臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

透過TMT之運籌帷幄，高科技企業能夠充分掌握市場脈動與先機，是獲致競爭優勢與持續成長的關鍵因素所在，而與世界級高科技公司的科技聯盟與技術轉移成為必經之道，同時高階經營團隊的特質，包括團隊背景、認知導向與決策模式等，實為決定企業是否能正確評估聯盟之可行性，決定聯盟的採行模式，進而創造聯盟的關鍵成功因素，並延續其競爭優勢的關鍵所在。誠如上述，本研究提出主要研究目的為：(1)探討策略科技聯盟模式及產業競爭特性的不同在高階經營團隊特質、策略科技聯盟考量因素、策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素、策略科技聯盟競爭優勢及策略科技聯盟經營績效等構面之差異；(2)探討不同類型高科技產業在高階經營團隊特質、策略科技聯盟考量因素、策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素、策略科技聯盟競爭優勢及策略科技聯盟經營績效等構面之差異；(3)探討高階經營團隊特質、策略科技聯盟考量因素、策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素、策略科技聯盟競爭優勢及策略科技聯盟經營績效等構面之互動關係；(4)探討高階經營團隊特質、產業競爭特性及策略科技聯盟考量因素對策略科技聯盟發展模式的影響。本研究之研究對象係以台灣地區高科技產業之高階經營團隊成員進行抽樣問卷調查。
本研究之結論如下：
1.TMT規模愈大、TMT年資差異愈小、TMT教育程度愈高，則其管理風格之表現較為積極開於，勇於變革。
2.在不同產業中，以生物科技廠商之表現最佳；水平競爭之廠商較垂直競爭廠商之表現為佳；股權投資與契約協定之廠商其聯盟競爭優及聯盟績效較佳。
3.當科技聯盟成員間之信任承諾及成員配適程度愈高時，且創新及效率基礎之表現愈佳，其科技聯盟經營績效也愈顯著。
4.當TMT之管理風格採取變革開創式之領導、產業內競爭者與替代品之競爭程度愈高，且聯盟是以資源技術及成本效率作為考量時，其科技聯盟傾向選擇合資之模式。

These are the critical elements that high-tech firms can obtain competitive advantage and continuous growth by grasp adequately the beating and opportunity of market through devise strategy in the command tent of TMT. Thus it is the essential way for Taiwanese high-tech firms to formulate technology alliance and transfer with world caliber high-tech firms. TMT characters including TMT background, reorganization orientations, and decision pattern, are the crucial intermediaries to assess correctly the feasibility and model choice of alliances, therefore, to create the key success factors of alliance and to continue competitive advantage. Exactly as said, the research issues are as follows: (1) to compare the similarities and differences of TMT characteristics, STA motives, STA key success factor, STA competitive advantage, and STA performance with STA development models and situations of industrial competitive peculiarity;(2) to compare the similarities and differences of TMT characteristics, STA motives, STA key success factor, STA competitive advantage, and STA performance with different type of industries;(3) to examine the interactions between TMT characteristics, STA motives, STA key success factors, STA competitive advantage, and STA performance;(4) to incorporate the view of TMT characters, industrial competitive peculiarity, and STA motives in analyzing factors influencing the model choice of STA. The sample of this research is the membership of TMT in Taiwanese high-tech industry.
The research findings are as follows:
1.As the scale of the TMT become larger, the variations of TMT members on seniority and TMT working time, and educational status, then the management style of TMT become more aggressive and flexible.
2.Among different industries, the strategic alliance of the biological firms tend to perform better than these of other firms. Firms with horizontal competition tend to perform better than those with vertical competition. Firms with strategic alliance through equal sharing and contractual agreement tend to perform better than firms with joint venture.
3.For the interrelationships between key success factors, STA competitive advantages, TMT management styles and alliances performances, it is shown that if the trust and partnership fitting between STA memberships became higher, then these firm tend to perform better on innovation, efficiency and STA performance.
4.If TMT adopted aggressive changing management style, if firms acquiring higher competitive advantage on competitor and substitution, and if they emphasize resource technology and cost efficiency, then these firms tend to select joint venture as their strategic alliance model.

目錄
中文摘要
英文摘要
誌謝
目錄I
表目錄III
圖目錄IV
第一章　　緒論1
　　　第一節　　研究背景與研究動機1
　　　第二節　　研究目的3
　　　第三節　　研究範圍與觀念性架構4
　　　第四節　　研究流程5
　　　第五節　　論文結構6
第二章　　文獻探討7
　　　第一節　　高階經營團隊相關文獻7
　　　第二節　　產業競爭特性14
　　　第三節　　策略科技聯盟考量因素18
　　　第四節　　策略科技聯盟發展模式25
　　　第五節　　策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素29
　　　第六節　　策略科技聯盟競爭優勢32
　　　第七節　　策略科技聯盟經營績效36
　　　第八節　　各構面互動影響關係之研究39
第三章　　研究設計與研究方法47
　　　第一節　　研究架構47
　　　第二節　　構面因素之操作性定義與衡量48
　　　第三節　　問卷設計54
　　　第四節　　抽樣設計與調查對象56
　　　第五節　　研究假設57
　　　第六節　　統計分析方法60
　　　第七節　　問卷回收及樣本結構64
第四章　　研究結果71
　　　第一節　　各構面之統計資料分析71
　　　第二節　　各構面之因素分析及信度檢定76
　　　第三節　　各構面因素之差異分析81
　　　第四節　　各構面因素之相關互動關係分析93
　　　第五節　　高階經營團隊管理風格、策略科技聯盟考量因素及產業競爭
　　　　　　　　特性對策略科技聯盟發展模式之影響分析103
　　　第六節　　策略科技聯盟經營績效與其它構面之影響關係分析110
　　　第七節　　線性結構方程模型113
第五章　　結論與建議120
　　　第一節　　研究結論120
　　　第二節　　研究建議129
　　　第三節　　研究限制131
參考文獻132
附錄－－問卷142
自述148
表目錄
表2-1　高階經營團隊特質之相關研究9
表2-2　Siminia之三種管理風格11
表2-3　高階經理人之管理風格模式13
表2-4　環境之屬性構面整理表15
表2-5　產業環境衡量構面及指標16
表2-6　策略科技聯盟之策略考量因素匯整19
表2-7　聯盟型態整理表25
表2-8　策略聯盟關鍵成功因素整理表29
表2-9　半導體產業競爭優勢因素整理表35
表2-10　聯盟績效指標之匯總表37
表3-1　高階經營團隊管理風格之衡量變項及操作定義48
表3-2　高階經營團隊組成特性之衡量變項及操作性定義49
表3-3　產業競爭特性之衡量變項及操作性定義50
表3-4　策略科技聯盟策略考量因素之衡量變項及操作性定義50
表3-5　策略科技聯盟型態之衡量變項及操作性定義51
表3-6　策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之衡量變項及操作性定義52
表3-7　策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之衡量變項及操作性定義53
表3-8　策略科技聯盟經營績效之衡量變項及操作性定義53
表3-9　公司基本資料之衡量變項及操作性定義55
表3-10　因素負荷量之篩選準則70
表3-11　問卷回收狀況64
表3-12　公司成立年數65
表3-13　公司之年營業額65
表3-14　公司之員工人數65
表3-15　公司之產業別66
表3-16　TMT人數規模66
表3-17　TMT平均年齡67
表3-18　TMT差異年齡67
表3-19　TMT背景67
表3-20　TMT平均年資68
表3-21　TMT差異年資68
表3-22　TMT教育程度68
表3-23　策略科技聯盟經驗69
表3-24　策略科技聯盟發展模式69
表4-1　高階經營團隊管理風格之意見平均值及標準差表72
表4-2　產業競爭特性之意見平均值及標準差表72
表4-3　策略科技聯盟策略考量因素之意見平均值及標差表73
表4-4　策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之意見平均值及標準差表74
表4-5　策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之意見平均值及標準差表75
表4-6　策略科技聯盟經營績效之意見平均值及標準差表75
表4-7　高階經營團隊管理風格之因素分析及信度檢定表77
表4-8　產業競爭特性之因素分析及信度檢定表77
表4-9　策略科技聯盟策略考量因素之因素分析及信度檢定表78
表4-10　策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之因素分析及信度檢定表79
表4-11　策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之因素分析及信度檢定表80
表4-12　策略科技聯盟經營績效之因素分析及信度檢定表80
表4-13　不同團隊規模對TMT管理風格之差異分析81
表4-14　不同平均年齡對TMT管理風格之差異分析82
表4-15　年齡差異對TMT管理風格之差異分析82
表4-16　不同平均年資對TMT管理風格之差異分析83
表4-17　年資差異對TMT管理風格之差異分析84
表4-18　不同教育程度對TMT管理風格之差異分析84
表4-19　不同專業背景對TMT管理風格之差異分析85
表4-20　合併後之產業別散佈85
表4-21　不同產業別對各研究構面之差異分析表86
表4-22　華德法係數凝聚過程88
表4-23　不同產業競爭特性之特質差異表88
表4-24　實際分群與預測分群之交叉列表89
表4-25　不同產業競爭特性之差異分析表90
表4-26　不同科技聯盟發展模式對各構面之差異分析表91
表4-27　不同契約協定內容對各構面之差異分析表92
表4-28　TMT管理風格對策略科技聯盟考量因素之典型相關檢定表93
表4-29　TMT管理風格對策略科技聯盟考量因素之典型負荷量94
表4-30　TMT管理風格對策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之典型相關檢定表95
表4-31　TMT管理風格對策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之典型負荷量95
表4-32　TMT管理風格對策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型相關檢定表96
表4-33　TMT管理風格對策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型負荷量97
表4-34　策略科技聯盟考量因素對策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之典型相關檢定表98
表4-35　策略科技聯盟考量因素對策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之典型負荷量98
表4-36　策略科技聯盟考量因素對策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型相關檢定表99
表4-37　策略科技聯盟考量因素對策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型負荷量100
表4-38　策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素對策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型相關檢定表101
表4-39　策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素對策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型負荷量102
表4-40　TMT管理風格、產業競爭特性、科技聯盟考量因素對科技聯盟發展
模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分析106
表4-41　策略科技聯盟市場績效之迴歸分析表110
表4-42　策略科技聯盟人力資源績效之迴歸分析表111
表4-43　策略科技聯盟技術與創新績效之迴歸分析表112
表4-44　結構方程模型分析表115
表4-45　TMT管理風格對科技聯盟發展模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分類表117
表4-46　產業競爭特性對科技聯盟發展模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分類表117
表4-47　科技聯盟考量因素對科技聯盟發展模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分類表117
表4-48　TMT管理風格與產業競爭特性對科技聯盟發展模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分類表118
表4-49　產業競爭特性與科技聯盟考量因素對科技聯盟發展模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分類表118
表4-50　TMT管理風格與科技聯盟考量因素對科技聯盟發展模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分類表118
表4-51　TMT管理風格、產業競爭特性與科技聯盟考量因素對科技聯盟發展
模式之複羅吉斯迴歸分類表119
表4-52　結構方程模型適合度評鑑表119
表5-1　研究假設與實證結果對照表120
表5-2　差異分析結果整理表122
表5-3　相關及迴歸分析結果整理表124
表5-4　整體模型分析結果整理表127
圖目錄
圖1-1　本研究觀念性架構4
圖1-2　本研究之研究流程5
圖2-1　高階管理的角色8
圖2-2　開放式系統之組織14
圖2-3　合作關係之種類27
圖3-1　本研究架構圖47
圖3-2　研究架構分析圖62
圖3-3　統計分析程序63
圖4-1　TMT管理風格與策略科技聯盟考量因素之典型相關94
圖4-2　TMT管理風格與策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之典型相關96
圖4-3　TMT管理風格與策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型相關97
圖4-4　策略科技聯盟考量因素與策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素之典型相關99
圖4-5　策略科技聯盟考量因素與策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型相關100
圖4-6　策略科技聯盟關鍵成功因素策略科技聯盟競爭優勢之典型相關102
圖4-7　結構方程模型之研究架構113
圖4-8　結構方程模型之研究結果116

參考文獻
【英文部份】
1.Aaker, D. A. (1981), “Factor Analysis: An Ecposition,” in D. Aaker (ed.), Multivariate Analysis in Marketing, 2nd ed., pp163-171.
2.Aaker, D. A. (1989), “Managing Assets and Skill: The Key To a Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” California Management Review, Winter, pp.91-106.
3.Aaker, D. A. (1998), Strategic Market Management, John Wiley & Sons.
4.Ahuja, G. (2000), “The Duality of Collaboration: Inducements and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, Special Issue, pp. 317-343.
5.Alexander, G. (1995), Strategic Alliances and Process Redesign: Effective Management and Restructuring of Cooperative Projects and Network, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
6.Alic, J. A. (1990), “Cooperation in R&D,” Technovation, Vol. 10 (5), pp. 319-332.
7.Anderson, E. and H. Gatignon (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, pp. 1-26.
8.Anderson, E. and B. A. Weitz (1986), “Make-or-Buy Decision: Vertical Intergration and Marketing Productivity,” Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 3-19.
9.Arie, Y. L. and U. S. Carroll (1990), “Individual Properties of the CEO as Determinants of Organization Design,” unpublished manuscript, Duke University.
10.Arie, Y. L. and U. S. Carroll (1994), “CEO Attitudes as Determinants of Organization Design: An Integrated Model,” Organization Studies, Vol. 15 (2), pp. 183-212.
11.Badaracco, J. L. Jr. (1991), The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
12.Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structure Equations Models,” Academic of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, pp. 76-94.
13.Balakrishnan, S. and B. Wernerfelt (1986), “Technical Change, Competition and Vertical Integration,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 34-359.
14.Bantel, K. A. (1994), “Strategic Planning Openness: The Role of Top Team Demography,” Group & Organization Management, Vol. 19 (4), pp. 406-424.
15.Bantel, K. A. and S. E. Jackson (1989), “Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Management Make a Difference,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10 (Special Issue), pp. 107-124.
16.Bertodo, R. G. (1990), “The Strategic Alliance: Automative Paradigm for the 1990s,” Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 375-388.
17.Boyd, B. (1990), “Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 419-430.
18.Boyd, B. K. (1995), “CEO Duality and Firm performance: A Contingency model,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16 (4), pp. 301-323.
19.Butler, R. J. and M. Carney (1986), “Strategy and Strategic Choice: The Case of Telecommunications,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 161-177.
20.Cattell, R. (1966), “The Scree Test for the Number of Factors,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, pp.245.
21.Chakravarthy, B. S. and P. Lonange (1991), Managing the Strategy Process, Prentice Hall.
22.Chung, S., H. Singh, and K. Lee (2000), “Complementarity, Status Similarit and Social Capital as Drives of Alliance Formation,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 1-21.
23.Collins, T. M. and T. W. Doorley (1991), Teaming up for the 90S: A Guide to International Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances, The Book Press.
24.Contractor, F. J., and P., Lorange (eds. 1988), “Cooperative Strategies in International Business,” Management International Review, Special Issue.
25.Cronbach, L. J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Test,” Psychometrika, Vol. 16, No.3, pp.297-334.
26.Czinkota, R. M., P. Rivoli, and I. A. Ronkainen, International Business, 2nd ed., The Dryden Press, 1992, pp. 317.
27.Daellenbach, U. S., A. M. McGarthy, and T. S. Schoenecker (1999), “Commitment to innovation: Teams, and Boards of Directors: Congruent or Countervailing Forces,” Journal of Management, Vol. 22 (2), pp. 185-208.
28.Daily, C. M. and C. Schwenk (1996), “Chief Executive Officers, Top Management Teams, and Boards of Directors: Congruent or Countervailing Forces,” Journal of Management, Vol. 22 (2), pp. 185-208.
29.Dalton, D. R. and Idalene F. K. (1985), “Organizational Performance as an Antecedent of Inside/Outside Chief Executive Succession: An Empirical Assessment,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28 (4), pp.749-763.
30.Devlin G. and M. Bleackley (1988), “Strategic Alliances: Guidelines for Success,” Long Range Planning, 21(5), pp. 18-23.
31.Dollinger, M. (1984), “Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance,” Academic of Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 351-369.
32.Duncan, R. B. (1972), “Characteristics of Environmental Uncertainty,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp.
33.Dunning, J. H. (1988), Explaining International Production, London.
34.Dyer, J. H. and H. Singh (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 660-679.
35.Edgar, L. O. (1997), “The Dynamics of Strategic Alliance: Sharing a Vision,” APEC SME Meeting held in Ottawa, Canada September 17, 1997, http://www.orion2000.com/speechAPEC97.html, visited on 1998/10/13.
36.Farkas, C. M. and S. Wetlaufer (1996), ”The Ways Chief Executive Officers Lead,” Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 110-122.
37.Finkelstein, S. and D. Hambrick (1990), “Top Management Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 484-503.
38.Gersony, N. (1996), “Sectoral Effects on Strategic Alliance Performance for New Technology Firms,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 7 (2), pp. 175-189.
39.Ghemawat, P., M. E. Porter, and R. A. Rawlinson (1986), Patterns of International Coalition Activity, in: Porter (1986).
40.Hair, J. P., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, fifth edition.
41.Haleblian, J. and S. Finkelstein (1993), “Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and Firm Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36(4), pp. 844-850.
42.Hambrick, D. C. and D. Fukutomi (1991), “Top Management Team Size, CWO Dominance, and Firm Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 (4), pp. 844-850.
43.Hambrick, D. C. and P. A. Mason (1984), “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9 (2), pp. 193-207.
44.Hambrick, D. C. and R. A. D’Aveni (1992), “Top team Deterioration as Part of the Downward Spiral of Lar,” Management Science, Vol. 38 (10), pp. 1445-1467.
45.Hamel, G., Y. L. Doz, and C. K. Prahalad (1989), “Collaborate with Your Competitors and Win,” Harvard Business Review, Jan./Feb., No. 1, pp. 133-135.
46.Hammer, M. and G. E. Mangurian (1987), “The Changing Value of Communications Technology,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 2, Winter 1987, pp. 65-71.
47.Harrigan, K. R. (1987), “Strategic Alliances: Their New Role in Global Competition,” Columbia Journal of World Business, Sum.
48.Harrigan, K. R. (1988), “Strategic Alliances and Partner Asymmetries,” Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexingion Books.
49.Harrigan, K. R. (1988), “Jonit Ventures and Competitive Strategy, “ Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 141-158.
50.Hennart, J. F. (1988), ”A Transaction Cost Theory of Equity Joint Ventures,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 361-374.
51.Hill, C. W. L. and C. R. (1995), Strategic Management Theory, The Houghton Mifflin Company, Third Edition.
52.Hladik, K. J. (1988), “R&D and International Joint Ventures,” Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexingion Books.
53.Iaquinto, A. L. and J. W. Fredrickson (1997), “Top Management Team Agreement About the Strategic Decision Process: A Test of Some of Its Determinants and Consequences,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 63-75.
54.James, B. G. (1985), “Alliance: The New Strategic Focus,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 18 (3), pp. 76-81.
55.Kaiser, H. (1958), “The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis,” Psychometrika, Vol. 2, pp.187-200.
56.Katz, R. (1982), “The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance,” Administration Science Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 81-104.
57.Keck, S. L. (1997), “Top Management Team Structure: Differential Effects by Environmental Context,” Organization Sciences, Vol. 8 (2), pp.143-156.
58.Khandwalla, P. N. (1976), “Some Top Management Team Styles, Their Context and Performance,” Organization and Administrative Sciences, Vol. (7) 4, pp. 21-51
59.Khanna, T., R. Gulati, and N. Nohria (1998), “The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope,” Strategic Management Journal Vol. 19, pp. 193-210.
60.Killing, F. P. (1988), “Understanding Alliances: The Role of Task and Organizational, Complexity,” Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington: D. C. Heathand Company, pp.55-67.
61.Klein, S., G. L. Frazier, and V. J. Roth (1990), “A Transaction Cost Analysis Model of Channel Integration in International Markets,” Journal of Marketing Review, Vol. (17), pp. 196-208.
62.Kolter, P. (1998), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, Prentice Hall International, 9th Edition.
63.Kogut, B. (1988), “Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 319-332.
64.Korut, B. and H. Singh (1988), “Entering the United States by Joint Venture: Competitive Rivalry and Industry Structure,” Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexingion Books.
65.Lei, D. and J. W. Slocum (1992), “Global Strategy, Competence-Building and Strategic Alliances,” California Management Review, pp. 81-97.
66.Lei, D. and J. W. Slocum (1991), “Global Strategies Alliances: Pay-offs and Pitfalls,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 19 (3), pp.44-62.
67.Lewis, J. D. (1990), Partnerships for Profit, the Free Press.
68.Limerick, D. and B. Cunnington (1993), Managing The New Organization: A Buleprint for Networks and Strategic Alliances, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
69.Lorange, P. (1988), “Cooperative Strategies: Planning and Control Consider Actions,” Center for International Management Studies, Wp- 512: Toronto, Ontario.
70.Lorange, P. and J. Roos (1991), “Why Some Strategic Allicances Succeed and Others Fail,” Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 12 (1), pp. 25-30.
71.Lorange, P., J. Roos, and P. S. Bronn (1992), “Building Successful Strategic Alliances,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 25 (6), pp. 10-17.
72.Lynch, R. P. (1989), The Partial Guide to Joint Ventures and Corporate Alliances, John Wiley & Sons.
73.Makhija, M. V. and U. Ganesh (1997), “The Relationship Between Control and Partner Learning in Learning-related Joint Ventures,” Organizaion Science, Vol. 8 (5), pp.
74.March, J. G. and H. A. Simon (1958), Organizations, John Wiley.
75.Merchant, H. and D. Schendel (2000), “How Do International Joint Ventures Create Shareholder Value,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 723-737.
76.Michel, J. C. and D. C. Hambrick (1992), “Diversification Posture and Top Management Team Characteristics,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35 (1), pp. 9-38.
77.Mockler, R. J. (1999), Multinational Strategic Alliances, John Wiley & Sons.
78.Mohr, J. and R. Spekman (1994), “Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior, and Conflict Resolution Techniques,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15 (2), pp. 135-152.
79.Montgomery, C. A. and M. E. Porter (1991), Strategy: Seeking and Securing Competitive Advantage, A Harvard Business Review Book.
80.Morley, M., S. Moore, and P. O’Regan (1995), “The Impact of the Top Management Team on the Sales Growth Performance of International Divisions of US Multinational Enterprises Operating in the Republic of Ireland,” IBAR (Irish Business and Administrative Research), Vol.17 (1), pp. 118-134.
81.Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley, and B. S. Silverman (1996), “Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer, “ Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, Vol. 17, pp. 77-92.
82.Murray, A. I. (1989), “Top Management Group Heterogeneity and Firm Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 125-142.
83.Norburn, D. and S. Birley (1988), “The Top Management Team and Corporate Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp.225-237.
84.Nohria, N. and C. Carcia-Pont (1991), “Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure,” Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, Vol. 12, pp. 105-124.
85.Nueno, P. and J. Oosterveld (1988), “Managing Technology Alliances,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 21 (3), pp. 11-17.
86.Nunnally, J. (1979), Psychometric Theory, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
87.Ohmae, K. (1985), Macht der Triade, Wiesbaden.
88.Ohmae, K. (1989), “The Global Logic of Strategic Alliances,” Harvard Business Review, Mar/Apr, pp. 143-154.
89.Ohmae, K. (1993), Collaborating to Compete: Using Strategic Alliances and Acquisitions in the Global Marketplace, McKinsey & Company, Inc.
90.Pekar, P. J. and R. Allio (1994), “Marking Alliances Work: Guidelines For Success,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 27 (3), pp. 54-65.
91.Perlmutter, H. V. and D. A. Heenan (1986), “Cooperate to Compete Globally,” Harvard Business Review, Mar./Apr., pp. 136-152.
92.Peter, J. P. (1979), “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16(February): 6-17.
93.Pfeffer, J. and P. Nowak (1976), “Join Ventures and Interorganization Interdependence,” Administrative Science Quartley, Vol. 21, pp. 398-418.
94.Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salanick (1978), The External Control of Organization, Harper and Row.
95.Pisano, G. P. (1990), “The R&D Boundaries of The Firm: An Empirical Analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 153-176.
96.Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaning Superior Performance, The Free Press.
97.Porter, M. E. (1986), Competition in Global Industries, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
98.Porter, M. E. and M. B. Fuller (1986), “Coalitions and Global Strategy,” Competition in Global Industries, Harvard business School Press, pp. 315-344.,
99.Rai, A. B. S. and A. Ramaprasad (1996), “Critical Success Factors for Strategic Alliances in The Information Technology Industry: An Empirical Study,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 (1), Winter, pp.141-155.
100.Richard L. D. (1998), Organization Theory and Design, South-Western College Publishing, Sixth edition, pp. 47.
101.Robinson, J. P., P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman (1991), “Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation,” in Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman (eds.). San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
102.Robinson, J. P. and P. R. Shaver (1973), Measures of Psychological Attitudes, Ann Arbor, MII: Survey Research Center Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
103.Root, F. R. (1994), Entry Strategies for International Markets, Lexington, MA. : Lexington Books.
104.Rowe, A. J., R. O. Mason, K. E. Dickel, R. B. Mann, and R. J. Mockler (1994), Strategic Management: A Methodological Approach, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Fourth Edition.
105.Sierra, M. C. (1995), Managing Global Alliances: Key Steps for Successful Collaboration, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
106.Sminia, H. (1994), Turning the Wheels of Change: The Top Management Contribution to the Process of Strategy Formation, Wolters-Noordhoff Groningen.
107.Souder, W. E. and S. Nassar (1990), “Managing R&D Consortia for Success,” Technology Management, Sep/Oct, pp. 44-50.
108.Souder, W. E, and S, Nassar (1991), ”Choosing an R&D Consortium,” Research-Technology Management, Mar/Apr, pp. 36-41.
109.Tushman, M. L. and E. Romenelli (1985), “Organizational Evaluation: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation,” Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, pp. 171-222.
110.Vroom, V. and B. Pahl (1971), “Relationship between Age and Risk-taking among Manager,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.55, pp. 399-405.
111.Vyas, N. M., W. L. Shelburn, and D. C. Rogers (1995), “An Analysis of Strategic Alliances: Forms, Functions and Framework,” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 10 (3), pp. 47-60.
112.Walker, G. and D. Weber (1984), “A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-Buy Decisions,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, pp.373-391.
113.West, M. W. (1959), “The Jointly Owned Subsidiary,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 37 (4), pp. 165-172.
114.Whipple, J. M. and R. Frankel (2000), “Strategic Alliance Success Factors,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 36 (3), pp. 21-28.
115.Wiersema, M. F. and K. A. Bantel (1992), “Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35 (1), pp. 91-125.
116.Wille, J. R. (1988), “Joint Venturing Strategies,” The Hand Book of Joint Venturing, New York: Dow Jones-Irwin.
117.Yan, A. and B. Gray (1994), “Bargaining Power, Management Control,and Performance in United States-China Joint Ventures: A Comparative Case Study,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 (6), pp.478-517.
118.Yoshino, M. Y. and U. S. Rangan (1995), Strategic Alliances: An Entrepreneurial Approach to Globalization, Harvard Business School Press.
119.Zuckerman, H. S. and T. A. D’Aunno (1992), “455 Electronics Execs Say Rugged Industrialism is Fading,” Electronic Business, March 30, 1992, pp. 38-82.
【中文部份】
1.王美玲，「產業環境、組織特性、組織慣性與組織病症關係之探討」，台灣大學商管所碩士論文，1997年。
2.尹良，「半導體產業策略聯盟之動向分析－以我國積體電路製造廠為例」，交通大學工業工程研究所碩士論文，1995年。
3.尤克熙，「國際策略聯盟實行條件相關因素之實證與探討－以高科技產業為例」，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1995年。
4.司徒達賢，「台灣企業之環境分析」，企銀月刊，第三卷第一期，頁32，1979年。
5.江正信，「高階經營團隊與企業策略決策模式、組織學習傾向、創新能力及經營績之關係研究」，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，2000年。
6.吳青松，「國際策略聯盟與經營績效評估：美國電腦製造業實例」，產業科技研究發展管理研討會，中國生產力中心，1990年。
7.吳青松，「本國產業策略聯盟與績效評估」，產業科技研究發展管理研討會，中國生產力中心，1991年。
8.吳青松，「策略聯盟之國際發展趨勢」，經濟情勢暨評論，第二卷第三期，頁8-13，1996年11月。
9.吳思華，策略九說，麥田出版社，1994年。
10.吳萬益、林清河，企業研究方法，華泰書局，2000年。
11.沈如騏，「董事會與高階管理團隊特質對高科技公司研究發展投入之影響」，中山大學企業管理所碩士論文，1999年。
12.林志豪，「產業環境、廠商能力對策略聯盟特性與績效關係之研究－以我國汽車零組件廠商為例」，銘傳大學國際企業管理所碩士論文，1998年。
13.林玲君，「策略聯形成因素與績效之研究－資訊電子業之實證」，台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，1991年。
14.林盈慧，「台灣地區生物技術廠商的資源基礎與策略聯盟型態相關性分析」，交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，1998年。
15.柯丁萍，「半導體產業策略聯盟之動向分析－以我國積體電路製造廠為例」，台灣大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文，1994年。
16.洪茂盛，「資訊科技對國際合資企業績效影響之實證研究－以製造業為例」，台灣大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文，1998年。
17.胡寬平，「廠商策略面因素與社會面因素對策略聯盟成立影響之研究」，文化大學國際企業管理所碩士論文，1998年。
18.許如婷，「高階管理團隊特徵對公司經營績效之影響－台灣地區上市公司之實證研究」，中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文，1997年。
19.徐銘毅，「技術策略聯盟類型、動機與關鍵成功因素之關係研究－以台灣高科技產業為例」，銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，1998年。
20.喬嘉，「高階管理者資訊行之初模」，台灣大學商學所碩士論文，1999年。
21.曾志弘，「聯盟文化差異、成立與運作特質對聯盟績效影響之研究－以在台合資企業為例」，中山大學企業管理所碩士論文，1997年。
22.曾成樺，「現金增資情況下企業策略行動之研究」，中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1997年。
23.黃俊英，多變量分析，中國經濟企業研究所，1999年。
24.黃建偉，「企業資源能力、策略聯盟、競爭優勢之關聯性研究－以不同架構角度探討」，雲林科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，1999年。
25.黃營杉，「策略管理」，華泰書局，1995年。
26.施坤壽、林清河、譚伯群，「競爭因素、製造策略、顧客滿意及組織績效之整合分析」，第一屆亞太管理學術研討會論文集，1997年。
27.施坤壽，「競爭因素、製造策略、顧客滿意及組織績效之整合分析」，台大管理論叢，2000年12月。
28.張博昌，「探討企業環境複雜度與獨特能力對策略聯盟型態的影響－以價值鍊為型態分類的基礎」，東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1996年。
29.陳孟莉，「外在環境、企業文化與組織再造之互動對經營績效之影響研究－以國內電子業為例」，成功大學企業管理所碩士論文，2000年。
30.陳順宇，迴歸分析，華泰書局，1996年。
31.陳順宇，多變量分析，華泰書局，1998年。
32.彭康麟，「半導體策略群組與其策略聯盟動機之研究」，中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1998年。
33.彭博詮，「台灣汔車產業策略聯盟行為之分析」，政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文，1995年。
34.孫燕卿，「高層管理、企業策略及環境不確性對產品發展成效之影響」，交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，1998年。
35.傅士龍，「產業合作網路對競爭優勢關係研究」，中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1997年。
36.鐘憲瑞，「企業統治類型與企業策略關係之研究」，政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1991年。
37.賴宏誌，「產業間與組織間聯盟策略配合型態對聯盟失靈影響研究」，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1998年。
38.蔡正揚、許政郎，「互惠協定與策略聯盟之探討－以航太工業為例」，產業科技研究發展管理研討會，中國生產力中心，1992年。