臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

一個有關字彙辨識的重要議題是探討字的組成份子，在字彙辨識時所扮演的角色，並且是否正如McClelland與Rumellhart(1981)所提出的交互激發模式所宣稱的，字彙的辨識歷程是同時具有上行、下行與兩者交互運作的歷程。這篇研究共有三個實驗，採用LDT的作業。實驗一與實驗二主要在驗證Taft與Zhu(1997)的研究結果與看法，他們的研究結果發現中文字聲旁的類型頻率（type frequency）對中文字的辨識歷程有決定性的影響，因此認為中文字的辨識歷程具有上行的路徑。但是本研究中的實驗一與實驗二的結果與Taft與Zhu的結果不同，並沒有發現他們所宣稱的有聲旁類型頻率的影響，在本研究的實驗一與實驗二的反應時間與錯誤率方面都只有發現全字字頻效果。實驗三改變實驗的操弄，提供更多的證據來支持前面兩個實驗的結果，實驗三中操弄部件的成字字頻，結果沒有發現部件成字字頻的效果。三個實驗的結果顯示出，認字時部件的處理並非如Taft與Zhu所宣稱的認字是由左部件辨認至右部件，認字的歷程也並非是在部件認出之後才能組成字，事實上認字時僅僅是處理部件的特徵訊息，不需要將部件認出才能完成字彙的辨認。

This study investigates the role of processing both semantic and phonetic radicals in recognizing Chinese characters. Using a large number of stimulus characters, Experiments 1 and 2 failed to replicate the phonetic type frequency effect observed by Taft and Zhu (1997). Experiment 3 found that participants processed both semantic and phonetic radicals only pre-categorically in recognizing characters. Possible reasons why the phonetic type frequency effect could not be replicated were discussed.

摘要
一、緒論 01
二、字優與字劣效果 03
1.字優效果 03
2.字劣效果 08
三、交互激發模式 11
1.字優的解釋 11
2.字劣效果的解釋 12
3.交互激發模式的質疑 12
四、研究方向與目的 14
1.中文字的組成與相關研究 14
A.筆劃因素 15
B.部件（筆劃型態） 15
2.研究目的 18
五、實驗部分 23
實驗一 23
實驗二 30
實驗一與實驗二綜合討論 38
實驗三 40
六、綜合討論 46
參考文獻 48
附錄 51
附錄一 實驗一與實驗二的真字與統計資料 51
附錄二 實驗三所使用的真字 55
附錄三 實驗三刺激字的統計資料 56
附錄四 實驗一反應結果 64
附錄五 實驗二反應結果 67

吳瑞屯與陳欣進（民89）。中華心理學刊。42卷，1期，65-86。
陳烜之（民73）。閱讀中文時對部件偵測的歷程。中華心理學刊。26卷，1期，29-34。
劉英茂與蘇有瑞（民87）。漢字聲旁表音功能研究。嘉義民雄：國立中正大學。
鄭昭明（民70）。漢字認知的歷程。中華心理學刊，23卷，2期，137-153。
蘇有瑞與劉英茂(1996)。中文的「詞優」與「字優」效果。中華心理學刊，38卷，1期，11-30。
Chen, S.C. & Liu, I-M. (2000). Functional orthographic units in Chinese Character recogntion. 心理學報, 32（增刊）：13-20.
Balota, D.A.(1985). The Locus of Word-frequency Effects in the Pronunciation Task. Lexical Access and /or Production ?Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89-106.
Brown, G.D.A(1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 1-23.
Chen, Y.P., Allport, D.A. & Marshall, J.C.(1996). What Are the Functional Orthographic Units in Chinese Word Recognition : The Stroke or the Stroke Pattern ? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psycology, 49A(4),1024-1043.
Feldman, L. B & Siok, W. W. T.(1997) . The Role of Component Function in Visual Recognition of Chinese Characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology . Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol.23, No. 3, 776-781.
Flores d’Arcais,G.B., Kawakami, M. & Saito, H. (1995).Phonological and Semantic Activation in Reading Kanji Character. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Vol.21, No.1, 34-42.
Forster, K.I.& Chambers, I.M. (1973).Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
Heally, A.F., and Drewnowski, A.（1983） Investigating the boundaries of reading ubits: Letter detection in misspelled words. Journal Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983,9,413-426.
Heally, A.F., Oliver, W.L.& McNamara, T.P.(1987). Detecting letter in continuous text: Effects of display size. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 13, 279-290.
Hue, C.W.（1992）.Recognition processes in character naming . In H.C. Chen & O.J.L. Tzeng（Eds）, Language processing in Chinese （pp.93-107）.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
Liu, I-M(1999).Character and word recognition in Chinese. In J. Wang, A.W. Inhoff,& H-C. Chen,(Eds), Reading Chinese script: Acognitive analysis (pp.173-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Liu, I-M, Wu, J-T, & Chou, T-L.(1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, Vol.59, 149-168.
Liu, I-M, Zhu, Y., & Wu,J-T. (1992).The long-term modality effect: In search of different in processing logographs and alphabetic word.Cognition.1992, 43:31-66.
McCleelland, J. L., & Johnston, J.C. (1977). The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 249-261.
McCleelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effect in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
McRae,K.,Jared,D.,& Seidenberg,M.S.(1990).On the rolesof frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 43-65.
Perfetti, C.A., Zhang, S. (1991).Phonological processes in reading Chinese word. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learing, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 633-643.
Reicher, G.M.(1969) . Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 81, 275-280.
Seidenberg, M.S.（1985b）.The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
Seidenberg, M.S.& McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, Developmental Model of Word Recognition and Naming, Psychological Review, Vol. 96, No. 4, 523-568.
Taft, M.& Zhu X.(1997).Submorphemic Processing in Reading Chinese, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 23,No. 3, 761-775.
Theios, J.,& Muise,J.G(1977). The word identification process in reading. In N. J. Castellan, Jr., D.B. Pisoni, & G.R. Potts(Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol.2). Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum.