跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/06 18:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:王萍
研究生(外文):Wang, Ping
論文名稱:美國特許學校及其在我國設立可行性之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study of U.S. Charter Schools and the Feasibility of its Implementation into Taiwan
指導教授:吳清山吳清山引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wu, Ching-Shan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:臺北市立師範學院
系所名稱:國民教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:88
語文別:中文
論文頁數:213
中文關鍵詞:特許學校學校改革另類學校績效責任制
外文關鍵詞:Charter SchoolSchool ReformAlternative SchoolAutonomy for Accountability
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:386
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究旨在探討國內教育人員對於特許學校在我國設立的各項意見與看法,以作為教育相關單位之參考。
研究採問卷調查的方法進行,以自編的「特許學校及其在我國設立之意見調查問卷」,蒐集教育行政人員與國民小學教育人員對於特許學校在我國設立的看法。蒐集對象為台灣地區國民小學教育人員以及教育部、台灣省教育廳、北、高市政府教育局以及台灣省21個縣市政府教育局之教育人員,計925人。調查所得資料經次數分配與百分比、百分比同質性卡方檢定以及聯結分析,以α= .05的顯著水準進行考驗之後,獲致以下結論﹕
1. 受訪者大多支持:(1)由教育專業團體、現任合格教師、非營利性財團法人來經營我國特許學校;(2)新設能夠獨立核准特許學校的機構;(3)特許學校的類型為新設學校;(4)特許學校學生來源應不分學區,一律開放入學;(5)特許學校經費取得採用「以公立學校(每生平均教育經費的某一比例)×(各校學生數)以核定學校的經費額度」的方式;(6)特許學校的教師聘用應該不限制合格教師資格,但需具備特殊領域專長;(7)另定我國特許學校法。
2. 受訪者大多認為我國設立特許學校具有「增加教育選擇的機會」、「適應不同學生的需求」等益處;有「學校仍受不當法規的牽制」、「學校易為營利團體所把持」等限制。
3. 受訪者大多支持特許學校理念,並認為特許學校在我國是一項可行的措施。
依據研究結果,本研究提出下列建議﹕
1. 制定我國特許學校法,並提昇其法律效益。
2. 訂定暫行要點,作為現階段推動特許學校的權宜之計。
3. 賦予特許學校適當經費與開辦補助,以解決財務問題。
4. 考量特許學校以新設學校為主,作為未來新學校設置的形式。
5. 建立健全的評鑑制度,以落實績效責任制度。
6. 提供技術支援,協助特許學校正常發展。
The main purpose of this study was firstly to explore the basic concept and development of the U.S. charter school movement, secondly to investigate the opinions of educators on U.S. charter schools, and finally to provide recommendations for implementing charter schools in Taiwan.
Questionnaire of survey based on opinions about charter schools implement into Taiwan, developed by the author, was administered to 1,280 samples randomly drawn from elementary schools and the bureau of educational administrations in Taiwan with a return rate of 72.3%. Data analyzed by frequencies, percentage homogeneity χ- square test, and measures of association yielded the following results.
Most respondents support: (1) charter schools be operated by professional groups, licensed educators, and non-profit corporate entities;(2)creating new independent charter-approving entities;(3)the characteristic of charter schools are newly created schools;(4) students should have equal access to all charter schools;(5) charter schools get dollar for dollar what a public school gets for each student ;(6)charter schools are free to employ and contract with non-certificated teachers to perform the particular service for which they are employed in the school;(7)enacting charter school legislation in Taiwan.
Reasons provided by the respondents in favor of charter schools are:(1) to provide school choice;(2)to serve special population. Possible implementation challenges provided by the respondents are:(1) charter schools be resisted by inadequate regulations;(2)charter schools be controlled by for-profit originations.
Findings illustrate that most respondents support charter school concept, and charter schools appear to be a viable reform in Taiwan.
Finally, based on the results, suggestions for educational administration agencies, elementary schools and future study were proposed.
目次
第一章緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………….1
第二節 研究待答問題…………………………………………….4
第三節 名詞釋義………………………………………………….5
第四節 研究方法與架構………………………………………….6
第五節 研究範圍與限制………………………………………….8
第二章美國特許學校的背景與發展
第一節 特許學校的意義與特性…………………………………10
第二節 特許學校的發展沿革與實施概況………………………23
第三節 各州特許學校法的分析…………………………………28
第四節 特許學校的相關議題……………………………………53
第五節 特許學校的爭議及挑戰…………………………………83
第六節 特許學校失敗原因之分析………………………………94
第七節 特許學校成功案例之分析……………………………..103
第三章調查研究設計與實施
第一節 調查研究架構…………………………………………..122
第二節 研究對象與抽樣方法…………………………………..123
第三節 研究工具………………………………………………..129
第四節 調查研究實施程序……………………………………..134
第五節 資料處理與分析………………………………………..134
第四章 調查研究結果分析與討論
第一節 調查研究結果…………………………………………..136
第二節 綜合討論………………………………………………..152
第五章結論與建議
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………..166
第二節 建議……………………………………………………..174
參考文獻
一、 中文部分……………………………………………………….181
二、 英文部分……………………………………………………….182
附錄
附錄一「我國設立特許學校之意見調查問卷」(初稿)………….192
附錄二「我國設立特許學校之意見調查問卷」(正式問卷)……200
附錄三「佛漢新世紀學習中心」補充資訊……………………….208
參考文獻
【中文部分】
王俊民(民86)。台北市中小學教育民營化之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所未出版之碩士論文。
四一○教育改造聯盟(民85)。民間教育改造藍圖﹕朝向社會正義的結構性變革。台北市﹕時報文化。
江樹人(民85)。美國委辦學校運動的緣起與發展。教師天地,84,62-66。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(民85)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北市﹕作者。
吳明清(民87)。鬆綁後的學校教育改革課題。教師天地,95,8-14。
吳清山(民85)。教育發展與教育改革。台北市﹕心理。
吳清山(民87)。是一種冒險,但值得嘗試:台北市國民小學試辦「公辦民營」之可行性模式分析。台北市中小學試辦「公辦民營」可行性研究。台北市政府教育局。
周志宏(民86)。教育法制體系之檢討與重建。律師雜誌,210,30-40。
林天祐、吳清山(民87)。教育名詞﹕特許學校。教育資料與研究,22,73。
林天祐(民87)。特許學校-公立學校組織再造的新機制。國教月刊,45(1),46-55。
馬信行、于卓民、歐進士、周志宏(民85)。國民教育公辦民營之可行性研究。台北市﹕教育部國教司。
張明輝(民86)。美國學校教育改革的成功案例﹕委辦學校運動及其相關研究。http://web.cc.ntnu.edu.tw/~minfei/美國委辦學校運動.html
張德銳(民87a)。教育選擇權對教育機會均等的影響。教育資料與研究,21,1-7。
張德銳(民87b)。以學校中心管理推動學校教育革新。教育政策論壇,1(2),133-153。
教育部(民87a)。中華民國教育統計。台北市﹕作者。
教育部(民87b)。台閩地區各國民中小學基本統計。台北市﹕作者。
教育部(民87c)。各級學校名錄。台北市﹕作者。
彭森明(民86)。美國公辦私校的教育措施。文教新潮,2(5),23-25。
歐用生、李柏佳、陳順和、余坤煌、陳韻如、陳正益(民87)。台北市中小學試辦「公辦民營」可行性研究。台北市﹕台北市政府教育局。
【英文部分】
American Federation of Teachers. (1996). Charter school laws: Do they measure up?(Executive summary)〔On-line〕. Available http://www.aft.org/edissues/chartrep.htm
Anderson, J. (1997). Parent involvement in a charter school. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 410 643)
Becker, H. J., Nakagawa K. & Corwin, R. G. (1997). Parent involvement contracts in California’s charter schools: Strategy for educational improvement or method of exclusion? Teacher College Record, 98(3), 511-36.
Bierlein, L. A. & Mulholland, L. A. (1993). Charter schools update: Expansion of a viable reform initiative.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 979)
Bierlein, L. A. & Mulholland, L. A. (1994). Comparing charter school laws: The issue of autonomy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375 519)
Blancheette, C. M.(1997). Charter schools: Issues affecting access to federal funds. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414 620)
Blakemore. C. (1998). A public school of your own. Golden, CO: Adams Pomeroy.
Blxby, M.(1998). Charter schools: More than we ever expected. Education Week, 17 (21), 47, 54, 55.
Brock-Nelson, L. V. (1998). Arizona and California charter schools: A comparative study (legislation). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
Buechler, M. (1996). Charter schools: Legislation and results after four years. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 388 749)
Budde, R. (1996). The evolution of the charter concept. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 72-73.
California Department of Education (1998a). The new charter schools law. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.ced.ca.gov/ tpbranh/retdiv/fcharter/ new_cslaw.html
California Department of Education (1998b). Update on the public charter school grant process. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.cde.ca.gov/ ftpbranch/retdiv/ charter/
RFA989.htm
Center for Education Reform (1998a). Charter schools: A progressive report part I: Achievement. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/chachiev.htm
Center for Education Reform (1998b). Charter school legislation: State rankings. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/laws/ ranking. htm
Center for Education Reform (1998c). Charter school myths and realities: Answering the critics. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/ fag/chmyths.htm
Center for Education Reform (1998d). The center for education reform issues 1997-1998 national charter school directory. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/press/ncsd9798.htm
Center for Education Reform (1998e). Charter school highlights and statistics. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/ chglance. htm
Center for Education Reform (1998f). Charter school legislation: State-by-state analyses. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/laws/ states.htm
Center for Education Reform (1998g). Answers to frequently asked questions about charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/faq/faqcs.htm
Center for Education Reform (1999). Charter schools: A progress report part II: The closures. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/ pubs/CharterClosures99.htm
Center for School Change (1998). Making a difference?Charter schools, evaluation and student performance.(Executive summary). 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/school-cchange/differen.htm
Dale, A. H.(1997a). CER charter schools I: The new neighborhood schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/charti.htm
Dale, A. H.(1997b). CER charter schools II: The process. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/chartii.htm
Dale, A. H.(1997c). CER charter schools III: What’s on the horizon. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/chartiii.htm
Dale, A. H.(1997d). CER charter schools IV: Evidence of success. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/chartiv.htm
Dunn, D. (1994). Charter schools: Experiments in reform. Austin, TX: Texas State Legislative Budget Board. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 198)
Education Commission of the State (1996). Charter schools issue brief: What are charter schools? 〔On-line〕. Available http:// www. ecs.org/ecs/ecsweb.nsf/
HTMLFrameObjects/Frameset-HomePage? OpenDocument
Education Week (1997). Charter school page. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edweek.org/context/topics/charter.htm
Finn, C. E., Bierlein, L.A. & Manno, B.V.(1997). Charter school accountability: Findings and prospects. Fastback 425. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 416 580)
Finn, C. E., Manno, B.V., Bierlein, L.A. & Vanourek, G. (1997a). Charter schools in action project:Final report, part II. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edexcellence.net/chart/chart2.htm
Finn, C. E., Manno, B.V., Bierlein, L.A. & Vanourek, G. (1997b). Charter schools in action project:Final report, part III. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edexcellence.net/chart/chart3.htm
Fulford, N. (1998). Charters in our midst: An overview. 〔On-line〕. Available Http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/pbriefs/97/97-lover.htm
Fusarelli, L. D. (1997). What’s to negotiate? Interaction in the absence of dialogue: The battle over vouchers and charter school.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414 654)
Goenner, J. N.(1996). Charter school-The revitalization of public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 32,34-36.
Greenawalt, C. E. (1995). Charter schools: A national innovation for Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, PA: Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 401 370)
Grutzik, C. F.(1997). Teachers’ work in charter schools: From policy to practice. 〔CD-ROM〕. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstract Item: AAC9803537
Innerst. C. (1997). CER charter schools V: The reality behind the few failures. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/chartv.htm
Jacobson, L. (1996). Under the microscope. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edweek.org/context/topics/charter.htm
Kane, P. R. (1998). Charter schools: Paying attention to ancillary findings. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-18/07kane.h18
Kolderie, T. (1996). A guide to charter activity. 〔On-line〕. Available http://edreform.com/pubs/whoswho3.htm
Lange, C. et al. (1996). Minnesota charter schools evaluation. Interim report. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota State Board of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 698)
Lieber, R. (1997). What’s to fear about charters? School Administrator, 54(7), 14-16.
Little Hoover Commission (1996). The charter movement: Education reform school by school. 〔On-line〕. Available http:// www.lhc.ca. gov/lhcdir/138rp.html
Manno, B. V., Finn, C. E., Bierlein, L. A, & Vanourek, G.(1996). Charter schools in action: A first look. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edexcellence.net/ issuespl/subject/charters/pewjan.htm
Manno, B.V., Finn, C. E., Bierlein, L.A. & Vanourek, G. (1997a). Charter schools in action project:Final report, part VI. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edexcellence.net/ chart/chart4.htm
Manno, B.V., Finn, C. E., Bierlein, L.A. & Vanourek, G. (1997b). Charter schools in action project:Final report, part IV. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edexcellence.net/chart/chart6.htm
Mccune, C. M. (1994). The modification of structural constrains in California charter schools. 〔CD-ROM〕. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstract Item: AAC9501193.
McGree, K. (1995). Redefining education governance: The charter school concept. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 401 619)
Millot, M. D. & Lake, R(1996). So you want to start a charter school? 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.gspa.washington. edu/prpe/pub/96/strategic.html
Nathan, J. (1996a). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. 〔On-line〕. Available http://uscharterschools. org/gen_info/ gi_main.
htm#Definitions
Nathan, J.( 1996b). Early lessons of the charter school movement. Educational Leadership, 54(2), 9-15.
Nathan, J.( 1997). The charter school movement is growing because it''s working. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-16/21nathan.h16
Nathan, J. (1998). Heat and light in the charter school movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(7), 499-505.
National Association of State Boards of Education (1996).The treatment of special education in charter school legislation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 746)
National Conference of State Legislatures (1998). Education Program: Charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.ncsl.org/ programs/educ/clschls.htm
NCREL(1998). Charters in our midst: The impact of charter schools in school districts. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/pbriefs/97/97-1toc.htm
NWREL(1998). Charter schools: The specifics. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.nwrel.org/charter/specifics.html
Office of the Press Secretary(1998). President Clinton’s education and training priorities for the fall. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/08-1998/wh-0831.html
O’Neil, J.(1996). New options, old concerns. Educational Leadership, 54(2), 6-8.
Page, L. & Levine, M. (1996). The pitfalls and triumphs of launching a charter school. Educational Leadership, 54(2), 26-29.
Pratt. J.(1996). An analysis of selected contracts governing charter schools in six states. 〔CD-ROM〕. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstract Item: AAC9638573
Premack, E. (1996). Charter schools-California’s education reform “Power Tool”. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 60-64.
Rael, E. J.(1995). A summary of arguments for and against charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/ v3n13/ procon.html
Rebarber, T. (1997). Charter school innovations: Keys to effective charter reform. (executive summary)〔On-line〕. Available http://www.reason.org/es228.html
Sack, J. L. (1997). Researchers recount the pluses of charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-16/29chart. h16
Saks, J. B. (1997). The basics of charter school: A school board primer. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 609)
Schnaiberg, L.(1998a).Charter schools struggle with accountability. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-17/39chart. h17
Schnaiberg, L.(1998b). Worksite charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http:// www.edweek.org/ew/vol-17/28work.h17
Schnaiberg, L.(1998c). Milwaukee, state battle over charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-18/08milwau. h18
Shore, R. A. (1996). New professional opportunities for teachers in the California charter schools.〔CD-ROM〕. Abstract from: ProQuest File:Dissertation Abstract Item: AAC9636749
Smith, F. L. (1997). Guidance for the charter bound. School Administrator, 54(7), 18-22.
SRI International (1997a). Evaluation of charter school effectiveness part I. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.lao.ca.gov/sri_charter_ schools_1297-part1.htm
SRI International (1997b). Evaluation of charter school effectiveness part II. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.lao.ca.gov/sri_charter_ schools_1297-part2.htm
UCLA Graduate School of Education(1998). Beyond the rhetoric of charter school reform: A study of ten California school districts. 〔On-line〕. Available http://gseis.ucla.edu/docs/charter.pdf
University of Minnesota (1998). Minnesota charter schools evaluation: Final report. (Executive summary). 〔On-line〕. Available http://carei.coled.umn.edu/
CharterSchools/MNevalFinal/Exec Sum. html
U.S. Department of Education (1996). A look at charter schools. Washington, DC: Author.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 425)
U.S. Department of Education (1997). The study of charter schools: First-year report. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.ed.gov/pubs/ charter/execsum.html.
U.S. Department of Education (1998). The study of charter schools: Second-year report. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www. uscharterschools.org/ res_dir/res_2year_
exec.htm
U.S. Department of Education (1999). The state of charter schools third-year report. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www. ed.gov/ pubs/charter3rdyear/execsum.html
USNews (1998). The new education bazaar: Charter schools represent the free market in action-with all its problems. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.usnews.com/ usnews/issue/980427/27char.htm
Vanourek, G., Manno, B.V., Finn, C. E. & Bierlein, L.A. (1997a). Charter schools in action project: Final report, part I. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edexcellence.net/chart/chart1.htm
Vanourek, G., Manno, B.V., Finn, C. E. & Bierlein, L.A. (1997b). Charter schools in action project: Final report, part V. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.edexcellence.net/chart/chart5.htm
Vernal, S. (1998). Problems faced by existing charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http:// olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v3n13/
Weiss, A. R.(1997). Going it alone: A study of Massachusetts charter schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.csus.edu/ier/charter/IRE_Report.html
Windler, W.(1996). Colorado’s charter schools-A spark for change and a catalyst for reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 66-69.
Windler, W.(1997). Colorado charter school information packet and handbook. Denver, CO: Colorado State Dept. of Education.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 416 580)
Wohlstter, P., Wenning, R. & Briggs, K. (1995). Charter schools in the United States: The question of autonomy. Educational Policy, 9(4), 331-58.
Yamashiro, K. & Carlos, L.(1995). More on Charter Schools. 〔On-line〕. Available http://www.wested.org/policy/ pubs/full_ text/ pb_ft_more.htm
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 蘇建文(1981)。兒童及青少年基本情緒之縱貫研究。教育心理學報,14:79-102。
2. 魏麗敏(1997)。同儕輔導的理論與實務。學生輔導雙月刊,52:52-61。
3. 趙梅如(1990)。國中教師信任感之研究。教育學刊,9:150-193。
4. 陳皎眉(1996)。校園的衝突與暴力。學生輔導雙月刊,57:20-31。
5. 陳密桃(1979)。國中教師對教師角色的自我觀念與其對學生及學生態度的關係─自我觀念對教色踐行實效影響分析之研究。教育學刊,1:321-325。
6. 周志宏(民86)。教育法制體系之檢討與重建。律師雜誌,210,30-40。
7. 吳明清(民87)。鬆綁後的學校教育改革課題。教師天地,95,8-14。
8. 江樹人(民85)。美國委辦學校運動的緣起與發展。教師天地,84,62-66。
9. 郭生玉(1980)。教師期望與教師行為及學生學習行為關係之分析。教育心理學報,13:133-152。
10. 許春金、孟維德(1997)。家庭、學校、自我控制與偏差行為。中央警察大學學報,30:225-255。
11. 許永熹(1997)。同儕輔導的功能及兩種方案模式。學生輔導雙月刊,52:43-51。
12. 曹中瑋(1997)。情緒的認識與掌握。學生輔導雙月刊,51:26-39。
13. 洪性榮(1998)。教師管理權VS. 學生人權。輔導通訊,53:1~4。
14. 李榮堂(1992)。當前訓導問題與癥結及革新途徑。高市鐸聲,3(1):58-61。
15. 吳潮聰(1998)。當前青少年問題之探討與處理。輔導通訊,53:9-12。