跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.86) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/02/08 01:38
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:邱皇智
論文名稱:研發管理活動、研發彈性能力與事業績效之關係研究-以台灣高科技產業為例
指導教授:張世佳張世佳引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:銘傳大學
系所名稱:管理科學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2000
畢業學年度:88
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:研發彈性研發管理事業綪效
外文關鍵詞:R&D flexibilityR&D managementbusiness performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:392
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:133
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
本篇研究主要的目的在於探討研發彈性的管理活動、研發彈性能力、和事業績效之間的相互關係,以國內新竹科學園區的高科技廠商為研究對象,探討研發彈性能力的影響變數,並利用路徑分析(path analysis)建立一整體因果關係模型。本研究仿Upton(1994)分析彈性之方式,而將彈性以範疇(range)彈性及機動(mobility)彈性等二個彈性要素(element)來衡量,並根據文獻整理出影響研發彈性的管理活動分別為研發早期顧客參與產品設計的程度、研發計劃案與外界技術合作的比率、研發計劃案與外界資金合作的比率、製造部門早期參與研發計劃的程度、以跨部門專案團隊的方式研發、高階管理者投入研發工作的程度及供應商參與新產品研發的程度等,而事業績效的衡量採用近二年來之銷售成長率及純益率為指標。研究內容分為三個部份,第一部份研究研發管理活動對研發彈性能力的影響關係。第二部份研究研發範疇彈性和機動彈性之間的關係。第三部份研究研發彈性能力與事業績效之間的關係。
本研究的結論主要有三個重點,(一)研發範疇彈性能力的決定性因子依序為研發早期顧客參與產品設計的程度、研發計劃案與外界技術合作的比率、製造部門早期參與研發計劃的程度及以跨部門專案團隊的方式研發;研發機動彈性的決定性因子為製造部門早期參與研發計劃的程度及以跨部門專案團隊的方式研發(二)廠商若擁有快速的研發機動能力,對範疇彈性能力並無顯著的正相關係,因為研發能力需要長期投資培養,很難只因速度提升而增加。(三)廠商擁有越佳的研發彈性能力則銷售成長率及利潤率會越佳。
The purpose of this study is to construct the casual model between R&D management, R&D flexibility and business performance. The empirical research also builds the propositions based on the manufacturers in HSINCHU SCIENCE-BASED INDUSTRIAL PARK and uses path analysis to verify the proposed model constructed by literature review. According to Upton’s (1994) framework for analyzing the specific dimension of flexibility, this study splits R&D flexibility into two distinct forms that are R&D range and R&D mobility flexibility. Here, the activity of management that influence the flexibility determinants include the degree of customer join the product designed, cooperation about technical exchange in R&D project, cooperation about venture capital in R&D project, manufacturer join the product designed, cross-department team, top manager join R&D project and close relationships with suppliers. The indicators of business performance are sales growth and earning ratio in recent 2 years.
The content of the research is as follows. First, this study is to investigate the impact of activity of management determinate programs on R&D range and R&D mobility flexibility. Second, this study is to deal with the relations among R&D range and R&D mobility flexibility. Finally, this study is also to explore those two distinct forms of R&D flexibility influence on business performance.
There are three major findings in the empirical research:
1. The determinant of R&D range flexibility is the degree of customer join the product designed, cooperation about technical exchange in R&D project, manufacturer join the product designed and cross-department team. The product mobility flexibility is determined in sequence by the manufacturer join the product designed and cross-department team.
2. The relationship with Greater R&D mobility and R&D range flexibility is insignificant because R&D is a long-term investment.
3. The major source of earning ratio comes from the R&D flexibility of the firm.
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究問題 2
1.3研究目的 3
1.4研究對象 4
1.5研究流程 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
2.1 彈性定義 7
2.1.1彈性的定義 7
2.1.2彈性的研究領域 7
2.1.3內部彈性與外部彈性 8
2.2 研發彈性能力 9
2.3影響研發管理活動之探討 14
2.4 績效之定義 18
第三章 研究方法 19
3.1研究架構 19
3.2 研究假設 20
3.2.1 研發管理活動對研發彈性能力 20
3.2.2 研發範疇及機動彈性能力之間的相互關係 23
3.2.3 研發彈性能力與經營績效 23
3.3變數衡量 24
3.3.1研發彈性能力的衡量 24
3.3.2研發管理活動之衡量 26
3.3.3事業績效之衡量 29
3.4 研究方法 30
3.5研究限制 32
第四章 實證研究結果 33
4.1 問卷回收情形 33
4.2 樣本廠商之敘述統計 35
4.2.1 廠商基本資料 35
4.2.2 研發管理活動的推動情形 35
4.2.3 研發彈性能力的情形 36
4.2.4事業績效的表現情形 37
4.2.5數據處理 37
4.3 分析結果 38
4.4 結果討論 45
第五章 結論與建議 50
5.1 研究結論 50
5.2 管理上的涵意 51
5.3 後續研究建議 52
參考文獻 53
問卷 56
1. Alan, H. S., “Advances Make Gas-To-Liquids Process Competitive for Remote Locations,” Oil & Gas Journal, Vol. 95, No. 31, 1997, pp68-72.
2. Brown, M. G. and Svenson, R. A., “Measuring R&D Productivity,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1988, pp11-15.
3. Buzacott, J. and Mandelbaum, M., “Flexibility and productivity in Manufacturing Systems,” Proceedings of the IIE Conference, (Chicago, IL), Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Atlanta, CA, 1985, pp404-413.
4. Chakrabarti, A. K., “Industry Characteristic Influencing The Technical Output: A Case of Small and Medium Size Firms in The US,” R&D Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1991, pp139-152.
5. Cusumano, M. A. and Nobeaka, K., “Strategy, Structure and Performance in Product Development: Observation from the Auto Industry,” Research Policy, Vol. 21, No.23, 1992, pp265-293.
6. Clausing, D. P., “Total Quality Development,” Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1994, pp94-98.
7. Cooper, R. G., and Wheelwright, S. C., “Winning Businesses in Product Development:The Critical Success Factors,” Research Technology Management, July-August, 1996, pp18-29.
8. DeMott, J. S., “Company Alliances for Market Muscle,” Nation’s Business, Vol. 82, No.2, 1994, pp52-56.
9. Ellis, L. W. and Curtis, C. C., “Measuring Customer Satisfaction,” Research Technology Management, Vol.38, No. 5, 1995, pp45-51.
10. Gary, P. P., Steven, C.W., “High-Tech R&D,” Harvard Business Review, September-October 1995, pp93-105.
11. Gerwin, D., “Manufacturing flexibility: A Strategic Perspective,” Management Science, Vol.39, No.4, 1993, pp.395-410.
12. Kamath, R. R., Liker, J. K., “A Second Look at Japanese Product Development,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, No. 6, 1994, pp154-164.
13. Karagozoglu, N., and Brown, W. B., “Time-base Management of the New Product Development Process,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1993, pp204-215.
14. Karagozoglu, N., “Environmental Uncertainty, Strategic Planning, and Techonological Competitive Advantage,” Technovation, Vol. 13, No.6, 1993, pp335-347.
15. Mabert, V. A., Muth, J. F., and Schmenner, R. W., “Collapsing New Product Development Time: Six Case Studies,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, September, 1992, pp200-212.
16. Mandelbaum, M., Flexibility in Decision Making: An Exploration and Unification, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 1978.
17. McDonough, E. F., “Faster New Product Development: Investigating the Effects of Technology and Characteristics of the Project Leader and Team,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1993, pp241-250.
18. Millett, S. M., “The Strategic Management of Technological R&D:An Ideal Process for the 1990s,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1990, pp153-163.
19. Nilsson, C. H. and Nordahl, H., “Making Manufacturing Flexibility Operational-Part 1: A Framework,” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol.6, No.1, 1995, pp.5-11.
20. Nilsson, C. H. and Nordahl, H., “Making Manufacturing Flexibility Operational-Part 2: Distinctions and an Example,” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol.6, No.2, 1995, pp.4-10.
21. Oaky, R., Rothwell, R. and S.Cooper, “The Management of Innovation in High-Technology Small Firms,” Quorum Books, 1988, Ch.4, pp.37-52.
22. Ramasesh R. V.,and Jayakumar M. D., “Measurement of Manufacturing Flexibility: A Value Based Approach,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol.10, No.4, 1991.
23. Rosenau, M. J, “And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem /solving(Second Edition)/The Science of Innovation: A Managerial Overview of the TRIZ Methodology,” The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1998, pp100-103.
24. Sethi, A. K. and Sethi, S. P., “Flexibility in Manufacturing: A Survey,” The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing System, Vol. 2, 1990, pp. 289-328.
25. Slack, N., “Flexibility as A Manufacturing Objective,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1983, pp.4-10.
26. Steudel, H. J. and Sesruelle, P., “Manufacture in the Nineties: How to Become a Mean Lean World Class Competitor,” Van Nostrand Reingold, 1992, pp6.
27. Suarez, F. F., Cusumanl, M. A. and Fine, C. H., “An Empirical Study of Flexibility in Manufacturing,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, Fall, 1995, pp. 25-32.
28. Upton, D. M., “The Management of Manufacturing Flexibility,” California Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1994, pp.72-89.
29. Upton, D. M., “Process Range in Manufacturing: An Empirical Study of Flexibility,” Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 8, 1997, pp1079-1092.
30. Youssef, M. A, “Design for Manufacturability and Time-to-market,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 14, No. 12, 1994, pp6-21.
1. 丁明勇,「高科技廠商特性、研究發展管理活動與成效之研究-以科學園廠商實證」,交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文,民86。
2. 李明軒、邱美如譯,國家競爭優勢上下冊,Michael E. Porter著,1997,天下文化出版股份有限公司。
3. 陳听如,「國內技術產業對於同步工程的應用與其績效之研究」,東海大學管理研究所碩士論文,民86。
4. 陳智賢,「研發成果績效指標之研究:以經濟部科技專案為例」,國立交通大學管理研究所碩士論文,民84。
5. 陳順宇著,多變量分析,華泰書局,台北,民國87年5月。
6. 黃俊英、林震岩, SAS精析與實例,華泰書局,台北,民國86年5月。
7. 楊浩二著,多變量常庇性檢定及應用之研究,華泰書局,台北,民國71年11月。
8. 楊國樞,文崇一,吳聰賢,李亦園,社會及行為科學研究方法,東華書局,民國84年3月。
9. 廖志德,研究發展績效現形,科學管理新知交流通訊,中國生產力中心編印,第四期,82年1月,頁12-15。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top