跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.200.27.215) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/04/24 17:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:黃昱之
研究生(外文):Yu-Chih Huang
論文名稱:國內公司監理之研究
論文名稱(外文):The Study of Domestic Corporate Governance
指導教授:胡為善胡為善引用關係
指導教授(外文):John Hu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:企業管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:82
中文關鍵詞:股東董事會股東代位訴訟監察人公司監理
外文關鍵詞:stockholders’ derivative suitsdirectorsthe stockholdersupervisorsthe corporate governance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:179
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
摘要



在社會快速變遷及產業技術的日新月異下,公司組織面臨的外在環境漸趨複雜,而公司在千變萬化的情境中,是否能充份發揮其創新之功能,是我們所關注的。近年來,少數不肖業者鋌而走險,破壞環境生態,更有甚者危害消費者,也有少數經營者操控資產,從事利益輸送以謀私利,危害金融秩序,造成社會動盪不安。
隨著社會變遷及企業型態的改變,我們必須對企業經營有所回顧與省思,以引導企業對社會作正面的貢獻;因此,本研究針對國內公司監理議題,包括公司董事會及監察人制度,本研究綜合問卷調查與受訪者之寶貴意見後,已發現國內公司監理有許多改善空間。本研究獲致具體之建議如下:
一、提供適當誘因以增進董事與監察人重視公司監理。
二、公司監察人獨立超然特性有待提升;而現行監察人選舉方式對監察人超然獨立特性會有所影響,應加以檢討。
三、董事及監察人之專業能力對於公司監理相當重要,但與現行之董事專業程度比較,監察人之專業應再提高。
四、股東對公司監理的重視對於公司監理而言,非常重要,但股東應加強對公司監理的關心及參與。
五、政府應多重視國內公司監理,且須成立專責評鑑機構,或以立法對國內企業作定期評估。
六、建議以公司規模為依據設定監察人最少人數。
七、公司法對股東代位訴訟持股比例之要求可再設計調整。
ABSTRACT

As the social environment and industrial technology changed rapidly, the company''s structure has to fit in the more complicated environment. It is our concern whether the function of business is keeping as good as usual or not under the complicated environment. These years, there are some businesses ruin the nature, or get the customers harmed, or make money through the transfer of company assets in an illegal way. As a result, the financial orders are spoiled and the society is full of unstableness.
As the change of society and business, there must be some review and rethinking about the business management to lead the businesses to have more positive functions to the society. This research discusses some issues on corporate governance, including the system of board of directors and supervisors. By way of study of papers and related investigations, the findings and suggestions of this study are as follows:
1.Provide sufficient compensation to make directors and supervisors pay more attention on corporate governance.
2.The supervisors should be more independent, the current way in election of supervisors influences the independence of supervisors, it is suggested to be redesigned and regulated.
3.The professions of directors and supervisors are important to the corporate governance. The supervisors should be more professional in comparison with the directors.
4.The stockholders’ attentions to the corporate governance are very helpful to the corporate governance. The stockholders shall care and involve more in corporate governance.
5.The government shall pay more attention on the status of domestic corporate governance. It is suggested to establish some institutes and to make laws to survey the business management periodically.
6. To define the minimum member requirement of supervisors in accordance with the scales of companies.
7.It is necessary to be considered to adjust the stock proportion requirement regarding the stockholders’ derivative suits in the current company law.
目 錄

第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………9
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………9
第二節研究目的……………………………………………………12
第三節研究步驟與流程 ……………………………………………13                 
第四節研究範圍與研究對象……………………………………… 15                         
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………16
第一節 公司經營與控制……………………………………………16
第二節 公司監理體系………………………………………………22
第三節 小結…………………………………………………………34
第三章研究方法………………………………………………………37
第一節研究架構……………………………………………………38                         
第二節研究假設……………………………………………………40                         
第三節統計方法……………………………………………………43                         
第四章 國內公司經營監理調查分析…………………………………44
第一節 樣本公司基本資料描述……………………………………44
第二節 統計分析……………………………………………………46
第三節 對國內公司監理的看法與建議……………………57
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………61
第一節 結論…………………………………………………………62
第二節 建議…………………………………………………………64
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………67
中文部份………………………………………………………………69
英文部份………………………………………………………………71
附錄A 統計資料分析…………………………………………………75
附錄B 問卷調查內容…………………………………………………77
中文部分王永慶(等),企業經營─學者業者聯合演講集,經濟日報社,1980。王秉鈞(主譯),管理學(作者:Stephen P. Robbins),華泰書局, 1995。王泰升,公開發行公司法制,蔚理法律,1989。王國華,台灣企業內部稽核現況之探索與影響設立因素之研究,國立政治大學未出版之碩士論文,1995。王義雲,各業會計制度,五南圖書出版公司,1990。朱侃如(譯),“訂做一個理想的董事會”(作者:Harry J. Bruce),世界經理文摘,1997,10。李政義,企業社會責任論,巨流圖書公司,1990。李俊德,我國企業董事會功能之研究,國立政治大學未出版之碩士論文,1982。呂亞力(等),論文寫作研究,三民書局,1992。周文賢,碩士論文撰寫方法,華泰書局,1996。林佩芬,內部稽核效能評估因素之研究,國立交通大學未出版之碩士論文,1992。林宜賢和蔡慧菁(譯),公司治理(作者:Walter Salmon et al.),天下遠見出版股份有限公司,2000。林炳滄(編譯),內部稽核執業準則,中華民國內部稽核協會,1998。武憶舟,“公司企業的內外關係及其社會責任”,法令月刊,第四十八卷第五期,1997,8。胡幼慧(等),質性研究─理論、方法及本土女性研究實例,巨流圖書公司,1999。柯承恩,“我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議”,會計研究月刊,第一七三期,第一七四期,2000。唐明月,管理科學的本質,松崗,1999。許士軍,管理:規劃與創新,地球出版社,1974。許士軍,“美國大學管理教育發展歷史的回顧及展望”,台大管理論叢,第一卷第一期,1980,5。許月霞,會計作業程序再造與內部控制之設計與規劃─以個案公司為例,國立成功大學未出版之碩士論文,1997。陳光榮,“企業的社會責任與倫理”,經濟情勢及評論,第一卷第四期,1996,2。陳孟君,量化的反思─重探社會研究的邏輯(作者:Stanely Lieberson),巨流圖書公司,1999。陳定國,高階管理:企劃與決策,華泰書局,1977。陳春山,企業管控與投資人保護─金融改革之路,元照出版,2000。許是祥(譯),管理:任務. 責任. 實務(作者:Peter F. Drucker),中華企管,1974。陳峰富,論股份有限公司債權人之保護,五南圖書出版公司,1988。陳峰富,認識公司,五南圖書出版公司,1988。張家麟,社會科學方法論的思維(作者:Kenneth Hoover and Todd Donovan),韋伯文化事業出版社,2000。陳清祥,從公司監察委員會之研究論我國公司監察人功能之強化,東吳大學未出版之碩士論文,1981。張緯良,企業概論,華泰書局,1998。尉謄蛟(譯),“董事會改革─權力與責任”(作者:Paul G. Stern),世界經理文摘,1994,6。黃心怡,我國企業內部稽核功能發揮影響因素之研究,東吳大學未出版之碩士論文,1989。游文誥(譯),企業概論(作者:Joseph T. Straub and Raymond F. Attner),揚智文化,1999。黃玉美,內部稽核人員“組織與專業衝突”影響因素之研究,東吳大學未出版之碩士論文,1990。黃志典(譯),新現實(作者:Peter F. Drucker),長河出版社,1991黃俊英,企業與社會,管拓文化,1992。黃書苑,股份有限公司之股東代表訴訟─著重於程序法上問題之比較研究,國立中興大學未出版之碩士論文,1986。黃振華(譯),社會科學方法論(作者:Max Weber),時報文化,1992。黃營杉(譯),策略管理(作者:Fred R. Davis),新陸書局,1999。莊代如,提昇我國企業內部稽核品質之研究─以製造業為例,國立成功大學未出版之碩士論文,1997。楊雯琇(譯),船井幸雄經營法則(作者:船井幸雄),時報文化,1999。溫蒂雅(譯),罷黜董事長─投資人改造企業新趨勢(作者:Michael Useem),商業週刊出版股份有限公司,1998。楊榮川,內部控制,五南圖書,1986。趙曉蓮,自行評估內部控制之探討─以美國個案公司為例,國立政治大學未出版之碩士論文,1999。劉俊海,股東權法律保護概論,人民法院出版社,1995。劉連煜,公司監控與公司社會責任,五南圖書出版公司,1995。劉毓玲(譯),二十一世紀的管理挑戰(作者:Peter F. Drucker),天下遠見出版股份有限公司,2000。司徒達賢,策略管理,遠流出版社,1995。司徒達賢,為管理定位,天下雜誌,1998。賴英照,公司法論文集,中華民國証券市場發展基金會,1986。謝天仁,論公開發行公司監察人之現狀問題及改進芻議,國立中興大學未出版之碩士論文,1992。謝安田,企業研究方法,水牛出版社,1979。蔡宏光,股份有限公司之股份,三民書局,1985。蔡鴻賢,我國企業實施內部稽核制度之研究,東吳大學未出版之碩士論文,1984。韓慧玲,影響內部稽核績效因素之研究─以上市公司製造業為例,國立中央大學未出版之碩士論文,1995。薛迪安(譯),面對管理時代的大師(作者:C. Northcote Parkinson and M. K. Rustomji and S. A. Sapre),新雨出版社,1997。英文部分Berle, Adolf A. and Means, Cardiner C., 1991, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Transaction Publishers。Cadbury, Adrian, 2000, “The Corporate Governance Agenda”, Corporate Governance, Jan., pp. 7-15。Clinnard, Marshall B., 1990, Corporate Corruption: The Abuse of Power, Prager, New York。Davis, J. R., 1980, “Takeover: It Seem Everyone’s a Loser”, Management Accounting, Vol. 58, No. 8, Sep., pp. 22 Demsetz, Harold, June 1983, “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of The Firm”, The Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 375-390。Dent, George W. Jr., 1989, Toward Unifying Ownership and Control in the Public Corporation, Wisconsin Law Review, May, pp. 881。Epstein, Edward J., Who Owns the Corporation, 1986, Priority Press Publication, New York。Forbes, D. P. and Milliken, F. J., 1999, “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 489-505。Fama, Eugene F. and Jensen, Michael C., June 1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control” , The Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 301-326。Gekas, George, 2001, “Striking a Balance”, CMA Management, Hamilton, Apr., pp. 34-39。Ginsburg, Douglas H., 1986, “Testimony presented to the US Sentencing Commission”, July 。Harvey-Jones, John, 1988, Making It Happen, Collins, London。Hessen, Robert, 1983, “The Modern Corporation and Private Property: A Reappraisal” , The Journal of Law and Economics, June, pp. 273-290。Jensen, Michael C., 1989, “The Public Corporation: Viewing the Eclipse”, Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec., pp. 182-192。Jensen, Michael C., 1993, “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control System”, The Journal of Finance, July, pp. 831-879。Kalbers, Lawrence P and Fogarty, Timothy J, 1998, “Organization and Economic Explanation of Audit Committee Oversight” , Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 10, No. 2 , pp. 129-150。Lee, Soo-Hoon and Phan, Phillip H., 2000, “Competencies of Directors in Global Firms:Requirements for Recruitment and Evaluation”, Corporate Governance, July, pp. 204-212。Lei, D. and Slocum, J. W.,1992, “Global Strategy, Competence-Building and Strategic Alliance”, California Management Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 81-97。Lewis, Marcia, 1992, “Give Directors Restricted Stock”, Directors and Boards, Vol. 16, No. 4。Manne, Henry G., 1964, “Some Theoretical Aspects of Share Voting”, Columbia Law Review , Vol. 64, No. 8, pp. 1430-1445。Mednick, Robert, 1991, “Reinventing the Audit”, Journal of Accounting, Aug. pp. 71-77。Millstein, Ira M. and Knowlton, Winthrop, 1988, “Can the Board of Directors Help the American Corporation Earn the Immortality it Holds So Dear? An Examination of Our System of Corporate Governance with Recommendations for Change”, Research paper, Center for Business and Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University。Mitchell, John A, 1993, “ Poisoned Chocolate? Corporate Governance and the Gadbury Report”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 31-37。Monks, Robert A. G. and Minow, Nell, 1995, Corporate Governance, Blackwell Business, USA。Moore, Wayne G, 2001, “Professional Guidance”, The Internal Auditor, Feb., pp. 77-83。Nader, Ralph, Green, Mark and Selgiman, Joel, 1976, Taming the Giant Corporation, W. W. Norton, New York。Orsini, Basil, 2000, “Improving Internal Communication”, The Internal Auditor, Dec., pp. 28-33。Ow-Yong, Kean and Guan, Cheah Kooi, 2000, “Corporate Governance Coded:A Comparison between Malaysia and the UK”, Corporate Governance, Apr., pp. 125-132。Patrick, J. A., Scherer, R. F., Brodzinski, J. D. Quinn, J. F. and Ainina, M. F., 1999, “Global Leadership Skills and Reputational Capital: Intangible Resources for Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 58-69。Porta, Rafael La, Lopez-De-Silanes, Florencio and Shleifer, Andrei, 1999, “Corporate Ownership Around the World”, The Journal of Finance, Apr. pp. 471-517。Ravi, Dharwadkar, Gerard, George and Pamela, Brandes, 2000, “Privatization in Emerging Economics:An Agent Theory Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No.3, pp. 650-669。 Ricardo-Campbell, Rita, 1983, “Comments on the Structure of Ownership and the Theory of The Firm” , The Journal of Law and Economics, June, pp. 391-394。Rosenberg, Nathan, Comments on Robert Hessen, 1983, “The Modern Corporation and Private Property: A Reappraisal” , The Journal of Law and Economics, June, pp. 291-296。Saul, Ralph S, 1996, “What Ails the Accounting Profession”, Accounting Horizons, June, pp. 131-137。Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert W., 1997, “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, The Journal of Finance, June, pp. 737-783。Steinberg, Richard M and Pojunis, Deborah, 2000, “Corporate Governance: The new frontier”, The Internal Auditor, Dec., pp. 34-39 。Stigler, George J. and Friedland, Claire, 1983, “The Literature of Economics: The Case of Berle and Means” , The Journal of Law and Economics, June, pp. 237-268。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊