跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/08 23:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張彥輝
研究生(外文):Yen-Hui Chang
論文名稱:影響廠商選擇環境科技創新類型之初步探討
論文名稱(外文):A Preliminary Study on Factors Affecting Firm’s Selection of Classes of Innovative Enviromental Technologies
指導教授:許牧彥許牧彥引用關係
指導教授(外文):Mu-Hui Hsu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理技術研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:87
語文別:中文
論文頁數:163
中文關鍵詞:環境保護創新類型環境科技創新
外文關鍵詞:Environmental ProtectionInnovation classificationsInnovative Environmental Technologies
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:358
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
摘 要
影響廠商選擇環境科技創新類型之初步探討
研 究 生:張彥輝 指導教授:許牧彥博士
國立雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士班
本研究是以台灣地區、水污染的環境問題,為研究的標的,進行探索性的研究。選擇半導體相關產業與染料、染整業,這兩大產業的廠商作為研究對象。因為傳統染料、染整業所背負的水污染壓力相當大,社區居民、相關利益團體亦相當關注;而半導體產業所承受水污染壓力相對地較小。
本研究所謂的『環境科技創新』,乃是採用「廣義式」的創新理念。亦即個別廠商無論是採用管末環保技術,或透過製程與設備之調整改善,甚至在原物料的選購、研發與採用、綠色產品的研發與量產、以及廠商自行研發特殊性的製程設施,能夠融入組織的文化與環境政策,形成不同於其他廠商的環境保護設施與技術,本研究皆統稱為「環境科技創新」。並將「環境科技創新類型」區分為「管末處理技術的採用(Y1)」、「生產線設置後(Y2)」與「生產線設置前(Y3)」等三大類型。
本研究將這些干擾變數(Molester)區隔為四大類,分別為領導者承諾的程度(M1)、組織特性(M2)、產業特性(M3)與技術特性(M4)等四類。並針對上述四大項的干擾變數,提出26個假說(Hypothesis),經過否證邏輯推論後,將本研究無法否證棄卻(Reject)的假說加以整理,提出16個命題(Proposition)。本研究發現「廠商視環境保護壓力為機會或負擔(M1)」、「生產製造技術自主研發能力(M42)」、「技術創新的意外與風險成本(M43)」、「製程壽命週期(M44)」及「產業相關外在技術變動速度(M45)」是影響廠商進一步選擇「生產線設置後(Y2)」或「生產線設置前(Y3)」之創新類型的最主要因素。
關鍵詞:環境保護、創新類型、環境科技創新
ABSTRACT
A Preliminary Study on Factors Affecting Firm’s Selection of Classes of Innovative Environmental Technologies
Student: Yen-Hui Chang Advisor: Dr. Mu-Yen Hsu
Department of Business Administration
National Yunlin University of Science & Technology
This thesis is an explorative study for the environmental problem of water pollution in Taiwan. What we selected to be our research objects are some firms of semiconductor and dye. By comparing the semiconductor industry with the dyeing industry, the later receives more pressure and attention from its neighborhood and other societies than the former does.
In this paper, we suppose the Innovative Environmental Technologies to be a global view of innovative idea. That is whenever a firm builds its technologies and facilities to protect the environment, which are different from the others in mixing both its organization culture and environmental policy, by adopting the-pipe-end technologies or improving its processes and equipment. This we consider that it adopts “Innovative Environmental Technologies”. Following as stated, we give them the same definition as well when a firm successfully does this by selecting, researching, and using special materials, developing and producing its Green Products, or improving its processing facilities. In this study, we divide the Innovative Environmental Technologies into three segments, one is the adoption of the-pipe-end environmental technologies (Y1), another is the pro-located process (Y2), and the other is the pre-located process (Y3).
There are four Molesters , the promissory level of a leader (M1), the attribute of a organization (M2), the attribute of a industry(M3), and the attribute of technologies, separated in the paper. We propose that there exit 26 Hypotheses according to the four Molesters. After logic reasoning from the falsification theorem, we propose 16 Propositions that cannot be rejected and discover five important factors affecting a firm''s will of selecting the pro-located process (Y2) or the pre-located process (Y3) to be its innovative environmental technologies, which are the promissory level of a leader (M1), its R&D ability in manufacturing (M42), the risk cost at all aspects of technological innovation (M43), the life cycle of its process (M44), and the variant speed of the others (M45).
Key Words: Environmental Protection; Innovation classifications; Innovative Environmental Technologies
目 錄
摘 要I
ABSTRACTII
致 謝III
目 錄VI
表目錄VIII
圖目錄IX
一 緒 論1
1.1 研究背景與動機1
1.2 研究目的4
二 文獻探討5
2.1 環境科技創新的重要性5
2.2 環境科技創新的類型9
2.4 影響廠商環境科技創新選擇的因素18
三 研究範疇與架構20
3.1 研究範疇20
3.2 研究架構21
3.3 研究對象25
3.4 研究方法27
3.5 研究限制31
四 個案描述33
4.1 EL股份有限公司35
4.2 FM股份有限公司39
4.3 TM股份有限公司43
4.4 TS股份有限公司47
4.5 TA股份有限公司52
4.6 MS股份有限公司56
4.7 VG股份有限公司60
4.8 FT股份有限公司64
五 研究假說與假說論證68
5.0 承擔環保壓力(法規、顧客、員工、同業、社區等)的大小(X)68
5.1 領導者視環保為負擔或機會(M1)75
5.2 組織特性變數(M2)82
5.3 產業競爭變數(M3)97
5.4 技術特性變數(M4)107
六 結論與建議135
6.1 結 論135
6.2 建 議141
參考文獻149
一、中文部分
1.Michael L. Tushman & Charle A.,1996,勇於創新,周旭華譯,P143,天下出版社,台北。
2.工商時報,1998,”科學園區18週年慶專刊”,工商時報,第一版,12月1日。
3.王榮德,1987,”流行病學方法論”,當代醫學,第十四卷,第二期,P7。
4.天下編輯,1996,環境台灣,初版,天下文化出版社,台北。
5.天下雜誌,1997,”天下雜誌18週年紀念特刊--環境台灣”,天下雜誌,181期,11月。
6.天下雜誌,1999,”全球汽車版圖重整”,天下雜誌,214期,3月。
7.邱作基,1997,”積體電路工業清潔生產技術指標探討(II)”,清潔生產資訊雙月刊,第十五期,P26-39。
8.林公孚,1996,”化危機為轉機─談環境保護所產生的經營壓力及其化解之道”,品質管制月刊,p16,三月。
9.洪振凱,1995,國內綠色產品研發之初探,國立台灣大學商學研究所,碩士論文。
10.馬 基著,周仲庚譯,卡爾‧巴柏(Karl Poper),龍田出版社,1979。
11.許美倫,1999,”做好環保企業永遠是贏家”,品保認證專刊,經濟日報,九版,3月31日。
12.張如蓮,1997,高科技事業中創新類型與組織知識創造之研究,政治大學科技管理研究所,碩士論文。
13.張峰垚,1996,台灣地區大型企業綠色化行動與環境教育初探,國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所,碩士論文。
14.陳美霞,1999,”防癌 政府與企業的社會責任”,中國時報,時論廣場,04月11日。
15.陳文輝,1996,”工業減廢的效益探討”,清潔生產資訊雙月刊,六期,p18-36。
16.曹以會,1999,”環境品質惡化 痛苦指數達77.47”,中時晚報,焦點新聞,04月10日。
17.黃俊英,1994,”綠色管理:企業因應環保壓力的對策”,中國行政,55,P1-16。
18.黃俊英,1994,環保導向的企業經營,見陸繼雄主編《環境決策與管理(二)》,初版,淑馨出版社,台北。
19.溫肇東、陳泰明,1997,”台灣的綠色創新組織初探”,台大管理論叢,第八卷第二期,p99─124。
20.經濟日報,1999,”CED金品獎暨創新設計技術獎專刊”,第一版,經濟日報,3月23日。
21.蔡啟通,1997,組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係,台灣大學商學研究所,博士論文。
22.蕭景楷,1996,”環保政策的設計”,環境教育,二十二期,P18-27。
二、英文部分
1.Birnbaum, P. H., 1984. “The Choice of Strategic Alternatives Under Increasing Relation in High Technology Companies”. Academy Management Journal. Vol.27, pp.489-510.
2.Cairncross, Frances. 1992. Costing the Earth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
3.Carter, Nancy M. 1990. “Small Firm Adaptation: Responses of Physicians’ Organizations to Regulation and Competitive Uncertainty”. Academy of Management Journal, vol.33, pp.307-333.
4.Clark, K., 1987. Investment in New Technology and Competitive Advantage. In: Teece, D.J. (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp.59-82.
5.Coddington, W., 1992, Environmental marketing: Positive strategies for reaching the green consumer, New York: McGraw_Hill, Inc..
6.Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal D. A., 1990. “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.35, pp.128-152.
7.Dougherty, D.,1996. Organizing for Innovation. In: Clegg, S.R.,Nord,W.R. (Eds),Handbook of Organization Studies. Sage Publications, London, pp.424-439.
8.Fariborz and Shanthi, 1998. “Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of enviromental change”. J. Eng. Technol. Manage., vol.15, pp1-24.
9.Glynn, M. A. 1996. “Innovation Genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligence to innovation”. Academy of Management Review, vol.21, No.4, pp.1081-1111.
10.Kimberly, J. R., Evanisko, M., 1981. “Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technology and adminstrative innovations”. Acad. mange. J., vol.24, pp.689-713.
11.Lengnick-Hall, C.A., 1992. “Innovation and Competitive Advantage: What We Know and What We Need to Learn”. Joural of Management, vol.18, pp.399-429.
12.Marcus, A.A., 1987. “U.S. Firms’ Responses to Regulation : Stonewalling and Opportunism”. Long Range Planning, vol.20, No.3, pp.98-104.
13.McKinley, William, Sanchez C. M., and Schick A. G., 1995,”Organizatioal Downsizing: Constraining, Cloning, Learning”. Academy of Management Executive, vol.9, No.3, pp.32-42.
14.Meyer, Alan D., and Goes J. B. 1998. “Organizational Assimilation of Innovation: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis”. Academy of Management Journal, vol.31, pp897-923.
15.Mezias, S. J. and Glynn, M. A., 1993. “The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, Revolution, and evolution”. Strategic Management Journal, vol.14, pp.77-101.
16.Orr, L., 1976. “Incentives for Innovation as the Basis of Effluent Charge Strategy”, American Economic Review, Vol.56, pp.441-447.
17.Peattie, K. & Ratnayaka, M., 1992. “Responding to the green movement”, Industrial Marketing Management, vol.21, pp.103-110.
18.Porter, F. M., 1991.” American’s Green Strategy”, Scientific American (April), p168.
19.Porter, F. M., 1995.” Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate “. Harvard Business Review (Sep/Oct), Vol.73 Issue 5, p120.
20.Sanchez R. & Mahoney J. T., 1996. “Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organizaiton Design”. Strategic Management Journal, vol.17, pp.63-76.
21.Sanchez, C. M. 1997. Environment Regulation and Firm-Level Innovation─The Moderating Effects of Organizational and Individual-Level Variables. Business & Society, vol.36, No.2, pp.140-168.
22.Sanchez, C. M. & McKinley W., 1998. “Environment Regulatory Influence and Product Innovation: the Contingency Effect of Organizational Characteristics”. J. Eng. Technol. Management, vol.15, pp.257-278.
23.Shrivastava, Paul., 1995. “Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage”. Strategic Management Journal, vol.16, pp.183-200.
24.Simon, F. L., 1992. “Marketing green products in the triad”, The Columbia Journal of World Business, pp.268-285.
25.Tushman, M. L. & Anderson, P., 1986. “Technological discontinuities and organizational environments”. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.32, pp.439-465.
26.Wheeler, W. A., 1992. “The revival in reverse manufacturing “, Journal of Business Strategy, pp.8-13, Jul. — Aug..
27.Whetten, David A. 1981.Organization Responses to Scarcity: Exploring the Obstacles to Innovative Approaches to Retrenchment in Education. Educational Adminstration Quarterly, vol.17, No.3, pp.80-97.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top