臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究係探討輸油氣鋼管在承受高內壓與撓曲作用下之撓曲強度與韌性行為，並針對輸油氣鋼管之修補與接合的方式，探討其行為。研究方法以試驗與理論解析兩方面進行，試驗方面製作十二組實尺寸鋼管試體進行撓曲試驗，試驗結果顯示：鋼管對銲接合提供管線穩定之撓曲強度與優良之韌性行為，且採用全圓周套管銲接修補之方式，能夠有效維持鋼管之撓曲強度與變形能力。解析方面以材料力學原理推導出鋼管在承受高內壓與撓曲作用下的側向力與側向變位關係，並對鋼管內壓、外徑及厚度三項變數進行探討，比較試驗與解析之結果發現，Tresca Criterion較von Mises Criterion更能準確的代表鋼管在承受高內壓與撓曲作用時之降伏狀態；變數探討結果顯示：鋼管內壓的存在會降低鋼管之撓曲強度，鋼管外徑及厚度的提高則有助於鋼管撓曲強度的提昇。

This research was conducted experimentally and analytically to investigate the flexural strength and deformation capacity of the pressurized steel pipelines. Twelve full-scale specimens, including the type of butt-weld steel pipes and full encirclement welded split sleeve repaired steel pipes, were fabricated and radiographically tested for the weld. Each specimen was subjected to a lateral deformation of a four-point bending test to study the flexural behavior of a buried pipeline. Test results showed that the API 5L steel pipes with butt-weld joint have significant ultimate strength and ductility. The full encirclement welded split sleeve provides an excellent repair procedure for steel pipelines to resist the flexural bending and lateral deformation. To study analytically, the relationship between lateral force and lateral deformation of pressurized steel pipes were derived that based on the theories of mechanics of materials. The parameters such as the pipe’s inner pressure, outer diameter and thickness were studied. Comparing the result of test and analysis showed that the Tresca Criterion can be more effective to represent the yielding state of the pressurized steel pipelines than the von Mises Criterion. The results of parameters studying showed that the existence of pipe’s inner pressure will reduce the flexural strength of steel pipelines. The increase of pipe’s outer diameter and thickness will raise the flexural strength of steel pipelines.

摘要i
Abstract ii
誌謝iv
目錄v
表目錄viii
圖目錄ix
照片目錄xii
符號說明xiii
第一章 緒論1
1.1 前言1
1.2 研究背景與動機1
1.3 研究目的與方法2
1.4 研究內容2
第二章 文獻回顧與相關規範4
2.1 文獻回顧4
2.2 相關規範6
第三章 鋼管撓曲試驗7
3.1 概述7
3.2 試體規劃與製作7
3.3 材料性質試驗10
3.4 試驗設置與步驟10
3.4.1 試驗設置10
3.4.2 試驗步驟11
3.5 試驗結果12
3.5.1 第一組試體（八吋鋼管）12
3.5.2 第二組試體（十吋鋼管）13
3.5.3 第三組試體（十二吋鋼管）13
3.6 結果討論13
3.6.1 鋼管接合方式之影響14
3.6.2 管內壓力之影響15
3.7 結論15
第四章 鋼管撓曲之力學行為解析17
4.1 概述17
4.2 基本假設與解析流程17
4.3 解析模式建立18
4.3.1 鋼管在軸向的張力降伏強度與壓力降伏強度18
4.3.2 鋼管斷面之軸力、彎矩與曲率19
4.3.3 鋼管所承受之側向力與側向變位22
4.3.4 以程式語言Fortran求解的邏輯24
4.3.5 以程式PFAP驗證試驗結果25
4.4 變數探討26
4.4.1 鋼管內壓之影響26
4.4.2 鋼管外徑之影響27
4.4.3 鋼管厚度之影響27
4.5 結論28
第五章 結論與建議29
5.1 結論29
5.2 建議30
參考文獻31
表35
圖44
照片71
附錄 放射線照相檢驗報告74

[1]邱耀正，冀樹勇，黃浩志，「斷層滑動引致埋管受軸壓之穩定分析」，中國土木水利工程學刊第五卷第四期，民國八十二年。
[2]蔡猷鐘，鍾政雄，「地下管線應力分析」，化工技術第二卷第八期，民國八十三年八月。
[3]潘文峰，廖鉦達，徐建民，「SUS 304 不銹薄壁鋼管在純彎曲負載下彈-塑性行為之分析」，成功大學學報第三十一卷，民國八十五年。
[4]Ariman, T. and Lee, B.-J., “Tension/Bending Behavior of Buried Pipelines under Large Ground Deformations in Active Faults,” Proceedings of the World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp.226-233. July, 1992.
[5]Basavaraju, C., “Simplified Analysis of Shrinkage in Pipe to Pipe Butt Welds,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol.197, pp.239-247, 2000.
[6]Chen, Q., Elwi, A. E. and Kulak, G. L., “Longitudinally-Stiffened Large Diameter Fabricated Steel Tubes,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 35, pp.19-48, 1995.
[7]Chen, W. F. and Ross, David A., “Test of Fabricated Tubular Columns,” Journal of the Structural Division, Vol.103, No.ST3, pp.619-634, 1977.
[8]Fernando, N. S. M., Small, J. C. and Carter, J. P., “Elastic Analysis of Buried Structures Subject to Three-Dimensional Surface Loading,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol.20, pp.331-349, 1996.
[9]Gere, J. M. and Timoshenko, S. P., “Mechanics of Materials,” 3rd edition, 1990.
[10]Ghasemian, M., Mortazavi, M. and Schmidt, L. C., “Behaviour of Hollow Curved Steel Struts Subjected to Compressive Load,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 52, pp.219-234, 1999.
[11]Gresnigt, A. M., “Ultimate Strength and Deformation Capacity of Pipelines,” Eighth International Conference on Offshore Mechanics And Arctic Engineering, pp.19-23, March 1989.
[12]Guran, A. and Atanackovic, T. M., “Fluid Conveying Pipe with Shear and Compressibility,” European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids, Vol.17, 1998.
[13]Hahn, G. D. and Sritharan, S., “Lateral Response of Underground Pipelines to Earthquakes,” Computers & Structures, Vol.53, No.3, pp.601-611, 1994.
[14]Han, K., Mau, S. T. and Zou, X., “Sectional Capacity of Circular Steel Tubes under Combined Loading,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol.119, No.2, pp.402-409, 1993.
[15]Honegger, D. G., “Research Needs Related to Detailed Evaluation of Pipeline Response to Large Ground Deformations,” Proceeding from the Fourth Japan-U.S. Workshop on earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, 1992.
[16]Kulak, G. L., “Tubular Members–Large and Small,” Engineering Structures, Vol.18, No.10, pp.745-751, 1996.
[17]Mavridis, G. A. and Pitilakis, K. D., “Axial and Transverse Seismic Analysis of Buried Pipelines,” 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 1996.
[18]Mavridis, G. A. and Pitilakis, K. D., “Transverse Seismic Analysis of Buried Pipelines,” Proceedings of the 4th U.S. Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA, 1995.
[19]Moore, I. D., “Response of Buried Cylinders to Surface Loads,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.113, No.7, pp.758-377, July, 1987.
[20]Moore, I. D. and Booker, J. R., “Behaviour of Buried Flexible Cylinders under the Influence of Nonuniform Hoop Compression,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol.21, No.9, pp.943-956, 1985.
[21]Moore, I. D., “Three-Dimensional Response of Elastic Tubes,” International Journal of Solids Structures, Vol.26, No. 4, pp.391-400, 1990.
[22]Pitilakis, K. and Mavridis, G., “Seismic Behavior & Vulnerability of Buried Pipelines,” Report EPOC-CT91-0039, Commission of the European Communities, D.G. XII, Part 3 “Tool for Buried Lifeline Analysis”,1993.
[23]Saleeb, A. F. and Chen, W. F., “Elastic-Plastic Large Displacement Analysis of Pipes,” Journal of the Structural Division, Vol.107, No.ST4, pp.605-626, 1981.
[24]Saleh, A. and Parsanejad, S., “Application of Orthogonalised Load/Deflection States to the Collapse Behaviour of Grout-Filled Damaged Tubular Members,” Structural Engineering Review, Vol.8, No.2/3, pp.269-275, 1996.
[25]Satoh, M., Suda, K., Suzuki, N. and Miura, F., “An Overview of Seismic Design of Buried Lifeline Structures in Japan,” pp.847-874.
[26]Schneider, S. P., “Flexural Capacity Of Pressurized Steel Pipe,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.124, No.3, pp.330-340, March 1998.
[27]Sohal, I. S. and Chen, W. F., “Moment-Curvature Expressions for Fabricated Tubes,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.110, No.11, pp.2738-2757, 1984.
[28]Sohal, I. S. and Chen, W. F., “Local Buckling and Sectional Behavior of Fabricated Tubes,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.113, No.3, pp.519-533, 1987.
[29]Toma, S. and Chen, W. F., “Analysis of Fabricated Tubular Columns,” Journal of the Structural Division, Vol.105, No.ST11, pp.2343-2366, 1979.
[30]Varma, A. H., Russell, B. W., and Wallace, B., “Large-Scale Rotating Bending Fatigue Tests for Offshore Pipe Connections,” Experimental Mechanics, Vol.37, No.2, pp.147-153, 1997.
[31]Vougioukas, E. A., Theodossis, C. and Carydis, P. G., “Seismic Analysis of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Vertical Fault Movement,” Proceedings of the 3rd US Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, pp.432-441, August, 1991.
[32]藤內繁明，山口種美，松井千秋，堺純一，「圓形鋼管撓曲特性相關試驗的研究」，日本建築學會大會學術講演梗概集，1993。