跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/05 08:43
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:劉怡芬
研究生(外文):Liu yi-feng
論文名稱:臺灣股市橫斷面報酬率決定因子:特徵、單因子或多因子
論文名稱(外文):Taiwan stock cross-sectional returns determinants : characteristics, market index or macroeconomic factors
指導教授:周賓凰周賓凰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Pin-Huang Chou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:財務管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:87
語文別:中文
論文頁數:46
中文關鍵詞:資本資產定價模式總體經濟因子公司市值帳面權益對市值比橫斷面迴歸CRR模式Fama-French 三因子模式風險貼水檢定
外文關鍵詞:CAPMmacroeconomic factorssizebook-to-market equitycross-sectional regressionsCRR modelFama-Fench 3 factors modelrisk primium test
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:1051
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本文主要目的在研究臺灣股票市場報酬率與可能解釋因素間之關係,研究期間為民國七十一年七月至八十七年六月,以月資料進行實證分析。實證內容包括三部分,首先以25個Size-BE/ME投資組合之排序後月報酬率與相對應期間之經濟變數、股票市場因子進行時間序列迴歸分析;接下來將第一部分所得之投資組合因素負載量分派至各年度所形成之投資組合中的各股,作為解釋變數,以各公司超額報酬當作被解釋變數進行橫斷面迴歸分析;最後進行橫斷面風險貼水時間序列平均值t檢定,以判別哪些變數能夠解釋股票橫斷面報酬。
實證時分別依據CAPM模式、CRR總體經濟模式、公司特徵相關因子進行研究,最後再綜合上述模型,觀察變數間解釋能力之消長。公司特徵因素則分別採用Fama & French(1992)與Fama & French(1993)之定義。
結果顯示CAPM模式為臺灣股票定價之最佳模型,期望報酬與市場Beta間確實存在線性關係,且Beta為解釋橫斷面期望報酬的唯一因子;CRR模式及採用特徵模型或因子模型之公司特徵皆則無法解釋股票橫斷面報酬。
In this study, we employ the cross-sectional and time-series approaches to analyze Taiwan stock returns determinants during July 1982 to June 1998.
In our time-series regression, we use monthly post-ranking returns of 25 stock portfolios which formed by size and book-to-market equity as the dependent returns and macroeconomic factors of Chen, Roll & Ross(1986)、 market index and SMB、HML stock factors of Fama & French(1993)as the explanatory returns.
Then allocate the full-period post-ranking betas(estimations of exposure)of a Size-BE/ME portfolio to each stock in the portfolio. These betas were used as the independent variables in cross-sectional regressions, with individual''s excess stock return being the dependent variable.
At last, we test whether the time-series means of estimates of associated risk premium is significantly different from zero or not to identify the stock returns determinants.
The empirical results of this study suggest that for Taiwan stocks, market beta is the only factor that proxies for the nondiversified risk of a security, none of CRR model、FF(1992) characteristics model and FF(1993) factor model can explain the differences in average risk premiums across stocks, i.e. CAPM is still alive in Taiwan stock market.
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究範圍與限制………………………………………… 4
第三節 研究架構………………………………………………… 5
第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………… 7
第三章 研究設計……………………………………………………... 11
第一節 選樣設計………………………………………………... 11
第二節 變數定義…………………………………………….….. 14
第三節 實證程序與模型…………………………………….….. 26
第四節 研究方法與假說…………………………………….….. 29
第四章 實證結果與分析…………………………………………..… 32
第一節 樣本資料概況……………………………………….….. 32
第二節 實證結果分析…………………………………….…..… 34
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………..… 41
1.Antoniou, Antonios, Ian Garrett and Richard Priestley, 1998, "Macroeconomic variables as common pervasive risk factors and the empirical content of the arbitrage pricing theory", Journal of Empirical Finance 5:221-240
2.Banz, Rolf W. and William J. Breen, 1986, "Sample dependent results using accounting and market data: some evidence", Journal of Finance 41:779-793
3.Bauman, W. Scott, C. Mitchell Conover, and Robert E. Miller, 1998, "Growth versus Value and Large-Cap Stocks in International Markets", Financial Analysts Journal / March-April: 75-89
4.Black, Fischer, 1972, "Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing", Journal of Business 45:444-455
5.Black, Fischer, 1993, "Beta and Return: Announcements of the the ''death'' of beta seem premature", Journal of Portfolio Management / Fall: 8-18
6.Capaul, Cairo, Ian Rowley and William F. Sharpe, 1993, "International Value and Growth Stocks Returns", Financial Analysts Journal / January-February: 27-36
7.Chan, K. C. and Nai-Fu Chen, 1988, "An Unconditional Asset-Pricing Test and the Role of Firm Size as an Instrumental Variable for Risk", Journal of Finance 43:309-323
8.Chen, Nai-Fu, Richard Roll and Stephen A. Ross, 1986, "Economic Forces and the Stock Market", Journal of Business 59:383-403
9.Clarke, Roger and Meir Statman, 1994, "Growth, Value, Good, and Bad", Financial Analysis Journal / November-December: 82-86
10.Daniel, Kent and Sheridan Titman, 1997, "Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock Returns", Journal of Finance 52:1-33
11.Daniel, Kent and Sheridan Titman, 1998, "Characteristics or covariances", Journal of Portfolio Management / Summer: 24-33
12.Daniel, Kent, Sheridan Titman and K. C. John Wei, 1998, "Explaining the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in Japan: Factors or Characteristics", working paper, Northwestern University
13.Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French, 1992, "The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns", Journal of Finance 47:427-486
14.Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. Fench, 1993, "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds", Journal of Financial Economics 33:3-56
15.Harris, Robert S. and Felicia C. Marston, 1994, "Value versus Growth Stocks: Book-to Market, Growth, and Beta", Financial Analysts Journal / September-October: 18-24
16.He, Jia and Lilian K Ng, 1994, "Economic Forces, Fundamental Variables, and Equity Returns", Journal of Business 67:599-609
17.He, Jia, Raymond Kan and Chu Zhang, 1998, "Tests of the Relations Among Marketwide Factors, Firm-specific Variables, and Stock Returns Using a Conditional Asset Pricing Model", working paper, City University of Hong Kong
18.Lintner, John, 1965, "The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets", Review of Economics and Statistics 47:13-37
19.Lo, Andrew W. and A. Craig Mackinlay, 1990, "Data-snooping Biases in Tests of Financial Asset Pricing Models", Review of Financial Studies 3:431-467
20.Mackintosh, George, 1995, "A Method of Valuing Growth Stocks", Financial Analysts Journal / January-February: 13-17
21.Ross, Stephen A., 1976, "The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing", Journal of Economic Theory 13:341-360
22.Sharpe, William F., 1964, "Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk", Journal of Finance 19:425-442
23.林秋炭,1991,「經濟因素、公司規模與股票報酬關係之研究」,東海大學企業管理研究所論文。
24.黃錫和,1993,「影響股票投資報酬變動原因之橫斷面分析:臺灣股市之實證研究」,臺灣技術學院管理技術研究所論文。
25.陳麗玲,1994,「臺灣股票市場中股票報酬率之橫斷面分析」,成功大學會計研究所論文。
26.黃理哲,1994,「臺灣股票市場股票報酬解釋因素之探討」,中山大學企業管理研究所論文。
27.彭國根,1996,「規模及淨值與規模比對股票報酬之影響-臺灣股票市場之實證研究」,東吳大學企業管理研究所論文。
28.劉亞秋,黃理哲及劉維琪,1996,「國內股市系統風險之探討」,證券市場發展季刊第八券第一期,第45頁至66頁。
29.周賓凰,劉貽芳及林惠雪,1999,「台股指數績效與均異效率性之評估」,證券市場發展季刊(forth coming)30.葉銀華,1989,「總體經濟因素對股票報酬影響之研究-套利定價理論與多因素模式之實證」,成功大學工業管理研究所論文。
31.郭逢春,1993,「臺灣上市公司在不同投資區間下的淨值/市價比效果」,台灣大學財務金融研究所論文。
32.李俊龍,1990,「公司規模、負債權益比與股票報酬」,東海大學企業管理研究所論文。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top