跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.9.169) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/06 07:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:謝千之
研究生(外文):Chien-Chin Hsieh
論文名稱:產品資訊情境、參考價格與知覺品質對消費者購買行為之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Product Information, Reference Prices ,and Perceived Quality on Consumers'''''''' Behavioral Intentions
指導教授:張重昭張重昭引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chung-Chau Chang Ph. D.
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2000
畢業學年度:88
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:產品資訊外部參考價格知覺品質知覺交易價值知覺獲得價值購買意願搜尋意圖內部參考價格
外文關鍵詞:product informationadvertised reference priceperceived qualityperceived transaction valueperceived acquisition valuewillingness to buysearch intentioninternal reference price
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:133
  • 點閱點閱:3039
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:619
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:16
消費者在考量購物時,購買意願通常決定於其所知覺之獲得價值,亦即消費者預期在購買後,對於知覺產品利益與知覺代價之間的取捨。銷售者可藉由增加消費者對產品利益或品質之知覺來增強消費者的對獲得價值的知覺。有些學者認為,消費者在購買行為中,決定知覺價值的因素並不單只有獲得價值此部份,還必須考慮到交易效用的影響。然而,當消費者對產品的相關資訊所知有限,或產品之品質無法保証,只能以價格做為評斷品質的基礎時,上述變數間之關係將會變得複雜。本研究除探討「知覺品質」與「參考價格」對消費者知覺價值的影響外,尚討論當消費者購買產品時,掌握產品資訊情境的不同,對於「知覺品質」與「交易價值」的影響。原先「知覺品質」、「參考價格」與「廣告售價」等變數之間的關係,是否會因為產品資訊情境的不同而受到影響,本研究中亦將探討。
本研究採3(三組產品資訊情境-簡單產品資訊、更詳細的產品資訊、提供品質保証的產品資訊) ×2 (二組廣告參考價格-合理高廣告參考價格、合理低廣告參考價格)×2(二組廣告售價-高售價、低售價)實驗設計方式,以知覺品質、內部參考價格、知覺獲得價值、知覺交易價值、購買意願、搜尋意圖為內生變數進行分析。結果顯示(1)當廠商提供之產品資訊越少,廣告售價對知覺品質之正面影響效果就越強。(2)當產品資訊強度愈高,消費者對產品之知覺品質愈高。(3)當消費者之知覺品質、廣告參考價格、廣告售價愈高時,其內部參考價格愈高。(4)當消費者之內部參考價格愈高、所面對之產品資訊強度愈高與廣告售價愈低時,則知覺交易價值愈高(5)當消費者之知覺品質、知覺交易價值愈高時,則其知覺獲得價值愈高;且當消費者之獲得價值愈高時,其購買意願愈高(6)對於台灣地區之學生消費群而言,搜尋意圖不受知覺獲得價值之影響。
Many past literature have addressed the consumers’ purchase intent and search intent as well as their antecedents, but the research findings are mixed. This research proposes a model with three exogenous constructs (product information, advertised reference price and advertised selling price) and six endogenous constructs (consumers'''''''' perceived quality, internal reference price, perceived transaction value, perceived acquisition value, willingness to buy and search intention.). This study employs 3(three levels of product information context, strong, medium or and weak)× 2 (two levels of advertised reference price, plausible-high and plausible-low)× 2 (two levels of advertised selling price, high and low) between-subjects factorial design. The major conclusions are as follows.
(1) As the firms provide less product information to the consumers, the advertised selling price exerts stronger effect on perceived quality.
(2) Consumers perceive better quality as the firms provide stronger product information.
(3) Consumers'''''''' internal reference price is positively correlated to perceived quality, advertised reference price and advertised selling price.
(4) Perceived transaction value is positively correlated to consumers'''''''' internal reference price and product information. Besides, there is a negative correlation between selling price and perceived transaction value.
(5) Consumers'''''''' perceived acquisition is positively influenced by perceived quality and perceived transaction value. And this higher acquisition will lead to higher willingness to buy.
(6) For students, the search intent is not influenced by perceived acquisition value.
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 參考價格 4
第二節 知覺品質 12
第三節 產品資訊 19
第四節 知覺價值理論 25
第五節 研究架構與研究假設 31
第三章 研究方法 38
第一節 研究設計 38
第二節 變數之定義、衡量與資料分析工具 45
第四章 研究結果 49
第一節 樣本回收情形 49
第二節 內部一致性之衡量 50
第三節 線性結構關係模式 51
第五章 研究結論與建議 58
第一節 研究結論 58
第二節 建議 62
第六章 參考文獻 66
1. 張重昭、高麗文,參考價格對消費者行為之影響,中山管理評論,民國84年3月,頁80-107。
2. 張重昭、周宇貞,知覺品質與參考價格對消費者知覺價值與購買意願之影響,企業管理學報,第45期,民國88年9月,頁1-36。
3. 周宇貞,知覺品質與參考價格對消費者知覺價值與購買意願之影響,私立東吳大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文,民國88年6月。
4. 梁安昌,不同價格訊息呈現方式下參考價格對消費者行為影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國82年6月。
5. Aaker, David A. (1996), Building Strong Brand, New York, The Free Press.
6. Biswas, Abhijit and Edward A. Blair (1991), “Contextual Effects of Reference Price in Retail Advertisement,” Journal of Marketing, 55, pp. 1-12.
7. Bolton, Ruth N. and James H. Drew (I 991), “The Multistage Model of Customer’s Assessments of Service Quality and Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(March), pp. 375-384.
8. Chang, Tzung-Zong and Albert R. Wildt (1989), “The Number and Importance of Information Cues and The Price-perceived Quality Relationship,” in 1989 AMA Educators’ Proceedings: Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing. eds. Paul Bloom et al. Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 209.
9. Chang, Tzung-Zong and Albert R. Wildt (1994), “Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intertion: An Empirical Study,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, No.1, pp. 16-27.
10. Chapman, Joseph D. and Dena Cox (1990), “The Impact of Discounts on Subjective Product Evaluations,” working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
11. Chapman, Joseph D. and Kent B. Monroe (1990), “The Framing Effects of Alternative Price Promotions on Buyers’ Subjective Product Evaluations,” working paper, Department of Marketing, Bell State University.
12. Chapman, Joseph D. (1986), “The Impact of Discounts on Subjective Product Evaluations” working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
13. Cohen, Joel B. (1979), “The Structure of Product Attributes: Defining Attribute Dimensions for Planning and Evaluation.” in Analytic Approaches to Product and Marketing Planning, A. Shocker, ed. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
14. Della Bitta, Alber J., Kent B. Monroe, and John M. McGinnis (1981), “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(November), pp. 416-427.
15. Dickson, Peter R. and Alan G. Sawyer (1990), “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers,” Journal of Marketing, 42(July), pp. 42-53.
16. Dodds, William B. and Kent B. Monroe (1985), “The Effects of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 12, Elizabeth C. Hirschman and Morris B. Holbrook, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 85-90.
17. Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal (1991), “The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), pp. 307-319.
18. Emery, Fred E. (1970), “Some Psychological Aspects of Price,” in Pricing Strategy. eds. Bernard Taylor and Gordon Willis. Princeton, NJ: Brandom/Systems, pp. 98-111.
19. Garvin, David A. (1983), “Quality on the Line,” Harvard Business Review, 61(Septemper-October), pp. 65-73.
20. Garvin, David A. (1987), “Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, 65(November-December), pp. 101-109.
21. Geistfeld, Loren V., G. B. Sproles, and S. B. Badenhop (1977), “The Concept and Measurement of a Hierarchy of Product Characteristics,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 4, W. D. Perreault, Jr., Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 302-307.
22. Grewal, Dhruv and R. Krishnan (1998), “The Effects of Store Name, Brand Name, and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 74(Fall), Issue.3, pp. 331-352.
23. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan (1998), “The Effects of Price-comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 62(April), pp. 46-59.
24. Grewal, Drhuv (1989), “The Effect of Intrinsic, Extrinsic Cues and Reference Prices on Buyer’s Perceptions of Quality and Value,” unpublished dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic, Institute and State University.
25. Gutman, Jonathan and Scott D. Alden (1985), “Adolescents’ Cognitive Structures of Retail Stores and Fashion Consumption: A Means-End Chain Analysis of Quality,” in Perceived Quality, J. Jacoby and J. Olson, eds. Lexingtion, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 99-114.
26. Hardie, Bruce G. S., Eric J. Johnson, and Peter S. Fader (1993), “Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice,” Marketing Science,12(Fall), pp. 378-394.
27. Helson, Harry (1964), Adaptation Level Theory, New York, Harper and Row.
28. Herr, Paul M. (1989), “Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), pp. 67-75.
29. Holbrook and Kim P. Corfman (1985), “Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaedrus Rides Again,” in Perceived Quality, J. Jacoby and J. Olson, eds. Lexington, MA Lexington Books, pp. 31-57.
30. Howard, J. A. (1977), Consumer Behavior: Application of Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
31. Jacoby, J. and Jerry C. Olson (1977), “Consumer Response to Price: An Attitudinal, Information Processing Perspective,” in Moving Ahead with Attitude Research, Y. Wind and P. Greenberg, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 73-86.
32. Kalwani, Manohar U. and Chi-Kin Yim (1992), “Consumer Price and Promotion Expectations: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27(August), pp. 251-262.
33. Kalyanarum, Gurumurthy and John D. C. Little (1987), “A Pricing Model Based on Perception Theories and Its Testing on Scanner Panel Data,” working paper, Sloan School of Management, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.
34. Klein, Noreen M. and Janet E. Oglethorpe (1987), “Reference Points in Consumer Decision Marking,” in Advances in Consumer Research, 14, Melanie Wallendorf and Paul F. Anderson, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 183-187.
35. Lichtenstein, Donald R., Richard G. Netemeyer, and Scot Burton (1990), “ Distinguishing Coupon Proneness From Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54(July), pp. 54-67.
36. Lichtenstein, Donald R., and William O. Bearden (1989), “Contextual Inferences on Perceptions of Merchant Supplied Reference Price,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), pp. 55-66.
37. Lutz, Richard (1986), “Quality is as Quality Does: An Attitudinal Perspective on Consumer Quality Judgements,” presentation to the Marketing Science Institute Trustees’ Meeting, Cambridge, MA.
38. Marmorstein, Howard, Grewal Dhruv, and Raymond P.H. Fishe (1992), “The Value of Time Spent in Price Comparison Shopping: Survey and Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19(June), pp. 52-61.
39. Mayhew, Glenn E. and Russell S. Winer (1992), “An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data.” Journal of Consumer Research, 19(June), pp. 62-70.
40. Mazumdar, Tridik (1986), “Experimental Investigation of the Psychological Determinants of Buyers’ Price Awareness and a Comparative Assessment of Methodologies for Retrieving Price Information from Memory,” working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
41. McGuire, William J. (1976), “Some Internal Psychological Factors Influencing Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2(March), pp. 302-319.
42. Monroe, Kent B. and Joesph D. Chapman (1987), “Framing Effects on Buyers Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, Melanie Wallendorf and Paul F. Anderson, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 193-197.
43. Monroe, Kent B. and R. Krishnan (1985), “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Perceived Quality, J. Jacoby and J. Olson, eds. Lexington, MA Lexington Books, pp. 209-232.
44. Monroe, Kent B. (1973), “Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price,” Journal of Marketing Profitable Decisions, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Monroe, Kent B. (1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decision, 2d ed. New York, McGraw-Hill.
46. Monroe, Kent B., Dhruv Grewal, and Larry D. Compeau (1991), “The Concept of Reference Prices: Theoretical Justifications and Research Issues,” present at the Association for Consumer Research Conference, Chicago(October).
47. Myers, James H. and Allan D. Shocker (1981), “The Nature of Product-Related Attributes,” Research in Marketing,Vol.5, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., pp.211-236.
48. Oliver, R.L. and J.E. Swan (1989), “Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 53(April), pp. 21-35.
49. Olson, Jerry C. and J. Jacoby (1972), “Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process,” in Proceeding of the Third Annual Conference of the Association For Consumer Research, Venkatesan, M., ed., Iowa City: Association for Consumer Research pp. 167-179.
50. Olson, Jerry C. and Thomas J. Reynolds (1983), “Understanding Consumers’ Cognitive Structures: Implications for Advertising Strategy,” Advertising and Consumer Psychology, L. Percy and A. Woodside, eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
51. Olson, Jerry C. (1977), “Price as an Information Cue: Effects in Product Evaluation,” in Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior, Woodside, Arch G., Jagdish N. Sheh, and Peter D. Bennet, eds., New York: North Holland Publishing Company, pp. 267-286.
52. Puto, Christopher P. (1987), “The Framing of Buyer Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14, pp. 301-315.
53. Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe (1988), “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), pp. 253-264.
54. Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe (1989), “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Subjective Product Assessments: An Integrative Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (August), pp. 351-357.
55. Sawyer, Alan G. and Peter Dickson (1984), “Psychological Perspectives on Consumer Response to Sales Promotion,” in Research on Sales Promotion: Collected Papers, Katherine Jocz, ed. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
56. Sherif, Caroly W. (1963), “Social Categorization as a Function of Latitude of Acceptance and Series Range,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, pp. 148-156.
57. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. (1992), “Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process,” Journal of Business Research, 21, pp. 309-333.
58. Tellis, Gerard J. and Gary J. Gaeth (1990), “Best Value, Price-Seeking and Price Aversion: The Impact of Information and Learning on Consumer Choices,” Journal of Marketing, 54(April), pp. 34-45.
59. Thaler, Richard (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 4, pp. 199-244.
60. Urbany, Joe E., William O. Bearden, and Dan C. Weibaker (1988), “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(June), pp. 95-110.
61. Urbany, Joe E., William O. Bearden, Ajit Kaicker, and Melinda Smith-de Borrero (1997), “Transaction Utility Effects When Quality is Uncertain,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, No.1, pp. 45-55.
62. Young, Shirley and Barbara Feigin (1975), “Using the Benefit Chain for Improved Strategy Formulation,” Journal of Marketing, 39(July), pp. 72-74.
63. Young, Shirley and Barbara Feigin (1978), “Some Practical Considerations in Market Segmentation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15(August), pp. 405-412.
64. Ziethaml, Valarie A. and Amna Kirmani (1993), “Advertising, Perceived Quality, and Brand Image,” in Aaker, David A. and Alexander L. Biel, eds., Brand Equity & Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands, Iowa City: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 143-161.
65. Ziethaml, Valarie A. and Karen L. Graham (1983), “The Accuracy of Reported Reference Prices for Professional Services,” in Advances in Consumer Research, 10, eds. Richard D. Bagozzi and Alice M. Tybout, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 607-611.
66. Ziethaml, Valarie A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52(July), pp. 2-22.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top