(34.236.244.39) 您好!臺灣時間:2021/03/09 18:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張銘勳
研究生(外文):minghsun Chang
論文名稱:色彩知覺與意象空間對色彩調和關係之探討
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Relationship between Color Harmony and Color Perceptual Space or Color Image Space
指導教授:莊明振莊明振引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:應用藝術所
學門:藝術學門
學類:應用藝術學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:87
語文別:中文
論文頁數:88
中文關鍵詞:色彩知覺空間色彩意象空間色彩調和
外文關鍵詞:Color Perceptual SpaceColor Image SpaceColor Harmony
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:1520
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:9
在色彩調和理論的操作型特徵研究上,Moon & Spencer曾提出色彩量化的模型,分別以色相差、明度差與彩度差為量尺,對調和區與不調和區加以定義。但其將人對色彩的視覺過程,獨立成三個向度來考量,似不符合人的視覺經驗。因此,歐立成(1997)以均勻色彩空間中兩色點的距離,定義同時涵蓋色相差、明度差與彩度差的綜合色差(DE*ab),並以色光為顯色條件,探討色差與色面積因素對色彩調和的影響。葉青林(1998)則以物體色為顯色條件,在相同理念下,繼續探討色彩差異與物體色色彩調和的關係。兩個研究結果都顯示,色彩差異與色彩調和之間,具有三次曲線的函數關係。
然而在歐立成及葉青林的研究,雖然導出色彩差異量與色彩調和的關係,但事實上,這是由仍顯散亂的資料中,導出不很確定的結果。因此,本研究將延續歐立成及葉青林的觀點,一方面建構以人們對色彩差異直覺認知的多向度色彩空間;以及能包含人類主觀感覺色彩意象空間,另外提出以相對比較分群法的實驗方法,來量測一對色彩的調和程度。以上述兩種色彩空間,嘗試來繼續探討色彩系統中,色彩間的秩序關係對色彩調和的影響,並比較及檢證Moon & Spencer(1944)及葉青林(1998)的研究結果。
結果顯示,本研究所得的色彩知覺空間及色彩意象空間,其所對應色彩調和的關係並不是非常明顯。然而,由色彩知覺及意象空間的建立中,我們仍可得到一些設計上配色的參考。
Regarding to the theories of color harmony, Moon and Spencer (1944) have proposed an quantitative model in which the color intervals of hue, value and chroma in a color combination will be independently defined as varied harmonious or inharmonious intervals according to the size of intervals. Although the idea of quantitatively defining interlaced harmonious and inharmonious color intervals is believable, humans do not perceive color along the three attributes independently. Instead, we perceive color integrally. Thus, in our previous studies, we defined an integrated color interval of a color combination in a CIFLAB uniform color scale (UCS) space as the distance of a set of colors and investigated its relation to color harmony. These studies revealed that color harmony is roughly a cubic function of the integrated color interval and that the color interval can be classified into varied harmonious or inharmonious one according to its size. However, this relationship is not very obvious and robust due to the fuzzily spreading pattern of data. We doubt that this fuzziness may be partly caused by the inappropriately adoption of CIELAB as an UCS space. It may not uniform enough for our purpose.
Therefore, in this study, we followed the research of Li-Cheng Aou (1997) and Ching-Lin Yeh (1998). On one hand, we constructed a multi-dimensional color space in which people feel the differentiation of color intuitively. Furthermore, the color image space also includes the subjective sensations of human. On the other hand, the author proposed an experimental methodology to measure one pair of color-harmony level by pair-comparison and grouping.
Based upon the color space mentioned above, the author tried to explore the effects between color-order and color-harmony in the color system, and compared and contrasted the research outcomes of Moon & Spencer(1944)and Ching-Lin Yeh(1998. The results shown that the major dimensions of people''s color perceptual space can be defined as value and hue. Moreover, it was reflected that three factors about color image, potency, activity, and emotion factors, would seemingly correspond to value, chroma, and hue. The relationship between color differentiation and color harmoniousness was not evident in the color space. In terms of Munsell''s hue differentiation and value differentiation, there are significant differences between hue differentiation and harmoniousness, and between value differentiation and harmoniousness. No significant difference was found between chroma diferentiation and harmoniousness. The smaller the hue differentiation or the bigger the value differentiation, the higher the color harmoniousness.
目錄
中文摘要Ⅰ
圖目錄Ⅳ
表目錄Ⅵ
第一章、研究導論1
1.1 研究背景及動機1
1.2 研究基礎論點2
1.2.1研究問題2
1.2.2研究論點2
1.3 研究目標4
1.4 研究限制4
1.5 論文架構5
第二章、相關研究文獻6
2.1 色彩調和的複雜性6
2.2 MOON & SPENCER的量化色彩調和理論8
2.3 以綜合色差探討色差和色彩調和的關係9
2.4 色彩意象相關研究11
2.5 應用多向度評量法的色彩研究14
第三章、研究方法及實驗設計16
3.1實驗一:色彩知覺相似性實驗16
3.1.1原理16
3.1.2實驗準備16
3.2實驗二:色彩語意差分實驗19
3.2.1原理19
3.2.2實驗準備20
3.3實驗三:色彩調和實驗25
3.3.1實驗準備25
第四章、研究結果分析及討論28
4.1 色彩知覺空間28
4.1.1本實驗分析架構及方法28
4.1.2色彩知覺空間的建立28
4.1.3色彩知覺空間的解釋29
4.2 色彩意象空間的建立40
4.2.1本實驗分析架構及方法40
4.2.2色彩意象41
4.2.3因子分析結果及解釋45
4.2.4色彩意象空間51
4.3 色彩調和的結果及討論57
4.3.1本節分析架構及方法57
4.3.2色彩調和實驗結果58
4.3.3色彩知覺與意象空間與色彩調和關係64
第五章、研究結論及建議70
5.1實驗結果回顧70
5.2研究建議75
參考文獻77
附錄一79
附錄二81
英文部分
1.Burchett, K. E., Color Harmony Attributes, Color Res. Appl. 16, 6-17(1996).
2.Birren, F., Science and Art, Objective and Subjective, Color Res. Appl.10, 180-186(1985).
3.Charles E.Osgood, Geoge J. Suci, Percy H. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, 1957。
4.Granger, G. W., The Prediction of Preference for Color Combination, J. Opt. Gen Psy. 52, 213-222(1955).
5.Granville, W.C.,Color Harmony:What is it?, Color Res. Appl.12,196-201(1987).
6.Hope,A & Walch, M, "The Color Compendium" Van Nostrand Reinhold New York,1990.
7.Judd,D.B. & Wyszechi G. Color in Business Science and Industry, Science and Industry, Wiley, New York ,1975.
8.Koujimachi. Chiyoda-ku, PCCS Harmonic Color Charts 201-L, Japan Color Enterprise CO. LTD Tokyo, 1991.
9.Munsell,A. H.,A Color Notation. Boston:Geo. H. Ellis,1905.
10.Moon, P. and Spencer, D. E., Geometric Formulation of Classical Color Harmony, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 34, 46-59(1944).
11.Ostwald, W.,Color Science, London,1931.
12.Pope, A., Notes on the Problem of Color Harmony and the Geometry of Color Space, J. Opt. Soc. Am.34, 759-765(1944).
13.Sivik, L. and Hard, Some Reflections on Studying Colour Combinations, Color Res.Appl.19,286-295(1994).
14.Taylor, Joann M. & Billmeyer Jr. Fred W., "Multidimensional Scaling of Selected samples from the Optical Society of America Uniform color Scales", Color research and Application, Vol.13, No 2, pp.85-98, (1988).
15.Y.C. Shen, 1997, Objective and Subjective modeling of Human Color Processing System and its Application﹐ Color Res. Appl.21,353(1996).
16.Shigenobu Kobayashi,The Aim and Method of the Color Image Scale, Color Res.Appl.19,286-295(1981).
中文部分
1.林書堯,色彩學,三民書局,台北,1993。
2.歐立成,色差與色面積因素對色彩調和的影響,國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文,新竹,1996。
3.葉青林,色差與色面積因素對物體色色彩調和的影響,國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文,新竹,1996。
4.賴瓊琦,色彩喜好及聯想調查研究,台北技術學院學報,1995,pp.399-411。
5.賴瓊琦,全省小學-大專色彩喜好調查,明志工專第二屆畢業專刊,1969。
6.賴瓊琦,由色彩意象語意量尺間相關分析之亞太國家文化差異,1998色彩研討會論文集,1998,pp.113-128。
7.劉智美,高中生的色彩感情研究,台中師院學報,1989,pp.503-534。
8.陳俊宏、黃雅卿,色彩嗜好調查研究報告,國立雲林技術學院學報,1996,pp.95-105。
9.林群英,從青少年色彩形象的測試分析談色彩之使用計劃,健行學報,1988,pp.209-239。
10.呂清夫,造形原理,雄獅圖書股份有限公司,1984。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔