跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.85) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/07 10:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林榮豐
研究生(外文):Lin Rong-Fong
論文名稱:慢性頸部疼痛病患人格特質、心理健康與頸部非器質性症狀之相關性探討
論文名稱(外文):The relationship between personality, psychological well-being and cervical non-organic sign in patients with chronic neck pain
指導教授:張志仲張志仲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chang Jyh-Jong
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:高雄醫學大學
系所名稱:行為科學研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:62
中文關鍵詞:非器質性症狀心理健康頸部疼痛
外文關鍵詞:non-organic signpsychological well-beingneck pain
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:707
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:106
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
本研究的目的為探討頸部非器質性症狀與人格特質、心理健康之相關性。非器質性行為模式代表一些出現的症狀,其來源並非器官產生器質性變化而引發的症狀。有些頸部疼痛病患為何會出現不同程度之頸部非器質性症狀,是否與心理層面例如心理健康、焦慮、人格特質、生活品質有相關值得進一步探討。
研究方法方面,研究對象來自高雄醫學大學附設醫院復健科門診治療病人,病患頸部疼痛超過6個月,共52人(男性15人,女性37人)平均年齡44.25±14.64歲,範圍18-80歲。研究工具包括頸部非器質性症狀測試、艾氏人格問卷-成人精簡版(Eysenck Personality Quiestionnaire, EPQ)、華人健康問卷(Chinese Health Questionnair, CHQ-12) 世界衛生組織健康相關生活品質問卷簡明版-台灣版本(WHOQoL-BREF台灣版)、自我健康狀態量表(Short-form 36)及貝克焦慮量表(Beck Anxiety Inventory-BAI)。頸部非器質性症狀測試的方法分五大項七個測驗,五項內容為1. 觸痛反應包含輕觸疼痛 (superficial tenderness)和非解剖相關性疼痛(nonanatomy tenderness)、2.模擬測試(simulation)反應、3.關節活動度(range of motion)反應、4.區域性混亂(regional disturbance)反應,包括感覺下降(sensory loss)和肌力下降(motor loss)和5.過度反應(over reaction)。非器質性症狀測試七個測驗,若病患有出現反應,即出現症狀給一分,總分最高七分最低零分。研究內容包括測試頸部非器質性症狀測試施測者間信度研究和頸部非器質性症狀測試與各種心理健康量表之關係。
結果方面,頸部非器質性症狀測試之施測者間信度研究,七個測驗試施測者間一致性Kappa 數值介於0.37至0.85之間,總分之階級內相關係數ICC為0.90。非器質性症狀測試總分與焦慮分數最為相關(r=0.54,p<0.001)與華人健康問卷總分有關、 Short-form 36中之生理功能和一般健康狀況面向和生命力面向此三個面向、Short-form 36心理健康總分以及與WHOQoL-BREF中之心理健康範疇得分以及自我評定目前生活滿意程度有關(r 值介於-0.28至0.42, p值介於0.05至0.001)。若將非器質性症狀測試總分分為高分組(3-7分)與低分組(0-2分),分析兩組心理健康情形差異性,貝克焦慮量表、Short-form 36中之一般健康面向和活力面向、世界衛生組織生活品質中之心理範疇範疇與生活品質的滿意程度兩組都有顯著統計上的差異(p<0.05)。
結論由信度分析結果,本研究之頸部非器質性症狀測試是可信的。頸部非器質性症狀測試主要與焦慮與自我評定目前健康生活滿意程度高度相關,越焦慮的病患其頸部非器質性症狀越多,自我認知健康生活品質越高則頸部非器質性症狀越少。臨床應用方面,頸部非器質性症狀的測試是一個可信的測試,可能提供了治療師瞭解病患心理狀況的簡易方法,可轉介病患做進一步的心理測試或需要不同專業的治療介入。
The “non-organic signs” is an illness behavior not related to an organic structure problem. Many chronic neck pain patients are afflicted with difference non-organic signs. What problems do these non-organic signs lead to? The relationship between the cervical non-organic signs and the psychological well-being need to be studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between cervical non-organic signs and personality, psychological well-being in patients with chronic neck pain.
Method: Fifty-two chronic neck pain patients (male: 15, female: 37, mean age: 44.25±14.64,range :18-80 ) with symptoms persisted over 6 months duration were recruited to participate from Departments of Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. The study’s instruments included Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ), WHO Quality of Life- BREF Taiwan version (WHOQOL-BREF), Short-form 36 Taiwan version (SF-36), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the presence of non-organic signs in these patients. The examination of cervical non-organic signs included five dimensions and seven items. First dimension is tenderness response, which combine the testing of superficial tenderness and nonanatomy tenderness. Second dimension is simulation response. Third dimension is range of motion response. The fourth dimension is regional disturbance response, which combine the testing of the condition of sensory loss and motor loss. The fifth dimension is over-reaction response. If the symptom is presented, the positive response is recorded and the sum of symptom be scored. The pilot study was performed to attain the inter-rater reliability. After finishing the inter-rater reliability study, the relation of cervical non-organic signs, personality and psychological well-being was studied.
Inter-rater reliability of the assessment of the cervical non-organic signs was good. The Kappa value ranged from 0.37 to 0.85. The ICC value of the total score of the cervical non-organic sign was 0.90. The total score of cervical non-organic signs were significantly correlated with anxiety, CHQ, the physical function, vitality and general health dimensions of SF-36, the psychological summary score of SF-36, the psychological health dimension, and the question asked about the satisfying level of life at present from WHOQOL-BREF. The patients was divided into two groups with a cut-off score 2, one was higher score group (3-7) and the other was lower score group (0-2). The score of anxiety, the physical function and vitality dimension of SF-36, the psychological health dimension and the question asked about the satisfying level of life at present from WHOQOL-BREF were statistically significant difference between two groups (p<0.05).
In conclusion, the test of cervical non-organic sign is a reliable tool for physical therapists to evaluate the patients with chronic neck pain.. The cervical non-organic sign was highly correlated with anxiety and satisfaction level of life at present. The clinical implication is that the test of cervical non-organic signs gives more patient’s psychological information for therapist. Those patients with many cervical non-organic signs will be suggested for detail psychological tests and intervention by relevant discipline.
中文摘要………………….…………………………………………… I
英文摘要………………………………………………………………III
目次…………………………………………………………………….V
表目錄…………………………………………………………………VII
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機….………….……………………………......1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………2
第二章 文獻回顧………………………………………………3
第三章 研究材料與方法
第一節 研究對象……..………………………………………13
第二節 研究工具……………………………………………..13
第三節 施測過程……………………………………………..22
第四節 統計分析……………………………………………..23
第四章 研究結果
第一節 施測者間信度先驅研究..…………………………..25
第二節 頸部非器質性症狀與人格特質及各種心理健康
量表之關係…………………………………………..26
第三節 頸部非器質性症狀高分組與低分組在人格特質、
各種心理健康量表與尋求相關醫療之差異情形….29
第五章 討論
第一節 頸部非器質性症狀之施測者間信度研究…………30
第二節 非器質性症狀測試與焦慮、與人格特質相關結果
之探討各種心理健康量表相關性 ..………………32
第三節 頸部非器質性症狀測試與SF36、WHOQoL內容
相關性之探討………………………………………34
第四節 非器質性症狀測試之高分或低分表現在各種心
理健康與尋求相關醫療之差異情形……….………35
第五節 研究限制與未來研究方向…………………………37
第六章 結論與建議..………………………..……………39
參考文獻…………………………………………………………41
表…………………………………………………………………45
附錄………………………………………………………………53
Ackerman, M.D., Stevens, M.J. (1989). Acute and chronic pain: pain dimensions and psychological status. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 223-228.
Andersen, J.H., Kaergaard, A., Frost, P., Thomsen, J.F., Bonde, J.P., Fallentin, N. (2002). Physical, psychosocial, and individual risk factors for neck/shoulder pain with pressure tenderness in the muscles among workers performing monotonous, repetitive work. Spine, 27, 660-667.
Ariens, G.A.M., Bongers, P.M., Hoogendoorn, W.E., Houtman, I.L., Wal, G., Mechelen, W.V. (2001). High quantitative job demands and low coworker support as risk factors for neck pain. Spine, 26, 1896-1903.
Ariens, G.A.M., Mechelen, W.V., Bongers, P.M., Bouter, L.M., Wal, G.V.D. (2001) Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: A systematic review. Am J Ind Med, 39, 180-193.
Beck, A.T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., Steer, R.A.(1998). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.
Beck, A.T., Rush, A.G., Shaw, B.F.(1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.
Benjamin, S., Morris, S., McBeth, J.(2000). The association between chronic widespread pain and mental disorder: a population-based study. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 43, 561-7.
Brenna, P., Solman, A.(1992). Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measure. Brish Med J, 304, 1491-1494.
Cheng, T.A., William, P.(1986). The design and development of a screening questionnaire (CHQ) for use in community studies of mental disorders in Taiwan. Psychological medicine, 16, 415-22.
Cheng, T.A., Wu, J.T., Chong, M.Y. (1990). International consistency and factor structure of the Chinese Health Questionnaire. Acta Psychiatric Scandinavica, 82, 304-8.
Cheng, T.A.(1985). A pilot study of mental disorders in Taiwan. Psychological Medicine, 15, 195-203.
Cohen, J.A. (1960). Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas, 20, 37-46.
Dworkin, S.F., Von Korff, M., LeResche, L. (1990). Multiple pains and psychiatric disturbance. An epidemiologic investigation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 239-44.
Dyrehag, L.E., Widerstrom-Noga, E.G., Carlasson, S.G. (1998). Relations between self-rated musculoskeletal symptoms and signs and psychological distress in chronic neck and shoulder pain. Scand J Rehab Med, 30, 235-242.
Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Ferguson, R.J., Ahles, T.A.(1998). Private body consciousness, anxiety and pai symptom reports of chronic pain patients. Behavior Research & Therapy, 36, 527-35.
Fydrich, T., Dowdall, D., Chambless, D.L.(1990). Aspect of reliability and validity for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. paper presented at the national Conference on Phobias and Related Anxiety Disorders. Bethesda, MD.
Gaines, Jr W.G., Hegmann, K.T. (1999). Effectiveness of Waddell’s nonorganic signs in predicting a delayed return to regular work inpatients experiencing acute occupational low back pain. Spine, 24, 396-400.
Gaskin, M.E., Greene, A.F., Robinson, M.E. (1992). Negative affect and the experience of chronic pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 36, 707-13.
Goldberg, D.P., Williams, P. (1988). A User’s Guide to the General Health Questionnaire: GHQ. NFER_NELSON: Windsor.
Karas, R., Macintosh, G., Hall, H., Wilson, L., Melles, T. (1997). The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction fo return to work for patients with low back pain . Physical Therapy, 77, 335-60.
Kinder, B.N., Curtiss, G., Kalichman, S. (1986). Anxiety and anger as predictors of MMPI elevators in chronic pain patients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 651-661.
Krause, N., Ragland, D.R., Greiner, B.A., Syme, S.L., Fisher, J.M. (1997). Psychosocial job factors associated with back and neck pain in public transit operators. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997, 23, 179-86.
Leino, P., Magni, G. (1993). Depressive and distress symptoms as predictors of low back pain, neck-shoulder pain, and other musculoskeletal morbidity: a 10-year follow-up of metal industry employees. Pain, 53, 89-94.
Lightenberg, P.A., Skehan, M.W., Swensen, C.H.(1984 ). The role of personality, recent life stress and arthritis severity in predicting pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 28, 231-6.
Linton, S.J.(2000). A review of psycological risk factor in back and neck pain. Spine, 25, 1148-1156.
Linton, S.J. (1992). An overview of psychosocial and behavioral factors in neck-and-shoulder pain. Scand J Med, 32, 67-78.
Lu, L., Chen, C.S. (1996). Correlations of coping behaviours: internal and external resources. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 9, 297-307.
Lu, L. (1999). Personal or environmental causes of happiness: a longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 79-90.
Main, C.J., Wood, P.R., Holli, S., Spanswick, C.C., Waddell, G.(1992). The distress and risk assessment method- A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of outcome. Spine, 17, 42-52.
Maruta, T., Goldman, S., Chan, C.W., Illstrup, D.M., Kunselman, A.R., Colligan, R.C. (1997). Waddell’s nonorganic signs and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory profiles in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine, 22, 72-75.
McCracken, L.M., Zayfert, C., Gross, R.T. (1992). The pain anxiety symptoms scale: development and validation of a scale to measure pain. Pain, 50, 67-73.
McHorney, C.A., Ware, J.E., Raczek, A.E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), II: psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med ical Care, 31, 247-263.
Nahit, E.S., Pritchard, C.M., Cherry, N.M., Silman, A.J., Macfarlane, G.J. (2001). The influence of work related psychosocial factors and psychological distress on regional musculoskeletal pain: a study of newly employed workers. Journal of Rheumatology, 28, 1378-84.
Nelson, D.V., Novy, D.M. (1997). Self-report differentiation of anxiety an depression in chronic pain. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 392-407.
Pietri-Taleb, F., Riihimaki, H., Viikari-Juntura, E., Lindstrom, K. (1994). Longitudinal study on the role of personality characteristics and psychological distress in neck trouble among working men. Pain, 58, 261-267.
Sobel, J.B., Sollenberger, P., Robinson, R., Polatin, P.B., Gatchel, R.J. (2000). Cervical nonorganic signs: A new clinical tool to assess abnormal illness behavior in neck pain patients: A pilot study. Arch Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 81, 170-175.
Taylor, A.G., Lorentzen, L.J., Blank, M.B. (1990). Psychologic distress of chronic pain sufferers and their spuouses. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 5, 6-10.
Timmermans, G.,Sternbach, R.A. (1974). Factors of human chronic pain: an analysis of personality and pain reaction variables. Science, 184, 806-807.
Von Koff, M., Le Resche, L., Dworkin, S.F. (1993). First onset of common pain symptoms: a prospective study of depression as a risk factor. Pain, 55, 251-8.
Waddell, G., McCulloch, J.A., Kummel, E., Venner, R.M. (1980). Nonorganic physical signs in low back pain. Spine, 5, 117-125.
Wade, J.B., Dougherty, L.M., Hart, R.P., Rafii, A., Price, D.D. (1992). A canonical correlation analysis of the influence of neuroticism and extraversion on chronic pain, suffering, and pain behavior. Pain, 51, 67-73.
Ware, J.E., Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473.
Werneke, M.W., Harris, D.E., Lichter, R.L. (1993). Clinical effectiveness of behavioral signs for screening chronic low-back pain patients in a work oriented physical rehabilitation program. Spine, 18, 2412-18.
姚開屏。台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。1999,台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組。
姚開屏。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。2000,台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top