臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

網路科技的崛起與風行，促使不少企管觀念亦隨之改變；尤其對虛擬資源的認知及重視，迫使過去由區域觀念、權變關係發展出來的傳統企業策略受到挑戰，以整體觀點考量的系統思考方式取代流行，成為學術上的焦點。
本研究以著重在「整體分類」、「功能耦合」的構形理論為基礎，對於台灣的傳統產業─紡織成衣產業重新進行省思，並以田野調查質化探索的方法，實地觀察、紀錄所採用的網路科技及管理機制；依所取得的個案資料進行整理，歸納出其構形型態、配適關係和管理意涵。
研究結果發現三種構形型態(簡單、代理、市集)存在於台灣紡織成衣產業之中，在加強管理效率的目的之下，各自採取不同的網路科技，而使企業網絡與網路科技有明顯的對應關係。在網路科技演進的帶動下，構形將朝向簡單與市集兩種構形型態流動。台灣在製造業的人力優勢已不復存在時，依據過去所累積的產業資源，市集型態是較適合台灣紡織成衣產業將來的發展方向。在本研究結果的描繪下，可以對台灣紡織成衣產業產生異於以往的產業觀點及轉型策略；對於網路科技迅速演進所帶來的衝擊，在本研究結論所提出的產業策略將可做為未來企業決策的參考。

As the fast development and popularity of network technology, how to achieve appropriate changes in business administration becomes an important issue. Especially for the Virtual Resource, the recognition and appreciation of it challenges the traditional business strategy that comes from limited region or contingency relation. In the academic world, such a global and systematic view becomes a focus.
This research is based on the Configuration Theory that emphasizes on the Gestalt Typology and Functional Coherency. We reviewed the textiles and clothing industry, which is one of the traditional industries of Taiwan. By field survey and qualitative exploration, this research observed and recorded the network technology and administration mechanisms of such industry. Based on the study of this information, we conclude its configuration styles, fitting, and the contents of administration.
As a result, this research concludes Simple, Agent, and Marketplace as the three configuration styles that exist in the textile and clothing industry of Taiwan. In order to optimize administrative efficiency, these styles apply different network technologies, which cause apparent varieties in their enterprise network and network technology. Consequently, under the guidance of Internet technology, the key configuration styles will move toward Simple and Marketplace. While Taiwan has gradually losing the advantages from manpower, the industrial resources accumulated in the past show that Marketplace is a better configuration style for the future development of the textiles and clothing industry in Taiwan. The result of this research alters the traditional view and business transforming strategy to the textiles and clothing industry of Taiwan. Under the impacts of rapid growing network technology, the conclusions of this research on industry strategy can provide decision-making suggestions to the future enterprise.

第壹章　緒　論 1
第一節　研究動機與背景 1
第二節　研究問題與研究目的 4
一、研究問題 4
二、研究目的 6
第三節　研究範圍 7
第四節　研究步驟 7
第貳章　文獻探討 9
第一節　構形理論相關概念 9
一、構形 9
二、組織構形 10
三、台灣紡織成衣產業的五個基本元件 16
四、中國人的構形概念 20
第二節　企業網絡相關概念 23
一、網絡理論 23
二、企業網絡 26
第三節　網路科技相關概念 28
一、管理意涵 28
二、資訊管理架構 29
三、媒體整合 31
第四節設計參數與構形的差異 32
一、行動者之間的交換折衝 32
二、行動者控制活動或資源部分 33
三、活動或資源互賴的部分 35
第參章　研究方法 37
第一節　研究架構 37
一、構形設計參數之選取 37
二、觀念架構 39
第二節　研究方法之選擇 41
第三節　研究對象之選擇 42
第四節　個案研究過程 42
第肆章　個案分析 43
第一節　簡單型構形 45
一、個案描述 45
二、理論與實証 53
第二節　代理型構形 61
一、個案描述 61
二、理論與實証 68
第三節　市集型構形 73
一、個案描述 73
二、理論與實証 80
第伍章　結論與建議 85
第一節　命題發展 85
第二節　管理應用與討論：以網路科技觀點 91
第三節　產業實務建議 94
一、對生產中間商的建議 94
二、對採購代理商的建議 95
三、對製造商的建議 96
四、對於政府單位的建議 96
第四節　未來研究建議 98
第五節　研究限制 99
參考文獻 100
一、中文書目 100
二、英文書目 103

一、中文書目：
1.司徒達賢(2001)，《策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法》，智勝出版。
2.李仁芳(1990)，《管理心靈》，商略印書館。
3.沈曼霖(1998)，《美國海外服飾採購行為之研究─以美商百貨連鎖店駐台採購處為實證》，輔仁大學織品服裝所碩士論文。
4.林俊宏(1995)，《組織構形與資訊科技構形之配合研究-服務業為例》，政治大學資訊管理所碩士論文。
5.周宗穎(1997)，網路為基礎的管理典範芻議，產業科技研究發展管理研討會。
6.吳思華(1998)，《策略九說：策略思考的本質》，臉譜文化出版，第三版。
7.吳思華(1999)，洞見數位世界的真貌，《新經濟：數位世紀的新遊戲規則》，麥格羅希爾出版。
8.吳思華(1999)，組織邏輯：人情與理性，《網絡台灣：企業的人情關係與經濟理性》，遠流出版社，p.271-283。
9.金觀濤，劉青峰(1994)，《興盛與危機：論中國社會超穩定結構》，風雲時代出版。
10.胡幼慧主編(1996)，《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，巨流出版。
11.陳燕俠 (2000)，《國家機器與紡織產業間之政策網絡研究：以中華民國紡織業(外銷)拓展會為例》，中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
12.陳介玄(1994)，《協力網路與生活結構─台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析》，聯經出版事業公司。
13.黃仁宇(1993)，《中國大歷史》，聯經出版。
14.黃光國(1988)，《中國人的權力遊戲》，巨流圖書公司。
15.張苙雲主編(1999)，《網絡台灣：企業的人情關係與經濟理性》，遠流出版社。
16.趙蕙鈴(1995)，協力生產網路資源交換結構之特質─經濟資源交換的社會網絡化，中國社會學刊第十八期。
17.鄭心瑩（2001），《台灣高科技紡織品策略聯盟營運模式之研究》，輔仁大學織品服裝學系碩士論文。
18.鄭伯壎，劉怡君(1995)，義利之辨與企業間的交易歷程：台灣組織間網絡的個案分析，《本土心理學研究》，1995年 8月，第四期，p.2-41。
19.劉月純(1999)，《跨國性組織構形與資訊科技構形配合之相關研究-以位於台灣的產業為例》，淡江大學資訊管理所碩士論文。
20.盧俊成(1999)，《網際網路的典範轉移暨網路市場與新經營模式之探索性研究》，台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
21.羅家德(2001)，《關係管理智慧》，元智大學資訊社會研究所。
22.羅家德、張紳震(2002)，資訊化組織與科層組織社會資本形成因素之比較，網絡與社會研討會。
23.謝國雄(1989)，黑手變頭家─台灣製造業中的階級流動，《台灣社會研究季刊》，第二卷第二期，p.11-54。
二、英文書目：
1.Antonelli, C. 1992. “The Economics of Information Networks,” in Antonelli, C.(ed), The Economics of Information Networks, Elservier Science Publishers, Netherlands.
2.Agnes, Michael (editor), 2000. “Webster’s New World College Dictionary (14th ED.)” John Wiley & Sons published.
3.Berger, P. L. & Luckman T. 1967. “The Social Consuction of Reality,” New York: Doubleday.
4.Burt, R. S. 1992. “The Social Structure of Competition,” Pp:57-91 in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action., edited by Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles, Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press.
5.DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,” American Sociological Review, 48:147-160
6.Durr, M. 1987. “Peer Networks Gain Ground,” Computerworld,21:4, Feb. 4
7.Edelman, A. H. 1992. “The fashion resource directory(2nd ED.),” New York: Fairchild Fashion & Merchandising Group.
8.Granovetter, M. S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-1380.
9.Granovetter, M. S. 1982. “The Strength of Weak ties: A Network theory Revisited,” In P. V. Marsden and Nan Lin, eds. Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
10.Granovetter, M. S. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology number 91(3):481-510
11.Hambricks, D.C. 1984. “Taxonomic Approaches to Studying Strategy: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues,” Journal of Management, Vol.10
12.Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J. 1989. “Organizational Ecology,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.Hakansson, Hakan and Johanson, J. 1993. “The network as a governance structure:Interfirm cooperation beyond markets and hierarchies,” Ch.2 in Gernot Grabher (ed.) The Embedded Firm:On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. New York:Routledge.
14.Jarnow, J. & Dickerson, K. G. 1997. “Inside the Fashion Business (6th ED.),” P.120, Prentice-Hall Inc.
15.Krackhardt, David and Stern, R. 1988. “Informal Networks and Organizational Crisis: An Experimental Simulation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 51:123-140.
16.Krackhardt, David. 1992. “The Strength of Stong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations,” in Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles, Networks and Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17.Krackhardt, David. 1995. “Entrepreneurial Opportunities in an Entrepreneurial Firm: A Structural Approach,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 3, Baylor University Published.
18.Koichiro Hayashi. 1992. “From Network Externalities to Interconnection: The Changing Nature of Networks and Economy,” in Antonelli, C.(ed), The Economics of Information Networks, Elservier Science Publishers, Netherlands.
19.Krackhardt, David and Hanson, J. R. 1993. “Informal networks: The Company Behind the Chart.” Harvard Business Review July-Aug: 104-111.
20.Lewis, R. (Ed.). 1995. “What’s in a names? Is it a brand, a private label, or a store? ,” “Infotracs” special supplement to Women’s Wear Daily, pp.1-35
21.Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J. 1997. “Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology,” John Wiley & Sons Inc. publish.
22.Mariotti, J. L. 2001. “Smart Things to Know About, Brands & Branding” Capstone publish.
23.Moore, J. F. 1998. “The New Corporate Form,” in Tapscott, D. Blueprint to the Digital Economy: Creating Wealth in the era of E-business, McGraw-Hill published.
24.Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Meyer, A.D., and Coleman, H.J. 1978. “Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.3, No.4
25.Mintzberg, H. 1979. “The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
26.Miller, D. 1987. “The Genesis of Configuration,” Academy of Management Review, 12:686-701
27.Meyer, A.D., Tsui, A.S., and Hinings, C.R. 1993. “Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis,” Acdedmy of Management Journal, Vol.36, No.6.
28.Noam, E. M. 1992. “The Three Stages of Network Evolution,” in Antonelli, C.(ed), The Economics of Information Networks, Elservier Science Publishers, Netherlands.
29.Pasternack, B. A. & Viscio, A. J. 2000. “The Centerless Corporation: A new Model for Transforming your Organization for Growth and Prosperity,”
30.Perrow, C. 1967. “A Framework for the Comparatice Analysis of Organization,” American Sociology Review, April 1967.
31.Peter Ping Li, 1998. “Towards a Geocentric Framework of Organizational Form: A Holistic, Dynamic and Paradoxical Approach,” Organization Studies, 19/5, p.829-861
32.Sam Walton & John. 1992. “Sam Walton, made in America:my story” Dell Publishing Group.
33.Senge, P. M. 1990. “The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization,” Doubleday published.
34.Yin, R.K., 1984. “Case Study Research Design and Methods,” SAGE published.