臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究目的在探討認知型態及內外向性格對多向度刺激辨識的績效影響。共進行兩個實驗，皆採二因子獨立樣本完全受試者間平衡設計，以藏圖測驗區分不同認知型態受試者；以艾森克人格測驗內外向量表區分內外向性格受試者，進行多向度刺激辨識作業，紀錄多向度刺激辨識作業中各向度反應時間及正確率為績效指標。
實驗結果顯示認知型態會影響多向度刺激辨識作業績效，場地獨立者在多向度刺激辨識作業中各向度的反應時間皆顯著短於場地依賴者，在正確率上則沒有顯著差異。內外向性格在多向度刺激辨識作業中各向度的正確率與餘備指示有交互作用，其中內向組受試者中屬於未告知組的報告正確率高於告知組；而在告知組的受試者中，內外向性格的報告正確率有顯著差異。在反應時間上則沒有表現出顯著差異。
最後本研究根據實驗結果提出在應用上的建議，並討論在多向度刺激辨識作業中造成認知型態及內外向性格績效差異的可能因素。

Two experiments investigated the effects of cognitive style and introversion-extraversion on multidimensional stimulus identification. In Exp1, field-independent Ss and field-dependent Ss were selected by the Hidden Figures Test to perform a task of multidimensional stimulus identification under different instructions of redundent. In Exp2, Ss were categorized as introverts or extraverts by The Eysenck Personality Inventory and completed the same task of Exp1.
Analyses indicate that the field-independent Ss have faster reaction time. But there is no significant differentiation in accuracy. The interaction of extraversion and redundent instructions in accuracy was observed.
Implications of the result and factors cause the effects of cognitive style and introversion-extraversion on multidimensional stimulus identification were discussed.

目 錄
摘 要I
AbstractII
誌 謝III
目 錄IV
圖目錄VI
表目錄VII
第一章 緒論1
1.1 研究背景與動機2
1.2 研究目的與範圍4
1.3 研究程序5
第二章 文獻探討與研究假設7
2.1 多向度刺激辨識7
2.1.1 多向度刺激辨識的作業特性7
2.1.2 影響多向度刺激辨識績效的因素8
2.2 認知型態10
2.2.1 場地獨立與場地依賴者的訊息處理特性11
2.2.2 場地獨立與場地依賴者的認知能力差異12
2.3 內外向性格12
2.3.1 內外向性格的行為表現12
2.3.2 內外向性格的反應差異13
2.3.3 內外向性格與動作時間14
2.4 研究假設16
第三章 實驗一：認知型態對多向度刺激辨識績效的影響18
3.1 實驗對象18
3.2 測驗工具19
3.3 實驗設計20
3.4 實驗設備與刺激符號20
3.5 實驗程序23
3.6 資料蒐集24
3.7 實驗結果25
3.7.1 正確率26
3.7.2 反應時間28
3.7.3 實驗進行之狀況確認30
第四章 實驗二：內外向在多向度刺激辨識績效的效果32
4.1 實驗對象32
4.2 測驗工具33
4.3 實驗設計34
4.4 其他實驗細節34
4.5 實驗結果35
4.7.1 正確率36
4.7.2 反應時間42
第五章 結論與建議45
5.1 研究發現45
5.1.1 實驗一45
5.1.2 實驗二45
5.2 結論與討論46
5.2.1 認知型態對多向度刺激辨識的績效影響46
5.2.2 內外向性格對多向度刺激辨識的績效影響47
5.2.3 餘備指示對多向度刺激辨識的績效影響48
5.3 研究之限制49
5.4 建議49
5.5 未來研究方向50
參考文獻51
附錄57

參考文獻
丁振豐（民76）學生場地獨立性與教師教學方法的交互作用對認知及情意學習效果之影響。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳靜吉（民63）藏圖測驗。台北，遠流出版社。
連玉秀（民84）場地獨立型與場地相依型的國中學生對化學計量解題行為之研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
曾瑞真（民73）我國大學生場地獨立性的形成及其與職業興趣的關係。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
戴禮明（民65）性別、年級與智慧功能的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
Allport, D.A. (1971). Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 104-108.
Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.) New York: Macmillan.
Brebner, J., & Cooper, C. (1974). The effect of a low rate regular signals upon the reaction times of introverts and extraverts. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 263-276.
Brebner, J., & Feavel, R.(1978). The effect of catch-trials on speed and accuracy among introvers and extravers in simple RT task. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 9-15.
Bullock, W. A., & Gilliland, K. (1993). Eysenck’s arousal theory of introversion-extraversion: a converging measures investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 113-123.
Christ, R. E. (1975). Review and analysis of color coding research for visual display. Human Factors, 17, 542-570.
Cochran K. F., & Davis, J. K.(1987). Individual differences in inference processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 197-210.
Converse, S. A., Kozar, S., & Batten, D.(1992). Color coding to facilitate performance of focused attention tasks with object displays. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Human Factor Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factor Society, 1493-1497.
Dicman, S. J., & Meyer, D. E.(1988). Impulsivity and speed-accuracy tradeoffs in information processing. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 54, 274-290.
Doucet, C., & Stelmack, R. M. (1997). Movement time differentiates extraverts from introverts. Personality and individual differences, 23, 775-786.
Egeth, H. E., & Pachella, R. (1969). Multidimensional stimulus identification. Perception and Psychophysics, 5, 341-346.
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The Biological basis of personality. Springfield: Charles C Thomas.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W.(1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: Hodder& Stoughton; San Diego: DIGITS.
Eysenck, M. W., & Eysenck, M. C. (1979). Memory scanning, introversion-extraversion, and levels of processing. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 305-315.
Goodenough, D. R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 675-694.
Hale, S. L., & Billmayer, H. J. (1988). Use of color CRTs in aircraft cockpits: a literature search. (Tech. Note 3-88) Human Engineering Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Harris, C. S., & Haber, R. N. (1963) Selective attention and coding in visual perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 328-333.
Hemphreys, M. S.,& Revelle, W. (1984) Personality, Motivation, Performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153-184.
Hughes, P. K., & Creed, D. J. (1994) Eye movement behavior in viewing color-coded and monochrome avionics displays. Ergonomics, 37, 1871-1884.
Jensen, A. R. & Munro, E. (1979). Reaction time, movement time, and intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 121-126.
Kanrick, A. F., & Peterson, R. C. (1971). R. C. Redundent color coding and keeping-track performance. Human factors, 13, 183-188.
Keuss, P. J. G., & Orlebeke, J. F. (1977). Transmarginal inhibition in a reaction time task as a function of extraversion and neuroticism. Acta Psychologica, 41, 139-150.
Lappin, J. S. (1967). Attention in the identification of stimulus in complex visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 321-328.
Lefever, M. M. & Ehri, L. C. (1981) The relationship between field independence and sentence disambiguation ability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 99-106.
Luder, C. B., & Barber, P. J. (1984). Redundent color coding on airborne CRT displays. Human Factors, 26, 19-32.
Matthews, G., & Amelang, M. (1993). Extroversion, arousal theory and Performance: a study of individual differences in the EEG. Personality and Individual differences, 14, 347-363.
Moore, D. M., & Dwyer, F. M. (1991). Effect of color coding information on students’ levels of field dependence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 611-616.
Moore, D. M., & Dwyer, F. M. (1994). Effect of cognitive style on test type (visual or verbal) and color coding. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1532-1534.
Noble, M., & Sanders, A. F.(1980). Searching for traffic signals while engaged in compensatory tracking. Human Factors, 22, 89-102.
Osga, G. (1982). An evaluation of identification performance for Raster Scan generated NTDS symbology(Final Report). San Diego, CA: Naval Ocean System Center.
Rammsayer, T., Netter, P., & Vogel, W. H. (1993) A neurochemical model underlying differences in reaction times between introverts and extraverts. Personality and Individual differences, 14, 701-712.
Robinson, J. A. , & Bennink, C. D. (1978). Field articulation And working memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 439-449.
Sanders, M. S., and McCormic, E. J. (1992). Human factors in engineering and design, (7th ed.) McGraw-Hill. New York.
Shieh, K. K. & Lai, C. J. (1996a). Effects of practice on the identification of multidimensional stimuli. Perceptual and motor skills, 83, 435-448.
Shieh, K. K., & Lai, C. J. (1996b). Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification. Perceptual and Motor skills, 82, 99-111.
Shieh, K. K., Lai, C. J. & Ellingstad, V. S.(1996). Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 99-111.
Shieh, K.K. (1998). Effectiveness of redundant color coding in multidimensional identification. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 615-625.
Smith, S. L. (1963). Color coding and visual separability in information displays. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 358-364.
Sočan G., & Bucik, V. (1998). Relationship between speed of information-processing and two major personality dimensions─extraversion and neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 35-48.
Stelmack, R. M. (1990). The biological basis of extraversion: Psychophysiological evidence. Journal of Personality, 58, 293-311.
Stelmack, R. M., Houlihan, M., & Mcgarry-Roberts, P. A. (1993). Personality, reaction time, and event-related potentials. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 399-409.
Swierenga, S. J., Boff, K. R., & Donovan, R.S. (1991). Effectiveness of coding schemes in rapid communication displays. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factor Society. Pp. 1522-1526.
Welford, A. T. (1960). The measurement of sensory-motor performance. Survey and reappraisal of twelve years’ progress. Ergonomics, 3, 189-230.
Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering Psychology and human performance, (2nd ed.)New York: HarperCollins.
Wickens, C.D., & Andre, A. D.(1990). Proximity compatibility and information display: effects of color, space, and objectness on information intergration. Human Factors, 32, 61-77.
Zelniker, T. (1989). Cognitive style and dimensions of information processing. Cognitive Style and Cognitive development. (Globerson, T., & Zelniker, T.) . New Jersey: Ablex.