跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.84) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/01/20 21:17
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊凌玉
研究生(外文):Yang, Ling Yu
論文名稱:以「雇主退休金慷慨度的改變」分析美國退休金計畫制度改變趨勢對於員工退休所得的影響
論文名稱(外文):Are Employers more Generous Now?:An Analysis of Pension Generosity and Employers’ Characters
指導教授:王儷玲王儷玲引用關係
指導教授(外文):Jennifer L. Wang
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立政治大學
系所名稱:風險管理與保險學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:風險管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:英文
中文關鍵詞:退休金趨勢雇主退休金慷慨度確定給付計畫確定提撥計畫401(k) 計畫
外文關鍵詞:Pension trendsEmployers'' generosityDefined benefit planDefined contribution plan401(k) plan
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:677
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:143
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
近年來有很多關於退休金計畫的研究主要在探討從確定給付計畫(defined benefit plan)轉向確定提撥計畫(defined contribution plan)趨勢的影響。而這些早期的研究(Clark and McDermed (1990 and 1993), Gustman and Steinmeier (1992), Ippolito (1985, 1986, 1993, and 1997), and Kruse (1995); Papke (1994, 1996) and Papke, Petersen and Poterba (1996))主要是利用計畫個數的改變或者是計畫參與者人數的增減來作為衡量此一趨勢影響力的指標。然而,這兩項指標從退休收入多寡的觀點來看,卻無法反應此一趨勢對於員工福利的影響程度。Wang and VanDerhei(2000)利用了「雇主退休金成本」的新概念,探討此一趨勢的影響。而本篇論文將要延續Wang and VanDerhei(2000)的研究,藉由衡量雇主慷慨程度的改變,進一步分析此一趨勢對於員工未來退休收入的影響程度。為了檢視雇主退休金慷慨度是否有隨著時間以及環境變化而有所不同,我們利用OLS迴歸模型來分析在兩段期間中(1985年與1996年)雇主退休金慷慨度的變化。結果發現在確定給付計畫及401(k)計畫之下,退休金計畫存在的時間愈長以及工會的支持對於雇主慷慨程度都有正面的影響。在財務變數方面,我們則是發現不論哪一種型態的退休金計畫,稅前收入金額的多寡對於雇主慷慨程度均具有正面的影響。此外,利用Chow Test,我們發現確定給付計畫在1985年和1996年的確具有結構上的改變,進一步分析之後,發現退休金計畫存在時間愈長、工會的支持、金融相關產業、固定資產佔總資產的比例以及稅前收入金額的多寡對於1996年確定給付計畫下之雇主退休金慷凱度的正向影響遠大其對於1985年的確定給付計畫。在員工退休福利上,我們則是發現401(k)計畫的雇主相對提撥率在過去20年有明顯地成長,這意味著401(k)計畫下的員工在過去20年裡的退休福利有明顯的增加。
Much debate has devoted in recent pension literature to discuss the impacts of current pension trend toward defined contribution(DC) plans, especially the substitution effect between 401(k) and other pension plans. However, the “generosity” of the employer pension plan deserves little attention. This paper analyzes the impacts of the effects of this trend on workers’ future retirement income by measuring the changes of employers’ pension generosity. We construct a panel data of firms that sponsor at least one pension plan in 1985 and compare the changes of their pension generosity for DB, DC and 401(k) plans between 1985 and 1996. OLS Regression Models are adopted to analyze the generosity of employers’ primary plan and supplemental plan and Chow test is conducted to test the structural changes between 1985 and 1996. Our results find that plan age and union status have positive impacts on employers’ generosity of DB and 401(k) plans. For financial variables, pretax income is an important consideration to employers’ generosity disregarding the type of plan. In addition, we find that there was a structure change of DB plans between 1985 and 1996 and that union status,plan age, financial etc. industry, proportion of fixed assets and pretax income have greater positive impacts on employers’ generosity of DB plans in 1996 than in 1985. For employees’ retirement income, the matching rates have grown over the last two decades and this stands for that employees covered by 401(k) plans have received better retirement benefit over the last two decades.
Introduction…………………………………………………………..1
Literature Review…………………………………………………….3
Data…………………………………………………………………... 7
Methodology…………………………………………………………. 8
Empirical Findings……………………………………………………12
Conclusion…………………………………………………………… 17
Reference…………………………………………………………….. 19
Appendix…………………………………………………………….. 22
Alderson, Michael J., “Corporate Pension Policy under OBRA 1987”, Financial
Management, 16 (1990):87-97.
Bodie, Zvi, Jay Light, Randall Morck, and Robert Taggart, “Funding and Asset Allocation Corporate Pension Plans”, in: Zvi Bodie, John Shoven, and David Wise, eds., Issues in Pension Economics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL), 1987:15-47.
Clark, Robert L, “Defined Contribution: Are They the Pension of the Future?”, in: Dallas Salisbury and Kathleen Utgoff, eds., What is the Future of Defined Benefit Pension Plans? ( Employee Benefit Research Institute, Washington, DC), 1989:5-14.
Clark, Robert L. and Ann A. McDermed. The Choice of Pension Plans in a Changing
Regulatory Environment, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1990.
Clark, Robert L., Ann A. McDermed and Michelle White Trawick. “Firm Choice of
Type of Pension Plan: Trends and Determinants,” In Ray Schmitt ed. The Future of Pensions in the United State, 1993: 114-125.
Dorsey, Stuart, “The Economic Function of Private Pensions: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Labor Economics, 5, (1987):S171-S189.
Francis, J.A. and S.A. Retier, “Determinants of Corporate Pension Funding Strategy”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9, (1987):35-60.
Gustman, Alan L. and Thomas L. Steinmeier. “The Stampede Toward Defined
ContributionPension Plans: Fact or Fiction?” Industrial Relations, 31: 2
(1992): 361-369.
Hamdallah, Ahmed El-Sayed and William Ruland. “The Decision to Terminate Overfunded Pension Plans,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 5(1986): 77-91.
Luzadis, Rebecca and Olivia Mitchell, A, Multinominal Logit Model of Pension Outcomes, Mimeo. (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY), 1988.
Ippolito, Richard A. “The Labor Contract and True Economic Pension Liabilities,” American Economic Review, 75 (1985): 1031-1043.
______. Pension and Public Policy, Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin for the
Pension Research Council, 1989.
______. The Economics of Pension Insurance, Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin
for the Pension Research Council, 1993.
______. “Towards Explaining the Growth of Defined Contribution Plans,” Industrial
Relations, Forthcoming.
______. Pension Plan and Employee Performance, 1997.
Kruse, Douglas L. “Pension Substitution in the 1980s: Why the Shift Toward
Defined Contribution Pension Plans?” Industrial Relations, 34: 2 (1995):
218-241.
Papke, Leslie E. “Does 401(k) Introduction Affect Defined Benefit Plans,” National
Tax Associated Proceeding of the Eight-Six Annual Conference (1994),
122-123.
______. “Are 401(k) Plans Replacing Other Employer-Provided Pensions: Evidence from Panel Data,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 1998.
Papke, Leslie E., Mitchell A. Petersen and James M. Poterba. “Do 401(k) Plan
Replace Other Employer-Provide Pension?” Advances in the Economics of
Aging, NBER, University of Chicago, 1996: 219-236.
Peterson, Mitchell A. “Pension Reversions and Worker-Stockholder Wealth
Transfers” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(1992): 1033-1056.
______. “Cash Flow Variability and Firm’s Pension Choice A Role for Operating Leverage ” Journal of Financial Economics, 36(1994): 361-383.
Wang, Jennifer L. and Jack L. VanDerhei. “The Impact of Primary Pension Trends on
Retirement Income: A Re-examination of Defined Benefit/Defined Contribution Trend,” Benefit Quarterly, first Quarter, 2000: 73-82.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 史馨如.( 1995 ).出院護理計劃實施之評值.榮總護理,12(3),340-345。
2. 江曉菁、余玉眉.( 2000 ).探討初產婦坐月子期間身體活動狀況及其代表意義.大仁學報,18,221-235.
3. 何淑娟.( 1999 ).肺部復健護理.長庚護理,10(1),56─59。
4. 沈建業.( 1996 ).呼吸困難與慢性肺部疾病.國防醫學,22(6),519-522。
5. 季瑋珠、符春美.( 1992 ).社區民眾從事體能活動之研究.中華民國公共衛生學會雜誌,11(4),328-339。
6. 胡月娟.( 1992 ).罹患慢性病對病人的衝擊及相關因素之探討.公共衛生,19(2),207-222。
7. 高紀惠.( 1992 ).心臟復健運動對活動耐力進展效應之探討.護理雜誌,39(3),63-75。
8. 馬素華、高紀惠.( 1990 ).呼吸道清除失效的導因及定義特徵之臨床效度測定.護理雜誌,37(2),71-82。
9. 曾淑津.( 1997 ).慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疾病症狀、身體功能狀態與心理感受之相關性態討.長庚護理,8(2),16-28。
10. 鄭幸宜、戴玉慈、郭壽雄、姚開屏.( 2000 ).成人氣喘患者的壓力、因應策略與生活品質之關係.護理研究,8(6),599-612。
11. 鄭綺、楊小娟、蔡仁貞.( 2000 ).輕中度和重度肺功能障礙慢性肺阻塞性肺疾病患者運動自我效能和運動測試結果比較之探討.護理研究,8(1),13-25。
12. 劉一民.( 1997 ).運動經驗的現象學考察─透過運動關照生命本體.台灣師大體育研究,3,83-100。
13. 劉翠薇、黃淑貞.( 1999 ).台北縣某商專學生運動行為及其影響因素之研究.學校衛生,Vol. 34,1-32。
14. 蕭光明.( 1996 ).慢性阻塞性肺疾病.胸腔醫學,11(4),230-239。
15. 顧佩芬、高紀惠、郭漢彬.( 1995 ).自發性引流對呼吸道清除成效之探討.長庚護理,6(2),1-12。