臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資訊電腦科技與網路的蓬勃發展使得我們的生活與工作型態有了重大的改變，傳統面對面的人工與紙張作業方式逐漸的汰換成為架構於網路環境之作業型態：只要連上網路就能夠很方便的存取與分享彼此的資源。並且透過Internet其無遠弗屆的特性與電子商務、網路銀行以及視訊會議等各種網路應用的蓬勃發展，不但縮短了人與人、企業與企業之間的距離，同時也提升了企業經營的效率與全球市場的開拓。因此，維持網路的正常和穩定的運作就變成非常重要的一件事。
然而，身處目前發展快速、網網相連的網路環境當中，網路管理的課題真的是千頭萬緒，不知該如何下手。分散式網路錯誤管理系統以區段診斷為基礎的方式，將錯誤診斷的知識與故障排除程序建構成網路錯誤診斷/排除知識模型，幫助網管人員快速、方便地分析複雜的警示訊息找出錯誤的原因以及地點，同時兩階段的推論方式也能有效的解決多個問題同時發生時的推論。因此相信本研究提出之方法必能夠給予網路錯誤管理實務一個好的解決方案。

The way of we live and work have been changed due to the plentiful development of computer science technology and Internet. Traditional face-to-face discussion and the paperwork have been gradually move to the new operational formation which is based on the Internet environment. It’s very easy and convenient to access and share the information and resources from each other through the Internet. With rapid growth of Internet and electronic business﹐internet bank﹐video conference and massive development of variety applications in the Internet platform it’s not only to shorten the distance between people to people and business to business but also enhance the operational efficiency. It also expands the global market share. Consequently, how to maintain a normal and stable network becomes a very important issue.
Despite of we staying in a rapid development and networking environment, it’s very difficult to cope with the issues of network management. The distributed network fault management is built based on the technology of segment diagnosis which is to constructs the network fault diagnose/obviate knowledge model. Helping network administrator quickly and easily to analyze complex alarm messages to find the fault reason and place. Meanwhile two-phase inference could efficiently solve multiple problems which occur in the same time. Hence, I do believe the approach which I provide in this paper could give us the best solution of network fault management in the practical application.

摘要……………………………………………………………...i
Abstract………………………………………….……………..ii
目錄…………………………………………………………….iv
表次…………………………………………………………….vi
圖次…………………………………………………………...vii
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………….1
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………….1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………….3
第三節 預定論文架構…………………………………………5
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………7
第一節 網路管理功能探討…………………………………..7
第二節 網路錯誤管理探討…………………………………..9
第三節 網路錯誤推論的相關研究探討………………….12
第三章 研究架構及研究方法………………………………..24
第一節 分散式網路管理系統整體架構圖……………….24
第二節 研究架構……………………………………………..29
第三節 研究方法……………………………………………..47
第四節 研究限制……………………………………………..52
第四章 系統實做……………………………………………….53
第一節 知識模型建立步驟………………………………….54
第二節 診斷問題之探討…………………………………….56
第三節 資料的蒐集………………………………………….63
第四節 警示的分析………………………………………….67
第五節 修復程序知識的建立………………………………74
第五章 系統有效性評估……………………………………..75
第一節 評估指標與步驟……………………………………75
第二節 網路錯誤模擬方法………………………………..77
第三節 實驗結果…………………………………………….78
第四節 推論錯誤原因之探討……………………………..81
第六章 結論與未來研究建議…………………………………84
第一節 結論…………………………………………………..84
第二節 未來研究建議………………….……………….86
參考文獻…………………………………….………………88
附錄一………………………………………….……………93

1. 吳介巽，支援近代交換式區域網路效能管理之智慧型資料獲取中介軟體的研究與開發，私立輔仁大學資訊管理研究所，1999。
2. 李成泰，儲存為基的TCP/IP區域網路拓樸探索與管理系統之建立，私立輔仁大學資訊管理研究所，2000。
3. 李卓倫，電信網路障礙管理一般化架構之設計，國立交通大學資訊工程研究所，1995。
4. 袁文宗，網路概論，儒林圖書有限公司，1996。
5. 梁宜通，網路管理環境下的TCP/IP警訊轉換，私立逢甲大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，1998。
6. 張紹勳，人工智慧與專家系統，松岡電腦圖書資料股份有限公司，1993。
7. 黃崇富，”善用網路分析儀解決封包問題”，網路通訊，1997年7月，頁58-61。
8. 楊士仲，”淺談網路監測分析系統”，網路通訊，1997年7月，頁50-55。
9. 潘政雄，以SNMP為基礎的網路管理系統：故障管理子系統，私立元智大學電機暨資訊工程研究所，1996。
10. 鄭靜紋，電信網路障礙管理系統之設計與製作，國立交通大學資訊工程研究所，1996。
11. 謝瑞宏，分散式多重智慧型代理軟體為基之網路流量擷取系統之研究，私立輔仁大學資訊管理研究所，2000。
12. American National Standard for Information Technology, “Fault Isolation-Information Characterization X3T8-1994”, Draft, 1994.
13. Baras, J.S.; Ball, M.; Gupta, S.; Viswanathan, P.; Shah, P., “Automated network fault management”, MILCOM 97 Proceedings Volume: 3 , 1997 , pp. 1244 -1250 vol.3.
14. Black, D.P., Managing Switched Local Area Networks A Practical Guide, Addison Wesley Longman, inc. ,1998.
15. Bouloutas A.T., Calo S. and Finkel A., “Alarm Correlation and Fault Identification in Communication Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Computer, Vol. 42, No. 2/3/4, Feb./Mar./Apr. 1994, pp.523-533.
16. Chao, C.S.; Yang, D.L.; Liu, A.C. ,”An Automated Fault Diagnosis System Using Hierarchical Reasoning and Alarm Correlation “, Internet Applications, 1999. IEEE Workshop on , August 1999 , pp. 120 —127.
17. Chen Jiann-Liang; Lin Shingfeng; Lee Ming-Yi, “Distributed fault management over ATM networks”, Distributed Computing Systems, 1997., Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Future Trends of , 1997 , pp. 196 —201.
18. Chen Jiann-Liang; Huang Pei-Hwa, “A fuzzy expert system for network fault management”, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1996., IEEE International Conference on Volume: 1 , 1996 , pp. 328 -331 vol.1.
19. Cronk, R.N.; Callahan, P.H.; Bernstein, L., “Rule-based expert systems for network management and operations: an introduction”, IEEE Network Volume: 2 5 , Sept. 1988 , pp. 7 —21.
20. Duarte, E.P., Jr.; Nanya, T., “An SNMP-based implementation of the adaptive distributed system-level diagnosis algorithm for LAN fault management”, Network Operations and Management Symposium, 1996., IEEE Volume: 2 , 1996 , pp.530 -539 vol.2
21. Duarte, E.P., Jr.; Nanya, T., “Hierarchical adaptive distributed system-level diagnosis applied for SNMP-based network fault management”, Reliable Distributed Systems, 1996. Proceedings., 15th Symposium on , 1996 , pp. 98 —107.
22. Feit S., SNMP: A Guide to Network Management, McGRAW-Hill, 1995.
23. Fahmy, H.I., Douligeris Christos, “END: An Expert Network Designer”, IEEE Network, Nvoember/December 1995, pp.18-27.
24. Jiang Shanliang; Siboni, D.; Rhissa, A.A.; Beuchot, G., “An intelligent and integrated system of network fault management: artificial intelligence technologies and hybrid architectures”, Networks, 1995. Theme: Electrotechnology 2000: Communications and Networks. [in conjunction with the] International Conference on Information Engineering., Proceedings of IEEE Singapore International Conference on , 1995 , pp.265 —268.
25. John Durkin, Expert Systems Design and Development, Prentice Hall Internation, Inc., 1994.
26. Katzela, I.; Schwartz, M., “Schemes for fault identification in communication networks”, Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Volume: 3 6 , Dec. 1995 , pp. 753 —764.
27. Kerschberg, L.; Baum, R.; Waisanen, A.; Huang, I.; Yoon, J., “Managing faults in telecommunications networks: a taxonomy to knowledge-based approaches”, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1991. ''Decision Aiding for Complex Systems, Conference Proceedings., 1991 IEEE International Conference on , 1991 , pp. 779 -784 vol.2.
28. Lewis Lundy, “A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to the Management of Faults in Communications Networks”,IEEE,1993.
29. Lo Cbi-Chun; Chen Shing-Hong, “Robust Event Correlation Scheme For Fault Identification In Communications Network”, Global Telecommunications Conference, 1998. GLOBECOM 1998. The Bridge to Global Integration. IEEE Volume: 6 , 1998 , pp. 3745 —3750.
30. Maxion R.A. and Feather E.F., “A Case Study of Ethernet Anomalies in a Distributed Computing Environment” ,IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, Vol.1, NO.4, Oct., 1990.
31. Network General Corporation, Expert Sniffer Network Analyzer Operations, 1996.
32. Oates Tim, ”Fault Identification in Computer Netwoks: A Review and a New Approach”, Computer Science Technical Report 95-113.
33. Stallings, Data and Computer Communications, Prentice Hall Internation, Inc., 1998.
34. Wayne Fuller, “Network Management Using Expert Diagnostics” , International Journal of Network Management, 1999, pp.119-208.
35. Yeh, S.W.; Wu, C.; Sheng, H.D.; Hung, C.K.; Lee, R.C., “Expert system based automatic network fault management system”, Computer Software and Applications Conference, 1989. COMPSAC 89., Proceedings of the 13th Annual International , 1989 , pp. 767 —774.