臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘要
七O年代以來，台灣藉由技術移轉引進國外重要關鍵技術，奠定今日我國半導體王國的地位。企業將新的技術運用於企業內部的運作上，可為公司帶來顯著的競爭優勢(Porter, 1985)。產業未來的競爭關鍵在技術，但沒有任何企業的內部研發能涵蓋市場及技術的快速變化。開發新技術的成本大、風險高，即使財力與技術能力基礎雄厚的企業，也無法獨立自行研發每一項新技術，（Drejer, 1997）。台灣企業更因為以中小企業為主體，常受限於人力、資金及設備，更是無法負擔技術研究發展龐大的支出。因此技術移轉成為中小企業獲得技術的主要來源。
競爭環境的改變，顧客已成為企業最重要的策略性資源，企業生存之道是在維持和顧客間的長期關係。產品為技術的技術供應者也不例外，綜觀過去學者對技術移轉的相關研究中，多半著重於技術移轉的模式、機制與移轉績效上。而觀察過去對於顧客滿意的相關研究中，大多是以企業對消費者(B2C)的角度出發，去探討影響一般消費大眾對於企業提供之產品或服務之滿意程度之因素。因此本研究在目前技術需求龐大、技術移轉頻繁的環境中，試著以顧客滿意的角度去探討技術移轉的成功與否，以提供扮演技術供應者的相關研究機構作為參考。
本研究採用問卷抽樣調查方式，以簡單隨機抽樣方式所抽出之420家曾經進行技術移轉的廠商為對象進行問卷發放，並以因素分析、簡單迴歸與逐步迴歸方式進行分析，結果發現「技術本身功能」、「價值感」、「期望切合」、「專業能力」、「服務品質」、「文件品質」、「後續服務」、「整體形象」、「創新文化」九項衡量變數皆與滿意度有顯著的正相關；而滿意度與再合作意願的迴歸分析結果也顯示其具有顯著之正相關。而以逐步迴歸分析所得之結果，導出四項具有代表性的預測變數，即「技術本身功能」、「後續服務」、「專業能力」與「整體形象」，因此以此四項變數作為解釋顧客滿意之構面。而根據「整體滿意」與「再次合作」之迴歸方程式顯示出：第一、受測樣本對於「再次合作」具有基本的傾向，滿意度僅為其一重要指標；第二、當「整體滿意」評價極高時，就有極高度「再次合作」的意願。

Abstract
Since 1970s, Taiwan has imported key technology by means of technology transfer and established the role as the Kingdom of semi-conductor up to the present day. Technology is essential for the competence of industries, and a company gains superior competence, if it employs new technology in the inner operation. However, not a single company’s inner R&D is able to handle the fast change in the market of technology. It takes great amounts of investment and high risk to develop new technology, and it is impossible for a company to independently process every development, even for those that own great wealth and strong technology ability. In consequence, the companies rely greatly upon the import of technology to decrease risk and to shorten the distance of technology between them and those in the advanced countries. As for in Taiwan, the companies are mainly consistent of medium-small enterprises, so they also can not afford the great amount of expense for technology development, and they are confined to human resources, capital and equipment. Therefore, technology transfer is the main source for medium-small enterprises to gain technology.

Owing to the change of competitive environment, customers have become the most important strategical resource for companies. The way for a company to survive is to maintain the long-period relationship with customers. We observe that the related scholarship researches for technology lay great stress upon the modes, processing solution and the results. On the other hand, we observe that the related researches for customer satisfaction from consumers’ point of view discuss the factors that influence customer satisfaction. Hence, in face to the present environment in which great deal of technology is acquired and transferred, we try from the angle of customer satisfaction to discuss whether technology is successfully transferred or not, and we hope that the result can be a reference for the related research organizations that have the role as technology suppliers.

This research is processed by use of questionnaire. We randomly pick up 420 companies that ever carried out technology transfer, and submit to them our questionnaire. Then we analyze the results by factor analysis, simple regression and stepwise regression, and we find that the degree of satisfaction is positively related with nine evaluative variations, “the function of technology”, “the sense of value”, “the expectation”, “the professional capacity”, “the quality of service”, “the quality of document”, “the service after sales”, “the total image”, and “the creative culture”. The result from the analysis of regression equations also reveals that satisfaction is positively related with the inclination of re-cooperation. After the analysis of stepwise regression, we induce four representative variations, “the function of technology”, “the service after sales”, “the professional capacity” and “the total image”. We use them to explain the components for customer satisfaction. Furthermore, regression equations of “total satisfaction” and “re-cooperation” show us two points: first, customer satisfaction can only be one of the important indications, when the tested objects show basic inclination; second, when “total satisfaction” reaches high degree, it leads to the inclination of re-cooperation.

目錄
第一章緒論………………………………………………………..…1
第一節研究背景與動機……………………………………………1
第二節研究目的……………………………………………………3
第三節研究範圍與對象……………………………………………3
第四節研究限制……………………………………………………3
第五節論文架構……………………………………………………5
第二章相關文獻探...………………………………………………...6
第一節技術與技術移轉相關文獻…………………………………6
第二節技術移轉績效相關文獻…………………………………11
第三節顧客滿意之定義…………………………………………..14
第四節顧客滿意相關理論與服務品質構面.…………………..18
第五節再購意願相關文獻………………………………………..23
第三章研究方法……………………………………………………25
第一節研究架構…………………………………………………..25
第二節研究假設…………………………………………………..26
第三節變數衡量架構……………………………………………..31
第四節變數定義………………………………………………..…32
第五節抽樣方法…………………………………………………..38
第六節統計分析方法……………………………………………..40
第四章研究資料分析……………………………………………….46
第一節多重問項變數分析……………………………………..…46
第二節各變項與滿意度分析…………………………………..…54
第三節影響顧客滿意度因素之分析……….…………………..64
第四節滿意度與再次合作關係之分析…………………….…..68
第五章結論與建議……………………………………………….71
第一節研究結論…………………………………………………..71
第二節研究建議…………………………………………………..74
參考文獻………………………………………………………………..77
附錄一…………………………………………………………………..83

參考文獻一、中文文獻毛倩文 (民 80)，我國廠商國際技術引進成敗關鍵因素之研究，國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文李國鼎（1978），「中美兩國間工業技術的雙向交流」，自由中國之工業，第50卷第 2期，8月，頁2-5林明杰 (民 81)，技術能力與技術引進績效相關之研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文俞慧芸 (民84)，政府科技專案之技術移轉模式與移轉績效之研究 – 以台灣電子資 訊產業為例，國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文陳蓉美 (民 84)，「1995年我國百貨業顧客滿意度調查報告」，商業現代雙週刊，第16期，P125-137陳怡之 (民 84)，我國廠商技術移轉需求與特性分析，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告黃俊英 (2000) ，行銷研究管理與技術，華泰書局。黃家齊 (民 79)，技術引進成效影響因素之研究，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文劉立元 (民 81)，以共同研發為動機成立之高科技公司的績效探討─以資訊電子業為例，國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版論文劉瑞圖 (民 83)，科技管理 (八) --- 科技企業的技術移轉，工業簡訊，七月，第二十四卷，pp. 63-68蔡忠育 (民 84)，技術接受者涉入與技術移轉績效之關係，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文鄭優 （民 78），「我國工業技術移轉之研究－影響技術引進成效因素之探討」，政治 大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文薛光濤（民 76），「中日技術合作成效之研究」，台北：經濟部投資審議委員會薛琦 ( 民 72 )，我國基本金屬及金屬品製造業技術合作實施成果調查報告，九月，經濟部投資審議委員會，pp. 53-54謝文凱 ( 民 82 )，技術移轉過程互動程度與技術移轉績效關係之研究---以共同研發聯盟為例，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文二、西文文獻Allen, T. J. (1984), Managing the Flow of Technology : Technology Transfer and the Dissemination on Technological Information Within the Research and Development Organization . Cambridge, MA : MIT PressAnderson, Eugene W. and Mary W. Sullivan (1990), “Customer Satisfaction and Retention Across Firms”, presentation at the TIMS College of Marketing Special Interest Conference on Services Marketing, Nashville.TN.(September)Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell, and D.R. Lemann (1994), “Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability : Finding from Sweden”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, No.3, July 1994 , pp. 53-66Andrews, F.M. and S.B. Withey(1976), Social indicators of wellbeing：American’ perception of life quality, New York. Plenum PressAutio, E. & Laamanen, T.(1995), “Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators”, Int. J. Technology Management, VOL. 10, Nos 7/8, pp. 643-664Bagur, J.( 1987), “Comments made at Federal Laboratory Consortium Conference on Technology Transfer”, U.S.A. Department of CommenceBaranson, J.( 1966), “Transfer of Technical Knowledge by International Corporations to Developing Ecnomics”Bozeman,Barry,Michael(1991), “Technology Transfer From U.S. Government and University R&D Laboratories”, Technovation, 11(4), 1991,pp. 231-246Bozeman, B. ar d Coker,K.,(1992) “Assessing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer From U.S. Government and University R&D Laboratories : The Impact of Market Orientation”, Technovation,12(4), pp. 239-225Brooks, H.( 1966), National Science Policy and Technology Transfer, Proceeding og Technology Transfer and Innovation, Washionton D. C. : National Science FoundationCardozo, R.N. (1965), “An Experimental Study of Cistomer Effort, Expection and Satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.2, August 1965, pp. 244-249Chakrabarti,A.K. & Rubenstein,A.H.,(1976)”Interorganizational Transfer of Technology:A Study of Adoption of NASA Innovations,”IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management,23(1),20-34Chen, M.(1995), “Technological transfer to China: major rules and issues”, Int. J. Technology Management, VOL. 10, Nos 7/8, pp. 747-756Churchill Gilbert & Surprenant, Carol (1982), "An Investigation into the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol 19, pp.491- 504Cooper, R. G (1984) “The Strategy-Performance Link in Product Innovation”, R&D Management, 84(4), 247-259Cronin, J. J. and Taylor, S. A. (1992), “Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension,” Journal of Marketing, 56: 3, pp.55-68Czepiel John A. and Jarry J. Rosenberg(1976)“Consumer Satisfaction Toward an Integrative Framework.”.Prodeedings of the Southern Marketing Association, pp.169-171Dabholkar, P. A., D. I Thorpe, and Rentz.J.O. (1996),"A Measure of Service Quality for Retail Stores: Scale Development and Validation", Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 24(1), pp.3-16Dearing,James W.( 1993), “Rethinking Technology Transfer”, International Journal Technology Management, 8(6/7/8), 1993, pp. 478-485Dorthy, L.B.( 1990), “Intraorganization Environment : Point -to-Point Versus Diffusion”SAGA Publication, Inc: pp.43-62Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D.& Miniard, P.W. (1984), Consuber Behavior, 6th edFornell, Claes (1992), “A national Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience”,Journal of marketing, Vol.56, No.1,January, pp. 6-21Goodman, J. (1989) , The Nature of Customer Satisfaction, Quality Progress, Feb:37-40Gronroos, C. (1984), "A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications" 　　European Journal of Marketing, Vol.18 ( 4 ), pp.36-44Gunther, E. E. (1959). Evaluating corporate image measurement. Paper presented at the Proceedings of TheARF Conference , New YorkHameri, A.(1996), “Technology transfer between basic research and industry”, Technovation, VOL. 16, NO. 2, pp. 51-57Harvey,I. A.( 1987), “Technology Transfer-An International Two-Way Street”, Industrial Management & Data Systems,7/8. ,1987, pp. 3-9Haywood-Farmer, J. (1988), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 8, 19-29 Helson, H. (1964), Adaptation-Level Theory, New York : Harper and Row.31Hempel, D.J. (1977) , Consumer Satisfaction with the Home Buying Process : Conceptualization and Measurement, The Conceptualization of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, H.Deith Hunt Cambridge, Mass : Marketing Science Institute : 7Holstius, K.(1995), “Cultural adjustment in international technology transfer”, Int. J. Technology Management, VOL. 10, Nos 7/8, pp. 676-686Hovland, C.I., O.J. Harvey, and M. Sherif (1957), “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Reaction to Communication and Attitude Change”,Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol.55, July 1957 , pp. 244-252Howard J.A. and J.N. Sheth (1969) , The Theory of Buyer Behavior, New York : John Willey and SonsKeller, R. T., & Chinta, R. R. (1990). International technology transfer: Strategies for success. Academy of Management Executive, 4(2), 33-43Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: A systematic approach to education. NY: Holt, Rinehart, & WinstonLeonard-Barton, Dorothy and Deepak K. Sinha,（1993）,”Developer-User Interaction and User Satisfaction in Internal Technology Transfer”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36, Iss.5, PP.1125-1139Lombardo, M. & Eichinger, B. (1997). HR role in building competitive edge leaders. Human Resouce Management, 6(1),141-146Mansfield, E.( 1975), “ International Technology Transfer: Forms, Resource Requirements and Policy,” AER Paper and Proceeding, (65) May 1975,12Mansfield, E., (1982), Technology Transfer, Productivity and Economic Policy, W. W. Norton & Company IncMartin, W.B. (1986), “Defining what Quality Service is For You”, Cornell, 32-38, February McLagan, P. A. (1983). Model for excellence. The conclusions and recommendations of the ASTD training and development study. DC: American Society for Training and Development.Miller, J.A. (1977) , Studying satisfaction, Modifying Models, Eliciting Expectation, Posing Problems, and marking Meaningful Measurements, Cambridge, Mass. : Marketing Science Institute,72-91Olins, W. (1989). Corporate identity : Marking business strategy visible through design. London : Thames and HudsonOliver, R.L. (1980) , “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions”, Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (November) :460-469Oliver, R.L. (1981), “Measurement and Evaluation of satisfaction Processes in Retail Settings”, Journal of Retailing, 57 (Fall) :25-48Oliver R.L. and W.S. Desarbo (1988) , “Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgment”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14 , March 1988 , pp. 495-507Ounjian, M. L. & E. B. Carne ,(1987), “A Study of Factors which Affect Technology Transfer in a Multilocation Multibusiness Unit Corporation”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. EM-34, No. 3, PP. 194~201Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, & L. L. Berry, (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research,” Journal of Marketing. 49, pp.41-50Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, & L. L. Berry(1988), “A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol.64（Spring,1988）, PP.14 -PP.23Perlmutter, H.V. and Sagafi-Nejad T.(1991),Technology Transfer, Pergamon Press, New YorkPhilip Kotlor，Principles of Marketing，Gary Armstrong，Englewood Cliffs，N,J，Prontic Hall，5th ed，1994Porter, M. E.,( 1985), Competitive Advantage : Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York : Free PressReichheld, F. and W. E. Sasser, Jr. (1990), “Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Service,” Harvard Business Review, 68 (Sep-Oct), 105-111Rogers, E.M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd Ed., New York: Free PressSasser, W. E., Olsen, R. P., & Wyckoff, D. D. (1978) , "Management of Service 　　Operation : Text, Cases, and Reading, Bacon.", New YorkSatikarn,M.(1981),”Technology Transfer: A Case Study Singapore,” Singapore University PressSchvaneveldt, Shane J. Takao Enkawa and Masami Miyakawa, “Consumer Evaluation Perspectives of Service Quality : Evaluation Factors and Two- Way Model of Quality,” Total Quality Management, Vol.2, 1991, PP.149-161Swan, J.E. and L.J. Comb(1976), “Produce Performance and Consumer Satisfaction: A New Concept.”, Journal of Marketing, pp.3-8Selnes, Fred (1993), “An Examination of the Effect of Product performance on Brand Reputation, Satisfaction and Loyalty”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.27, No.9, pp. 19-35Sharif, M. N.( 1988), “Basis For Techno-Economic Policy Analysis ”, Science & Public Policy, 15- 4, pp.217-229, Aug 1988Singh, J. (1991) , Understanding the Structure of Consumers Satisfaction Evaluation of Service Delivery, 19 ( 3 ) : 223-234Smeltzer, L. R. (1997). “The meaning and origin of trust in buyer-supplier relationship.”International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 40-48Smilor, R. W. & Gibson, D. V.(1991), “Technology transfer in multi-organizational environments: the case of R&D consortia”, IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, VOL. 38, NO. 1, pp. 3-13Solow, R.（1957）, ”Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, August, pp321-340Souder, W. E.( 1987) ,Managing New Product Innovations, Lexington Books, pp. 217-220Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work. NY: John Wiley & Sons.Steele, L. W. (1989), ”Managing Technology,the Strategic View” , New York:McGrawHillTakeuchi, H., and J. A. Quelch (1983), “Quality is More Than Making a Good Product”, Harvard Business Review, 61, 139-145Tan, R. R.(1996), “Success criteria and success factors for external technology transfer projects”, Project Management Journal, June, pp. 45-46Taylor, Steven A. and Thomas L. Baker (1994), “An Assessment of Relationship Between Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in the Formation of Consumer’s Purchase Intention”, Journal of Retail Banking, Vol. 70, pp.163-178Teece,J. David,The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer, Cambridge, Mass : Ballinger, 1976Tunstall W. B.（1985）, "Breakup of The Bell System : A Case Study in Culture Transformation", Gaining Control of The Corporate Culture, San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, pp.45Weiner B., ruaaell D., and Lerman, D. (1978) , “The Cognition-Emotion Process in Achievement-Related Contexts”,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , Vol.37 , July 1978 , pp. 1211-1220Westbrooks, R.A. (1980) , A Rating Scale for Measuring Product/Service Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing, Fall : 68-72Williams,F. & D. V. Gibson(1990), Technology Transfer : A Communication Perspective, Massachusetts/Toronto, Newbury Park, Cal : Sage PublicationsWong, J. K.(1995), “Technology transfer in Thailand: descriptive validation of a technology transfer model”, Int. J. Technology Management, VOL. 10, Nos 7/8, pp. 788-796Woodruff, R.B. (1983) , Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Process Using Experience-Based Norms, Journal of Marketing Research, 20.(August) : 296-304Woodside,A.G.Frey, L.and Daly,R.T. (1989) ,”Linking Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention “, Journal of Care Marketing, Deec :5-17Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Mary Jo Bitner (1996), “Service Marketing”, Mcgraw-Hill