跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.87) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 18:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳彥行
研究生(外文):Yan-Xing Chen
論文名稱:長期看護保險之實證分析--願付價格法的應用
論文名稱(外文):The Demand for Long-Term Care Insurance -- A Willingness to Pay Approach
指導教授:胡玉蕙胡玉蕙引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu-Whuei Hu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:經濟學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2000
畢業學年度:88
語文別:英文
論文頁數:45
中文關鍵詞:願付價格長期看護保險CV 法
外文關鍵詞:Willingness to payLong-term care insuranceContingent Valuation Method
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:548
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:149
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
長期看護保險在台灣為一新興的保險商品,本文使用以Contingent Valuation Method(CVM)所設計的問卷來估計消費者對此一商品的願付價格,並探討影響願付價格的重要因素。本文也設計出一雙元的估計方式,並利用Chow-test來檢定 CVM 的可靠性及穩定性。
我們發現年齡及所得對於長期看護保險需求有顯著的正向影響。實證結果也顯示反向選擇的發生,以及父母使用遺產來誘使子女提供長期看護的可能性。在長期看護需求快速增加的情況下,若市場機能無法發揮,我們建議全民健保在附加保險及根據個人風險調整保費的方式下納入長期看護給付。此外,我們設計的檢定並無法拒絕 CVM 的可靠性及穩定性。
Given very limited size of the current private long-term care (LTC) insurance market, it is difficult to predict the consumers'' response to the new insurance product.By applying the contingent valuation method to investigate the individual''s willingness to pay for LTC insurance, our study has expanded the scope of studying new insurance product literature.
Using data collected from the 1998 and 1999 surveys on "Health and Insurance",we estimate the model of the willingness to pay (WTP) for LTC insurance to test the hypothesis of adverse selection, moral hazard, and bequest motives.
Our results indicate that the classical problem of adverse selection may exists, which may limit the size of private LTC insurance market.Our results also suggest a plausible picture of the exchange bequest motive. Nonetheless, as population aging and less children for the future generation in Taiwan,
the negative relationship between the presence of children and the WTP for LTC insurance implies the demand for LTC insurance will increase. Based on the current findings, the government interference in the LTC insurance market is in order.
In addition to single equation estimations for each of 1998 and 1999 samples, we provide evidence on the reliability of the CV method based on the results of a bivariate estimation;a "Chow test" also shows that the effects of the important factors are stable over time.
1. Introduction..........................................4
2. Literature review.....................................7
3. Conceptual framework of the WTP for LTC insurance....10
4. Survey design and data...............................16
4.1 The CV method....................................16
4.2 Variations in elicitation methods................17
4.3 DAta.............................................19
5. Empirical specification..............................19
5.1 Dependent variable...............................19
5.2 Explanatory variables............................21
5.3 Estimation method................................26
6. Empirical result.....................................30
6.1 Single-period estimation.........................30
6.2 Bivariate analysis (Testing reliability).........36
6.3 The "Chow test" (Testing stability)..............37
7. Conclusions and implications.........................38
Appendix A..............................................41
Appendix B..............................................42
Reference...............................................44
Alberini, A.(1995),"Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimations:bivariate and interval-data models,"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 169--180.
Arrow, K.J.(1963), "Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care,"A.E.R. 33, 941-973.
Bishop, R. C. and Heberlein, T.A.(1979),"Measuring values of extramarket goods: are indirect measure biased,"American ournal of Agricultural Economics, 61(5), 926--930.
Cameron, T. A. and Quiggin, J.(1994),"Estimation using Contingent valuation data from a dichotomous choicewith follow-up questionnaire,"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 218--234.
Davis, R. K.(1964),"The value of big game hunting in a private forest,"Transactions of the 29th North American wildlife and natural conference.(Washington, D.C., Wildlife management institute).
Loomis J .B.(1989),"Test-retest reliability of the contingent valuation method:a comparison of general population and visitor responses," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 76--84.
McCall, N., Mangle, S., Bauer, E., and Knickman, J.(1998),
"Factors important in the purchase of partnership Long-term Care Insurance," Health Services Research 33(2), 187-203.
Meier, V.(1998),"Long-term care insurance and life insurance demand,"Geneva Paper on Risk and Insurance Theory 15(3), 201-219.
Meier, V.(1999),"Why the young do not buy long-term care insurance,"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18, 83-98.
Mitchell, R.C., and Carson, R.T.(1981),"An experiment in determining willingness to pay for national water quality
improvements,"draft report to the U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Mossion, J.(1968), "Aspects of rational insurance purchasing,"
J.P.E. 76(4), 553-568.
Norton, E.C.(2000),"Handbook of health economics,"forthcoming book.
Pauly, M.V.(1990), "The rational nonpurchase of long-term care insurance,"J.P.E. 98(1), 153-168.
Sloan, F.A. and Norton, E.C.(1997),''Adverse selection, Bequest, Crowing out, and private demand for insurance:Evidence from the long-term care insurance market,"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15, 201-219.
Zweifel, P. and Struwe, W.(1996),"Long-term care insurance and bequests as instrument for shaping intergenerational relationships,"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12, 65-76.
Zweifel, P. and Struwe, W.(1998),"Long-term care insurance in a two generation model,"{\it Journal of Risk and Insurance 65(1), 13-32.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top