臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

一、整體來說，儘管兒童在貧窮環境下的危機與概念在文獻、研究中廣為流傳，然與兒童住在一起的受訪者並未一同感受問題而賦予如學者般的特別關注。以研究的角度來看，貧窮兒童在秀林鄉的環境中屬於貧窮弱勢中的弱勢，兒童可能面臨的生活危機僅在研究領域中被強調。
二、福利政策以給予金錢的方式，再由家庭中父母或主要照顧者以自行購買的方式滿足家庭的需求，例如購買教育、購買水電，然而福利所給予的金錢並不足以讓父母應付基本生存需求，又何況購買對兒童發展有益的事物呢！從另一點來說，政府透過公共制度迫使父母必須購買教育、購買學校制服、營養午餐、以及購買水和電……造成家庭極重的負擔；對貧窮家庭而言，家中極大比例的收入用於滿足公共制度的消費，包括工作的收入與福利的補助。然而福利決策的過程並未能體會福利受助者這樣的心情與景況，僅以少量的金錢象徵性補助貧窮家庭，並不期待更積極的資源介入與影響。
三、透過申請者對福利的意見與實際的生活情形，反映出福利政策的執行對申請者的污名。第一，秀林鄉居民申請福利協助的原因根源於秀林鄉、花蓮地區的工作機會貧乏；第二，福利在防治福利依賴的決策心態使得秀林鄉居民在福利服務的過程中被誤會為懶惰、不工作、喜歡不勞而獲…依賴福利供養的人，而他們被迫必須成為社會所謂的福利依賴者，其過程與體驗並沒有被福利了解與接納。
四、儘管福利政策有明確的規定，如低收入補助的對象、家庭所得限制、救助金額計算…等，但是對需要協助的村民來說，他們與福利救助是遙遠與疏離的，一但嘗試要接近福利，他們就要經歷許多碰壁的過程，在連串的錯誤後才能獲得對福利的認識與利益。
五、除了實際工作上的問題，村幹事、社工員、研究者自己，甚至包括許多過去的研究都將解決原住民的問題寄託於教育之中，舉例來說，台灣有許多針對原住民學業成就的研究，即期望從教育中找到合適原住民的模式進而改善原住民低社經、失業…等目前普遍存在之問題，而福利的角色與功能並不明顯地被注意。

It is easy to view children as the high-risk group that inherits impoverish heritage, hence it plays an important role in the topic of poverty. The natural resources in Shiu-Lin Village are plentiful and abundance, but its residents remained unable to benefit or improve their economic situation as a result of those bounties. This research has selected the Shiu-Lin Village as its target research region.
The following points are taken from the researcher’s personal experience while conducting this research:
1. Overall speaking, even with the widespread knowledge of the risks and beliefs involved with children of poverty in literatures and reports, the respondents who co-habited with the children did not experience the same concern as stated in those documents, hence no special considerations were given. From a research perspective, the poverty-stricken children of Shiu-Lin Village are at the bottom rank of this dastardly poor group; hence the possible life crisis of those children is an issue worthy of emphasis in the realm research, however.
2. Governmental welfare policy is to give cash directly to the parents of a household or the caretaker of the children to purchase goods in order to satisfy the needs of the household, such as paying for education, water and utilities. However the current amount of cash brought on by the social benefit is insufficient for the parents to take care of their basic living necessities, let along paying for the beneficial matters in children’s development! Let’s look from another perspective, government mandates the parents to pay for education, pay for school uniform, nutritious lunches, as well as water and utilities, based public standards, is causing families tremendous burden. For a poor family, its majority ratio of income, including income from work and welfare benefit, is spent on satisfying the expenditures of public standard. Nonetheless, when the decision of social welfare was made, considerations of the mindset and actual situation of these destitute recipients were not a part of the process; hence these families could only receive a small token amount of subsidy. In fact, these families are expecting the government to progressively invest huge amounts of resources or influence.
3. The comments of the applicants and actual living conditions reflected the detrimental effect of the execution of the welfare policy on its recipients. First, the reason why Shiu-Lin villagers apply for social supplements rooted from employment hardship in Shiu-Lin Village and in the Hualien region. Second, in the eyes of anti-welfare dependence, the recipients of social welfare, the villagers of Shiu-Lin Village are the people who live off social welfare, and are regard as lazy, lack the desire to work, and freeloaders. But the reason as to why these villagers were forced to become dependent on the social welfare in the first place, that process and journey, were not understood or accepted by the welfare body.
4. Abide the clear stipulations in the social welfare policy such as the low-income candidates, limited household income, the calculation of the subsidy, etc., but those poor villagers in need of assistance, remain far and away from the rescues of social benefit. Once they attempt to come closer to social welfare, they must face with a laborious and painstaking process, only to learn the faces of social welfare and social benefits after a series of trial and error.
5. Apart from the physical work issue, the village leaders, social workers, this researcher, and many previous report papers, have all pinned the hope of aborigine resolution on education. For example, Taiwan has many researches focusing on the education of the aborigines. The purpose of these researches is to find a proper model suitable for the aborigines through education that may lead to improvements of the vast problems currently in existence, low social income of the aborigines, unemployment, etc. But nonetheless, the role and the functions of the social welfare are not noticeably conspicuous.

第一章 緒論
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 貧窮兒童的問題
第二節 原住民兒童的相關問題探討
第三節 台灣的貧窮福利與原住民福利計劃
第三章 研究方法
第一節 量化研究
第二節 質化研究
第三節 資料的分析
第四節 研究的程序
第四章 分析與討論
第一節 貧窮對兒童的影響
第二節 秀林鄉福利輸送實質
第三節 貧窮循環的問題與解決
第五章 研究結論
第一節 分析討論
第二節 研究結論
第三節 研究的反省

一、中文文獻
鄭善明（民85年）。原住民國小六年級兒童福利需求之研究－以台東縣為例。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
劉明興（民86）。台北市低收入戶人口特質與文化之分析。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
臺灣省社會處（民87）。台灣省低受入戶福利需求調查報告。臺灣省社會處。
臺灣省社會處（民86）。社政年報－中華民國八十五年七月七日至八十六年六月。臺灣省社會處。
臺灣省社會處（民86）。台灣省山地鄉原住民福利需求調查報告。臺灣省社會處。
黃瑞琴（民85）。質性研究。台北：心理出版社。
章順仁（民87年）。台灣原住民痛風之流行病學研究。高雄醫學院醫學研究所博士論文。
陳順利（民88年）。原漢青少年飲酒行為與學業成就之追蹤調查－以台東縣關山地區為例。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
陳佩文（民87年）。原住民非行少年成長環境與學校經驗之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
許文忠（民87年）。山地布農族學童族群認同與自尊之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
張銘章（民68年）。貧窮形成原因實證之研究。東吳大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
張建中（民87年）。岐視、教育與原住民的貧窮－對烏來地區原住民低收入戶的實際觀察。國立中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。
張坤鄉（民87年）。原住民國中生中途輟學相關因素與形成過程之研究－以屏東縣為例。國立政治大學教育系博士論文。
林勝義（民86）。兒童福利行政－兒童福利概要。台北：五南。
季紅瑋（民86年）。都會區原住民國中生壓力因應歷程之探討。東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
秀林鄉公所編輯小組（民86年）。花蓮縣秀林鄉為民服務手冊。花蓮縣秀林鄉公所。
李明政、葛應欽、衛民（民87年）。原住民族社會福利體系之規劃。行政院原住民委員會施政整體規劃委託研究計劃。
全國成（民85年）。原住民青少年問題與因應對策。青年輔導年報。
台大醫學院病歷委員會修正（民84年）。6-15歲男女身高體重曲線圖。國立臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院。
王淑英、何慧卿（民86年）。Head Start美國學前啟蒙計劃。青少年兒童福利學刊。
王玉屏（民71）。國中低收入學生行為困擾、學習態度與學業成就之調查研究。教育研究所集刊，第24輯，253-157。
Babbie, E.（1998）.。社會科學研究方法（李美華等譯）。時英出版社。（原英文出版1975）
二、英文文獻
Bailey, R., ＆ Brake, M.（1975）. Introduction：Social Work in the Welfare State. Radical Social Work. Pantheon Books.
Berg, B.（1998）. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Allyn and Bacon.
Dodge, K. A.（1994）. Socialization mediators of the relation between socioeconomic status and child conduct problems. Child Development, 65, 649-665.
Downs, S. W., et al.（1996）. Child welfare and family services: policies and practice. White plains. NY: Longman.
Duncan, G. J.（1991）. The economic environment of children. In A. C. Huston（Ed.）, Children in Poverty：child development and public policy, 23-50. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Duncan, G. J., Gunn, J. B., & Klebanov, P. K.（1994）. Economic Deprivation and Early Childhood Development. Child Development, 65, 296-318.
Greene, G.（1995）. Long-Term Outcomes of Early Childhood Programs：Analysis and Recommendations. The Future of Children, 5, 3, 6-24.
Gunn, J. B., ＆Duncan, G. J.（1997）. The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7, 2, 55-71.
Gustravsson, N. S., ＆ Segal, E. A.（1994）. Critical issues in child welfare. CA: Sage Publication.
Huston, A. C.（1991）. Children in Poverty：Development and policy issues. In A. C. Huston（Ed.）, Children in Poverty：child development and public policy, 1-22. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Klerman, L. V.（1991）. The health of poor children: Problems and Programs. In A. C. Huston（Ed.）, Children in Poverty：child development and public policy, 136-157. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, V. E., Gunn, J. B., Schnur, E., & Liaw, F. R.（1990）. Are Head Start Effects Sustained？A longitudinal Follow-up Comparison of Disadvantaged Children Attending Head Start, No Preschool, and other Preschool Program. Child Development, 61, 495-507.
Plotnick, R. D.（1992）. Income support for families with children. In P. J. Pecora（Eds.）, The child welfare challenge policy, practice, and research. NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Ramey, C. T., ＆ Campbell, F. A.（1991）. Poverty, early childhood education, and academic competence: The Abecedarian experiment. In A. C. Huston（Ed.）, Children in Poverty：child development and public policy , 190-219. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Schorr, L. B.（1991）. Effective programs for children growing up in concentrated poverty. In A. C. Huston（Ed.）, Children in Poverty：child development and public policy, 261-281. NY: Cambridge University Press.
World Health Organization.（1986）. The growth chart-a tool for use in infant and child health care. Author.