臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

80年代期間在開發者意圖改變傳統土地的開發形式、不同於傳統的產權私有觀念加入共有觀念、增加居住空間的耐久性、創造空地集中使用方式，建物正向立面朝中庭配置及人車動線系統分離的概念，使用者要求安全性高、私密性高的意識型態情況下，產生不同的居住價值觀，於是房地產市場出現中庭式集合住宅類型。爾後其空間如何被使用及調整，生活方式如何轉變，此類型社區鄰里關係如何交流，在理想與現實間，都市型與非都市型社區面臨那些問題，與原規劃設計理念是否符合或者另外產生其他的發展方向，是本研究所要探討的主要內容。
經由本研究對中庭式社區之居住生活空間演變探討後歸納以下結論：
一．以外部空間領域建立而言
（一）中庭式社區之戶外空間為入居者居住生活領域的延伸。私領域、半公私領域、公共領域中，以自行規劃使用方式，期望更清晰界定其領域範圍，反應出國人對於各相關領域界定之憂慮。
（二）對於社區土地共享共有、由以往私有演變為私有加共有的觀念都表認同，產權獨立轉化為共同持分，非必如傳統觀念全部為私有土地。
（三）外部空間公領域及私領域之調整界定，半公、半私領域界線，入居者以私有盆栽、景石、花器等活動方式界定。
二．以內部空間使用型態而言
（一）公室領域：客廳區位面向中庭的配置不同以往傳統式為客廳面向道路關係。但公室空間順序依循主入口→客廳→餐廳→廚房模式。不論是都市型或非都市型社區，其客廳區位之選擇與原設計相符，顯示居住者已能認同中庭式住宅建築物正面及主入口、客廳朝向庭園開放空間，背面及次入口面向車道的配置形態。
（二）私室領域：
1.主臥室面對中庭的區位被大多數居住者認同，與原規劃設計理念相符。其次男女子女臥室，以面對車道較低樓層者優先選擇。
2.主臥室床舖位置傾向避免與動線對衝，大多數居住者主臥床頭方向與動線方向垂直。
（三）起居樣式
1.客廳角窗與主臥室落地窗窗簾之使用，以關閉者居多，且晚上多於白天，白天拉開者以座向北向居多，可知，希望得到更多之採光量，或因鄰棟距離較大者。鄰棟距離為影響隱私權之重要因素。
2.居住者以各種空間設置方式界定玄關的空間屬性及客廳的方向性足見居住者對玄關空間之重視。
3.居住者對於客廳角窗窗台使用上，以展示功能為主，其次為座椅功能，以增加客廳之使用機能。
三．以鄰里交流關係而言
（一）鄰里關係平時交流網絡類型，可分為無交流型、一字型、L型、口字型四類，以口字型之交流範圍最大，且交流戶數亦較多。
（二）鄰里關係最初認識途徑以遷入搬家時最多，平時交流方式以聊天方式為最多。最主要場所以各區庭園為主，且入居後時間愈久有增加趨勢。
（三）鄰里關係交流地點，兩類型社區經入居後時間的變遷，由最初認識地點以庭園場所為最多，平時交流時間仍以庭園地點為最多，可見中庭庭園是鄰里關係交流的重要場所。

In the eighties, developers intend to change traditional land-developing styles. They bring in the concept of sharing, which is much different from the traditional concept of property privately owning. They also strengthen the durable capacity of living space, create the method of centralized using open land and come up with the disposition concept of buildings facing towards courtyard and the separation concept of movement line system between people and cars. Under the circumstances of users’ ideology to ask high safety and high private, different concepts of living value have shown up. Then, the type of courtyard-centralized houses has occurred in the real estate market. How their space has been used and adjusted, how the living ways have changed, how the neighborhoods communicate, what problems municipal and non-municipal style communities have faced between the ideal and realistic, and whether they conform to the original design idea or they have other developing aspects are the major points which will be discussed in this research project.
After discussing the evolution of living space in courtyard community in this research project, we get the following conclusions.
I.As far as the outside space domain is concerned.
A.The outdoor space of courtyard community is the extension of dwellers’ living domain. Private domain, ambiguous domain and public domain are designed and used by dwellers and they expect to distinguish and define the domain scope more clearly. This reflects our nationals’ concern about the definition of all the related domains.
B.Dwellers show the agreement to enjoy and share the community land together and recognize the changing concept from privately owning to both privately owning and sharing together, which is not like the traditional concept that all the land are privately owned.
C.In adjusting the definition of public domain and private domain in outside space, dwellers take activities, such as using potted plants, landscape rocks and stones, flower wares, to distinguish and define the dividing line between ambiguous domain.
II.As far as the inside space domain is concerned.
A.Public Room Domain: The disposition of living rooms facing towards courtyard is much different the traditional, which living rooms face towards roads. The orders of public room space follow this model: main entrance, living room, dining room and kitchen, no matter the community is municipal or non-municipal style. The arrangement of living room disposition conforms to the original design idea. It indicates that dwellers have recognized the disposition of the front side, main entrance and living rooms of courtyard living buildings facing towards the open space of courtyard, and the back side and second entrance facing towards the lane.
B.Private Room Domain:
a.The disposition of master suit facing towards courtyard is recognized by most dwellers and it conforms to the original design idea. Then, boys and girl bedrooms are in lower floors.
b.The master suit bed is inclined to avoid conflicting with the movement line direction. Instead, the direction of most dwellers’ bed in the master suit is vertical to the movement line direction.
C.Living Life Style
a.When dwellers use the corner windows in the living room and French window curtains in the master suit, they always close them and daytime is more than night. If they are opened during daytime, most of them face towards the north so as to get more natural light or it is because they are farther to the adjoining building. Therefore, the distance between two buildings is an important factor affecting the private right.
b.Dwellers define and distinguish the attributes of porch space and the direction of the living room by using all kinds of space disposition methods. It shows that dwellers pay much attention to porch space.
c.The function of dwellers’ using on the windowsill in corner windows of the living room is mainly to display and secondly chairs arrangement, to raise the using function of the living room.
III.As far as the communication between neighborhoods is concerned.
A.The network styles of the ordinary communication between neighborhoods are divided into: non-communication style, straight-line style, L style and square style. Among all of them, square style has the largest communication scope and communicating houses are more.
B.The time knowing new neighborhoods at the first time is mostly when they moved in. The ordinary communication ways are mainly chatting. The main communication places are mainly the courtyards in each community. Moreover, a tendency shows that the longer dwelling time is, the more they communicate with each other.
C.With the dwelling time, the communication places between neighborhoods, whether in municipal and non-municipal style communities, or from knowing new neighborhoods at the first time to chatting with each other in ordinary time, are all the courtyard places. It shows that the courtyard is an important place in the relationships between neighborhoods communication

目　　錄

第一章緒論...................................1
　　第一節　研究動機與研究目的................. 1
　　第二節　研究範圍與研究內容..................2
　　　1-2-1　研究範圍...........................2
　　　1-2-2　研究內容...........................3
　　第三節　用詞定義............................4
　　第四節　相關研究回顧........................6
　　第五節　研究方法............................8
　　　1-5-1　研究步驟及內容....................10
　　　1-5-2　研究流程..........................11

第二章台中中庭式社區發展背景................13
　　第一節　形成中庭式住宅經緯.................13
　　第二節　配置形態特徵.......................13
　　第三節　調查分析...........................20
　　　2-3-1　調查概要..........................20
　　　2-3-2　居住者基本屬性....................35
　　第四節　小結...............................55

第三章外部空間領域形成過程..................57
　　第一節　外部空間構成概念...................57
　　　3-1-2　住宅外部空間之功用................57
　　　3-1-3　住宅外部空間之層級................57
　　第二節　外部空間配置形態...................60
　　第三節　外部空間公領域調整內容.............65
　　　3-3-1　共用步道調整內容..................65
　　　3-3-2　共用庭園調整內容..................67
　　第四節　外部空間私領域調整內容.............69
　　　3-4-1　門前外玄關調整內容................69
　　　3-4-2　門前庭園調整內容..................71
　　　3-4-3　門前步道調整內容..................73
　　第五節　小結...............................74

第四章居住空間使用形態......................75
　　第一節　公室領域平面空間...................75
　　　4-1-1　公室領域空間概要..................75
　　　4-1-2　公室領域空間調整內容..............78
　　第二節　私室領域平面空間...................88
　　　4-2-1　私室領域空間概要..................88
　　　4-2-2　私室領域空間調整內容..............91
　　第三節　起居樣式的特徵.....................97
　　　4-3-1　公室領域起居樣式特徵..............97
　　　4-3-2　私室領域起居樣式特徵.............103
　　第四節　小結..............................108

第五章鄰里關係交流形態.....................110
　　第一節　鄰里交流關係與居住者屬性關係......110
　　　5-1-1　平時交流戶數.....................110
　　　5-1-2　交流家庭主要職業.................111
　　　5-1-3　平時交流代表人物.................112
　　　5-1-4　交流代表人物職業.................112
　　第二節　鄰里交流形態關係..................113
　　　5-2-1 最初認識途徑.....................113
　　　5-2-2 最初認識地點.....................114
　　　5-2-3 平時交流方式.....................115
　　　5-2-4 平時交流時間.....................116
　　　5-2-5 平時交流地點.....................117
　　　5-2-6 交流地點變遷.....................118
　　第三節　鄰里交流關係人氣佳之居住者屬性關係119
　　第四節　鄰里交流類型關係..................122
　　　5-4-1　鄰里交流關係概念.................122
　　　5-4-2　一字型交流類型...................122
　　　5-4-3　L型交流類型......................124
　　　5-4-4　口字型交流類型...................127
　　　5-4-5　無交流類型.......................129
　　　5-4-6　鄰里關係交流類型配置關係.........132
　　　5-4-7　健全交流網絡關係.................135
　　第五節　小結..............................139

第六章結論與建議...........................141
　　第一節　結論..............................141
　　第二節　後續研究..........................145

附錄一　參考文獻..............................147
附錄二　調查訪談表............................148
附錄三　入居後全區庭園配置圖..................155
附錄四　鄰里關係交流分析表....................157
附錄五　鄰里關係居住者人氣佳分析表............185
附錄六　鄰里關係健全交流網絡分析表............187

1.郭永傑，1988，台灣住宅樣式關係比較與居住論之研究，日本九州大學建研所博論。2.郭永傑，1995，居室空間形式變遷關係之研究，國科會研究報告。3.台灣的住宅建築（1976-1990），1991年，中華民國建築師公會全聯會出版社。4.林季芸，1990，建築觀察－台中市地區新近盛行的中庭集合住宅，建築師雜誌1990.6，建築師公會。5.黃瑞茂，丁致成，1992，台中中庭式集合住宅之探討（1982-91），空間雜誌第39期，P68-80。6.翁國超，1993，中庭式集合住宅「共用空間」使用與管理問題之研究 －－以台中市第四期、五期重劃區為例，東海碩論。7.彭康健，1993，台中市中庭花園社區發展風格，空間雜誌第42期，P61。8.黃至民，1997，住宅公領域配置形態之研究，逢甲碩論。9.許志堅，1997，住宅與家具關係之研究－以高雄市族國宅為例，逢甲碩論。10.陳重宜，1996，連棟透天厝住宅平面空間構成特徵之研究－以嘉義市地區為例，逢甲碩論。11.楊裕富，1997，住宅社區建築原型，田園城市文化事業有限公司。12.蘆原義信著，王錦堂譯，外部空間之構成。13.拉普普著，施植明譯，1996，建築環境的意義，田園城市文化事業有限公司。14.拉普普著，張玫玫譯，1985，住居、形式與文化，境與象出版社。