臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在網路學習日益普及的今天，國內已有多位學者利用網路的特性進行專題導向式學習的研究，但研究的面向多侷限於科學知識的學習，顯少有人應用於教師專業知識的成長之上，所以我們有必要去嘗試一項可行的方法，協助職前師資培育生增益相關教學專業知識學習的成效，並且幫助任課教師引導職前師資培育生的學習。因此本研究嘗試運用全球資訊網，支援教育學程之職前師資培育生進行專題導向式的學習，希望能夠達到下列目的：（1）發展網路化專題導向學習應用於教育學程教學媒體課程之「教學網站評鑑」專題的學習活動與策略；（2）探討網路化專題導向學習於教育學程教學媒體課程的實施情況與相關問題，並提出有效的教學策略；（3）瞭解學習者對網路化專題導向學習應用於教育學程教學媒體課程的意見反應；（4）探討學習檔案應用於專題導向學習的困難與限制，並應用檔案評量分析學生的學習過程與結果。

There are some researches regarding project-based learning (PBL) on Web, whereas most are focused upon science learning. It is hence needed to try an effective approach to designing and implementing PBL on Web for assisting students of teacher preparation program in improving their learning outcomes and qualities. This study uses the World Wide Web to support students of teacher preparation program to do project-based learning. The results of this study expect the following: (1) developing the activities and strategies of project-based learning on Web for instruction media course of teacher preparation program；(2) discussing the situation and the related problems of implementing project-based learning on Web for instruction media course of teacher preparation program；(3) comprehending the responses of students who participate in project-based learning on Web for instruction media course of teacher preparation program；(4) discussing the difficulty and limitation of implementing the portfolio for project-based learning on Web, and using the portfolio to analyse the learning process and results of students.

第一章 緒 論.....................................1
第一節 研究背景與機...............................2
第二節 研究目的...................................5
第三節 研究重要性與貢獻...........................7
第四節 研究範圍與限制.............................8
第五節 重要名詞釋義...............................9
第二章 文獻探討..................................14
第一節 專題導向學習的意義與目的..................15
第二節 專題導向學習的功能與特性..................18
第三節 專題導向學習實施的考量....................21
第四節 專題導向學習的理論基礎....................22
第五節 專題導向學習的學習策略....................25
第六節 專題導向學習之教學運用策略................31
第七節 網路化專題導向學習的學習環境與功能機制....33
第八節 應用網路支援專題導向學習的相關研究........38
第三章 研究方法與設計............................49
第一節 研究架構..................................50
第二節 研究流程與步驟............................52
第三節 研究對象..................................56
第四節 研究方法..................................57
第五節 研究工具..................................60
第四章 研究過程與結果............................63
第一節 系統功能介紹..............................64
第二節 分析階段..................................75
第三節 設計階段..................................87
第四節 發展階段.................................113
第五節 實施階段.................................117
第六節 訪談與評量階段...........................159
第五章 研究結論與建議...........................185
第一節 結論.....................................186
第二節 建議.....................................192
第三節 對未來研究相關建議.......................195
參考書目.........................................196
附錄一：自我反省記錄表...........................202
附錄二：自我評量表...............................203
附錄三：同儕互評表...............................204
附錄四：學習者分析問卷...........................205
附錄五：學習者訪談表.............................206

中文部份
1.王春展（民85）。情境學習理論及其在國小教育的應用。國教學報， 第8期，頁53-71。
2.王繼正(民87)。創造性問題解決式的專題製作教學。技術及職業教育雙月刊，第43期，頁57-59。
3.中央大學大氣科學網路教室(Lain，Learning Atmospheric-Science In Network) 。Http://lain.atm.ncu.edu.tw
4.江火明(民88)。大氣科學的網路學習。八十八年暑期大氣科學研習論文集，頁115-127。
5.李基常、王繼正(民87)。創造性問題解決式的專題製作教學。技術職業教育雙月刊，第45期，頁39-44。
6.邱貴發(民85)。情境學習理念與電腦輔助學習----學習社群理念探討。台北：師大書苑。
7.邱貴發、鐘邦友(民82)。情境學習理念在電腦輔助教學軟體設計的應用。中華民國第七屆電腦輔助教學研討會論文集，頁69-78。
8.林達森(民88)。論析統整性課程及九年一貫課程的啟示。教育研究資訊第7卷，第4期，頁97-116。
9.袁賢銘(民85)。網路上遠距教學之應用。
http://plato.cis.nctu.edu.tw/Albatross/net96930.html
10.徐新逸(民85)。情境學習在數學教育上之應用。教學科技與媒體，第29期，頁13-22。
11.張新仁(民86)。認知教學革新。教育研究，58，頁64-77。
12.徐木蘭(民88)。全腦思考的新挑戰。經濟日報副刊(88.01.20)。
13.陳淑敏(民85)。從社會互動看皮亞傑與維高斯基的理論及對幼教之示。台北市立師範學院：皮亞傑與維高斯基的對話研討會。
14.郭重吉民(85)。從建構主義談數理師資培育的革新。科學發展月刊，第24卷，第7期，頁555-562。
15.陳斐卿、江火明（民88）。網路上合作學習的個案研究--鋒面專題。中華民國第十四屆科學教育學術研討會暨第十一屆科學教育學會年會會議手冊及短篇論文彙編，中華民國科學教育學會，國立高雄師範大學，高雄。「網路上STS(Science, Technology, and Society)專題式合作學習─以地球科學為例」(陳斐卿、江火明與林熙禎，民88)
16.陳景欣(民87)。網際網路上群體學習環境之設計。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
17.許書務(民87)。問題導向學習之教學策略研究：以專科微電腦應用系統設計專題為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
18.黃秀文(民85)。從傳統到變通：教學評量的省思。國民教育研究學報，第二期。
19.唐宣蔚(民87)。大學生學業成長網路學習社群之建構與實施。淡江大學教育資料科學研究所碩士學位論文。
20.曾志朗 (民87)。網路上的科學教育。中部地區科學教育簡訊，頁10。
21.單文經（民87）。鷹架支持的譬喻在大班教學上的應用，視聽教育雙月刊，39卷，第6期，頁1-22。
22.鈕文英（民88）。自然探究法之理論與方法分析。高雄師大學報，第10期，頁61-83英文部份
1.Adams, D. M. , & Hamm, M. E. （1990）. Cooperative learning critical hinking and collaboration across the curriculum. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
2.Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology : A cognitive　view . New York : Holt , Rinehart &Winston .
3.Basili, P. A., & Sanford, J. P. (1991). Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 293-304.
4.Bell, P., Davis, E. A., &　Linn, M. C. (1995). The knowledge integration environment: Theory and design. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 1995 Conference.
5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1996). Two models of classroom learning using a communal database. In S. Dijkstra, H. P. M. Krammer, J. J. G. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Instructional models in computer-based learning environments(229-242). NY: Springer-Verlag.
6. Bransford, J.D., & The CTGV (1996). MOST environments for accelerating literacy development. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives of the design of technology-supported learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.Brown,J.S.,Collins,A.,& Duguid, S.(1996).Situated cognition and culture of learning. In McLellan(Eds.),Situated Learning Perspectives .Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
8.Chi, M. T. H.,& Glaser, R.(1985). Problcm-solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Human ability.--An information-processing approach. New York：W. H. Freeman and Cornpany.
9.Chiu, C. H., Chen, H. P., Wei, L. C., & Hu, H. W. (1999). Approaching effective network cooperative learning .Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics/Science Education and Technology (M/SET 99 Proceedings).San Antonio,Taxas,USA.
10.Collaborative visualization (CoVis)。Http://www.covis.nwu.edu
12.CTGV (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment ,and professional development. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cunnigham,D. J., Duffy, T. M., & Knuth, R. A. (1993). The textbook of future. In C. Mcknight(Ed.), Hypertext: A psychological perspective. England: Ellis Horwood.
13. Curriculum Review (1994). Constructing buildings, bridges and minds: Building an integrated curriculum through social studies. Curriculum Review, 33(9), 25-26.
14.Daniel, H.(1993). Charting the agenda:educational activity after Vygotsky. New York：Macmillan.
15.Diana.J. (1996) The advantage of PBL.
Http://edweb.sdsu.clrit.learningtree/ PBL/PBLadvantages.html.
16.D. W., Johnson, R. T., Johnson(1993). Circles of learning: cooperation in the classroom. Minnesota Interaction Book Company.
17.Eisenhardt, K.M., “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, (14:4), 1990, 532-550.
18.Edelson, D. C., Pea, R. D., & Gomez, L. M. (1996). The collaboratory notebook. Communications of the ACM, 39(1), 32-33.
19.Eysench, M.W. & Keane, M.T.（1990）. Cognitive psychology：A student''s handbook. London：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Gay, G. & Grosz-Ngate, M. (1994). Collaborative design in a networked multimedia environment: Emerging communication patterns. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 418-432.
21.Gillani, B. B.（1994）.Application of Vygotsky’s social cognitive theory to the design of instructional materials. U.S.A.:The Southern California University.
22.Hoadley, C. M., Bell, P., & The KIE Research Group (1996). Web for your head—The design of digital resources to enhance lifelong learning.
23.Helgeson, S.L.(1992). Problem solving research in middle/junior high school science education. Columbus, OH : ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
24.James D. Russell, Robert A. Reiser, Carole Hruskocy, Clare Ruckdeschel (1999). Strategies for Teaching Project-Based Courses. Educational Technology, March-April, 56-60.
25.James Laffey, Thomas Tupper, Dale Musser, & John Wedman, (1998). A Computer-Mediated Support System for Project-Based Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73-86.
26. Johnson and Johnson(1994). Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition.
27. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B.(1995).Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American journal of distance education, 9(2), 7-27.
28.Kagan,S.（1992）.Cooperative learning resources for teachers.San Juan Capistrano,CA：Resources for Teachers.
29.KIE Research Group (1997). A KIE project walkthrough: Overview. (Accessible
at http://www.kie.berkeley.edu/hitd-walkthrough/hitd2.html)
30.Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE)。Http://www.kie.berkeley.edu
31.Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A., (1996). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in junior and senior high school. Boston: Ally & Bacon.
32.Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting Project-based Science. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341-358.
33.Moursund, D. (1999). Project-Based Learning Using Information Technology. Oregan：ISTE Publications, 53-91.
34.Musthafa, B. (1997). Literacy activities in a fifth-grade informal, project- based literature program: A qualitative case study of instructional supports and children’s learning engagement. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ohio, 1997). (Universty Microfilms No.AAC9813321 ).
35.Norman, G.R. & Schmidt, H.G.（1992）. The psychologyical basis of problem- based learning:A review of the evidence. Academic Med. 67（9）, 57-65. Ormrod, T.C. & Ball, L. J. (1993). Does programming knowledge or design strategy determine shifts of focus in prolog programming? In Cook, C. R. et al ., (Eds). Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fifth workshop. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36.Rogers, L. (1997). Get real! Project-based learning, practical advice for getting maximum learning out of class projects. Learning Magazine, 8(1). Avaliablable from http://www.gsn.org/weblib/real/getreal.htm.
37.Roth, W. M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 503-534.
38.Schmidt, H.G..et al.,（1996）. New directions for medical education: problem-based learning and community-oriented medical education. New York:Springer- Verlag. 106-111.
39.Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, practice. Second edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
40.Steinberg, A. (1997). Real Learning, Real Work. Routledge, New York.
41.Topping, K.(1998). Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research , 68, 249-276.
42.Wagner, R. (1997): The CoVis Project: A national tested for science learning
room. Oak Brook, IL: NARST.
43.Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E. (1995). Effects of cooperative incentives and cooperative heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of learning groups in a college life science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 291-299.
44.Woods, D. R. (1989). Creativity and PS. Journal of College Science Teaching, 15(4), 409-412.
45.Yarnall, L. & Kafai, Y. (1996). Issues in project-based science activities: Children’s constructions of ocean software games. ED 395819.