1.中文部分
1. 1論文及期刊
1.王傳芬,網路交易法律問題之研究---以消費者保護為依歸,台灣大學法律研究所碩士論文,八十八年六月。2.陳汝吟,論網際網路上電子契約之法規暨消費者保護,中興大學法律研究所碩士論文,八十八年六月。3.蔡淑美,網路廣告與消費者保護民事法律問題之研究,成功大學法律研究所碩士論文,八十九年六月頁。4.莊心潔,PEER-TO-PEER多媒體傳輸科技著作權問題之研究,東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文,九十年七月。5.章忠信,網路服務業者之著作權侵害責任,萬國法律,第九十七期,八十七年二月。6.章忠信,美國一九九八年數位化千禧年著作權法案簡介,萬國法律,第一○七期,八十八年十月。7.陳錦全著,NII與著作權---美國著作權智慧財產權白皮書介紹,資訊法務透析,一九九六年三月。
8.余伊婷,鄭慧文,法治斌著,從ACLU v. Reno(II)看美國如何管制色情言論,資訊法務透析,一九九九年十月
9.張雅雯,網際服務提供者就網路違法行為之法律責任,律師雜誌第二二八期。10.張雅雯著,網際網路連線服務提供者就網路違法內容之法律責任(上),資訊法務透析,一九九八年三月。11.張雅雯著,網際網路連線服務提供者就網路違法內容之法律責任(中),資訊法務透析,一九九八年五月。12.張雅雯著,網際網路連線服務提供者就網路違法內容之法律責任(下),資訊法務透析,一九九八年六月。13.黃嘉珍,ISP網路上的著作權法責任。
http://www.grandsoft.com.tw/gim/015/dru151.htm
14.郭聯彬,談搜尋引擎對侵權內容的免責界限。
http://topia.yam.com/home/lianbin/pages/Digi07.htm
15.雷憶瑜,ISP及搜尋引擎相關之法律責任問題。http://www.cc.nctu.edu.tw/~iel/Thesis/1999/1999_9.pdf
16.方軍,對等聯網(P2P),二○○○年十一月十七日,http://www.greenteasoft.com/page07.htm
17.Jones Lin,P2P的技術架構(上),數位觀察者第一一五期,二○○二年三月二十七日。
http://www.digitalobserver.com/111-120/115/reader.htm
18.Jones Lin,P2P的技術架構(下),數位觀察者第一一六期,二○○二年四月六日。
http://www.digitalobserver.com/111-120/116/reader.htm
1.2相關新聞報導
19.張文邦,iMesh撒下天羅地網抓回檔案,PC home Online 網路家庭,二○○○年四月十七日。
http://toget.pchome.com.tw
20.張文邦,MediaShare 與網友分享音樂檔案的秘密武器,PC home Online 網路家庭,二○○○年十月九日。
http://toget.pchome.com.tw
21.張文邦,CuteMX不管是敵人還是朋友大家來交換音樂吧!PC home Online 網路家庭,一九九九年十一月二十九日。
http://toget.pchome.com.tw
2.英文部分
2.1書籍
22.Timothy D. Casey, ISP Liability Survival Guide Strategies for Managing Copyright, Apam, Cache, and Privacy Regulation, Wiley Computer Publishing John Wiley & Son,Inc , 2000。
23.Charles H. Kennedy, An Introduction to U.S. Telecommunications Law, 2nd ed.Artech House telecommunications library, 2001。
2.2論文及期刊
24.Edward A. Cavazos, Computer Bulletin Board Systems and of Reply:Redefining Defamation Liability for New Technology, 12 Rev. Litig. 231(1992)。
25.Loftus E. Becker, Jr., The Liability of Computer Bulletin Board Operators for Defamation Posted by Others, 22 Conn. L. Rev. 203,(1982)。
26.Eric Schlachter, Cyberspace, the Free Market and the Free Marketplace of Ideas:Reconizing Leagle Differences in Computer Bulletin Board Functions, 16 Hastings Comm.&Ent. L.J.87,(1993)。
27.Suman Mirmira , V. Business Law 1. Electronic Commerce a) Internet Service Provider Liability * LUNNEY V. PRODIGY SERVICES CO., 15 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 437,(2000)。
28.Sewali K. Patel, IMMUNIZING INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS FROM THIRD-PARTY INTERNET DEFAMATION CLAIMS: HOW FAR SHOULD COURTS GO?Vanderbilt Law Review, (March, 2002)。
29.David R. Sheridan, Zeran v. AOL and the Effect of Section 230 of Communications Decency Act Upon Liability for Defamation on the Internet,61 Alb. L. Rev. 147,(1997)。
30.William M. McSwain, Developments in the Law─The Law of Cyberspace,III The Long Arm of Cyber-Reach, 112 Harv. L. Rev.(1999)。
31.Michelle J. Kane, VI. BUSINESS LAW:1. Electronic Commerce:b) Internet Service Provider liability:Blumenthal v. Drudge, 14 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 483(1999)。
32.Christopher Butler, Note, PLOTTING THE RETURN OF AN ANCIENT TORT TO CYBERSPACE : TOWARDS A NEW FEDERAL STANDARD OF RESPOnSIBILITY FOR DEFAMATION FOR INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER, 6 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev.427(1999/2000)。
33.John T. Soma and Natalie A. Norman, International Take-Down Policy: A Proposal for WTO and WIPO to Establish International Copyright Procedural Guidelines for Internet Service Providers, 22 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 391(2000)。
34.Susan Freiwald , COMPARATIVE INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS IN CYBERSPACE: THE CASE OF INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY FOR DEFAMATION, harvard Journal of Law and Technology(Spring, 2001)。
35.Giorgio Bovenzi, Liabilities of System Operators on the Internet, 11 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 93 (1996)。
36.Douglas Luftman, Note, Defamation Liability for On-Line Services: The Sky is Not Falling, 65 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 1071,(1997)。
37.Christian C.M. Beams, Note, The Copyright Dilemma Involving Online Service Providers: Problem Solved ... for Now, 51 Fed. Comm. L.J. 823, 830 (1999)。
38.Charles S. Wright, Actual Versus Legal Control: Reading Vicarious Liability for Copyright Infringement into the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, 75 Wash. L. Rev. 1005, 1012-20 (2000)。
39.M. Gross, Contributory and Vicarious Liability:Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. MAPHIA,13 Berkeley Tech. L.J. (1998)。
40.Pamela Samuelson,TIGHTENING THE COPYRIGHT NOOSE: Why You Should Be Worried About the White Paper on Intellectual Property Rights and the National Information Infrastructure,http://www.eff.org/IP/tightening_copyright_noose.article.
41.Mary Ann Shulman, Internet Copyright Infringement Liability: Is an Online Access Provider More Like a Landlord or a Dance Hall Operator? 27 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 555 (Spring, 1997)。
42.George Smirnoff III , Note: Copyright on the Internet: A Critique of the White Paper’s Recommendation for Updating the Copyright Act and How the Courts are Already Filling in its Most Important Shortcoming, On-line Service Provider Liability, 44 Clev. St. L. Rev. 197 (1996)。
43.Christian C.M. Beams, The Copyright Dilemma Involving Online Service Providers:Problem Solved….for Now, 51 Fed. Comm. L.J.823(May 1999)。
44.Brandon K. Murai, Online Service Providers and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act : Are Copyright Owners Adequately Protected?40 Stanta Clara L. Rev.285(1999)。
45.Joseph A. Sifferd, THE PEER-TO-PEER REVOLUTION: A POST-NAPSTER ANALYSIS OF THE RAPIDLY DEVELOPING FILE-SHARING TECHNOLOGY, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law & Practice(Winter, 2002)。
46.Niels Schaumann , COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND PEER-TO-PEER TECHNOLOGY, William Mitchell Law Review(2002)。
47.Nicole A. Wong,Susan M. Infantino,John P. Kern,Kyann Kalin, ONLINE CONTENT LIABILITY ISSUES, David Saenz Practising Law Institute,Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series, New York, July 9-10, 2001。
48.Assaf Hamdani, WHO''S LIABLE FOR CYBERWRONGS? Cornell Law Review, May, 2002。
49.Matthew E. Babcock,Wesley Powell,Madeleine Schachter,Andrew J. Schell,David A. Schulz, PUBLISHING WITHOUT BORDERS: INTERNET JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES, INTERNET CHOICE OF LAW ISSUE,ISP IMMUNITY, AND ON-LINE ANONYMOUS SPEECH, Practising Law Institute, Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series PLI Order No. G0-00MQ, May 2, 2001。
50.Peter Brown, AVOIDING COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT: LIABILITY ON THE INTERNET, Practising Law Institute, Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series, PLI Order No. G0-00PS/2, September 2001 - NYC。
51.Jeffrey P. Cunard,Jennifer B. Coplan, DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNET AND E-COMMERCE LAW: 2001, Practising Law Institute, Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series, PLI Order No. G0-00Q1, November, 2001。
52.Victoria McEvedy., THE DMCA AND THE ECOMMERCE DIRECTIVE,Copyright (c) 2002 Sweet and Maxwell Limited and Contributors。
53.Jeffrey P. Cunard, Jennifer B. Coplan , DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNET AND E-COMMERCE LAW: 2001,Practising Law Institute,Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Literary Property Course Handbook Series,PLI Order No. G0-00Q1(November, 2001)
54.Rosa Julià-Barceló & Kamiel J. Koelman, Intermediary Liability In The E-Commerce Directive:So Far So Good, But It''s Not Enough,Computer Law & Security Report 2000-4。
55.ETNO Reflection Document on the Draft Directive on Certain Legal Aspects of Electronic Commerce in the Internal Market RD92 (01/99),
http:// www.etno.be/RD/RD92.html。
56.1999 WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA
workshop on service provider liability,A LOOK BACK AT THE NOTICE-TAKEDOWN PROVISIONSOF THE U.S. DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACTONE YEAR AFTER ENACTMENT,prepared by Mr. Batur Oktay,Corporate Counsel,Adobe Systems Incorporated,Seattle, Washington and Mr. Greg Wrenn, Associate General Counsel,Yahoo! Inc.,Santa Clara, California
,Geneva, December 9 and 10, 1999。http://www.wipo.int/eng/meetings/1999/osp/doc/osp-lia2.doc。
57.GESAC POSITION ON THE AMENDED PROPOSAL FOR DIRECTIVE ON CERTAIN LEGAL ASPECTS OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE IN THE INTERNAL MARKET(Com(99)427 final),PROVISIONS GOVERNING INTERMEDIARIES’ LIABILITY,GESAC-267IP99EN,Brussels, October 26, 1999。
http:// www.gesac.org/eng/positions/commerceelectronic.htm。
58.ISPA SUBMISSION TO THE DTI CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE,http://www.ispa.org.uk/html/Microsoft﹪20Word﹪20-﹪20ISPA﹪20response﹪20EC﹪20Directive1﹪20(1).pdf。
59.ESPRIT Project 27028, Electronic Commerce Legal Issues Platform,Recommendation to the Commission Liability for Online Intermediaries。
http://www.jura.uni-muenster.de/eclip/ documents/final_report.pdf。
60.Institute for information Law,Liability for online intermediary, Amsterdam,1997
http://www.imprimatur.net/IMP_FTP/lia.pdf。
61.Mr. Kamiel Koelman and Professor Bernt Hugenholtz , Online Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringement,Geneva workshop on service provider liability, December 9 and 10, 1999。http://www.wipo.org/eng/meetings/1999/osp/doc/osp_lia1.doc。
62.ROSA JULIÀ-BARCELÓ, ON-LINE INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY ISSUES:Comparing E.U. and U.S. Legal Frameworks,(2000)E.I.P.R. ISSUE 3©SWEET & MAXWELL LIMITED 。
63.Alfred C. Yen, Internet Service Provider Liability for Subscriber Copyright Infringement,Enterprise Liability,and the First Amendment, 88 Geo. L.J. 1833,(June,2000)。
2.3官方資料
64.TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996 , CONFERENCE REPORT ON S. 652, House Rept. 104-458。
65.Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure:The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights, Washington D.C.,September 1995。
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/doc/ipnii/lawcopy.pdf.
66.WIPO COPYRIGHT TREATIES IMPLEMENTATION AND ON-LINE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT LIABILITY LIMITATION, House Rpt.105-551。
67.WIPO COPYRIGHT TREATIES IMPLEMENTATION AND ON-LINE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT LIABILITY LIMITATION, House Rep. 105-551(II)。
68.The Digital Millenium Copyright Act of 1998 , Senate Rpt. 105-190。
69.On-Line Copyright Liability Limitation Act-HON.HOWARD COBLE(Extension of Remark-July 17,1997)。
70.WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act;and On-Line Copyright Liability Limitation Act:Hearing on H.R.2281 and H.R.2180 Before the Subcomm. on Courts and Intellectual Property of the House Comm. on the Judiciary,105th Cong.222(1997)。
71.Introduction of the “ON-LINE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT LIABILITY LIMITATION ACT”---HON. HOWARD COBLE(Extension of Remarks-February 12,1998)。
72.Statement on introduced Bill and joint resolutions---John Ashcroft(Remarks in Senate-9,3,1997)。
73.Internet Gambling Prohibition Act of 2000, Committee Report---House Rpt. 106-655 Part I。
74.Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (''Directive on electronic commerce''), Official Journal L 178 , 17/07/2000 P. 0001 - 0016。
75.Explanatory Memorandum to the Commission''s original proposal COM (1998) 586 final of 18.11.1998, OJ C 30, 5.2.1999,final http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/dat/1999/en_599PC0427.html.
76.EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM, Amended proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on certain legal aspects of electronic commerce in the Internal Market (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 250 (2) of the EC-Treaty)。http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/dat/1999/en_599PC0427.html.
77.Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the Harmonization of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society,OJL 167,22/6/2001。
2.4相關新聞報導
78.Aimster Sues the Record Industry By Robert Menta---5/3/01http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/2001/aimstersue.html
RIAA Seeks Reversal Of Judge''s Aimster Rulings, By Kevin Featherly, Newsbytes
ALBANY, NEW YORK, U.S.A.,30 Jul 2001, 6:20 PM CST
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/168504.html
79.RIAA sues Aimster over file swapping, By John Borland , Staff Writer, CNET News.com, May 25, 2001, 8:45 AM PT
http://news.com.com/news/0-1005-200-6033575.html
80.Aimster Earns Procedural Victory In RIAA Litigation, By Steven Bonisteel, Newsbytes, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, U.S.A.,17 Oct 2001, 3:32 PM CSThttp://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/171234.html
81.Kazaa Suspends Downloads - Court Verdict Due, By Steve Gold, Newsbytes
AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS,17 Jan 2002, 12:37 PM CST ,http://www.newsbytes.com/news/02/173743.html.
82.KaZaa Ignores Court Order to Shut Down, By Robert Menta- 12/21/01,
http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/2001/kazaa.html.
83.Court Gives Kazaa a Win on Piracy---A Netherlands court rules the file-sharing network is not responsible for its users'' piracy., Joris Evers, IDG News Service, Thursday, March 28, 2002
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,91744,00.asp.
84.Brad King, Congress Isn''t Napster''s Cavalry, Wired News (Oct. 4, 2000),
http:// www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,39113,00. html.
85.Shane Ham & Robert D. Atkinson, Napster and Online Piracy: The Need to Revisit the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Progressive Policy Institute http://www.ppionline.org/ndol/print.cfm?contentid=646 (May 1, 2000)
86.Brad King, The Kazaa Ruling: What It Means, 2:00 a.m. April 2, 2002PST,
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51457,00.html.
87.RIAA Sues Napster Clones: Kazaa、Morpheus、and Grokster, By Steven Bonisteel Newsbytes,03 Oct 2001。
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/170798.html
88.Lawmarkers Say Napster’s Heirs Expose Kids To Porn, By Brian Krebs, Newsbytes,27 Jul 2001。http://www.lawlists.net/pipermail/cybertelecom-l-announce/2001-July.txt