跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(98.82.120.188) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/09/13 03:18
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:張文瓊
論文名稱:中風病人出院後之長期照護安排
論文名稱(外文):Long-term care arrangements of discharged stroke patients
指導教授:吳淑瓊吳淑瓊引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shwu Chong Wu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:衛生政策與管理研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:公共衛生學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2001
畢業學年度:89
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:中風出院長期照護後續照護服務使用急性後期照顧
外文關鍵詞:strokedischargelong-term carepost-hospital careservices utilizationpost-acute care
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:664
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:10
本研究主要目的為了解需要後續照護的中風病人出院後的長期照護安排,並進一步探討影響長期照護安排的因子。研究資料來自1999年台大公共衛生學院衛生政策與管理研究所吳淑瓊教授主持之「政策對長期照護的可近性、品質與成本之影響」研究計畫。研究樣本為1999年9月1日起至2000年6月30日止,在台北市立仁愛醫院、台大醫學院附設醫院、衛生署台北醫院、耕莘醫院、台北市立陽明醫院、台北醫學大學附設醫院、台北市立萬芳醫院等七家醫院因中風而住院之病人,且經篩選確定為出院後一個月有後續照護需要者,共491位。
研究結果指出,中風病人出院後一個月間14.1%住進機構,55.4%完全由家庭照顧,佔最大多數,30.5%不但有家人照顧,並使用外來社區式服務,顯示目前仍然是由家庭承擔大多數的照護責任。
利用多類別對數複迴歸(polytomous logistic regression)分析病人之社會人口學特性(包括性別、年齡、籍貫、教育程度、家庭月收入、居住地區都市化程度)、出院後一個月的健康照護需要(包括身體功能障礙程度、認知功能)、照護資源(包括子女人數、是否有社會補助)、出院準備服務、病人與家庭間的資源交換(包括工具性、財務性、知識經驗性)等變項對病人出院後之長期照護安排的影響。在控制相關影響因子之後,得到重要結果如下:(1)年齡較高(OR=1.05)、身體功能障礙程度為3~4項ADLs障礙(OR=4.99)、5項ADLs全部障礙(OR=15.37)、醫院有安排後續照護服務者(OR=6.45),與完全由家庭照顧比較之下較可能使用機構式照護。(2)子女人數較少(OR=0.82)、工具性資源交換為很少~常常組(OR=0.26)、知識經驗性資源交換為常常組者(OR=0.41)使用機構式照護的機會較低。(3)病人為女性、身體功能障礙程度為3~4項ADLs障礙(OR=3.21)、5項ADLs全部障礙(OR=9.57)、醫院有安排後續照護服務者(OR=3.49),與完全由家庭照顧比較之下,較可能採用家庭加社區式正式照護資源。
除病人社會人口學特性、健康照護需要等因素之外,照護資源、出院準備服務與病人生病以前和家庭間的資源交換程度亦為出院後長期照護安排的影響因子。其中,出院準備服務的作用更是值得重視。它可以提高出院病人對後續照護服務的可近性,因此在政策發展上應促進出院準備服務的品質,建立完善的轉介機制,並充實社區中的居家支持服務,以落實連續性照顧之理念。
The purpose of this study is to examine the long-term care arrangement of the discharged patients suffered from stroke, and to analyze the factors associated with these different types of post-hospital care arrangement. The study draws on the data from the research project〝The Impact of policies on the accessibility, quality, and cost of long-term care〞. The sample in this study is consecutive stroke patients from 7 hospitals in Taipei at one month post discharge and screened as having need of long-term care.
The results revealed that 14.1% of the discharged patients needing long-term care lived in the long-term care institutions, 30.5% of them were cared by their families and used at least one kind of community-based formal care services, and 55.4% of them were cared by their families completely. It shows that the families bear quite huge responsibility of care.
In this study, the long-term care arrangement of discharged stroke patients is influenced by five domains:the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients, the need for health care, the resource of care, the discharge plan, and the resource exchanges between patients and their families when the patients were still healthy. After controlling for other factors by using the method of polytomous logistic regression, we found that (1) the patients who were older, discharged with 3~4 items of ADLs disabled, all the 5 ADLs disabled, had fewer children, been transferred to some kind of post-hospital care by their hospitals, never gave instrumental assistance to their families, never or seldom gave informational assistance to their families tended to live into the long-term care institutions. (2) the patients who were female, discharged with 3~4 ADLs disabled, all the 5 ADLs disabled, been transferred to some kind of post-hospital care by their hospitals, tended to be cared both by their families and community-based formal services.
目 錄
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………………6
第二節 研究重要性與目的……………………………………………………9
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 中風後遺症及照護需求…………………………………………..…11
第二節 出院病人可使用之服務模式……………………………………..…15
第三節 中風病人出院後服務使用情形及其影響因子……………………..19
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構與假設……………………………………………………..23
第二節 研究變項之操作型定義及測量……………………………………..25
第三節 研究材料……………………………………………………………..33
第四節 資料處理與分析…………………………….……………………….34
第四章 研究結果
第一節 樣本回收情形及回收樣本特性……………………………………..37
第二節 長期照護安排影響因子之雙變項分析……………………………..43
第三節 長期照護安排影響因子之多變項分析……………………………..48
第五章 討論
第一節 重要發現與討論……………………………………………………..53
第二節 研究限制……………………………………………………………..62
第三節 未來研究方向………………………………………………………..63
第四節 政策啟示……………………………………………………………..65
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………..90
圖表目錄
圖3-1 中風病人出院後之長期照護安排影響因子研究架構……..……………24
表3-1 研究變項之操作型定義與測量…….………………………………….…30
表3-2 多類別對數複迴歸分析變項參考組說明……………………………..…36
表4-1 住院樣本回收情形………………………………………………………..67
表4-2 出院後一個月追蹤情形…………………………………………………..67
表4-3 樣本社會人口學特性……………………………………………………..68
表4-4 病人居住安排…………………………………………………………..…69
表4-5 ADLs功能表現分佈狀況…………………………………………………70
表4-6 ADLs功能障礙狀況………………………………………………………70
表4-7 ADLs功能障礙累計………………………………………………………70
表4-8 IADLs功能障礙狀況……………………………………………………..71
表4-9 IADLs功能障礙累計…………………………………………………..…71
表4-10 身體功能障礙程度…………………………………………………….….72
表4-11 認知功能狀況………………………………………………………..……73
表4-12 認知功能障礙程度……………………………………………………..…74
表4-13 子女人數…………………………………………………………………..75
表4-14 各項社會補助情形……………………………………………………..…75
表4-15 社會補助…………………………………………………………………..76
表4-16 出院準備服務內容………………………………………………………..77
表4-17 出院準備服務分組………………………………………………………..77
表4-18 與家庭的工具性資源交換………………………………………………..78
表4-19 工具性資源交換分組分佈……………………………………………..…79
表4-20 與家庭間的財務性資源交換……………………………………………..80
表4-21 財務性資源交換分組分佈………………………………………………..80
表4-22 與家庭間的知識經驗性資源交換……………………………………..…81
表4-23 知識經驗性資源換分組分佈……………………………………………..81
表4-24 出院後各項長期照護服務使用情形…………………………………..…82
表4-25 出院後之長期照護安排…………………………………………………..83
表4-26 長期照護安排與社會人口學特性之關係………………………………..84
表4-27 長期照護安排與健康照護需要之關係…………………………………..85
表4-28 長期照護安排與照顧資源之關係………………………………………..86
表4-29 長期照護安排與出院準備服務之關係……………………………….….87
表4-30 長期照護安排與病人和家庭間資源交換之關係………………………..88
表4-31 中風病人出院後長期照護安排影響因子多類別對數複迴歸分析…..…89
參考文獻
一、中文部分
內政部,中華民國臺閩地區人口統計,1999年。
李源德、陳榮基編著:高血壓與腦中風(四版)。台北:健康世界雜誌社,1992
朱昭美:功能障礙老人的社區式照護成本。國立台灣大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,1995
吳肖琪、林麗嬋、藍忠孚、吳義勇:全民健保實施後急性病床住院病患超長住院情形之分析。中華衛誌 1998;17 (2):139-146。
嚴毋過、吳淑瓊、許菁菁、陳寶輝:台北市公私立醫院非急性長期住院病人的盛行率、長期照護需要與長期照護態度。護理研究 1996;4 (2):151-159。
莊逸洲、盧成皆、陳理:論量計酬輿論病例計酬之支付制度對費用結構與品質之影響:以長庚醫院之剖腹生產與陰道分娩為例。中華衛誌 1997;16 (2):149-158。
吳淑瓊、陳正芬:長期照護資源的過去、現在、與未來。社區發展季刊 2000;29:19-31。
顏毓真:功能障礙老人的家庭照護者對支持性方案的需求。國立台灣大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文,1997
李淑霞:照護失能老人對家庭照護者的負面影響。國立台灣大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文,1994
劉佳安:老人對居家護理之認識與使用意願。國立台灣大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文,1997
二、英文部分
Brosseau L, Potvin L, Philippe P, Boulanger YL. Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 75:431-436, 1996
Brown RD, Ransom J, Hass S, Petty GW, O’Fallon WM, Whisnant JP, Leibson CL. Use of nursing home after stroke and dependence in stroke severity. A population-based analysis. Stroke. 30:924-929, 1999
Clarke PJ. Black SE., Badley EM., Lawrence JM., Williams JI. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disability and Rehabilitation. 21(3):116-123, 1999
Cox C. Findings from a statewide program of respite care : A comparison of service users, stoppers, and nonusers. The Gerontologist. 37(4): 511-517, 1999
Dighe MS, Aparasu RR, Rappaport HM. Factors predicting survival, changes in activity limitations, and disability in a geriatric post-stroke population. The Gerontologist. 37(4): 483-489, 1997
Grimby G, Andern E, Daving Y, Wright B. Dependence and perceived diffculty in daily activeties in community-living stroke survivors 2 years after stroke : A study of instrumental structures. Stroke. 29(9): 1843-1849, 1998
Hermans E, Anten HW, Diederiks JP, Philipsen H. Use of care by home-dwelling stroke patients during three years. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 12 (3):186-190, 1998
Hochstenbach Jb, Donders AR, Mulder T, Limbeek J, Schoonderwaldt H. Many chronic problems in CVA patients at home. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. 140(22): 1182-1186, 1996
Hu HH, Sheng WY, Chu FL, Lan CF, Chaing BN. Incidence of stroke in Taiwan. Stroke. 23(9):1237-1241, 1992
Huang ZS, Chaing TL, Lee TK. Stroke prevalence in Taiwan. Findings from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey. Stroke. 28(8):1579-1587, 1997
Jette AM, Tennstedt S, Crawford S. How does formal and informal community care affect nursing home use ? Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences. 50B(1): S4-S12, 1995
Kane RL, Chen Q, Finch M, Blewett L, Burns R, Moskowitz M. Functional outcomes of posthospital care for stroke and hip fracture patients under medicare. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 46(12):1525-33, 1998
Katz PR, Kane RL, Mezey MD. Emerging systems in long-term care. NY: Springer,1999
Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, Brusin E, Mononen H, Maatta R, Nieminen P, Sotaniemi KA, Myllyla VV. Poststroke depression correlates with cognitive impairment and neurological deficits. Stroke. 30(9):1875-1880, 1999
Kondo K, Adachi M. A study of factors influencing determination of discharge disposition of stroke rehabilitation. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 46(7):542-550, 1999
Konstam, V, Salem D, Pouleur H, Kostis J, Gorkin L, Shumaker S, Mottard I, Woodes P, Konstam MA, Yusuf S. Baseline quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization in 5,025 patients with congestive heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology. 78:890-895, 1996
Kosloski K, Montgomery RJV. The impact of respite use in nursing home placement. The Gerontologist. 35(1): 67-74, 1995
Levine JB, Covino NA, Slack WV, Safran C, Safran DB, Boro JE, Davis RB, Buchanan GM, Gervino EV. Psychological predictors od subsequent medical care among patients hospitalized with cardiac disease. The Journal of Cardiopulminary Rehabilitation. 16:109-116, 1996
Liu K, Wissoker D, Rimes C. Determinants and costs of Medicare post-acute care provided by SNFs and HHAs. Inquiry. 35(1):49-61, 1998
Penrod JD, Kane RL, Finch MD, Kane RA. Effects of post-hospital Medicare home health and informal care on patient functional status. Health Services Research 33(3):513-529, 1998
Petrovitch H, White L, Masaki KH, Ross GW, Abbott RD, Rodriguez BL, Lu G, Burchfiel CM, Blanchette PL, Curb JD. Influence of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, and stroke on cognitive impairment in late life. The American Journal of Cardiology. 81:1017-1021, 1998
Pullen R, Harlacher R, Pientka L, Fusgen I. The elderly stroke patient-observations 18 months after the event. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 32(5): 358-363, 1999
Schuling J, Greidanus J, Meyboom-de Jpng B. Measuring functional status of stroke patients with the Sickness Impact Profile. Disability and Rehabilitation. 15(1):19-23,1993
Legh-Smith J, Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R. Services for stroke patients one year after stroke. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 40(2):161-165, 1986
Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella. Cognitive impairment after stroke:frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 57(2):202-207, 1994
Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke. 27(9):1459-1466,1996
Teasell RW, McRae MP, Finestone HM. Social issues in the rehabilitation of younger stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 81(2): 205-209, 2000
Woo J, Yuen YK, Kay R, Nicholis MG. Survival, disability, and residence 20 months after acute stroke in a Chinese population:implications for community care. Disability and Rehabilitation. 14(1):36-40, 1992
Wu SC, Li CY, Chang AL. The influence of intergenerational exchange on nursing home admission in Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 12: 163-174, 1997
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top