摘 要
本研究旨在探討傅柯與哈伯瑪斯的啟蒙主張。為暸解二者啟蒙主張的立足點，首先探討啟蒙運動以來的主要啟蒙主張，以認識當前啟蒙研究的學術脈絡。其次分析傅柯與哈伯瑪斯對現代啟蒙困境與出路的診斷，並依二者的理論架構探討現代教育問題，以及改進之道。最後對二者的啟蒙主張及其教育蘊義加以比較和評論。
綜合前述探究，本研究有以下結論：
一、當代對於啟蒙問題的探討大體可歸結為：社會文化因素對人的宰 制的問題。
二、傅柯的啟蒙主張及其教育蘊義，重點包括：
(一)現代人的啟蒙困境在於權力作用限制了人的自主性和生命型態 的多樣可能性。
(二)啟蒙的出路在於對權力進行持續不斷的批判，以及自主地創造自己的生命型態。
(三)教育是一種規訓權力，學校是規訓的實施場所。
(四)要轉化教育的規訓特質，必須將教育型態由一元取向轉變為多元取向。
三、 哈伯瑪斯的啟蒙主張及其教育蘊義，重點包括：
(一)現代人的啟蒙困境在於技術層面凌越實踐層面，系統凌 越生活世界，壓縮了人們對於生活型態的自主與創造空間。
(二) 啟蒙的出路在於開展理性溝通，以釋放社會的理性能量，導向理性社會之途。
(三)現代教育體系是社會理性化發展的結果，但也有著系統 化的弊病。
(四)教育的改進之道為將教育活動重建為理性溝通歷程，以
解除教育生活世界殖民化的困境，釋放師生的主動性與創造性。
四、傅柯的主張為多元生命型態與多元價值提供了一種新的倫理基礎，鼓勵人們在社會網絡中展現個人獨特生命意蘊；哈伯瑪斯則為多元社會提供一種形成共識的合理程序，有助於維繫多元社會的融合，二者主張可以構成一種互補關係，以促進啟蒙社會的實現。
五、對我國當前教育，傅柯的觀點有助於教育人員正視青少年追求多元價值的傾向，並啟示青少年用心經營自我生命。哈伯瑪斯的主張則有助於協調教育的多元觀點，整合社會力量以開展教育事業。

The purpose of the study is to explore Foucault’s and Habermas’ thoughts on enlightenment. The study begins with a review of the significant propositions on “what is enlightenment” since the time of the Enlightenment, so as to get the key point of argument on the topic. In the study, an important problem is discussed, that is Foucault’s and Habermas’ propositions and advocacy on the obstacles and the way for the enlightenment in modern social conditions. Based on the discussion, the derivative implications in education are raised.
The conclusions are as the follows:
First, the core problem in contemporaries on pursuing enlightenment is the domination from social and cultural conditions.
Second, by the view of Foucault, the power effects confine modern people to certain normality, and prescribe a limit to the decision of individual life type. Power is the confinement that obstructs our way to enlightenment. For the solution of such a problem, we should have the “ethos” that is a permanent critique on power, and a creation of the life types on our own.
Third, by the view of Habermas, the condition of colonization of lifeworld hinders people from realizing the project of enlightenment, and makes the deciding of social development less rests on the rational communication of social members than the system rules. For the accomplishment of the unfinished enlightenment project, we must practice widely rational communication, so as to release the rational energy of the society.
Fourth, Foucault’s advocacy provides a new ethical basis for the creation of multi-value; Habermas’ advocacy affords the multi-society a rational procedure to coordinate a variety of opinions. The two kinds of advocacy could be complementary to each other.
Finally, for the education of our own society, the propositions of Foucault may promote a positive concern for the multi-value pursuing of the Young; Habermas’ could help us to coordinate the variety of perspectives on educational problems.

封面
目錄
第一章 緒論
第二章 啟蒙時代以來主要的啟蒙主張
第一節 啟蒙運動的啟蒙計畫
第二節 啟蒙的困境
第三章 傅柯的啟蒙觀及其教育蘊義
第一節 啟蒙所面臨的危險
第二節 啟蒙的出路
第三節 傅柯啟蒙觀的教育蘊義
第四章 哈伯瑪斯的啟蒙觀點及其教育蘊義
第一節 當代啟蒙的困境
第二節 啟蒙的出路
第三節 哈伯瑪斯啟蒙觀點的教育蘊義
第五章 傅柯與哈伯瑪斯啟蒙觀點及其教育蘊義之比較
第一節 傅柯與哈伯瑪斯對人與社會的觀點
第二節 傅柯與哈伯瑪斯對啟蒙困境與出路的診斷
第三節 傅柯與哈伯瑪斯啟蒙觀點的教育蘊義
第四節 評論
第五節 傅柯與哈伯瑪斯主張的啟示
第六章 結論
參考書目

參考書目
中共馬恩列斯著作編譯局(編譯)(1994)。馬克思恩格斯選集(第一卷)。北京：人民出版社。
王又如(譯)(1995)。西方心靈的激情(R.Tarnas原著)。台北：正中。
王治河(1996)。傅柯的系譜學。哲學雜誌，15期，頁44-69。
王家通(1990)。學校制度。載於黃光雄主編，教育概論，頁299-338。台北：師大書苑。
王德威(譯)1993)。知識的考掘(M. Foucault原著)。台北：麥田。
幼獅文化公司(編譯)(1977)。伏爾泰思想與宗教衝突(世界文明史，卷九之三)(W.Durant原著)。台北：幼獅。
朱元鴻等(譯)(1994)。後現代理論：批判的質疑(S.Best & D. Kellner原著)。台北：巨流。
何兆武(譯)(1991)。歷史理性批判文集(I. Kant原著)。北京：商務印書館。
吳家駟(譯)(1990)。資本論(第一卷)(K.Marx & F.Engels原著)。台北：時報。
呂健忠(譯)(1991)。蘇格拉底之死－柏拉圖作品選譯(柏拉圖原著)。
台北：書林。
李少軍、尚新建(譯)(1992)。西方政治思想史(G.H. Sabine原著)。台北：桂冠。
李日章(譯)(1988)。西方近代思想史(F.L. Baumer原著)。台北：聯經。
______(譯)(1984)。啟蒙運動的哲學(E. Cassirer原著)。台北：聯經。
李英明(1986)。哈伯瑪斯。台北：東大。
尚衡(譯)(1990)。性意識史(第一卷，導論) (M. Foucault原著)。台北：桂冠。
林玉体(1983)。西洋教育史。台北：文景。
林志明(譯)(1998)。古典時代瘋狂史(M. Foucault原著)。台北：時報。
林朝成(譯)(1990)。溝通與社會演化(J. Habermas原著)。台北：結構群。
高承恕(1988)。理性化與資本主義。台北：聯經。
高毅(譯)(1995)。傅柯的生死愛慾(J. Miller原著)。台北：時報。
張漢裕(譯)(1960)。基督新教倫理與資本主義的精神(M. Weber原著)。台北：協志。
陳文團(1996)。論人類之合理性：哈伯瑪斯之共識理論。哲學雜誌，18期，頁72-103。
陳學明(譯)(1994)。合法性危機(J. Habermas原著)。台北：時報。
曾慶豹(1998)。哈伯瑪斯。台北：生智。
黃瑞祺(1996)。批判社會學-批判理論與現代社會學。台北：三民。
楊深坑(1997)。溝通理性、生命情懷與教育過程：哈伯瑪斯的溝通理性與教育。台北：師大書苑。
溫明麗(1987)。哈伯瑪斯溝通行動理論及其德育涵義。台灣師大教育研究所碩士論文。
劉北成、楊遠嬰(譯)(1992)。瘋癲與文明(M. Foucault原著)。台北：桂冠。
劉北成、楊遠嬰(譯)(1993)。規訓與懲罰(M. Foucault原著)。台北：桂冠。
劉絮愷(譯)(1994)。臨床醫學的誕生(M. Foucault原著)。台北：時報。
蔣年豐(1996)。黑格爾與傅柯論警察：對理性啟蒙兩種不同的回響。哲學雜誌，15期，頁70-695。
錢永祥等(1991)。學術與政治-韋伯選集(1)(M. Weber原著)。台北:遠流。
錢俊(譯)(1995)。傅柯-超越結構主義與詮釋學(H.Dreyfus & P.Rabinow原著)。台北：桂冠。
薛興國(譯)(1988)。論何謂啟蒙(M.Foucault原著)。載於李明輝等(譯)，思想，頁13-35。台北：聯經。
簡惠美(譯)(1989)。資本主義與現代社會理論：馬克斯、涂爾幹、韋伯(A. Giddens原著)。台北：遠流。
蘇峰山(1996)。批判如何可能：關於傅柯批判哲學的一些爭議。中央研究院主辦，多元主義研討會論文。
顧忠華(譯)(1986)。理性化與官僚化(W. Schluchter原著)。台北：聯經。
Aristotle,(1980). The Nicomachean ethics(D. Ross trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Augustine, (1960). The confessions of St. Augustine(J.K. Ryan trans.). New York: Doubleday.
Ball, S.J.(1990). Management as moral technology. In S.Ball(ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
Bernstein, R.(ed.)(1985). Habermas and modernity. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
___________(1992). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/ postmodernity. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Boyd, W & King, E.(1975). The history of western education(11th ed.). London: Adam & Charles Black.
Cassirer, E.(1951). The philosophy of the enlightenment(F. Koelln & J. Pettegrove trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Condorcet, A.-N.(1971). Learning how to reason for human progress. In J. Chambliss(ed.), Enlightenment and social progress: Education in the 19th century, pp.7-18. Minneapolis: Burgess Pub.
Deleuze, G.(1988). Foucault(S. Hand trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dreyfus, H. & Rabinow, P.(1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. The University of Chicago.
_____________________(1986). What is maturity? Habermas and Foucault on "What is Enlightenment?" In D.C. Hoy(ed.), Foucault: A critical reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Durant, W.(1953). The story of Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.(original work published 1926)
Eribon, D.(1991). Michel Foucault(B. Wing trans.). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M.(1967). Madness and civilization: a history of insanity in the age of reason (R. Howard trans.). Cambridge: Tavistock.
__________(1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.
__________(1973). The birth of clinic. New York: Vintage.
__________(1972). The archaeology of knowledge( A.M.S. Smith trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
__________(1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison(R. Hurley trans.). New York: Vintage.
__________(1978). History of sexuality(Vol.1)-An introduction(R. Hurley trans.). New York: Vintage.
__________(1980). Power / knowledge(C.Gordon ed.). New York: Pantheon.
__________(1982).Space, knowledge and power. In P. Rabinow(ed.), The Foucault Reader, pp.239-256,
__________(1983a). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow(Eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and Hermeneutics. The University of Chicago.
__________(1983b). On the genealogy of ethics: an overview of work in progress. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow(Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and Hermeneutics. The University of Chicago.
__________(1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow(ed.), The Foucault Reader, pp. 32-50. New York: Pantheon Books.
__________(1985). The use of pleasure: Volume 2 of the history of sexuality(R. Hurley trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
__________(1988a). The care of the self: Volume 3 of the history of sexuality(R. Hurley trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
__________(1988b). Technologies of the self. In L.H. Martin,etc. (Eds.), Technologies of the self, pp.16-49. London: Tavistock.
__________(1988c). The political technology of individuals. In L.H. Martin,etc.(Eds.), Technologies of the self, pp.145-162. London: Tavistock.
__________(1988d). Politics,philosophy,culture(L.D. Kritzman ed.). New York: Routledge.
Fraser, N.(1981). Foucault on modern power: Empirical insights and normative confusions. In B. Smart(ed.) Michel Foucault: Critical assessments,Vol V, pp.459-467. London: Routledge.
Gay, P.(1977). The enlightenment: An interpretation, Vol.2-The science of freedom. New York: Norton.
Giddens, A.(1971). Capitalism and modern social theory-An analysis of the writings of Marx Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge University Press.
Goldmann, L.(1973). The philosophy of the enlightenment: The Christian burgess and the enlightenment(H.Maas trans.). London: Routledge & K. Paul.
Guthrie, W.K.C.(1962). History of Greek philosophy,Vol.3. Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J.(1970). Toward a rational society(J. Shapiro trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
__________(1973). Theory and practice(J. Viertel trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
__________(1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. In New German Critque,No.1.
__________(1975). Legitimation crisis(Th. McCarthy trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
__________(1978). Knowledge and human interest(J.Shapiro trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
__________(1979). Communication and the evolution of society(Th. McCarthy trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
__________(1984). The theory of communicative action,vol.1(Th. McCarthy trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
__________(1987a). The theory of communicative action,vol.2(Th. McCarthy trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
__________(1987b). The philosophical discourse of modernity(F.G. Lawrence trans.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
__________(1989a). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
__________(1989b).The new conservatism( S. Nicholsen ed. and trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
__________(1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action (Ch. Lenhardt & S. Nicholsen trans.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
__________(1992). Autonomy and solidarity: Interviews with Jurgen Habermas(P. Dews ed.). New York: Verso.
__________(1993). Justification and application: remarks on discourse ethics(C. Cronin trans.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Held, D.(1980). Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Honneth, A.(1991). The critique of power: Reflective stages in a critical social theory(K. Baynes trans.). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Honneth, A. & Joas, H.(ed.)(1991). Communicative action: Essays on Jurgen Habermas*s theory of communicative action(J. Gaines & D.L. Jones trans.). Oxford: Polity Press.
Hoy, D.C.(ed.)(1986). Foucault: a critical reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
Hoy, D.C. & McCarthy, Th.(1994). Critical theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, Th.W.(1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
Kant, I.(1964). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals(H. J. Paton trans.) New York: Harper & Row.
______(1988). What is enlightenment? In L.W. Beck(ed.), Kant: selections. pp.459-467. New York: Macmillian.
Kelly, M.(1994). Critique and power: Recasting the Foucault/ Haberms debate. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Macey, D.(1995). The lives of Michel Foucault. New York: Vintage.
McCarthy, Th.(1978). The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge,Mass: MIT Press.
Marcuse, H.(1964). One dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marshall, J.D.(1990). Foucault and educational research. In S.Ball(ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
Nietzsche, Fr.(1965). The birth of tragedy & The genealogy of morals. (F. Gollfing trans.). New York: Doubleday Books.
Outhwaite, W.(1994). Habermas: A critical introduction. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Pusey, M.(1987). Jurgen Habermas. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Rasmussen, D.M.(1990). Reading Habermas. Oxford: Blackwell.
Richters, A.(1988). Modernity-Postmodernity controversies: Habermas and Foucault. In B. Smart(ed.), Michel Foucault: Critical assessments,Vol.1. London: Routledge.
Rorty, C.(1985). Habermas and Lyotard on postmodernity. In R. Bernstein(ed.), Habermas and modernity, pp.161-175. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sheridan, A.(1980). Foucault: The will to truth. New York: Tavistock.
Smart, B.(ed.)(1994). Michel Foucault: Critical assessments,Vol I. London: Routledge.
_______(ed.)(1995). Michel Foucault: Critical assessments,Vol V. London: Routledge.
Taylor, C.(1986). Foucault on freedom and truth. In D.C. Hoy(ed.), Foucault: A critical reader, pp.69-102.Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Thompson, J.B. & Held, D.(ed.)1982). Habermas: critical debates. Cambridge,Mass: MIT Press.
Usher, R. & Edwards, R.(1994). Postmodernism and education. London: Routledge.
Weber, M.(1930). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons trans.).London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Weber, M.(1978). Economy and society(G.Roth & C.Wittich ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wellmer, A.(1985). Reason, utopia and the dialectic of enlightenment. In R.Bernstein(ed.), Habermas and modernity, pp.35-66. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
White, S.(ed.)(1995). The Cambridge companion to Haberms. Cambridge University Press.
Young, R.E.(1989). A critical theory of education: Habermas and our children*s future. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.