跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.88) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 14:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:何英杰
研究生(外文):Ying-Chieh, Ho
論文名稱:回填土夯實對被動土壓力之影響
論文名稱(外文):Effects of backfill compaction on passive earth pressure
指導教授:方永壽方永壽引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:土木工程系
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:87
語文別:英文
論文頁數:138
中文關鍵詞:夯實被動土壓力土壓力相對密度臨界狀態
外文關鍵詞:compactionearth pressurepassivesandrelative densityresidual state
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:207
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本論文探討回填土夯實對作用於擋土牆被動土壓力之影響。本研究利用國立交通大學模型擋土牆設備探討平移模式牆位移所造成土壓力之變化。試驗採用36%、60%與80%相對密度之渥太華砂為回填材料。根據實驗結果,獲得以下各項結論。
1. 對鬆砂而言,當牆開始移動時,土壓力開始增加,最後達到一極限土壓力。土壓力大約呈現三角狀分佈。Coulomb及Terzaghi 理論可以合理估計因牆移動所造成之被動土壓力。
2. 對緊砂而言,土壓力係數Kh隨牆移動而增加,當土壓力係數達到尖峰值後,Kh逐漸下降,最後達到一極限值。Coulomb及Terzaghi 理論利用尖峰摩擦角fpeak估計之土壓力係數會比實驗所獲得之尖峰Kh值及極限Kh值為高。在大量的牆位移(如S/H = 0.12)之下,Kh的極限值可將土壤殘餘強度fr引入Terzaghi 理論加以推估。
3. 無論回填土之初始密度為何,當牆位移量S/H超過0.12後,土壓力係數Kh會到一固定值。這是因為在破壞土楔內之土壤都已達到臨界狀態,其剪力強度應利用土壤的殘餘抗剪角fr估計。
4. 對鬆砂而言,Coulomb及Terzaghi 理論都稍微低估其被動土壓力。對中等緊密砂及緊砂而言,Terzaghi 理論利用尖峰抗剪角fpeak計算出之被動土壓力係數與實驗值相當吻合。若使用直剪試驗所獲得之殘餘抗剪角fr來計算Coulomb及Terzaghi 被動土壓力係數可發現,計算值與在大的牆移動量之下所獲得之土壓力係數與實驗值很接近。
5. 在計算緊密狀態下回填土之被動土壓力時,必須考慮破壞土壤之膨脹及強度折減現象。將土壤之殘餘強度引用在Coulomb及Terzaghi理論可合理估計在牆發生大位移時的被動土壓力。依此保守的設計,擋土牆將可確保維持在安全的狀態。
This paper presents experimental data of earth pressure acting against a vertical wall, which moved toward a mass of dry sand compacted at different densities. Ottawa sand with relative densities of 36%, 60%, and 80% are tested. The instrumented retaining-wall facility at National Chiao Tung University was used to investigate the variation of earth pressure induced by the translational wall movement. Based on this study, the following conclusions can be drawn.
1. For loose sand, as the wall starts to move, the earth pressure increases, and eventually a limiting passive earth pressure is reached. The shape of pressure distribution is approximately a triangular. Coulomb and Terzaghi''s theories would provide a good evaluation of passive thrust due to the translational wall movement.
2. For dense sand, the horizontal earth pressure coefficient Kh increases with the increasing wall movement. After reaching a peak value, Kh decreases and finally remained an ultimate value. Coulomb and Terzaghi solutions calculated with a peak f angle are greater than the experimental peak and ultimate passive thrusts. At a large wall movement, the ultimate Kh could be properly estimates by introducing the critical state concept into the Terzaghi theory.
3. When the passive wall movement S/H is greater than 0.12, the passive soil thrust Kh reaches to a constant value regardless of its initial density. It may be deduced that, the soil along the failure surface has reached the "critical state", and the shearing strength on the surface could be estimated with the residual fr angle.
4. For loose backfill, Coulomb and Terzaghi''s theories slightly underestimated the passive thrust. For medium dense and dense backfill, the peak experimental results are in good agreement with Terzaghi''s solution calculated with fpeak. If the residual fr angle obtained from the direct shear tests is used in the Coulomb and Terzaghi''s formula, the theoretical solutions are found to be in good agreement with the experimental passive thrust at large wall movements.
5. When calculate the passive earth pressure in dense backfill, it is recommended to consider the dilation and the strength reduction of soil along the failure surface. The passive earth pressure under a large wall deformation could be successfully approximated by introducing the residual soil strength into Coulomb and Terzaghi''s theories. The conservative design will keep the retaining wall always on the safe side.
1 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………1
1.1 Objective of Study ………………………………………2
1.2 Research Outline …………………………………………3
1.3 Organization of Thesis …………………………………4
2 LITERATURE REVIEW ………………………………………………5
2.1 Passive Earth Pressure Theories ………………………5
2.1.1 Coulomb Passive Earth Pressure Theory …………5
2.1.2 Rankine Passive Earth Pressure Theory …………7
2.1.3 Terzaghi General Wedge Theory ……………………7
2.2 Laboratory Model Retaining Wall Tests ………………10
2.2.1 Model Study by Narain, Saran and Nandakumaran10
2.2.2 Model Study by Mackey and Kirk …………………10
2.2.3 Model Study by James and Bransby ………………11
2.2.4 Model Study by Fang, Wu, and Chen ………………12
2.2.5 Model Study by Fang, Chen, and Chen ……………12
2.3 Effect of Soil Compaction on Earth Pressure…………13
2.3.1 Study of Rowe …………………………………………13
2.3.2 Study of Sherif, Fang, and Sherif ………………14
2.3.3 Study of Duncan and Seed……....…………………14
2.4 Critical State Concept ……………………………………15
3 EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS …………………………………………16
3.1 Soil Bin ………………………………………………………16
3.2 Model Retaining Wall ………………………………………17
3.3 Driving System ………………………………………………18
3.4 Data Acquisition System …………………………………18
3.5 Compactor………………………………………………………18
4 BACKFILL AND INTERFACE CHARACTERISTICS ……………………20
4.1 Backfill Properties ………………………………………20
4.2 Interface Characteristics between Model Wall and Backfill ……………21
4.3 Side Wall Friction Tests …………………………………22
4.4 Control of Soil Density……………………………………23
4.4.1 Density Control Box…………………………………23
4.4.2 Loose Backfill Density………………………………23
4.4.3 Compaction of Backfill………………………………24
4.4.4 Distribution of Soil Density ……………………24
5 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ……………………………………………26
5.1 Shearing Behavior of Compacted Sand……………………26
5.2 Earth Pressure Distribution of Test Results ………27
5.2.1 Loose Sand ……………………………………………27
5.2.2 Medium Dense Sand ……………………………………28
5.2.3 Dense Sand ……………………………………………30
5.3 Effects of Soil Density on Earth Pressure …………31
5.4 Compacted and Air-Pluviated Backfill …………………33
5.4 Recommendation for Design ………………………………34
6 CONCLUSIONS ………………………………………………………35
References ………………………………………………………37
Tables ………………………………………………………………42
Figures ……………………………………………………………46
Appendix A: Soil Pressure Transducer Calibration ……130
1. Ang, A., H., and Tang, W., H., (1975) "Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design Volumn Ⅰ- Basic Principles," John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, N.Y., pp. 286-294.
2. Brooker, E. W., and Ireland, H. O., (1965), "Earth Pressure at Rest Related to Stress History," Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.2, No. 1, pp.1-15.
3. Bros, B., (1972), "The Influence of Model Retaining Wall Displacements on Active and Passive Earth Pressure in Sand," Proceedings, 5th European Conference on Soil Mechanics, Vol.1, Madrid, Spain, pp. 241-249.
4. Casagrande, A., (1936), "Characteristics of Cohesionless Soils Affecting the Stability of Slopes and Earth Fills," Journal of the Boston Society of Civil Engineers, Jan., reprinted in Contributions to Soil Mechanics 1925-1940, BSCE, pp. 257-276.
5. Caquot, A., and Kerisel, J., (1948) Tables for the Calculation of Passive Pressure, Active Pressure, and Bearing Capacity of Foundations, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.
6. Clough, G. W., and Duncan, J. M., (1971), "Finite Element Analysis of Retaining Wall Behavior," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 87, No. SM12, pp. 1657-1673.
7. Chen, T., J., (1993), "An Experimental Study of Earth Pressure Due to Various Wall Movements," Master of Engineering Thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
8. Chen, J., M., (1994), "An Experimental Study of Earth Pressure Due to Various Wall Movements and Backfill Inclinations," Master of Engineering Thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
9. Chen, H., R., (1997), "Earth Pressure At-Rest with Different Soil Densities and Backfill Inclinations," Master of Engineering Thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
10. Duncan, J., M., and Seed, R. B., (1986), "Compaction-Induced Earth Pressures under Ko-Conditions," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
11. Das, B. M., (1994), " Principal of Geotechnical Engineering," PWS Publishing Company, Boston.
12. Fang, Y. S., and Ishibashi, I., (1986), "Static Earth Pressures with Various Wall Movements," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, No. 3, Mar., pp. 317-333.
13. Fang, Y. S., Wu, B. F., and Chen, T. J., (1994), "Passive Earth Pressure with Various Wall Movements," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 8, Aug., pp. 1307-1323.
14. Fang, Y. S., Chen, J. M., and Chen, C. Y., (1997) "Earth Pressures with Sloping Backfill," Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 3, March, pp. 250-259.
15. Harr, M. E., (1966), "Foundations of Theoretical Soil Mechanics," McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, N. Y.
16. Ishibashi, I., and Fang, Y., S., (1987), "Dynamic Earth Pressures with Different Wall Movements Modes," Soil and Foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 4, Dec., pp. 11-22.
17. James, R. G., and Bransby, P. L., (1970), "Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of a Passive Earth Pressure Problem," Geotechnique, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 17-37.
18. James, R. G., and Bransby, P. L., (1971), "A Velocity Field for Some Passive Earth Pressure Problems," Geotechnique, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 61-83.
19. Lee, I. K., and Herington, J. R., (1992), "Effect of Wall Movement on Active and Passive Pressures," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, June.
20. Lambe, T. W., and Whitman, R. V., (1979), "Soil Mechanics," John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York, N. Y.
21. Lee C., C., (1998), "Passive Earth Pressure with Various Backfill Densities", Master of Engineering Thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
22. Mackey, R. D., and Kirk, D. P., (1967), "At Rest, Active and Passive Earth Pressures," Proceedings, South East Asian Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Bangkok, pp. 187-199.
23. Matteotti, G., (1970), "Some Results of Quay-Wall Model Tests on Earth Pressure," Proceedings, Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol.47, pp. 185-204.
24. Mayne, P. W., and Kulhawy, F. H., (1982) "Ko-OCR Relationships in Soil," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol.108, No. GT6, June, pp.851-872
25. Mitchell, J.K., (1993), Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
26. Nakai, (1985), "Finite Element Computions for Active and Passive Earth Pressure Problems of Retaining Wall," Soil and Foundations, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 98-112.
27. Narain, J., Saran, S., and Nandakumaran, P., (1969), "Model Study of Passive Pressure in Sand," Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 95, No. SM4, July, pp. 969-983.
28. Oda, M., (1972), "Initial Fabrics and Their Relations to Mechanical Properties of Granular Material," Soils Fdns, Vol. 12, pp.17-36.
29. Potyondy, J. G., (1961) "Skin Friction between Various Soils and Construction Materals", Geotechnique, Vol.2, No.4, December, pp. 339-353
30. Packshaw, S., (1969) "Earth Pressure and Earth Resistance", A Century of Soil Mechanics, The Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England, pp.409 - 435.
31. Poulos, S. J., Castro, G. and France, J.W., (1985), " Liquefaction Elevation Procedure," J. Geotech. Engng, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 6, pp. 772-792.
32. Potts, D. M., and Fourie, A. B., (1986), "A Numerical Study of the Effects of Wall Deformation on Earth Pressures," Int. Numer. Anal. Methods Geometh., Vol. 10, pp. 383-405.
33. Paikowsky, S. G., Player, C. M., and Connors, P. J., (1995), " A Dual Interface Apparatus for Testing Unrestricted Friction of Soil along Soil Surfaces," Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 18, No. 2, June, pp. 168-193.
34. Roscoe, K. H., Schofield, A. N., and Worth, C. P., (1958), "On the Yielding Soils," Geotechnique, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 22-53.
35. Roberto, P., (1991), "A Sand-Spreader. Used for the Reconstitution of Granular Soil Model," Soil and Foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 2, June, pp. 175-180.
36. Rowe, P. W., (1954), "A Stress Strain Theory for Cohesionless Soil with Applications to Earth Pressures At Rest and Moving Walls," Geotechnique, Vol. 4, pp. 70-88.
37. Rowe, P. W., and Peaker, K., (1965), "Passive Earth Pressure Meassurements, " Geotechnique, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 57-78.
38. Sherif, M. A., Fang, Y. S., and Sherif, R. I., (1984), "Ka and Ko behind Rotating and Non-Yielding Walls," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 1, Jan., pp. 41-56.
39. Tatsuoka, F., and Haibara, O., (1985), "Shear Resistance between Sand and Smooth or Lubricated Surface," Soil and Foundations, JSSMFRE, Vol. 25, No. 1, Mar., pp. 89-98.
40. Tejchman, J., and Wu, W., (1995) "Experimental and Numerical Study of Sand-Steel Interfaces", International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geotechanics, Vol. 19,No. 8, pp.513-536
41. Terzaghi, K., (1932), "Record Earth Pressure Testing Mechine," Engineering News-Record, Vol. 109, Sept., 29, pp. 365-369.
42. Terzaghi, K., (1934), "Large Retaining-Wall Tests," Engineering News-Record, pp. 136-140.
43. Terzaghi, K., (1941), "General Wedge Theory of Earth Pressure," ASCE Transaction, pp. 68-80.
44. Terzaghi, K., and Peck, R. B.,(1967), Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice,Wiley, New Wark.
45. Wu, B., F., (1992), "Design and Construction of National Chiao Tung University Model Retaining Wall,"Master of Engineering Thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top