跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.82) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/11 20:38
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭育群
研究生(外文):yu-chung, Cheng
論文名稱:軍訓主任教官領導行為對部屬士氣影響之初探
論文名稱(外文):THe relationship between leader behavior and subordinate''s morale: A preliminary study on Taiwan high school military instructor
指導教授:李伯謙李伯謙引用關係
指導教授(外文):Po-chien, Li
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2001
畢業學年度:89
語文別:中文
論文頁數:70
中文關鍵詞:體恤領導體制領導工作滿意組織承諾離職傾向
外文關鍵詞:consiserationinitiation of structurejob satisfactionorganization commitmentturnover
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:256
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
軍訓主任教官領導行為對部屬士氣影響之初探
研究生:鄭育群 指導教授:李伯謙博士
元智大學管理研究所
中文提要
學生軍訓制度是國家戰略下之政策工具,而軍訓教官在快速變遷的現代社會中其身份與地位倍受各界質疑。為此,本研究旨在以軍訓制度中人力資源管理為主軸,探討軍訓主任教官領導行為對部屬士氣之影響,希以提振軍訓教官士氣與工作績效。
本研究從文獻探討中歸納軍訓主任教官的行為可區分為:體恤與體制兩類,代表部屬個人士氣表現因子為:工作滿意、組織承諾、離職傾向三者。以此為準,建立研究架構及假說,推判體恤領導可增進部屬士氣,體制領導會降低部屬士氣。經實證研究相關分析發現體恤與體制兩種領導行為對部屬士氣之影響為:
一、體恤領導與部屬之工作滿意呈正相關,與組織承諾及離職傾向則無顯著關係。
二、體制領導與工作滿意和組織承諾呈負相關,與離職傾向呈正相關。
The Relationship Between Leader Behavior
and Subordinate’s Morale:
A Preliminary Study on Taiwan High School Military Instructor
Student: Yu-chung Cheng. Advisor: Po-chien Li, Ph. D
Institute of Management
Yuan - Ze University
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the research is to explore the relationship between the leader behaviors of military instructor directors and their subordinates’ work morale. To test research hypotheses, mail survey was used to collect date from 122 high school military instructors examined in the current study include consideration and initiation of structure, and the construct of work morale was measured by three job-related attitudinal variable: job satisfaction, affective commitment, and intend to leave. The results of the study indicated that consideration behavior was positively related to subordinate’s job satisfaction, but was not associated with affective commitment and intent to leave. In contrast, initiation of structure behavior appeared to have a negative relationship with job satisfaction and affective commitment, and have a positive association with intent to leave. Research implications and suggestions for future studies are also provided in the thesis.
目   錄
書名頁....................................Ⅰ
論文口試委員審定書........................Ⅱ
授權書....................................Ⅲ
中文提要..................................Ⅳ
英文提要..................................Ⅴ
誌謝......................................Ⅵ
目錄......................................Ⅶ
圖目錄....................................Ⅸ
表目錄....................................Ⅹ
一、 緒 論...............................1
1.1 研究背景.........................1
1.2 研究動機.........................2
1.3 研究目的與重要性.................2
二、  文獻探討...........................4
2.1 我國軍訓制度介紹.................4
2.2 領導的意義及特性.................8
2.3 領導理論演進及型式...............9
2.4 士氣與影響士氣的因素.............31
三、  研究架構及假設.....................38
3.1 研究架構簡介.....................38
3.2 領導行為對個人士氣因子的影響.....40
3.3 研究假設.........................43
四、  研究方法...........................44
 4.1 研究對象與資料蒐集...............44
 4.2 研究變項衡量.....................45
五、  研究結果及分析.....................47
5.1 樣本資料分析 .....................47
5.2 研究樣本描述性統計................49
5.3 研究假設檢定......................49
六、 結論及建議...........................53
6.1 研究發現.........................53
6.2 研究限制.........................54
6.3 研究建議.........................55
參考文獻...................................58
附錄: 研究問卷............................66
自傳.......................................70
圖 目 錄
圖2-1  教育部軍訓處組織體系..............7
圖2-2  領導行為連續構面..................13
圖2-3  俄亥俄州立大學兩構面領導模型座標..14
圖2-4  領導方格..........................17
圖2-5  途徑目標理論中領導者的角色........22
圖2-6  情境與偏好的領導型式..............23
圖2-7  情境領導理論架構..................25
圖2-8  轉換領導因子......................30
圖2-9  士氣與生產效率之關係..............33
圖3-1  研究架構..........................39
表 目 錄
表2-1   領導者六大特質分類............10
表2-2   領導行為主要論點..............18
表2-3   任務、關係導向領導者差異比較..19
表2-4   情境有利程度與領導型式之搭配..20
表2-5   領導型式及其分類說明..........27
表2-6   規範性決策模式之權變因素......27
表3-1   研究假設......................43
表4-1   問卷發出回收統計..............45
表5-1-1 受訪者性別分析................47
表5-1-2 受訪者年齡分析................47
表5-1-3 受訪者教育程度分析............48
表5-1-4 受訪者婚姻狀況分析............48
表5-1-5 受訪者服務年資分析............48
表5-2   研究構面描述性統計............49
表5-3   研究構面相關分析..............51
表5-4   研究構面分析結果..............52
參考文獻
中文部份:
1.大衛、麥孔米克(David McCormick)著,變革中的美國陸軍,國防部史政編譯局譯,台北,民國99年9月。
2.李元墩、林育理、陳啟光、林韻儀,「主管領導型態與部屬組織承諾及其生產力關係之研究-以員工人格特質為情境變項」,2000年兩岸管理科學學術研討會,淡江大學,民國89年11月。
3.周淑淑,「新聞文從業人員心理變數,工作壓力與離職傾向之關係」,中央大學所碩士論文,民國79年6月。
4.陳德禹,行政管理,三民書局,二版,台北,民國85年10月。
5.陳月娥,社會科學研究方法,一版,千華出版社,民國88年9月。
6.俞文釗,管理心理學,五南圖書出版公司,台北,民國82年12月。
7.許士軍,管理學,一版,東華書局,民國70年1月。
8.高國騰,「個人特質,工作機會,工作績效及工作滿意度對離職行為之影響」,交通大學碩士論文,民國82年。
9.黃景泰,「主管領導型式對部屬工作滿足之影響-以交通部為例」,政治大學碩士論文,民國78年6月。
10.翁婉靜,「工作績效對銷售人員工作滿足與離職關係的干擾效果」,大同工學院碩士論文,民國78年6月。
11.趙本利,趙本利自傳-困知勉行錄,正中書局,台北,民國87年4月。
12.韓志宇,「我國新商業銀行授信人員工作壓力之研究-以C銀行為例」,元智大學碩士論文,民國89年6月。
13.謝元熙,文武何一教育的功能,一版,台灣書店,台北,民國67年4月。
14. ,文武何一教育的功能,二版,台灣書店,台北,民國82年12月。
英文部份:
1.Ajay K. Kohli, “ Effects of Supervisory Behavior: The Role of Individual Differences Among Salespeople”, Journal of Marketing, vol 53, pp.40 — 50 October 1989.
2.Ayman, R., and M.M. Chemers, “Relationship of supervisory behavior ratings to work group effectiveness and subordinate satisfaction,” Journal of Applied Psychology 68:338-341,1983.
3.Bass, B.M. Leadership, Psychology, and Organizational Behavior, New York: Happer and Row. 1960.
4. ., “Leadership: Good, Better, Best,” Organizational Dynamics 13: 26-40, winter 1985.
5.Bass, B.M., and B.J. Avolio, “Developing transformational leadership: 1993 and beyond,” Journal of European Industrial Training 14: 21-27, 1990.
6.Bagozzi, R.P. “The Nature and Cause of Self-Esteem, Performance, and Satisfaction in the Salesforce: A Structural Equation Approach,” Journal of Business, 53 (3), 315 — 311980.
7.Bennis, W.G., and B. Nanus, Leaders: strategies for taking charge, New York: Harper and Row, 1985.
8.B1agozzi, Richard P. “Sales force Performance and Satisfaction as a Function of Individual Difference, Interpersonal, and Situational Factor,” Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 517 — 31, November 1978.
9.Bluedorn, A. C. “A Unified Model of Turnover from Organizations” Human Relation 35 pp135-153, February, 1982
10.Bray, D.W. and D.L. Grant. “The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management”. Psychological Monograph 80(17): No. 625, 1966.
11.Bowers., D.G. and S.E. Seashore, “Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with Four Factor theory of Leadership,” Administrate Science Quarterly 11, 238-263,1996.
12.Burn, J.M., Leadership. New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
13.Bycio, P., R.D. Hackeet and J.S. Aleen & Bass, “Conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership”, Journal of Applied Psychology 80:468-478, 1995.
14.Cartwright, D.C. Influence, leadership, control In Handbook of organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally. March 1965.
15.Chemers, M.M. “Cross-culture training as a means for improving situational favorableness.” Human Relations 22: 531-546, 1969.
16. , R.B. Hays, F. Rhodewalt, and Wysocki. “A person environment analysis of job stress: A contingency model explanation’’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24: 172-177, 1985.
17.Churchill, Glibert A., Jr., Neil M. Ford, and Orville C. Walker, Jr. “Organizational Climate and Job Satisfaction in the Salesforce,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 323-32, November 1976.
18.Conger, J.A. and R.N. Kanungo, Charismatic leadership: The elusive factors in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1988a.
19.Daft,R. L. Leadership Theory and Practice, Harcourt Brace & Company, p:69. 1999.
20.Davis Heith, Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior, 5th Ed, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, pp.76. 1977.
21.Dubinsky, Alan J. and Steven W. Hartley (1986), "A Path-Analytic Study of a Model of Salesperson Performance," Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 14(Spring), 36-46.
22.Evans, Linda., “Teacher morale: An individual perspective”. Educational Studies vol.18 Issue2, p161, 1992.
23. , “Understanding teacher morale and job satisfaction”, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol.13. No. 8, pp831-833, 1997.
24.Fiedler, F.E. A theory of leadership effectiveness, New York: McGraw-Hill,1967.
25.Fiedler, F.E., and M.M. Chemers. Leadership and effective management. Glenview, III.: Scott-Foreman. 1974.
26.Fiedler, F.E.., and J.E. Garcia., New approaches to leadership: Cognitive resources and organizational performance. New York: John Wiley, 1987.
27.Fleishman E. A. & E. F. Harris, “Patterns of Leadership Behavior Related to Employee Grievances and Turnover”, Personnel Psychology 15, 1962 pp43-56。
28.Galton, F. Hereditary genius. New York: Appleton. 1869.
29.Gerhart, B., ”Voluntary Turnover Alternative Job Opportunities”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.75, pp467-476. 1990.
30.Goleman, D. Working with emotional intelligence, New York: Bantan Books, 1998.
31.Greenleaf, R.K. The power of servant leadership, San Francisco: Berrett — Koehler 1998.
32.Hampton, Ron., Alan J. Dubinsky, and Steven J. Skinner, "A Model of Sales Supervisor Leadership Behavior and Retail Salespeople''s Job-Related Outcomes," Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 14(Fall), 33-43. 1986.
33.Hemphill, J.K., and A.E. Coons. “Development of the leader behavior description questionnaire. In leader behavior: Its description and measurement”. R.M. Stogdill and A.E. Coons. Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research.
34.Hersey, P., and K.H. Blanchard. Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, 4th Ed., pp. 171-180, Prentice-Hall 1982.
35.Homans, G.C The human group. New York: Har2court, Brace 1950.
36.Hoppock, R. Job Satisfaction, New York: Harper, 1935.
37. House, R.J., and T.R. Mitchell, “Path-goal theory of leadership”, Cotemporary Business 3(fall):81-98, 1974.
38.Huges R.L., R.C. Ginnett and C.J. Curphy, Leadership: Enhancing the Lesson of Experience, Irwin 1998.
39.Johnston, M. W., A. Parasuraman, C.M. Futrell, and W C. Black, “A Longitudinal Assessment of the Selected Organizational Influences on Sales People’s Organizational Commitment during Early Employment,” Journal of Marketing Reseaarch 27, pp.333 — 344, August, 1990.
40.Katz, D., and R.L. Kahn. The social psychology of organization, New York: Wiely 1966.
41.Kanter, R.L., “Commitment and social organization, A study of commitment mechanisms in Utopian Communities”, American Social Review, Vol.33, p.449, 1968.
42.Karen, A.J., and Northcraft, G.B., Neale, M.A. “Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroup,” Administrative Science Quarterly 44:741-763,1999.
43.Kennedy, J.K, Jr. “Milder LPC leaders and the contingency model of leadership effectiveness,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30:1-14, 1982.
44.Krech, D., and R.S. Crutchfield. Theory and Problems of social Psychology, New York: McGraw- Hill1948.
45.Lawler, E.E.III, High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1986.
46. , The ultimate advantage: Creating the high involvement organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1992.
47. , From ground up: Six principles for building the new logic corporation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
48.Likert, R., “From Production- and Employee- Centeredness to System 1-4.” Journal of Management 5, pp: 147 — 156, 1979.
49.Mann, R.D. “Areview of the relationship between personality and performance in small group,” Psychological Bulletin, 56 (1959), PP.241 — 270.
50.Maier, N.R.F. Problem solving discussion and conferences: Leadership methods and skills, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
51.Meyer, J.B., Allen, N.J., “Testing the “side-Bet Theory” of organizational commitment: some methodological consideration”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, pp.372-378,1984.
52.Michaels, Ronald., William L. Cron,Alan J. Dubinsky and Eric A. “Influencde of Formalization Organizational Commitment and Work Alienation of Salespeople and Industrial Buyers,” JMR, 25 (November), pp 376 — 383. 1988.
53.Misumi, J., and Peterson, M.F. “The performance maintenance (PM) theory of leadership: Review of a Japanese research program.” Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 198 — 223, 1985.
54.Mobley, W.H. “Employee turnover: Causes, consequences, and control”, Reading, MA: Addison - Wesley, 1982.
55.Morris, M.H., & J.D. Shreman, “Generalizability of an organizational commitment model”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.24, pp.512-526, 1981.
56.Nahavandi, A. The Art and Science of Leadership 2nd, Prentice Hall, Inc, pp.2-6. 2000.
57. , “The effect of personal and situational factors on satisfaction with leadership,” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. 1993.
58.Newstetter, W. I., M.J. Feldstein., T.M. Newcomb. Group adjustment. Cleveland: Western Reserve University Press, 1938.
59.Nicholls, W.T., “A new approach to situational leadership,” Leadership and Organization Development Journal 6(4):2-7, 1985.
60.Porter, L.W., and E.E. Lawler, Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, III.: Irwin-Dorsey,1968.
61.Porter, L. W. & F.J. Smith, “The Etiology of Organizational Commitment”, Unpublished paper University of California, Invine, 1976.
62.Robbins S. P., Organization Behavior, Prentice-Hall, N. J.1993
63.Robbins, S. P. & Mary Coulter, Management, Prentice Hall, 2000.
64.Robert Blake and Jane S. Mouton, The managerial grid III. Houston: Gulf, 1985.
65.Ross, S.M., and L.R. Offerman, “Transformational leaders: Measurement of personality attributes and work group performance”. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin 23:1978-1086. 1997.
66.Rychlak, J.F. “Personality correlates of leadership among first level managers”. Psychological Reports 12: 43-52. 1963.
67.Sanjeev Ajarwal and Sridhar Ramaswami, “Affective Organizational Commitment of Salespeople: An Expanded Model”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management,Volume, XIII, Number 2, pp.49-70. 1993.
68.Salancik, G.K., “Commitment and control of Organizational Behavior”, In B.M. Staw & G.K. Salancik (Eds) New direction in organizational behavior, Chicago: St. Clair, pp.1-54. 1977.
69.Stainers, G. l., and R. P. Quinn. “ American Workers Evaluate the Quality of Their Jobs.” Monthly Labor Review 102, no.1 pp.627-66 1979.
70.Seltzer, J., and Numerof, R.E. “Supervisory leadership and subdinate burnout.” Academy of Management Journal, pp.439 — 446. 1988.
71.Smith, K.R., Morale: a refinement of Stogdill’s model, Journal of Educational Administration, 14(1), pp.87-93, 1976.
72.Smith, F. J., K. D. Scott; and C. l. Hulin. “Trends in job — Related Attitudes in Managerial and Professional Employees.” Academy of Management Journal 20, pp.454-60, 1977.
73.Stogdill, R.M. “Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature.” Journal of psychology 25:35 — 71.1948.
74.Tannenbaun, R. and Schmidt, W.H. “How to choose a leadership pattern,” Harvard business review, March- April, P:76. 1975.
75.Taylor and D. Bowers, “The survey of organizations: A machine scored standardized questionnaire instrument,” Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1972.
76.Vroom, V.H., Work and motivation. New York: Wily and Sons, 1964.
77.Yukl G.A., Leadership in Organizations, Prentice — Hall, 1998.
78.Zalenik, A. “The leadership gap”, Academy of Management Executive 4(1):7-22, 1990.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊