷程及其調適行為比較，得到下列結論:
1.在個人電腦產業中，產業典範並非皆由大型廠商帶領而改變，亦有可能由小型廠商率先採取一些創新的行動，成為產業的先驅者，待創新成功，大型企業反而跟進並加以模仿該項創新。
2.在個人電腦產業中，產業典範移轉的過程中，會有震盪調整期出現，因為一些追隨者仍然遵循原有典範，但先驅者正在建立新的典範，兩股力量會互相角力而不穩定，使得主流設計無法確立 。
3.在個人電腦產業中，當某項創新在產業間擴散開來，其效用將隨其差異價值下降而遞減；此時，一些先驅者會更轉而採取新的創新行動，因此將促成產業典範的移轉，確定新的主流設計。
4.生產的產品組合不同的個人電腦及其相關產業的廠商，在產業典範移轉過程之中，對關鍵成功要素的主觀認知詮釋不同，並採取不同類型的調適行為。
5在產業典範移轉之前累積不同資源的個人電腦及其相關產業的廠商傾向於選擇不同的調適行為。
6.採取重新定向或是策略更新調適行為的個人電腦及其相關產業的廠商在產業典範移轉之後，多獲得快速的成長 。
7.採取調整型調適行為的個人電腦及其相關產業的廠商在產業典範移轉過後，大多退出原來據點或遭淘汰。

This thesis is based on the data of books "The Largest Corporations in Taiwan" from 1986 to 1995 which are published by China Credit Information Services, Ltd. We chose top 20 firms every year from the computer & peripheral manufacturing industry, classfied the firms and collected the data of PC (personal computer) industry and firms which we are interested in.
We defined the developing periods of PC industry in Taiwan and the industry paradigm in different developing periods. We also discussed the processes and the ways that the paradigm shifted. According to the information mentioned above and the developing and adaptation strategies of the chosen firms, we found that,
1. In PC (personal computer) industry, the paradigm shift is not always elicited by those top firms. It is possible that those large-scale firms follow those small firms that take some innovative actions.
2. During the period of paradigm shift, the new paradigm is under construction and the old paradigm is challenged; therefore, the industry is in an unstable condition.
3. In PC (personal computer) industry, if the innovation is diffused, the value of innovation decreases. That some pioneers devoted themselves to innovating led to paradigm shift and new dominant design.
4. In PC and peripheral industry, the firms of different product combinations have different perception about the KSFs (key success factors) and make different adaptations to the changes of the environment.
5. Before the paradigm shift, the firms which have accumulated different kinds of resources are apt to make different adaptations to the changes of the environment.
6. After the paradigm silift, most of the firms wilich chose reorientation or strategic renewal as an adaptation behavior grew in a higher velocity.
7. After the paradigm shift, most of the firms which chose adjustment as an adaptation behavior exited or forced to exited from the market.