臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以個案研究與深入訪談，將產品開發活動中設計評價構築成一個具層屬性與影響層面的架構，主要發現如下為：(1)產品開發過程中的設計評價架構主要由二者組成，包括核心的評價核心(評價要項﹑評價量測與評價評判)，及以外部的影響構面(本質構面﹑經營構面及環境構面)，在進行評價活動時，必須先依各個影響構面的考量，組織出評價內涵各要項的定義，透過量測尺度的衡量，並對最後的評價結果經由討論以做出決策。(2)關於評價核心，在評價要項部分整理出了六個基本的評價準測要項，分別為創意﹑造形美學﹑人因﹑成本﹑材料以及工程可行性。在評價量測上，是以區間式的尺度來衡量，並以討論為決策時評價評判的基礎。(3)在影響設計評價的構面中，可分為三個層次，彼此又具有層屬性的關係。最高層的構面為環境構面(包含時代性與社會環境)；再來是經營層面(包含公司資源與設計企畫)；最低的層級則是本質構面(包含人員層面﹑過程層面及產品層面)，且與設計評價的關聯最密切。(4)另外在產品設計可能的評價要項上，部分的評價要項有一部分在本研究中定義在影響層面中，另一部分則是整合到六個要項中。而同樣的評價要項之所以產生不同的產品及結果，主要仍在於影響層面對要項定義所產生的獨特性所致。

This study is based on the case study and in-depth interview, establishing a framework with hierarchy and affecting factors for design evaluation in product development.
The main findings are : (1) the framework of design evaluation consists of evaluation core(including items, measurement and criteria) and affecting factors(including substantial, managerial, and environmental). The evaluation must chose the items and define them according to the affecting factors, then measure the items and make a judgement and decision; (2) six items for design evaluation including creativity, athletics, human factors, cost, material and technical feasibility. The interval scale is used to measure the items, and the decision is made through discussion; (3) the affecting factors can be divided into three hierarchical layers, including the highest level of environmental factors(time and social context), then the managerial level(corporate resource and design planning), and the substantial level (people, process and product); (4) in all possible design evaluation items, some of them are defined as the affecting factors, some of them are concluded into the six items. The unique definition of items by affecting factors may cause different final results of design evaluation.

一﹑緒　論
1-1 設計貢獻
1-2 設計與企業表現
1-3 台灣產業的轉型
1-4 研究動機與目的
1-5 研究方法架構與論文章節
二﹑相關研究
2-1 設計評價的本質
2-2 評價活動的分類
2-3 產品開發過程
2-4 相關評價方法
2-5 評價現況
三﹑設計評價架構建構
3-1 個案訪談
3-2 訪談案例一：聲寶家電
3-3 訪談案例二：光陽工業
3-4 訪談案例三：山葉機車
3-5 訪談案例四：裕隆汽車
3-6 訪談案例：巨大工業
3-7 訪談案例六：美利達工業
3-8 產品設計評價模式架構
四﹑設計評價模式架構修正
4-1 個案研究
4-2 個案分析討論
4-3 深入訪談
4-4 綜合討論
4-5 設計評價模式架構修正
4-6 其他發現
五﹑結論與建議
5-1 結論
5-2 評價架構的運作
5-3 後續研究與建議
參考文獻
附錄一 : 訪談問題表
附錄二：深入訪談A.
附錄三：深入訪談B.

中文部分
王得煒, 1996, 產品設計評價研究, 台灣工業技術學院碩士論文.
楊尚潔, 1995, 新產品開發過程中工業設計與其他功能領域互動關係之研究－以台灣資訊業為例, 國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文.
林文榮, 1994, 優良設計產品與其成果之相關性研究, 台灣工業技術學院碩士論文.
游萬來, 宋同正 譯, 1998, 設計進程－成功設計管理的指引, 六合出版社, 台北, pp.33-52.
黃俊英, 1996, 行銷研究－管理與技術, 華泰書局, 台北, pp.291-318.
經濟部技術處, 1997, 經濟部產業技術白皮書, 經濟部技術處, 台北, pp.12-14.
何明泉, 林盛宏, 宋同正, 1998, 產品設計評價系統建構之研究, 行政院國科會專題計畫成果報告(NSC-87-2213-E224-010), 雲林.
何明泉, 張仲夫, 1997, "產品形象之傳達策略", ''''97海峽兩岸暨國際工業設計研討會論文集, 台北科技大學, 台北, pp.255-260.
王源祥, 1993, "工業設計與企業創新", 產品設計與包裝, Vol.55, pp.33-39.
王振源, 1972, "產品設計的評價", 工業設計, Vol.20, pp.22-25, 台北泰山.
吳韻儀 譯, 1996, "發掘產品看不見的吸引力", 天下雜誌 183期, pp.160-166.
英文部分
Baxter, M., 1995a, Product Design-A Practical Guide to Systematic Method of New Product Development, Chapman & Hall, Lodon. P.264.
Baxter, M., 1995b, Product Design-A Practical Guide to Systematic Method of New Product Development, Chapman & Hall, Lodon. pp.96-99.
Blaich, R. & Blaich J., 1993, "Product Design and Corporate Strategy－Managing the Connection for Competitive Advantage ", McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, p.22.
Callon, M., 1991, "Reseaux technico-economiques et irreversibilite" in R. Boyer (ed.), L''''Irriversibilite en L''''Economie, Paris, EHESS.
Cooper, R. G., 1993, "Winning at New Product ", Addison-Wesley., New York, pp.106-119.
Gorb, P.,1990, "The Future of Design and It''''s Mamagement", in Oakley, M. (ed.), Design Management: A Handbook of Issues and Method, Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K., pp.15-25.
Grenier, B.,1990, "Product Evaluation", in Oakley, M. (ed.), Design Management: A Handbook of Issues and Method, Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K., pp.336-341.
Hayes, R. H. , 1990, "Managing Design for Strategic Impact," Paper delivered at the Second International Design Forum, Singapore.
Holt, K.,1990, "The Natural of Design Process", in Oakley, M. (ed.), Design Management: A Handbook of Issues and Method, Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K., pp.195-205.
Pugh, S.,1996, Creating Innovative Products Using Total Design, Addison-Wesley, Workingham, England, pp.335-339.
Quirin, S., 1994, "企業形象與產品形象", 產品包裝與設計, Vol.57, pp.57-63.
Rosenthal, S. R., 1992, Effective Product Design and Development: How To Cut Lead Time and Increase Customer Satisfaction, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., U. S.
Roy, R.,1990, "Product Design and Company Performance", in Oakley, M. (ed.), Design Management: A Handbook of Issues and Method, Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K., pp.49-62.
Screven, C. G.,1980, "Evaluation and the Exhibit Design Process: Pretesting Audience as a Design Tool", Mobilia, pp.5-7.
Takeuchi, H. & Nonaka, I., 1986, "The New New Product Development Game", Harvard Business Review, 64(1), pp.137-146.
Turner, B.,1990, "Design Evaluation", in Oakley, M. (ed.), Design Management: A Handbook of Issues and Method, Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, U.K., pp.348-349.
Thomas, R. J., 1993, New Product Development-Mamaging and Forecasting for Strategic Success, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada, p.129.
The Design Council, 1992, Design and Business Performance: A Chief Executive''''s Handbook, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
Walker, D. et al., 1989, Managing Design: Overview: Issues, P791, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, p38.
Walsh, V., 1995, The evaluation of design: Evaluation of Research and Innovation, pp.489-510
Walsh, V., Roy R., Bruce M. & Potter S., 1992, Wining by Design, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
Whitney, P.,1980, "Three Views of Design Evaluation", Mobilia, pp.2-4.
Yen, J., 1995, "A Comparison of Structured and Non-structured Methods for the Evaluation of Graphic Design Projects" Doctor dissertation, Iowa State University.
Zaccai, G., 1991, "How to Make the Client/Consultant Relationship More Like a Basketball Game Than a Relay Race" Design Management, Vol.2, No.2, pp.43-48.