跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/14 21:31
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林玫秀
研究生(外文):Mei-Hsiu Lin
論文名稱:台灣上市與上櫃公司盈餘管理現象之研究
論文名稱(外文):An Investigation of Taiwan Listed and OTC Companies’Earnings Management Behavior
指導教授:戚務君戚務君引用關係簡俱揚簡俱揚引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wu-jiun ChiJiu-Young Jian
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中原大學
系所名稱:會計研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:63
中文關鍵詞:盈餘管理心理門檻財務預測
外文關鍵詞:earnings managementfinancial forecastpsychological threshold
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:254
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
本文主要探討我國上市與上櫃公司是否普遍從事盈餘管理,使用BD(1997)與DPZ(1999)之研究所採用之綜合橫斷面統計次數分配法(pooled cross-sectional distribution approach)檢測我國企業是否受到避免產生帳面虧損、維持前期盈餘績效與避免逾越強制性盈餘財務預測誤差率之限制三項門檻心理所驅使而普遍從事盈餘管理,同時,亦探究我國企業受門檻心理影響而從事盈餘管理是否受景氣榮枯所影響。
本研究結果證實我國上市與上櫃公司普遍受三項心理門檻驅使而從事盈餘管理,惟水泥業、汽車業與運輸業呈現不顯著,且在面臨實際盈餘數些微超越預測盈餘數時,亦發現營建業與電線電纜業並不因法令管制壓力而進行盈餘管理。

此外,本文亦進一步依據景氣燈號分組進行檢測,發現實證結果僅有EM 1-1與假說相符。亦即景氣循環對於避免產生帳面虧損、維持前期盈餘績效與符合財務預測20%誤差門檻之盈餘管理行為並無影響。
This paper tests whether Taiwan listed and OTC companies would management earnings commonly. We refer to pooled cross-sectional distribution approach that is the methodology for identifying earnings management developed by Burgstahler and Dichev(1997) and Degeorge, Patel and Zeckhauser(1999) to examine the behavior of earnings management in Taiwan. Our empirical explorations identified earnings management to exceed each of three threshold: report of positive profit, sustaining last year’s earnings performance, and exceeding mandatory management forecast errors. Furthermore, we also explored what the business cycle impacted on the behavior of earnings management in Taiwan.

The empirical results indicate that Taiwan listed and OTC companies managed earnings to exceed each of three thresholds. The analyses of the data by different industries show cement, automotive and transport industries were insignificant statistically on threshold of sustaining last year’s earnings performance. When architecture and electric wire and cable industries’ forecast earnings had over real earnings lightly, the empirical results were not support the hypotheses. Besides, we also examined the data by different business cycle signal. We found the empirical results were same as the hypotheses anticipated. In other words, business cycle didn’t affect listed and OTC companies to managed earnings to exceed the threshold of report of positive profit, sustaining last year’s earnings performance, and meet mandatory management 20% forecast errors.
目錄
頁次
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………..1
第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………..1
第二節 研究架構………………………………………………………………..6

第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………..7
第一節 盈餘管理驅策動機之研究…………………………………………….7
第二節 盈餘管理工具之文獻………………………………………………...13

第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………… 17
第一節 研究設計……………………………………………………………...17
第二節 研究假說……………………………………………………………...19
第三節 實證分析模式與變數定義…………………………………………...22
第四節 資料來源、研究期間與樣本選取…………………………………...25

第四章 實證結果與分析……………………………………………………………27
第一節 盈餘管理心理門檻系列假說之基本敘述統計量….………………..27
第二節 盈餘管理心理門檻假說以及敏感性測試之統計檢定量分析……...38

第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………………54
第一節 實證結論……………………………………………………………...54
第二節 研究限制與建議……………………………………………………...56

參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………..57
附錄1:Z檢定中STDi的證明…………………………………………………….61




表次
頁次
表2-1:盈餘管理驅策動機之研究彙總表…………..………………………………8
表2-2:盈餘管理工具動機之文獻彙總表……………….…………………….…..14
表4-1:EM 1假說基本敘述統計量……………….……………………………….29
表4-2:EM 2假說基本敘述統計量……………………………….……………….30
表4-3:EM 3假說基本敘述統計量…………………………………………………31
表4-4:EM 4假說基本敘述統計量………………………………………………...32
表4-5:景氣對策信號資料…………………………………………………………33
表4-6:EM 1-1假說基本敘述統計量……………………………………………..35
表4-7:EM 2-1假說基本敘述統計量……………………………………………..36
表4-8:EM 3-1假說基本敘述統計量………………………………………………37
表4-9:EM 4-1假說基本敘述統計量………………………………………………38
表4-10:EM 1假說檢定之統計量……………………………………………….…43
表4-11:EM 2假說檢定之統計量……………………………………………….…44
表4-12:EM 3假說檢定之統計量………………………………………………….45
表4-13:EM 4假說檢定之統計量…………………………………………………46
表4-14:EM 1-1假說檢定之統計量………………………………………………50
表4-15:EM 2-1假說檢定之統計量………………………………………………51
表4-16:EM 3-1假說檢定之統計量………………………………………………52
表4-17:EM 4-1假說檢定之統計量………………………………………………53

圖次
頁次
圖1-1:研究架構…………………………………..………………………………6
參考文獻中文部分丁萬鳴,水泥業產銷將全面解禁,聯合報,民86年3月3日,第1版。王泰昌與戚務君,財務資訊與投資策略,台北:鑫報投顧,民89。行政院經濟建設委員會網頁http://www.cepd.gov.tw/analysis/index.htm。李建然,影響台灣上市公司自願性盈餘預測行為因素之研究,政治大學會計學系博士班博士論文,民86。沈維民,企業之盈餘管理:以「會計方法選用」和「應計項目認列」為例,管理評論,第十六卷,第一期,民86:11-38。官心怡,經理人原盈餘預測與盈餘操縱之關聯性,台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文,民83。林嬋娟、洪櫻芬、薛敏正,財務困難公司之盈餘管理實證研究,管理學報,第十四卷,第一期,民86:15-38。吳淳渼,我國銀行業盈餘管理行為、工具與還原分析,中原大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文,民89。金成隆、林修葳與林憶樺,台灣上市電子公司研究發展費用與強制性盈餘預測關聯性之實證研究,管理學報,第十七卷,第四期,民89,十二月:713-740。金成隆、林修葳與黃書楣,國內現金增資企業盈餘管理之實證研究,中山管理評論,第八卷,第四期,民89:709-744。金成隆、林修葳與張永芳,強制性財務預測誤差與盈餘管理關係:20﹪門檻限制影響之研究,中國財務學刊,第七卷,第一期,民88,四月: 59-96。徐自強,國內產業動態-航空運輸業,中國商銀月刊,第十四卷,第十一期,民84,十一月:38-50。張文瀞,盈餘品質對上市公司盈餘管理之影響,當代會計,第二卷,第二期,民90:195-214。張瑞益,提列呆帳損失,奇普仕帳面調整時機,耐人尋味,中時電子報分類新聞,民91年1月17日,財經版。張瓊文,強制性財務預測與盈餘管理關聯性之研究-更新標準改變前後之探討,台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文,民89。歐祥義、江明珠與陳中興,水泥業在台難生存,才獲准登陸,自由時報,民86年7月16日,第14版。魏文勤,強制性財測誤差門檻與盈餘管理--營收與其他盈餘組成份子之探討,彰化師範大學商業教育學研究所未出版碩士論文,民89。顏月珠,商用統計學,台北:三民書局,民74。蘇勇儒,管理當局與財務分析師財務預測相對準確性之比較,東吳大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文,民85。英文部分Barth, M., J. Elliot, and M. Finn. 1995. Market rewards associated with increasing earnings patterns. Working paper, Cornell University.Barton, J. 2001. Does the use of financial derivatives affect earnings management decisions? The Accounting Review.76(January): 1-26.Bartov, E. 1992. Timing of asset sales and earnings manipulations. The Accounting Review. (June):840-855.Beaver, W.H., and E. E. Engel. 1996. Discretionary behavior with respect to allowances for loan losses and the behavior of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics.:177-206. Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research. (Spring): 1-24.Boynton C.E., P. S. Dobbins, and G. A. Plesko. 1992. Earnings management and the corporate alternative minimum tax. Journal of Accounting Reseach .:131-153.Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics .:99-126.Cahan,S. F. 1992. The effect of antrust investigations on discretionary accruals:A refined test of the political-cost hypothesis. Accounting Review. (January):77-95.DeAngelo, L., E. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes:A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. Accounting Review. ( July ):400-420.DeAngelo, L., E. 1988. Managerial competition, information costs, and corporate governance:The user of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics. (January):3-36.Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review . (January):193-225.Dechow, P., S. Richardson, and A.I. Tuna. 2001.Earnings management and costs to investors from firms meeting or slightly exceeding benchmarks. Working paper, University of Michigan.DeFond, M., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of Accurals.Journal of Accounting and Economics.: 145-176.DeFond, M. L., and C. W. Park.. 1997. Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23 (July): 115-139.Degeorge, F. J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business.:1-33. Demski, J., and D.E.M. Sappington. 1990. Fully revealing income measurement. The Accounting Review. (April):363-383.Demski, J., and D.E.M. Sappington. 1987. Delegated expertise. Journal of Accounting Research (Spring):68-89.Friedlan, J. 1994. Accounting choices of issuers of initial public offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research.: 1-31.Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics.:125-153.Healy, P. 1985. The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting principles. Journal of Accounting and Economics .: 85-107.Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research. (Autumn):193-228.Kasznik, R. 1999. On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research . (Spring): 54-81.Liu, C-C., S.G. Ryan, and J.M.Wahlen. 1997. Differential valuation implications of Loan Loss Provisions Across Banks and Fiscal Quarters. The Accounting Review .(January):133-146.McNichols M. F. 2000. Reseearch Design Issues in Earnings Management Studies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy .:313-345.McNichols M., and Wilson, P. 1988. Evidence of earnings management from the provision for bad debts. Journal of Accounting Research. (Supplement):1-31.Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S.O. Rego. 2001. Earnings Management:New Evidence Based on Deferred Tax Expense. Working paper, University of Iowa.Scott, D.W. Multivariate Density Estimation:Theory, Practice, and Visualization. New York:Wiley., 1992.Scott, W.R. Financial Accounting Theory.Ontario: Prentice-Hall.Canada Inc.,1997.Silverman, B. W.1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London:Chapman & Hall. Sunder, S. 1997. Theory of accounting and control. Cincinnati, Ohio : South-Western College Pub.Sweeney, A. P. 1994. Debt-Covenant Violations and Managers’ Accounting Responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics .:281-308.Teoh, S.H., Welch, I., and Wong, T.J. 1998a. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance.:1935-1974.Teoh, S.H., Welch, I., and Wong, T.J. 1998b. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasonal equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics.:63-99.
電子全文 電子全文(本篇電子全文限研究生所屬學校校內系統及IP範圍內開放)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊